dusk
15.4M vizualizări
337,524 discută
Popular
Cele mai recente
抄底 CZ 的机会来了？扒一扒 Aster 和 HYPE 的 8 倍估值差
HYPE 这一周确实猛，直接从 22 拉到了 38U，涨幅超过 70%。
既然 HYPE 已经把高度打出来了，我们自然就要看它的竞品 Aster。这里面的数据差非常值得注意：
HYPE 目前的 FDV已经到了 377 亿美金，而 Aster 只有 47.2 亿。
两者是同赛道的直接竞争对手，市值却差了接近 8 倍。市场资金通常不会一直追高，这时候回头看低估值的 Aster，补涨的概率很大。
还有一个更实际的“底牌”：
根据之前的链上数据，CZ 建仓 Aster 的成本大概在 0.9U 左右，买了超过 200 万 U。
而 Aster现在的价格只有 0.59U。
这说明连 CZ 目前都是浮亏状态。要想回到他的成本价，币价至少需要涨 50% 以上。对于我们来说，现在进场的成本比大户还要低，这就相当于咱们有了一个很厚实的安全垫。
接下来的行情，我觉得大概率是 HYPE 维持高位震荡，资金溢出流向 Aster，去修复这个巨大的估值缺口。
最后，除了这种公链之间的博弈，我还关注到一个做基建的项目 Dusk。
现在的行情还是偏向于情绪炒作，但到了后面，肯定会轮动到有实际业务的板块。
Dusk 做的是合规隐私和 RWA（真实世界资产），专门对接机构资金。这种项目平时不声不响，但技术门槛高，属于那种一旦起势就很稳的标的。
总之，现阶段策略很简单：看着 HYPE 的高度，埋伏 Aster 的补涨，同时配置点 Dusk 做长线防守。
📢 本帖由 DUSK 赞助发布：#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
既然 HYPE 已经把高度打出来了，我们自然就要看它的竞品 Aster。这里面的数据差非常值得注意：
HYPE 目前的 FDV已经到了 377 亿美金，而 Aster 只有 47.2 亿。
两者是同赛道的直接竞争对手，市值却差了接近 8 倍。市场资金通常不会一直追高，这时候回头看低估值的 Aster，补涨的概率很大。
还有一个更实际的“底牌”：
根据之前的链上数据，CZ 建仓 Aster 的成本大概在 0.9U 左右，买了超过 200 万 U。
而 Aster现在的价格只有 0.59U。
这说明连 CZ 目前都是浮亏状态。要想回到他的成本价，币价至少需要涨 50% 以上。对于我们来说，现在进场的成本比大户还要低，这就相当于咱们有了一个很厚实的安全垫。
接下来的行情，我觉得大概率是 HYPE 维持高位震荡，资金溢出流向 Aster，去修复这个巨大的估值缺口。
最后，除了这种公链之间的博弈，我还关注到一个做基建的项目 Dusk。
现在的行情还是偏向于情绪炒作，但到了后面，肯定会轮动到有实际业务的板块。
Dusk 做的是合规隐私和 RWA（真实世界资产），专门对接机构资金。这种项目平时不声不响，但技术门槛高，属于那种一旦起势就很稳的标的。
总之，现阶段策略很简单：看着 HYPE 的高度，埋伏 Aster 的补涨，同时配置点 Dusk 做长线防守。
📢 本帖由 DUSK 赞助发布：#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
#dusk $DUSK 🔐 Confidențialitatea și conformitatea nu trebuie să fie în conflict în Web3. @Dusk _fundația construiește un blockchain destinat activelor confidențiale, DeFi reglementat și cazuri de utilizare financiară din lumea reală. Alimentat de $DUSK , #Dusk formează viitorul confidențialității conforme.
Dusk Network's SBA: Super Secure Consensus with Tiny Failure Probabilities!
Dusk Network's Segregated Byzantine Agreement (SBA) is an extremely efficient Proof-of-Stake consensus algorithm that provides near-instant finality and high statistical security. The liveness graph (at h=0.75 honest ratio) indicates that as the committee size increases from 20 to 100, the one-step liveness probability increases dramatically—to as much as ~97% for τ=0.66 thresholds. Larger committees make honest majority results much more likely and the network super-efficient.
But failure probabilities are even more dramatic—decreasing exponentially from 10^-3 for small committees to 10^-15 or even 10^-33 for N=100, particularly for higher τ values such as 0.80. This implies that the probability of an attacker obtaining supermajority in critical steps such as Block Reduction and Agreement becomes close to impossible, preventing forking in a single round. Mathematically assured safety that's just perfect for real-world financial assets!
SBA is ideal for Dusk Network's fast and secure consensus needs in the realm of privacy-centric regulated finance. With mainnet launching in 2026, it's ready for serious adoption.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
Dusk Network's Segregated Byzantine Agreement (SBA) is an extremely efficient Proof-of-Stake consensus algorithm that provides near-instant finality and high statistical security. The liveness graph (at h=0.75 honest ratio) indicates that as the committee size increases from 20 to 100, the one-step liveness probability increases dramatically—to as much as ~97% for τ=0.66 thresholds. Larger committees make honest majority results much more likely and the network super-efficient.
But failure probabilities are even more dramatic—decreasing exponentially from 10^-3 for small committees to 10^-15 or even 10^-33 for N=100, particularly for higher τ values such as 0.80. This implies that the probability of an attacker obtaining supermajority in critical steps such as Block Reduction and Agreement becomes close to impossible, preventing forking in a single round. Mathematically assured safety that's just perfect for real-world financial assets!
SBA is ideal for Dusk Network's fast and secure consensus needs in the realm of privacy-centric regulated finance. With mainnet launching in 2026, it's ready for serious adoption.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
De ce contează momentul Dusk mai mult în 2026 decât a contat acum un an
Acum un an, Dusk părea devreme. Nu greșit, ci doar devreme. Astăzi, mediul din jurul său arată foarte diferit, iar aceasta este ceea ce mi-a schimbat perspectiva. @Dusk dezvoltă finanțe reglementate pe blockchain, iar aceasta era o conversație de nișă. În 2026, devine principala. Guvernele, schimburile și marii administratori de active nu mai întreabă dacă activele din lumea reală se mișcă pe blockchain. Întrebarea este cum să o facă fără a încălca regulile de conformitate, expunând date sensibile sau creând coșmaruri legale. Această schimbare contează pentru că cele mai multe blockchain-uri nu au fost niciodată concepute pentru această realitate.
The Hidden Machinery Behind Dusk Network: Why These Cryptographic Primitives Matter
Dusk Network is more than just another privacy coin. It is a conscious effort to create a blockchain on which real-world financial transactions can take place without revealing who is sending what to whom and why. To achieve this, the network relies very heavily on a shortlist of very specific cryptographic primitives: Pedersen commitments, Bulletproofs, EdDSA, bLSAG, BLS signatures, and zero-knowledge proofs in general.
These are not selected because they are fashionable. They are selected because each one addresses a specific problem that cannot be solved by simpler tools (basic ECDSA, basic hashes, basic public keys) without breaking either privacy or performance.
I can take you through each component and explain the real-world need that drove its creation and how they all work together in Dusk’s design.
1. Pedersen Commitments – Hiding values while still being able to prove they add up
Suppose you wanted to send funds on-chain but didn’t want the amount to be visible. However, the network still needs to be able to verify that the total amount of money going in is equal to the total amount of money going out (no inflation, no magic money creation).
A simple public-key encryption scheme would allow you to hide the amount. However, then you could never prove that the two hidden amounts added up to something.
Pedersen commitments exactly solve this problem.
You choose two group elements G and H, where the discrete log relationship between H and G is unknown (in practice, H is computed from G via a hash-to-point so that no one knows the log). To commit to a value x, you compute C = rG + xH.
The "magic" here is:
Hiding: Even if an attacker has unlimited compute power, they can’t figure out x from C (since that would require solving the discrete log problem for H).Binding: You can’t open the same C to two different values (discrete log hardness again).Additive homomorphism: C(x1, r1) + C(x2, r2) = C(x1+x2, r1+r2). You can add commitments without knowing the values.
In Dusk, this is used for every confidential transaction output. The sender commits to the amount they are sending and the amount they are receiving (the change). The network only sees commitments, but it can prove that they add up to zero using the homomorphism. No amounts ever go on the chain in the clear.
Vector Pedersen applies the same concept to multiple values at once (amount + blinding + memo field + whatever else you want to hide together). That’s why the paper presents the vector form – Dusk frequently needs to commit to multiple scalars at once.
2. Bulletproofs – Proving “this hidden number is between 0 and 2⁶⁴” without revealing it
With hidden numbers comes the next challenge: how to prove that the number is non-negative (or within a valid range) without revealing the number itself?
Traditional range proofs (as in old confidential transactions in Monero before Bulletproofs) were massive – several kilobytes per output.
