boots

"Solana ($SOL/USDT) Pregătită pentru o Posibilă Scădere
Prețul $SOL întâmpină o rezistență puternică între $228.95 și $229.32, arătând semne de slăbiciune. Eșecurile repetate de a depăși această zonă indică faptul că presiunea bearish ar putea fi în creștere.
Perspective Tehnice:
Zona de Rezistență: $228.95 - $229.32
Semnal Bearish: Vânzătorii intervin, împiedicând momentum-ul ascendent
Bias pe termen scurt: Mișcare de scădere probabilă dacă respingerea se menține
Setare de Tranzacționare:
Zona de Intrare: $227.50 - $228.80
Niveluri de Profit: $224.50, $222.95, $221.35

Elon Musk Strikes Back – xAI Sues OpenAI Over Tech Theft & Talent Poaching
Elon Musk's AI company, xAI, has launched a new lawsuit against OpenAI. They say that the company that made ChatGPT has been stealing employees and intellectual information from them.
xAI is suing OpenAI, saying that it stole important employees to get to the secret tech that powers its Grok chatbot.
Xuechen Li, a former engineer, is named in the case. He is already under a court order that limits his AI-related work at OpenAI.
The case makes the fight between Musk and OpenAI much worse, since both companies are fighting hard for the best AI talent and intellectual property.
The case, which was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, says that OpenAI ran a "coordinated, unfair, and unlawful campaign" to hire important xAI employees so that they could get to confidential information about its Grok chatbot.
The lawsuit says OpenAI went after those who knew a lot about xAI's source code, infrastructure, and commercial strategies, such former developer Jimmy Fraiture and a high-level finance officer.
A lawsuit over trade secrets names ex-xAI engineer Xuechen Li
Xuechen Li, a former employee, is also named in the case. He is also being sued for allegedly stealing trade secrets.
Earlier this month, a court ruling temporarily stopped Li from working on AI technology at OpenAI.
Musk's team says that OpenAI got these people to break their confidentiality agreements, which is against their job duties.
OpenAI has refuted the claims, saying, "We don't allow any breaches of confidentiality and we don't want any trade secrets from other labs." It also called Musk's activities "ongoing harassment."
xAI, on the other hand, says that it found out about the poaching strategy while looking into Li's alleged wrongdoing.
The petition includes an email conversation in which a former xAI executive responds to a legal warning with the frank phrase "suck my dick."
This is the next step up in the long-running spat between Musk and OpenAI, a business he co-founded in 2015 but quit in 2018 because he couldn't take control.
Musk has said several times that OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, have given up on the group's initial nonprofit objective in order to make money by working with companies like Microsoft.
The lawsuit adds another dimension to the growing competition for AI domination, where big tech companies are fighting hard to get the best people and intellectual property.
In March, Elon Musk sold his social media site X to his AI business xAI in an all-stock transaction that was made public on March 28. The agreement valued xAI at $80 billion and X at $33 billion, including $12 billion in debt.
The move happened at the same time as a court turned down Musk's request to throw out a class-action lawsuit that said he lied to shareholders when he bought Twitter.
Some people say that the deal makes things riskier for Musk and his businesses, and that xAI might now be involved in lawsuits that are already going on.
Some people, like Adam Cochran of Cinneamhain Ventures, say that Musk is inflating xAI's value to sell X while hiding losses for investors. They even suggest that the acquisition might be a mechanism to move user data across companies.
Musk says that the combination would improve the synergies between X's platform and xAI's technologies, especially the Grok chatbot, which he says is better than early versions of ChatGPT.
People who support Grok think it might make xAI a genuine contender in the AI race, but there are still doubts about the $80B value.
#ElonMusk #Aİ #Binance #boots