Bulletproofs reduced this to ~2 KB for a 64-bit range, and importantly, without trusted setup.
The key to Bulletproofs’ efficiency is that they prove assertions about arithmetic circuits using inner-product proofs. The prover and verifier both operate on vectors whose inner product represents the range constraint. The proof size is merely logarithmic in the bitsize of the range.
In Dusk, Bulletproofs are used to prove:
The transaction amounts are in [0, 2⁶⁴)Correct computation of the Poseidon hash (used for note commitments) in a circuitVarious other small circuit integrity checks
Poseidon is selected specifically for its suitability for arithmetic circuits (low multiplicative depth), which keeps the Bulletproof circuit small and efficient to prove/verify.
The verification time is linear in the size of the circuit, but since the circuits Dusk employs are very small (primarily Poseidon calls), this remains feasible even on mobile hardware.
3. Signature schemes – the various roles they play in Dusk
EdDSA – efficient, deterministic, non-malleable message authentication
For regular peer-to-peer messages (gossiping, block announcements, and so on), Dusk employs EdDSA on Curve25519.
Why not ECDSA?
EdDSA is deterministic → no bad randomness can reveal the private key.
Twisted Edwards curve provides faster arithmetic and complete addition laws (no special cases).
The signature consists of merely two group elements — very compact and efficient to verify.It is the go-to scheme for anything that does not require anonymity.bLSAG (Back Linkable Spontaneous Anonymous Group signatures) – anonymous spending with double-spend protectionThis is the ring signature variant used for spending notes.
You have a set of public keys (the ring). You prove you know the secret key for one of them, without revealing which one. The signature size is constant, regardless of the ring size.
Linkability is provided by the key-image: a deterministic value computed from the secret key, and key-images are unique for each key. If you attempt to spend the same note twice, the key-images match → double-spend detected.
The “spontaneous” component indicates that there is no setup process, and anyone can choose any ring on the fly. The “Back” component refers to Adam Back’s solution that enabled linkability without compromising anonymity.
This is what enables Dusk to have anonymous transactions like Monero but also allows for double-spend detection on-chain.
BLS signatures – aggregation for consensus
BLS (Boneh-Lynn-Shacham) signatures live on pairing-friendly curves (BN-254 or BLS12-381). The pairing enables aggregation of many signatures into one short signature that verifies against the aggregated public key.
In $DUSK , this is applied in the consensus layer: hundreds of validators can sign the same block, and their signatures are aggregated on the fly, leaving only one signature on-chain. Block size remains small even with thousands of signers.
The drawback is that BLS signatures need a trusted setup for the curve parameters (or MPC ceremony), but after that, it is very powerful.
4. Zero-knowledge proofs – the overall philosophy
All the above building blocks are ultimately employed within larger zero-knowledge proofs.
The zero-knowledge proofs of $DUSK must fulfill three properties (which are explicitly stated in the paper):
Completeness – honest prover always convinces honest verifier.Soundness – cheating prover cannot convince verifier except with negligible probability.Zero-knowledge – verifier learns nothing beyond the truth of the statement.
The explanation for why these three properties are absolutely essential is straightforward: in a privacy coin, the proof is literally the only thing between the user’s financial privacy and complete transparency. If soundness is broken, then someone can print fake money. If zero-knowledge is broken, then the entire point of privacy is moot.
Dusk employs a mix of Bulletproofs (for range and circuit proofs) and other SNARK-friendly methods within its transaction proofs. This means that the observer can see only the proof and the commitments, while everything else remains hidden.
Why this particular set of tools?
It’s not possible to get everything done with one primitive. Pedersen’s gives you anonymity + binding + additivity. Bulletproofs give you efficient range and circuit proofs on top of those commitments. bLSAG gives you anonymity for spending. BLS gives you efficient consensus. EdDSA gives you fast everyday signing. They all combine to create a layered system where each layer solves exactly the problem the layer above can’t solve.
This is why Dusk’s design appears “over-engineered” compared to other, simpler chains – because it’s a harder set of problems to solve. Most other chains have to give up either privacy or scalability. Dusk is attempting to preserve both, and this requires using this particular set of cryptographic tools.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
These are not selected because they are fashionable. They are selected because each one addresses a specific problem that cannot be solved by simpler tools (basic ECDSA, basic hashes, basic public keys) without breaking either privacy or performance.
I can take you through each component and explain the real-world need that drove its creation and how they all work together in Dusk’s design.
1. Pedersen Commitments – Hiding values while still being able to prove they add up
Suppose you wanted to send funds on-chain but didn’t want the amount to be visible. However, the network still needs to be able to verify that the total amount of money going in is equal to the total amount of money going out (no inflation, no magic money creation).
A simple public-key encryption scheme would allow you to hide the amount. However, then you could never prove that the two hidden amounts added up to something.
Pedersen commitments exactly solve this problem.
You choose two group elements G and H, where the discrete log relationship between H and G is unknown (in practice, H is computed from G via a hash-to-point so that no one knows the log). To commit to a value x, you compute C = rG + xH.
The "magic" here is:
Hiding: Even if an attacker has unlimited compute power, they can’t figure out x from C (since that would require solving the discrete log problem for H).Binding: You can’t open the same C to two different values (discrete log hardness again).Additive homomorphism: C(x1, r1) + C(x2, r2) = C(x1+x2, r1+r2). You can add commitments without knowing the values.
In Dusk, this is used for every confidential transaction output. The sender commits to the amount they are sending and the amount they are receiving (the change). The network only sees commitments, but it can prove that they add up to zero using the homomorphism. No amounts ever go on the chain in the clear.
Vector Pedersen applies the same concept to multiple values at once (amount + blinding + memo field + whatever else you want to hide together). That’s why the paper presents the vector form – Dusk frequently needs to commit to multiple scalars at once.
2. Bulletproofs – Proving “this hidden number is between 0 and 2⁶⁴” without revealing it
With hidden numbers comes the next challenge: how to prove that the number is non-negative (or within a valid range) without revealing the number itself?
Traditional range proofs (as in old confidential transactions in Monero before Bulletproofs) were massive – several kilobytes per output.
Bulletproofs reduced this to ~2 KB for a 64-bit range, and importantly, without trusted setup.
The key to Bulletproofs’ efficiency is that they prove assertions about arithmetic circuits using inner-product proofs. The prover and verifier both operate on vectors whose inner product represents the range constraint. The proof size is merely logarithmic in the bitsize of the range.
In Dusk, Bulletproofs are used to prove:
The transaction amounts are in [0, 2⁶⁴)Correct computation of the Poseidon hash (used for note commitments) in a circuitVarious other small circuit integrity checks
Poseidon is selected specifically for its suitability for arithmetic circuits (low multiplicative depth), which keeps the Bulletproof circuit small and efficient to prove/verify.
The verification time is linear in the size of the circuit, but since the circuits Dusk employs are very small (primarily Poseidon calls), this remains feasible even on mobile hardware.
3. Signature schemes – the various roles they play in Dusk
EdDSA – efficient, deterministic, non-malleable message authentication
For regular peer-to-peer messages (gossiping, block announcements, and so on), Dusk employs EdDSA on Curve25519.
Why not ECDSA?
EdDSA is deterministic → no bad randomness can reveal the private key.
Twisted Edwards curve provides faster arithmetic and complete addition laws (no special cases).
The signature consists of merely two group elements — very compact and efficient to verify.It is the go-to scheme for anything that does not require anonymity.bLSAG (Back Linkable Spontaneous Anonymous Group signatures) – anonymous spending with double-spend protectionThis is the ring signature variant used for spending notes.
You have a set of public keys (the ring). You prove you know the secret key for one of them, without revealing which one. The signature size is constant, regardless of the ring size.
Linkability is provided by the key-image: a deterministic value computed from the secret key, and key-images are unique for each key. If you attempt to spend the same note twice, the key-images match → double-spend detected.
The “spontaneous” component indicates that there is no setup process, and anyone can choose any ring on the fly. The “Back” component refers to Adam Back’s solution that enabled linkability without compromising anonymity.
This is what enables Dusk to have anonymous transactions like Monero but also allows for double-spend detection on-chain.
BLS signatures – aggregation for consensus
BLS (Boneh-Lynn-Shacham) signatures live on pairing-friendly curves (BN-254 or BLS12-381). The pairing enables aggregation of many signatures into one short signature that verifies against the aggregated public key.
In $DUSK , this is applied in the consensus layer: hundreds of validators can sign the same block, and their signatures are aggregated on the fly, leaving only one signature on-chain. Block size remains small even with thousands of signers.
The drawback is that BLS signatures need a trusted setup for the curve parameters (or MPC ceremony), but after that, it is very powerful.
4. Zero-knowledge proofs – the overall philosophy
All the above building blocks are ultimately employed within larger zero-knowledge proofs.
The zero-knowledge proofs of $DUSK must fulfill three properties (which are explicitly stated in the paper):
Completeness – honest prover always convinces honest verifier.Soundness – cheating prover cannot convince verifier except with negligible probability.Zero-knowledge – verifier learns nothing beyond the truth of the statement.
The explanation for why these three properties are absolutely essential is straightforward: in a privacy coin, the proof is literally the only thing between the user’s financial privacy and complete transparency. If soundness is broken, then someone can print fake money. If zero-knowledge is broken, then the entire point of privacy is moot.
Dusk employs a mix of Bulletproofs (for range and circuit proofs) and other SNARK-friendly methods within its transaction proofs. This means that the observer can see only the proof and the commitments, while everything else remains hidden.
Why this particular set of tools?
It’s not possible to get everything done with one primitive. Pedersen’s gives you anonymity + binding + additivity. Bulletproofs give you efficient range and circuit proofs on top of those commitments. bLSAG gives you anonymity for spending. BLS gives you efficient consensus. EdDSA gives you fast everyday signing. They all combine to create a layered system where each layer solves exactly the problem the layer above can’t solve.
This is why Dusk’s design appears “over-engineered” compared to other, simpler chains – because it’s a harder set of problems to solve. Most other chains have to give up either privacy or scalability. Dusk is attempting to preserve both, and this requires using this particular set of cryptographic tools.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
$DUSK #dusk
Prietenul meu a cumpărat acțiuni în SUA și a dublat investiția într-un an. Am fost la bancă să-mi deschid un cont pentru a investi, dar am fost informat de către funcționar că acest produs este disponibil doar pentru utilizatorii cu un capital de 3 milioane. Bogăția din această lume are o barieră de intrare: acțiunile originale SpaceX, proprietățile comerciale din zone centrale, aceste active de vârf sunt întotdeauna deschise pentru capitalul mare, în timp ce investitorii obișnuiți pot doar să cumpere criptomonedele deja procesate de instituții pe piața secundară.
Dar această barieră va fi spartă de @Dusk .
DUSK nu este o simplă blockchain public, ci lucrează pentru a rupe privilegiile financiare. În 2026, va lansa platforma DuskTrade, colaborând cu bursa olandeză NPEX, care deține licențe financiare legitime, pentru a aduce active reale în valoare de peste 300 de milioane de euro pe blockchain.
Aceasta înseamnă că zgârie-norii și acțiunile companiilor de top vor fi împărțite în tokenuri mici, fără bariera 'investitorilor calificați', chiar și cu doar 100U, poți obține o parte din active, împărțind beneficii de apreciere cu elitele de pe Wall Street.
Mai important, datorită licenței NPEX, aceste active sunt protejate de lege, nu sunt doar scheme financiare. DUSK urmează o cale de conformitate, iar tehnologia sa Hedger asigură protecția confidențialității, permițând operațiuni conforme fără a expune informațiile personale. În plus, cu lansarea din a doua săptămână a lunii ianuarie a rețelei principale DuskEVM, care este compatibilă cu ecosistemul Ethereum, dezvoltatorii pot desfășura rapid aplicații, completând și mai mult ecosistemul tranzacțiilor RWA.
Prietenul meu a cumpărat acțiuni în SUA și a dublat investiția într-un an. Am fost la bancă să-mi deschid un cont pentru a investi, dar am fost informat de către funcționar că acest produs este disponibil doar pentru utilizatorii cu un capital de 3 milioane. Bogăția din această lume are o barieră de intrare: acțiunile originale SpaceX, proprietățile comerciale din zone centrale, aceste active de vârf sunt întotdeauna deschise pentru capitalul mare, în timp ce investitorii obișnuiți pot doar să cumpere criptomonedele deja procesate de instituții pe piața secundară.
Dar această barieră va fi spartă de @Dusk .
DUSK nu este o simplă blockchain public, ci lucrează pentru a rupe privilegiile financiare. În 2026, va lansa platforma DuskTrade, colaborând cu bursa olandeză NPEX, care deține licențe financiare legitime, pentru a aduce active reale în valoare de peste 300 de milioane de euro pe blockchain.
Aceasta înseamnă că zgârie-norii și acțiunile companiilor de top vor fi împărțite în tokenuri mici, fără bariera 'investitorilor calificați', chiar și cu doar 100U, poți obține o parte din active, împărțind beneficii de apreciere cu elitele de pe Wall Street.
Mai important, datorită licenței NPEX, aceste active sunt protejate de lege, nu sunt doar scheme financiare. DUSK urmează o cale de conformitate, iar tehnologia sa Hedger asigură protecția confidențialității, permițând operațiuni conforme fără a expune informațiile personale. În plus, cu lansarea din a doua săptămână a lunii ianuarie a rețelei principale DuskEVM, care este compatibilă cu ecosistemul Ethereum, dezvoltatorii pot desfășura rapid aplicații, completând și mai mult ecosistemul tranzacțiilor RWA.
Noriko Serini ADWG:
Dusk
全世界正在进入战国时代，最近这么多欧洲大人物们开始密集访华，从加拿大到芬兰，从英国到德国，欧洲突然之间，变得温情脉脉。
英国批准了拖延七年的中国超级使馆项目。
德国将中国电动车纳入了30亿欧元的巨额补贴名单。
加拿大则与我们签订了里程碑式的贸易协议。
卡尼不顾老特的咄咄逼人，说中加协议是在纠正过去的错误”。
法国的马克龙直接喊话欧洲需要更多中国的直接投资。
听到这里了，听不下去的你可以离开了，你是不是以为欧洲已经开始选边站了？历史的天平要反转了?大错特错了兄弟！当下进行的是一场“新战国时代”的合纵连横，欧洲正在试图打破由两个超级大国主导的G2格局，进入卡尼所说的 “可变几何”时代。
比如加拿大谈北极主权，就和丹麦格陵兰站一起，谈关键矿产，就以G7为支点组建“买方联盟”谈贸易。
他找了东大，一边又想打造一个排除G2、覆盖15亿人口的新贸易集团。策略就是精致的利己主义。
只谈利弊，不论阵营。学过历史的人都知道，战国时代有两大特征：制度上礼崩乐坏、外交上合纵连横，二战以来那套基于规则的国际秩序，比如联合国、WTO、国际法权威性正在我们眼前失效。
当规则不再保护你时，你只能自己保护自己。
在世界加速滑向多极竞争、传统规则受到挑战的当下，经济活动对确定性和稳定性的渴求愈发强烈。@Dusk Network的出现，恰好回应了这一需求。它没有回避监管，选择主动拥抱欧洲的MiCA框架，构建一个既保护交易隐私，又能满足严格合规要求的金融基础设施。
这种“隐私+合规”的独特定位，使#dusk 有望成为传统金融资产在转向链上世界时可信赖的桥梁。旧秩序松动的裂缝中，像$DUSK 这样积极构建透明、可预测新规则的项目，或许正为我们揭示未来金融体系的某种雏形。
英国批准了拖延七年的中国超级使馆项目。
德国将中国电动车纳入了30亿欧元的巨额补贴名单。
加拿大则与我们签订了里程碑式的贸易协议。
卡尼不顾老特的咄咄逼人，说中加协议是在纠正过去的错误”。
法国的马克龙直接喊话欧洲需要更多中国的直接投资。
听到这里了，听不下去的你可以离开了，你是不是以为欧洲已经开始选边站了？历史的天平要反转了?大错特错了兄弟！当下进行的是一场“新战国时代”的合纵连横，欧洲正在试图打破由两个超级大国主导的G2格局，进入卡尼所说的 “可变几何”时代。
比如加拿大谈北极主权，就和丹麦格陵兰站一起，谈关键矿产，就以G7为支点组建“买方联盟”谈贸易。
他找了东大，一边又想打造一个排除G2、覆盖15亿人口的新贸易集团。策略就是精致的利己主义。
只谈利弊，不论阵营。学过历史的人都知道，战国时代有两大特征：制度上礼崩乐坏、外交上合纵连横，二战以来那套基于规则的国际秩序，比如联合国、WTO、国际法权威性正在我们眼前失效。
当规则不再保护你时，你只能自己保护自己。
在世界加速滑向多极竞争、传统规则受到挑战的当下，经济活动对确定性和稳定性的渴求愈发强烈。@Dusk Network的出现，恰好回应了这一需求。它没有回避监管，选择主动拥抱欧洲的MiCA框架，构建一个既保护交易隐私，又能满足严格合规要求的金融基础设施。
这种“隐私+合规”的独特定位，使#dusk 有望成为传统金融资产在转向链上世界时可信赖的桥梁。旧秩序松动的裂缝中，像$DUSK 这样积极构建透明、可预测新规则的项目，或许正为我们揭示未来金融体系的某种雏形。
@Dusk acest punct poate fi mai mult?
El arată că încă lucrează cinstit.