The Mitosis Advantage – Transforming Idle Assets Into Active Capital
I decided to write a series of evaluations of the most important tools and projects in the Mitosis ecosystem. $MITO
I want to gather and organize everything I learn and share it with you so that we can all better understand how DeFi and crypto operate together and how cross-chain liquidity works.
The most essential thing for me is to keep things simple. I might make errors since I'm still learning. If I do, please let me know in the comments. You may also ask me questions or express your thoughts.
It would be great if you could give me any ideas or thoughts on how to make these reviews more informative and fun. Let's learn together!
Stork Oracle (Infrastructure)—the reasons for and effects of Mitosis in the environment
Even though they are very vital, ecosystem tools frequently don't get the credit they deserve. The Mitosis ecosystem includes the Stork Oracle.
To put it simply, oracles connect smart contracts to the real world. They bring in real, verified information, such as the results of events or the worth of assets. Without them, blockchains would be like sealed vaults that can't see what's going on outside of their own walls.
For example, @Mitosis Official can't identify whether a user did anything on another network, like placing tokens into an Ethereum contract or what the current price of ETH is on the market. To receive real-world, accurate information regarding prices, actions, or events, you need to get it from a reliable outside source. Stork is the source in #Mitosis . It gets data from a variety of different exchanges and sources and transmits it to the network with very little delay and extremely high accuracy.
There are two primary kinds of oracles:
Push model: They send data to the blockchain on a set schedule, such once a minute.
The pull model (that's Stork): Data only moves when it needs to. It's faster (less time spent waiting), cheaper (less gas), and more flexible (not tied to a provider's schedule).
A number of oracles employ the "push" strategy, which means they send out data on a regular basis, such every minute, every 10 minutes, or even more often. Chainlink, for instance, delivers updates ahead of time and keeps them on-chain. This might create a delay of 2 to 5 minutes.
Things that are bad: - Data becomes old soon
- Constant pushes contribute to the cost of gas
- No room for change: you have to stick to the provider's rules and schedule.
Stork employs a push-model oracle that communicates price data on-chain every time there is a change, as when prices change on controlled exchanges like Binance or Coinbase. This model has very minimal delay when it comes to updates (as little as 500 ms) and is quite accurate, even when the market is volatile.
Stork works with over 60 networks and covers over 370 assets, making it a one-size-fits-all solution for multichain protocols. When the price changes by 0.1% or every half second on a timer, the data is updated. This is very crucial for derivatives and DeFi techniques that happen a lot.
Digital signatures based on secp256k1, which is the same cryptographic curve used in Ethereum, are utilized to send the data. This enables you add data right away to the same transaction where it is used, without needing to publish it beforehand or make a call from outside.
In short:
- There is very little latency; data is always supplied immediately away and is always up to date.
- Gas optimization: You don't have to be updating data on-chain all the time "just in case."
- Flexibility: Users and contracts may make requests at any moment, without having to wait for a schedule.
- Easy to set up: the data arrives in the same transaction as it is required, with no further infrastructure layer.
You should realize that oracles are never the same for everyone. Their design, trust model, and how often they update are all made to fit particular conditions. There are centralized solutions, decentralized validator networks, and specialized feeds for things like options, NFTs, weather data, and more. So, the answer to the question "which oracle is best" always depends on how it will be utilized.
Stork is the ideal choice for Mitosis because it offers low latency, flexible liquidity routing, and a modular architecture. It is stable and quick enough to build programmable liquidity in real time because of its push mechanism, high update frequency, and direct contract integration. #Binance #Mitosis #boots $MITO

Oprește utilizarea prea multor indicatori. Iată doar cei 3 de care ai nevoie
Dacă ești trader pe Binance, probabil ai văzut grafice acoperite cu 10+ indicatori RSI, MACD, Benzile Bollinger, Stochastic, Nori Ichimoku și altele.
Dar iată adevărul: prea mulți indicatori = prea multă confuzie.
Traderii profesioniști nu se bazează pe zeci de semnale. Ei se concentrează pe câteva instrumente puternice care realmente ghidează procesul decizional. Să descompunem cei 3 indicatori de care ai nevoie explicati în cuvinte simple.
1. 200 EMA (Media Mobilă Exponențială) – Regele Trendului