Fiecare bloc arde tokenuri, restul se împarte tuturor celor care stake-uiesc. Cu cât se ard mai multe, cu atât monedele devin mai puține. $DUSK
Acesta poate fi considerat un mecanism de manipulare a pieței.
Prețul este acum de 0.11 dolari, nu avem ce face, piața este încă instabilă.
dusk este destul de îndrăzneț, a lucrat în domeniul confidențialității timp de 7 ani 😂😂😂
Frate, eu încă spun că ești grozav, dar ești totuși prost.
Spunând că e grozav, a reușit să lucreze 7 ani până să lanseze, asta arată perseverență, chiar vrea să facă ceva.
Spunând că e prost, el deja a câștigat mult, iar tu încă te chinui.
Până la urmă, este și un proiect care a strâns câteva zeci de milioane de dolari.
Vreau mai mult!!
Vino un mare jucător să analizeze un pic, unde ar trebui să îmi plasez ordinul?😉😉😉#dusk #BinanceSquare
El arată că încă lucrează cinstit.
Fiecare bloc arde tokenuri, restul se împarte tuturor celor care stake-uiesc. Cu cât se ard mai multe, cu atât monedele devin mai puține. $DUSK
Acesta poate fi considerat un mecanism de manipulare a pieței.
Prețul este acum de 0.11 dolari, nu avem ce face, piața este încă instabilă.
dusk este destul de îndrăzneț, a lucrat în domeniul confidențialității timp de 7 ani 😂😂😂
Frate, eu încă spun că ești grozav, dar ești totuși prost.
Spunând că e grozav, a reușit să lucreze 7 ani până să lanseze, asta arată perseverență, chiar vrea să facă ceva.
Spunând că e prost, el deja a câștigat mult, iar tu încă te chinui.
Până la urmă, este și un proiect care a strâns câteva zeci de milioane de dolari.
Vreau mai mult!!
Vino un mare jucător să analizeze un pic, unde ar trebui să îmi plasez ordinul?😉😉😉#dusk #BinanceSquare
以太坊gas逼疯人类，DuskEVM开始“挖墙脚”：来我这基本免费，还带隐私外挂
想象你是个普通人，用手机 App 转账：
每点一次确认，就要交一笔不小的手续费，还要等半天才能到账——你会不会立刻想换个 App？
现在，把这个场景换成开发者。
他们每天写代码、部署合约、维护 dApp，却被以太坊的 高 gas、拥堵、L2 碎片化 折磨到怀疑人生。
于是最近，一个名字开始在开发者圈子里被提起：DuskEVM。
它给出的条件很直接：
⓵ 几乎零成本从以太坊搬家
⓶ gas 便宜到可以忽略
⓷ 还多送一个“隐私 + 合规”的外挂
那问题来了：
开发者真的会走吗？DuskEVM 又凭什么接得住？
0️⃣ 为什么普通人也要关心开发者？
你可能不写代码，但你用的每一个 DeFi、NFT 市场、链游，本质上都是开发者写出来的产品。
开发者去哪：
⓵ dApp 体验就跟到哪
⓶ 流动性就跟到哪
⓷ 用户自然也会慢慢迁移
所以这不是“程序员的事”，而是整个生态的源头变量。
1️⃣ 为什么开发者这么重要？一句话：得开发者，得生态
在 Web3 里，开发者就是“建筑师”。
Uniswap、Aave、OpenSea、各种链游和工具类应用，
你真正使用的不是链，而是：
⓵ 智能合约
⓶ 前端交互
⓷ 一整套产品体验
如果一条链：
⓵ 没开发者 → 没 dApp
⓶ 没 dApp → 没用户
⓷ 没用户 → 没交易、没 TVL
最终代币将失去叙事，失去所有
类比现实世界：
一条街如果没有商家开店，你会特地过去逛吗？
2️⃣ 为什么现在开发者开始想跑路？以太坊真的把人耗累了
时间来到 2026 年，很多以太坊开发者的耐心已经被消耗殆尽。
虽然主网 gas 已从高峰期的几十美元，
降到平均 约 0.15 美元，但核心问题并没解决：
⓵ L2 数量爆炸，每个都要单独适配
⓶ 部署、测试、维护成本明显上升
⓷ 网络拥堵时体验仍然不稳定
⓸ 用户抱怨，压力却落在开发者身上
⓹ 熊市环境下，融资和激励都更困难
于是你能听到越来越多真实的声音：
“如果有更便宜、更省事的选择，为什么不换？”
3️⃣ DuskEVM 凭什么开始“挖墙脚”？
先一句话说明定位：
@Dusk 是底层公链，DuskEVM 则是它加装的以太坊兼容引擎。
目标只有一个：
让以太坊开发者几乎无痛迁移。
⓵ 几乎零成本搬家
• 完整 EVM 兼容
• 支持 Solidity 0.8.x
• Hardhat、Foundry、Remix、ethers.js 直接可用
实际操作流程很简单：
复制原有合约修改 RPC endpoint 直接部署
对开发者来说，这是“平移”，不是“重构”。
⓶ gas 成本极低
平均 gas 约 0.001 美元TPS 实测 700–800足够支撑中小型 dApp 使用
这不只是省钱，而是开发和试错的心理负担明显下降。
⓷ 原生支持“可控隐私”
DuskEVM 支持 Phoenix 协议的 View Key 机制：
交易默认隐私监管或审计方可被授权查看不必牺牲合规性换隐私
对想做机构级或合规场景的开发者来说，这是一个现实需求，而不是噱头。
4️⃣ 这对开发者和 DUSK 各自意味着什么？
对开发者：
⓵ 开发和运营成本更低
⓶ 不用重学新技术栈
⓷ 多一个“隐私 + 合规”的产品卖点
⓸ 熊市里的低成本实验环境
对 DUSK：
⓵ 开发者 = 生产力
⓶ 迁移一旦形成规模
⓷ 活跃度、TVL、交易量都会被带动
DuskEVM 很可能是 DUSK 在熊市中被忽视的一张重要牌。
5️⃣ 现实与风险：别上头，也别忽视
必须说清楚现实情况：
⓵ DuskEVM 仍处于 beta 阶段
⓶ 生态体量较小，流动性有限
⓷ 工具链成熟度不及主流 L2
⓸ 开发者迁移是慢变量
真正的验证点只有一个：
隐私与合规能力，是否真的被项目使用起来。
在那之前，普通用户不必急着下结论。
开发者迁徙是一场长跑，而不是短线行情。
DYOR，市场有风险。
$DUSK #dusk
每点一次确认，就要交一笔不小的手续费，还要等半天才能到账——你会不会立刻想换个 App？
现在，把这个场景换成开发者。
他们每天写代码、部署合约、维护 dApp，却被以太坊的 高 gas、拥堵、L2 碎片化 折磨到怀疑人生。
于是最近，一个名字开始在开发者圈子里被提起：DuskEVM。
它给出的条件很直接：
⓵ 几乎零成本从以太坊搬家
⓶ gas 便宜到可以忽略
⓷ 还多送一个“隐私 + 合规”的外挂
那问题来了：
开发者真的会走吗？DuskEVM 又凭什么接得住？
0️⃣ 为什么普通人也要关心开发者？
你可能不写代码，但你用的每一个 DeFi、NFT 市场、链游，本质上都是开发者写出来的产品。
开发者去哪：
⓵ dApp 体验就跟到哪
⓶ 流动性就跟到哪
⓷ 用户自然也会慢慢迁移
所以这不是“程序员的事”，而是整个生态的源头变量。
1️⃣ 为什么开发者这么重要？一句话：得开发者，得生态
在 Web3 里，开发者就是“建筑师”。
Uniswap、Aave、OpenSea、各种链游和工具类应用，
你真正使用的不是链，而是：
⓵ 智能合约
⓶ 前端交互
⓷ 一整套产品体验
如果一条链：
⓵ 没开发者 → 没 dApp
⓶ 没 dApp → 没用户
⓷ 没用户 → 没交易、没 TVL
最终代币将失去叙事，失去所有
类比现实世界：
一条街如果没有商家开店，你会特地过去逛吗？
2️⃣ 为什么现在开发者开始想跑路？以太坊真的把人耗累了
时间来到 2026 年，很多以太坊开发者的耐心已经被消耗殆尽。
虽然主网 gas 已从高峰期的几十美元，
降到平均 约 0.15 美元，但核心问题并没解决：
⓵ L2 数量爆炸，每个都要单独适配
⓶ 部署、测试、维护成本明显上升
⓷ 网络拥堵时体验仍然不稳定
⓸ 用户抱怨，压力却落在开发者身上
⓹ 熊市环境下，融资和激励都更困难
于是你能听到越来越多真实的声音：
“如果有更便宜、更省事的选择，为什么不换？”
3️⃣ DuskEVM 凭什么开始“挖墙脚”？
先一句话说明定位：
@Dusk 是底层公链，DuskEVM 则是它加装的以太坊兼容引擎。
目标只有一个：
让以太坊开发者几乎无痛迁移。
⓵ 几乎零成本搬家
• 完整 EVM 兼容
• 支持 Solidity 0.8.x
• Hardhat、Foundry、Remix、ethers.js 直接可用
实际操作流程很简单：
复制原有合约修改 RPC endpoint 直接部署
对开发者来说，这是“平移”，不是“重构”。
⓶ gas 成本极低
平均 gas 约 0.001 美元TPS 实测 700–800足够支撑中小型 dApp 使用
这不只是省钱，而是开发和试错的心理负担明显下降。
⓷ 原生支持“可控隐私”
DuskEVM 支持 Phoenix 协议的 View Key 机制：
交易默认隐私监管或审计方可被授权查看不必牺牲合规性换隐私
对想做机构级或合规场景的开发者来说，这是一个现实需求，而不是噱头。
4️⃣ 这对开发者和 DUSK 各自意味着什么？
对开发者：
⓵ 开发和运营成本更低
⓶ 不用重学新技术栈
⓷ 多一个“隐私 + 合规”的产品卖点
⓸ 熊市里的低成本实验环境
对 DUSK：
⓵ 开发者 = 生产力
⓶ 迁移一旦形成规模
⓷ 活跃度、TVL、交易量都会被带动
DuskEVM 很可能是 DUSK 在熊市中被忽视的一张重要牌。
5️⃣ 现实与风险：别上头，也别忽视
必须说清楚现实情况：
⓵ DuskEVM 仍处于 beta 阶段
⓶ 生态体量较小，流动性有限
⓷ 工具链成熟度不及主流 L2
⓸ 开发者迁移是慢变量
真正的验证点只有一个：
隐私与合规能力，是否真的被项目使用起来。
在那之前，普通用户不必急着下结论。
开发者迁徙是一场长跑，而不是短线行情。
DYOR，市场有风险。
$DUSK #dusk
蚂蚁仓战神:
逻辑完全错了，开发者是没有选择权的，选择权在用户，用户在哪里开发者在哪里
$DUSK #dusk As discussed earlier, $DUSK already delivered a strong bullish move. Now, price has returned to this area for a potential retest.
If this retest is successful and the level holds as support, we can expect another strong bullish continuation with good rallies in the coming days.
$DUSK #creattoearn
@crypto informer649
If this retest is successful and the level holds as support, we can expect another strong bullish continuation with good rallies in the coming days.
$DUSK #creattoearn
@crypto informer649
如果一个项目磨了六年才出主网，换做别的币可能早就凉透了。但 #dusk ($DUSK ) 偏偏选在 2026 年 1 月 7 日正式“亮剑”，这感觉就像是个一直闭关的高手，终于在监管最严、竞争最烈的时候推门而入。
主网上线快一个月了，如果你只看币价翻倍、看 583% 的暴力拉升，那你是外行。真正的“肌肉”在链上数据里，那是藏不住的。
1. 2 秒区块：金融级的“快感”
以前咱们总说隐私和速度不可兼得，但在 Dusk 主网上，~2 秒的区块时间和“即时终局（Instant Finality）”已经成了标配。这意味着你转一笔账，连个哈欠都打不完，交易就彻底锁死、不可逆了。这种体验直逼中心化银行，但背后跑的是全去中心化的 PoS 共识。
2. 真实活跃：不再是“空城计”
别看 2026 年主网才开，链上的活跃度比很多老牌公链都要硬：
活跃地址： 上线不到一个月，活跃地址已经稳定在 19,000 左右。
真实质押： 质押量（Staking）直接冲破了 1.2 亿枚 DUSK，占了流通盘的 12% 以上。这说明大家不是拿了币就跑，而是真的在当“矿工”拿 12% 左右的收益，是在长期陪跑。
桥接爆发： ERC20 桥接合约开启后，流动性一度涨了 47%。DUSK 已经从以太坊上的“代金券”变成了自己主网上的“燃油”。
3. RWA 落地：这才是它的“杀手锏”
Dusk 聪明在不碰那些空气币，它直接和荷兰合规交易所 NPEX 搞了 3 亿欧元的证券化资产上线。
通过 DuskEVM，开发者可以直接用 Solidity 这种熟工具，部署那些带“隐私快门”的保密合约。你在链上买股票，你的持仓是隐私的，但监管审计时又能合规——这种“分寸感”，是目前金融机构入场 Web3 的唯一通行证。
从“画饼”到“基建”
2026 年 1 月是 DUSK 的转折点。它从一个虚无缥缈的隐私叙事，变成了一个能跑 RWA、能做秒级支付的硬核基建。@Dusk $DUSK
主网上线快一个月了，如果你只看币价翻倍、看 583% 的暴力拉升，那你是外行。真正的“肌肉”在链上数据里，那是藏不住的。
1. 2 秒区块：金融级的“快感”
以前咱们总说隐私和速度不可兼得，但在 Dusk 主网上，~2 秒的区块时间和“即时终局（Instant Finality）”已经成了标配。这意味着你转一笔账，连个哈欠都打不完，交易就彻底锁死、不可逆了。这种体验直逼中心化银行，但背后跑的是全去中心化的 PoS 共识。
2. 真实活跃：不再是“空城计”
别看 2026 年主网才开，链上的活跃度比很多老牌公链都要硬：
活跃地址： 上线不到一个月，活跃地址已经稳定在 19,000 左右。
真实质押： 质押量（Staking）直接冲破了 1.2 亿枚 DUSK，占了流通盘的 12% 以上。这说明大家不是拿了币就跑，而是真的在当“矿工”拿 12% 左右的收益，是在长期陪跑。
桥接爆发： ERC20 桥接合约开启后，流动性一度涨了 47%。DUSK 已经从以太坊上的“代金券”变成了自己主网上的“燃油”。
3. RWA 落地：这才是它的“杀手锏”
Dusk 聪明在不碰那些空气币，它直接和荷兰合规交易所 NPEX 搞了 3 亿欧元的证券化资产上线。
通过 DuskEVM，开发者可以直接用 Solidity 这种熟工具，部署那些带“隐私快门”的保密合约。你在链上买股票，你的持仓是隐私的，但监管审计时又能合规——这种“分寸感”，是目前金融机构入场 Web3 的唯一通行证。
从“画饼”到“基建”
2026 年 1 月是 DUSK 的转折点。它从一个虚无缥缈的隐私叙事，变成了一个能跑 RWA、能做秒级支付的硬核基建。@Dusk $DUSK
DUSK NETWORK AND THE FUTURE OF REGULATED PRIVACY-FOCUSED BLOCKCHAIN FINANCE
Look I’ve been around crypto long enough to know that most projects sound the same. Every whitepaper promises the future. Every chain claims it’s faster cheaper more scalable more decentralized more everything. Honestly after a while it all blends into one big noise.
But Dusk is different. Not in a flashy hype-cycle way. More in a quiet “oh this actually makes sense” kind of way.
Dusk launched back in 2018 which already says something. That was before NFTs before DeFi summer before everyone and their cousin launched a token. The team wasn’t chasing trends. They were looking at a problem people still don’t talk about enough. Real finance and crypto don’t actually fit together very well.
And yeah that’s a real headache.
Because here’s the thing. Public blockchains are transparent. Like brutally transparent. Every transaction. Every balance. Every contract. Anyone can see it. That’s great for trust sure. But imagine running a bank like that. Or a payroll system. Or a bond market.
You can’t. No one serious wants their financial life broadcasted to the entire internet.
At the same time fully private systems don’t work either. Regulators won’t touch them. Institutions can’t use them. Governments hate them. And let’s be real privacy coins got labeled as shady pretty fast. Fair or not that’s just how it played out.
So you end up stuck in this weird situation.
Institutions need privacy
Regulators need transparency
Crypto usually gives you only one
Dusk basically said “What if we stop pretending it has to be one or the other”
That’s the core idea. Not total privacy. Not total transparency. But programmable privacy. Privacy when you need it. Proof when you’re asked for it.
And yeah that sounds abstract at first. It did to me too.
But think about it like this. You can keep your transaction private but still prove you followed the rules. You don’t show your full identity but you can prove you’re allowed to participate. A regulator can audit without seeing everyone’s personal data.
That’s powerful. And honestly that’s how real finance already works off-chain. Dusk just brings that logic on-chain.
Now some context. Early crypto like Bitcoin and Ethereum was built on this almost idealistic idea that radical transparency solves everything. And for a while it felt true. You didn’t need banks. You didn’t need trust. The code handled it.
But people forget something. Transparency is not the same as usability.
Corporations don’t want their internal operations public. Funds don’t want their positions visible. Governments don’t want citizens tracking every financial move in real time.
That’s not paranoia. That’s basic operational reality.
So then came privacy coins. Monero Zcash all that. And technically they’re impressive. Cryptography at its finest. But socially and legally total nightmare. Exchanges started delisting them. Regulators started waving red flags. Institutions stayed far away.
And honestly I’ve seen this before in tech. Something works perfectly in theory then crashes into the real world.
Dusk sits in the middle of that crash.
Instead of pretending regulation doesn’t exist Dusk assumes it does. Instead of fighting it they design around it. That’s a big mindset shift in crypto and yeah some people hate it.
Crypto culture loves the idea of being anti-system. Permissionless. Anonymous. No rules. No middlemen.
But let’s be real for a second. That version of crypto was never going to replace global finance. It was always going to stay niche.
Dusk isn’t trying to replace the system. It’s trying to upgrade it.
And technically they’re doing it in a pretty smart way. It’s a layer 1 blockchain built specifically for financial stuff. Not gaming. Not memes. Not social apps. Finance.
Tokenized securities. Regulated DeFi. Real-world assets. On-chain identity. Compliance logic. All built into the base layer instead of patched on later.
That part matters more than people realize.
Most chains build first then try to bolt compliance on top. KYC here. Whitelists there. Legal wrappers everywhere. It’s messy. And fragile.
Dusk builds compliance into the protocol itself. Identity frameworks. Permissioned assets. Auditability. It’s part of the system not an add-on.
Which is exactly what institutions want.
And yeah institutions actually do want blockchain. That’s another myth people cling to. They don’t want wild-west DeFi. They don’t want anonymous liquidity pools. They want efficiency. Automation. Lower settlement times. Less paperwork.
They just also want legal safety. Privacy. Risk control.
Dusk fits that profile almost too perfectly.
One of the strongest use cases is tokenized securities. This is where things get serious. Stocks bonds funds all represented as tokens on-chain.
Sounds simple. It’s not.
Securities come with rules. Who can buy. Who can sell. How transfers work. Which jurisdictions apply. What happens if someone messes up.
You can’t run that on a fully public chain without breaking laws. Period.
Dusk lets you issue and trade these assets privately while still enforcing all those rules. Investors get privacy. Issuers get control. Regulators get audit access.
That’s basically digital capital markets without the insane friction of traditional systems.
Another big one is regulated DeFi. Current DeFi feels like a casino half the time. High yields. Anonymous users. No identity. No accountability. Fun sure. But institutions won’t touch it.
With Dusk you can build DeFi apps where users are verified rules are enforced and everything still runs on smart contracts.
So you get automation without chaos.
And then there’s real-world assets. Real estate. Commodities. Carbon credits. Private equity. Trillions in value just sitting there hard to trade slow to move locked behind paperwork.
Tokenize them on Dusk and suddenly you get fractional ownership instant settlement programmable rights and still legal backing.
That’s not some distant dream. That’s actually one of the most realistic blockchain use cases out there.
Of course it’s not all perfect.
Dusk is complex. Like genuinely complex. You can’t just ape into it as a developer and build in a weekend. You need to understand cryptography finance compliance and how they all interact.
That slows adoption. No way around it.
And culturally Dusk doesn’t fit the crypto rebel narrative. It’s not anti-regulation. It’s not trying to overthrow banks. It’s working with them.
Some people see that as selling out.
I see it as growing up.
Another risk is regulatory dependency. If laws change Dusk has to change. That’s the tradeoff of playing in the real world. You get legitimacy but you also inherit all the politics and bureaucracy.
Still the overall trend is pretty clear.
Governments are issuing digital bonds
Banks are tokenizing assets
Funds are experimenting with on-chain settlement
Regulators are writing crypto frameworks
The question isn’t “if” traditional finance moves on-chain. It’s “how”.
And most existing blockchains aren’t built for that future.
Dusk is.
At a deeper level Dusk represents something bigger than just another protocol. It represents the moment crypto stops being a playground and starts becoming infrastructure.
Less ideology. More plumbing.
Less rebellion. More integration.
Less hype. More systems.
That shift feels uncomfortable for a lot of people. But honestly it’s inevitable.
The internet went through the same thing. Started chaotic. Ended up regulated commercial embedded into everything.
Blockchain’s on the same path.
So yeah Dusk isn’t sexy. It’s not loud. It’s not trending on Twitter every week.
But it’s solving one of the hardest problems in the entire space. How to make blockchain actually work for real finance without killing privacy or breaking the law.
And that’s not exciting.
That’s important.
#dusk @Dusk $DUSK
But Dusk is different. Not in a flashy hype-cycle way. More in a quiet “oh this actually makes sense” kind of way.
Dusk launched back in 2018 which already says something. That was before NFTs before DeFi summer before everyone and their cousin launched a token. The team wasn’t chasing trends. They were looking at a problem people still don’t talk about enough. Real finance and crypto don’t actually fit together very well.
And yeah that’s a real headache.
Because here’s the thing. Public blockchains are transparent. Like brutally transparent. Every transaction. Every balance. Every contract. Anyone can see it. That’s great for trust sure. But imagine running a bank like that. Or a payroll system. Or a bond market.
You can’t. No one serious wants their financial life broadcasted to the entire internet.
At the same time fully private systems don’t work either. Regulators won’t touch them. Institutions can’t use them. Governments hate them. And let’s be real privacy coins got labeled as shady pretty fast. Fair or not that’s just how it played out.
So you end up stuck in this weird situation.
Institutions need privacy
Regulators need transparency
Crypto usually gives you only one
Dusk basically said “What if we stop pretending it has to be one or the other”
That’s the core idea. Not total privacy. Not total transparency. But programmable privacy. Privacy when you need it. Proof when you’re asked for it.
And yeah that sounds abstract at first. It did to me too.
But think about it like this. You can keep your transaction private but still prove you followed the rules. You don’t show your full identity but you can prove you’re allowed to participate. A regulator can audit without seeing everyone’s personal data.
That’s powerful. And honestly that’s how real finance already works off-chain. Dusk just brings that logic on-chain.
Now some context. Early crypto like Bitcoin and Ethereum was built on this almost idealistic idea that radical transparency solves everything. And for a while it felt true. You didn’t need banks. You didn’t need trust. The code handled it.
But people forget something. Transparency is not the same as usability.
Corporations don’t want their internal operations public. Funds don’t want their positions visible. Governments don’t want citizens tracking every financial move in real time.
That’s not paranoia. That’s basic operational reality.
So then came privacy coins. Monero Zcash all that. And technically they’re impressive. Cryptography at its finest. But socially and legally total nightmare. Exchanges started delisting them. Regulators started waving red flags. Institutions stayed far away.
And honestly I’ve seen this before in tech. Something works perfectly in theory then crashes into the real world.
Dusk sits in the middle of that crash.
Instead of pretending regulation doesn’t exist Dusk assumes it does. Instead of fighting it they design around it. That’s a big mindset shift in crypto and yeah some people hate it.
Crypto culture loves the idea of being anti-system. Permissionless. Anonymous. No rules. No middlemen.
But let’s be real for a second. That version of crypto was never going to replace global finance. It was always going to stay niche.
Dusk isn’t trying to replace the system. It’s trying to upgrade it.
And technically they’re doing it in a pretty smart way. It’s a layer 1 blockchain built specifically for financial stuff. Not gaming. Not memes. Not social apps. Finance.
Tokenized securities. Regulated DeFi. Real-world assets. On-chain identity. Compliance logic. All built into the base layer instead of patched on later.
That part matters more than people realize.
Most chains build first then try to bolt compliance on top. KYC here. Whitelists there. Legal wrappers everywhere. It’s messy. And fragile.
Dusk builds compliance into the protocol itself. Identity frameworks. Permissioned assets. Auditability. It’s part of the system not an add-on.
Which is exactly what institutions want.
And yeah institutions actually do want blockchain. That’s another myth people cling to. They don’t want wild-west DeFi. They don’t want anonymous liquidity pools. They want efficiency. Automation. Lower settlement times. Less paperwork.
They just also want legal safety. Privacy. Risk control.
Dusk fits that profile almost too perfectly.
One of the strongest use cases is tokenized securities. This is where things get serious. Stocks bonds funds all represented as tokens on-chain.
Sounds simple. It’s not.
Securities come with rules. Who can buy. Who can sell. How transfers work. Which jurisdictions apply. What happens if someone messes up.
You can’t run that on a fully public chain without breaking laws. Period.
Dusk lets you issue and trade these assets privately while still enforcing all those rules. Investors get privacy. Issuers get control. Regulators get audit access.
That’s basically digital capital markets without the insane friction of traditional systems.
Another big one is regulated DeFi. Current DeFi feels like a casino half the time. High yields. Anonymous users. No identity. No accountability. Fun sure. But institutions won’t touch it.
With Dusk you can build DeFi apps where users are verified rules are enforced and everything still runs on smart contracts.
So you get automation without chaos.
And then there’s real-world assets. Real estate. Commodities. Carbon credits. Private equity. Trillions in value just sitting there hard to trade slow to move locked behind paperwork.
Tokenize them on Dusk and suddenly you get fractional ownership instant settlement programmable rights and still legal backing.
That’s not some distant dream. That’s actually one of the most realistic blockchain use cases out there.
Of course it’s not all perfect.
Dusk is complex. Like genuinely complex. You can’t just ape into it as a developer and build in a weekend. You need to understand cryptography finance compliance and how they all interact.
That slows adoption. No way around it.
And culturally Dusk doesn’t fit the crypto rebel narrative. It’s not anti-regulation. It’s not trying to overthrow banks. It’s working with them.
Some people see that as selling out.
I see it as growing up.
Another risk is regulatory dependency. If laws change Dusk has to change. That’s the tradeoff of playing in the real world. You get legitimacy but you also inherit all the politics and bureaucracy.
Still the overall trend is pretty clear.
Governments are issuing digital bonds
Banks are tokenizing assets
Funds are experimenting with on-chain settlement
Regulators are writing crypto frameworks
The question isn’t “if” traditional finance moves on-chain. It’s “how”.
And most existing blockchains aren’t built for that future.
Dusk is.
At a deeper level Dusk represents something bigger than just another protocol. It represents the moment crypto stops being a playground and starts becoming infrastructure.
Less ideology. More plumbing.
Less rebellion. More integration.
Less hype. More systems.
That shift feels uncomfortable for a lot of people. But honestly it’s inevitable.
The internet went through the same thing. Started chaotic. Ended up regulated commercial embedded into everything.
Blockchain’s on the same path.
So yeah Dusk isn’t sexy. It’s not loud. It’s not trending on Twitter every week.
But it’s solving one of the hardest problems in the entire space. How to make blockchain actually work for real finance without killing privacy or breaking the law.
And that’s not exciting.
That’s important.
#dusk @Dusk $DUSK
黄金大V反如约而至，后续怎么看？
昨天才说完，黄金的终极价值是90%的人都想不明白的今天就来个大V逆反！
长期的上涨逻辑没变，所以别慌。#
这两天好些新朋友急得不行，因为买在了山顶。我给他们的原话是：买了就先拿着，别急着割。除非你从此再不碰黄金，否则卖了再买图个啥？
错了就认，但别懊恼，关键是接下来怎么调整。投资的事，心态才是底仓。得稳得住，不赌、不贪、不冒进、也别没完没了地后悔。短期波动就跟摇骰子猜大小差不多，你得看远一点——未来究竟在哪儿。
黄金市场的史诗级波动，是一次对过热情绪和脆弱杠杆的出清。
它非但没有摧毁黄金的长期牛市逻辑，反而通过价格回调，为投资者提供了以更合理成本布局这一战略资产的珍贵窗口。
驱动黄金上涨的“货币贬值、去美元化、地缘冲突”三大宏观叙事依然坚实，甚至在前所未有的全球格局演变中不断强化。投资者或可保持战略定力，利用市场波动带来的机会，以资产配置的视角逢低布局，分享黄金在新时代下的长期价值重估。
2026年伊始，国际金价如脱缰野马，一路飙升突破5500美元/盎司，创下历史新高。
2026地缘政治紧张、美联储宽松政策及全球通胀压力，推动投资者涌向避险资产。黄金作为传统“避风港”，涨幅逼近30%，吸引无数目光。
在此背景下，@Dusk 项目脱颖而出。作为隐私导向的区块链平台，$DUSK 币市值已超7000万美元，流通量近5亿枚。
与XMR、ZEC等隐私币不同，DUSK在交易所下架潮中幸存并壮大，提供合规隐私解决方案，犹如“数字黄金”。老毒先生认为，黄金大涨预示经济不确定性，DUSK可作为补充投资，捕捉区块链浪潮。投资者不妨关注：黄金护航安全，#dusk 驱动创新，双管齐下，共御风险。
长期的上涨逻辑没变，所以别慌。#
这两天好些新朋友急得不行，因为买在了山顶。我给他们的原话是：买了就先拿着，别急着割。除非你从此再不碰黄金，否则卖了再买图个啥？
错了就认，但别懊恼，关键是接下来怎么调整。投资的事，心态才是底仓。得稳得住，不赌、不贪、不冒进、也别没完没了地后悔。短期波动就跟摇骰子猜大小差不多，你得看远一点——未来究竟在哪儿。
黄金市场的史诗级波动，是一次对过热情绪和脆弱杠杆的出清。
它非但没有摧毁黄金的长期牛市逻辑，反而通过价格回调，为投资者提供了以更合理成本布局这一战略资产的珍贵窗口。
驱动黄金上涨的“货币贬值、去美元化、地缘冲突”三大宏观叙事依然坚实，甚至在前所未有的全球格局演变中不断强化。投资者或可保持战略定力，利用市场波动带来的机会，以资产配置的视角逢低布局，分享黄金在新时代下的长期价值重估。
2026年伊始，国际金价如脱缰野马，一路飙升突破5500美元/盎司，创下历史新高。
2026地缘政治紧张、美联储宽松政策及全球通胀压力，推动投资者涌向避险资产。黄金作为传统“避风港”，涨幅逼近30%，吸引无数目光。
在此背景下，@Dusk 项目脱颖而出。作为隐私导向的区块链平台，$DUSK 币市值已超7000万美元，流通量近5亿枚。
与XMR、ZEC等隐私币不同，DUSK在交易所下架潮中幸存并壮大，提供合规隐私解决方案，犹如“数字黄金”。老毒先生认为，黄金大涨预示经济不确定性，DUSK可作为补充投资，捕捉区块链浪潮。投资者不妨关注：黄金护航安全，#dusk 驱动创新，双管齐下，共御风险。
Binance BiBi:
哈喽！我来帮您总结一下：您认为黄金虽短期波动，但长期看好，回调是机会。同时，您将DUSK项目比作“数字黄金”，建议将其作为黄金的补充投资，一个主安全，一个主创新，双管齐下分散风险。这个角度很赞哦！
Dimineața am finalizat o depunere, după-amiaza am primit un telefon de înșelătorie, bancă, ești trădător?
Dimineața am finalizat o depunere la ghișeul băncii, procesul nu a fost complicat, am semnat, am verificat și am plecat. După-amiaza, când am ajuns acasă, telefonul a sunat, interlocutorul a putut spune cu exactitate ce nume de familie am, dacă am avut recent o mișcare mare de fonduri, discursul era atât de familiar încât părea că a avut noroc. În acel moment nu mi-a fost frică să fiu înșelat, ci m-am îndoit pentru prima dată că problema nu ar putea fi în sistemul intern.
Ulterior am descoperit că astfel de lucruri nu sunt neobișnuite. Datele nu sunt „dezgropate” o dată și terminat, ci sunt copiate, apelate și stocate din nou în sistemul centralizat. Nu poți judeca care nod a avut probleme, nici nu poți dovedi că nu ai autorizat circulația acestor informații. Procesul de conformitate a fost finalizat, dar intimitatea a fost consumată în acest proces.
Ulterior am descoperit că astfel de lucruri nu sunt neobișnuite. Datele nu sunt „dezgropate” o dată și terminat, ci sunt copiate, apelate și stocate din nou în sistemul centralizat. Nu poți judeca care nod a avut probleme, nici nu poți dovedi că nu ai autorizat circulația acestor informații. Procesul de conformitate a fost finalizat, dar intimitatea a fost consumată în acest proces.
TradingMateAI:
哈哈，这确实很敏感的话题！数据隐私确实是当前行业关注的重点。希望相关的隐私保护技术能尽快完善，保护用户的个人信息。
那个被嘲笑了6年的“偏执狂”，终于等到了华尔街的投降
“在这个全员裸奔的时代，谁先穿上衣服，谁就是规则的制定者。”
2018年，当币圈沉浸在“代码即法律”的狂欢时，@Dusk 像个格格不入的异类。它在做一个看起来极度矛盾的课题：如何让绝对的隐私与严苛的合规共存？
那时候，极客嘲笑它背叛了去中心化，机构嘲笑它是不切实际的幻想。Dusk 守着这个“四不像”的构思，在冷宫里坐了整整六年。
从“笑话”到“神话”的六年
六年后的今天，剧情反转得比电影还快。当贝莱德（BlackRock）的BUIDL基金规模突破10亿美元，当摩根大通试图将万亿资产搬上链时，这些华尔街巨头突然发现一个致命的法律悖论：
公链太“透明”： 暴露交易策略等于商业自杀。
私链太“封闭”： 监管机构无法审计等于违法。
这时候，全世界才看懂了 Dusk 的先见之明。 它通过零知识证明（ZK）技术，打造了一面“单向玻璃”：监管能透过玻璃看到你合规，但围观者只能看到一片迷雾。
V8引擎的轰鸣与硬核稀缺
很多人不理解 Dusk 的经济模型，嫌 Gas 费贵。这就像嫌弃 酷路泽V8 费油一样——你想要极致的安全感和推背感，就得支付相应的能量。
在 Dusk 的生态里，每一次 RWA（现实资产）的转账、每一笔合规分红，都在后台疯狂燃烧 $DUSK 。这不是那种人为制造的“减半”游戏，而是由真实金融需求硬生生“烧”出来的稀缺。交易越频繁，通缩越狠。
最后的防弹衣
从 Ledger 地址泄露导致的入室抢劫，到传统机构因数据裸奔而迟迟不敢入场，历史在反复证明：隐私不是为了隐藏罪恶，而是为了捍卫体面。
Dusk 不是在制造黑箱，它是在给 Web3 金融穿上一件合规的防弹衣。当大部分人还在炒作没有灵魂的 Meme 币时，聪明的猎手已经发现：真正的机会，往往藏在那些被嘲笑了六年、却最终解决了行业死结的基础设施里。
Dusk 之后，区块链再无“裸奔”的借口。
#dusk
2018年，当币圈沉浸在“代码即法律”的狂欢时，@Dusk 像个格格不入的异类。它在做一个看起来极度矛盾的课题：如何让绝对的隐私与严苛的合规共存？
那时候，极客嘲笑它背叛了去中心化，机构嘲笑它是不切实际的幻想。Dusk 守着这个“四不像”的构思，在冷宫里坐了整整六年。
从“笑话”到“神话”的六年
六年后的今天，剧情反转得比电影还快。当贝莱德（BlackRock）的BUIDL基金规模突破10亿美元，当摩根大通试图将万亿资产搬上链时，这些华尔街巨头突然发现一个致命的法律悖论：
公链太“透明”： 暴露交易策略等于商业自杀。
私链太“封闭”： 监管机构无法审计等于违法。
这时候，全世界才看懂了 Dusk 的先见之明。 它通过零知识证明（ZK）技术，打造了一面“单向玻璃”：监管能透过玻璃看到你合规，但围观者只能看到一片迷雾。
V8引擎的轰鸣与硬核稀缺
很多人不理解 Dusk 的经济模型，嫌 Gas 费贵。这就像嫌弃 酷路泽V8 费油一样——你想要极致的安全感和推背感，就得支付相应的能量。
在 Dusk 的生态里，每一次 RWA（现实资产）的转账、每一笔合规分红，都在后台疯狂燃烧 $DUSK 。这不是那种人为制造的“减半”游戏，而是由真实金融需求硬生生“烧”出来的稀缺。交易越频繁，通缩越狠。
最后的防弹衣
从 Ledger 地址泄露导致的入室抢劫，到传统机构因数据裸奔而迟迟不敢入场，历史在反复证明：隐私不是为了隐藏罪恶，而是为了捍卫体面。
Dusk 不是在制造黑箱，它是在给 Web3 金融穿上一件合规的防弹衣。当大部分人还在炒作没有灵魂的 Meme 币时，聪明的猎手已经发现：真正的机会，往往藏在那些被嘲笑了六年、却最终解决了行业死结的基础设施里。
Dusk 之后，区块链再无“裸奔”的借口。
#dusk
100 de euro poți cumpăra obligațiuni europene conforme? Transformă activele instituționale în beneficii pentru micii investitori!
Familia, cine înțelege? În trecut credeam că acțiunile, obligațiunile și aceste active instituționale nu au legătură cu noi, micii investitori, că sunt greu de accesat și complicate, dar DUSK a mutat direct peste 300 de milioane de euro în titluri de valoare europene pe blockchain, iar cu 100 de euro poți intra, această mișcare este cu adevărat extraordinară!
Poate că unii se vor întreba, este sigur pentru micii investitori să cumpere această chestie? Stai liniștit! DUSK colaborează cu Bursa licențiată din Olanda, NPEX, care deține trei licențe solide: MTF, Broker și ECSP, totul de la emitere până la decontare este sub supravegherea Uniunii Europene, hash-ul de pe blockchain este un document legal, mai conform decât să cumpărăm produse financiare de la bancă! Și întregul proces este atât de simplu: folosești pașaportul pentru KYC, se rezolvă în 3 minute, transferi 100 de euro prin SEPA pentru a obține un stablecoin conform, și poți cumpăra 0,5 părți din obligațiuni verzi, cu o dobândă de 4,2%, de 400 de ori mai mult decât dobânda la bancă, cu plăți automate zilnice în portofel, nu este minunat să câștigi pasiv?
Poate că unii se vor întreba, este sigur pentru micii investitori să cumpere această chestie? Stai liniștit! DUSK colaborează cu Bursa licențiată din Olanda, NPEX, care deține trei licențe solide: MTF, Broker și ECSP, totul de la emitere până la decontare este sub supravegherea Uniunii Europene, hash-ul de pe blockchain este un document legal, mai conform decât să cumpărăm produse financiare de la bancă! Și întregul proces este atât de simplu: folosești pașaportul pentru KYC, se rezolvă în 3 minute, transferi 100 de euro prin SEPA pentru a obține un stablecoin conform, și poți cumpăra 0,5 părți din obligațiuni verzi, cu o dobândă de 4,2%, de 400 de ori mai mult decât dobânda la bancă, cu plăți automate zilnice în portofel, nu este minunat să câștigi pasiv?
Binance BiBi:
来啦来啦！根据您提到的信息，我为您分析了一下：截至 09:31 UTC，DUSK 现报 $0.1133，24小时内上涨了6.59%；SCRT 现报 $0.1137，24小时内下跌了2.07%；DASH 现报 $43.51，24小时内微跌0.23%。投资有风险，请务必DYOR哦！
Bună tuturor,
Timpul rămas în campania $DUSK scade, iar odată cu el scad și oportunitățile pentru cei care sunt încă indeciși. Piața actuală nu oferă claritate, dar campaniile răsplătesc pe cei care acționează, nu pe cei care așteaptă. Mulți dintre participanții anteriori au intrat din dorința de a experimenta, iar rezultatul a fost mai bun decât se așteptau.
Credeți că intrarea târzie este mai bună decât a nu intra deloc?
@Dusk #dusk
dashreef44:
لماذا لم تتحول مهمة التداول الاخيرة خضراء رغم انني تداولت بأكثر من 11 دولار لأكثر من مرة؟
HYPE 一周暴涨 70% 冲上 38U，FDV 直逼 377 亿美金。这不仅仅是价格的狂欢，更是直接把赛道的估值天花板给掀开了。
看着 HYPE 的K线，很多人的第一反应是“高攀不起”。但作为老交易员，我们更应该看到它对标的物的溢出效应。作为曾经最大的竞争对手，Aster 当前的 FDV 仅为 47.2 亿美金。
377亿 vs 47亿，这近 8倍的市值缺口，就是摆在桌面上的赔率。
我看好 Aster 接力补涨的逻辑非常硬：
龙头溢价： HYPE 已经把空间打开了，资金不敢在高位接盘，必然会回流到同赛道的低估值龙头 Aster 上。
YPE 和 Aster 的博弈，本质上是公链/生态的竞争。而在这一轮牛市中，除了这种显性的公链之争，还有一个更深层的赛道正在蓄力——那就是合规隐私与 RWA（真实世界资产）的结合
这就不得不提 Dusk
如果说 HYPE 是靠情绪和市值拉升来吸引眼球，那么 Dusk 走的就是“机构金融”的硬核路线。作为专门为受监管金融打造的 L1，Dusk 做的不是简单的炒作，而是通过 ZK 技术解决机构进场的隐私痛点。
盯住 HYPE 的高度，埋伏 Aster 的补涨，同时别忘了布局 Dusk 的未来。
📢 本帖由 DUSK 赞助发布：#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
看着 HYPE 的K线，很多人的第一反应是“高攀不起”。但作为老交易员，我们更应该看到它对标的物的溢出效应。作为曾经最大的竞争对手，Aster 当前的 FDV 仅为 47.2 亿美金。
377亿 vs 47亿，这近 8倍的市值缺口，就是摆在桌面上的赔率。
我看好 Aster 接力补涨的逻辑非常硬：
龙头溢价： HYPE 已经把空间打开了，资金不敢在高位接盘，必然会回流到同赛道的低估值龙头 Aster 上。
YPE 和 Aster 的博弈，本质上是公链/生态的竞争。而在这一轮牛市中，除了这种显性的公链之争，还有一个更深层的赛道正在蓄力——那就是合规隐私与 RWA（真实世界资产）的结合
这就不得不提 Dusk
如果说 HYPE 是靠情绪和市值拉升来吸引眼球，那么 Dusk 走的就是“机构金融”的硬核路线。作为专门为受监管金融打造的 L1，Dusk 做的不是简单的炒作，而是通过 ZK 技术解决机构进场的隐私痛点。
盯住 HYPE 的高度，埋伏 Aster 的补涨，同时别忘了布局 Dusk 的未来。
📢 本帖由 DUSK 赞助发布：#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Conectați-vă pentru a explora mai mult conținut