Good morning Puppies community and all my amazing followers! 🐶🌞
A new day, a new chance to grow together — in life and in crypto!
The Puppies Coin family keeps getting stronger, with positive vibes, teamwork, and belief in the future of this project. 💪✨
Let’s stay focused, support each other, and keep building the most loyal community in the meme coin world.
Together, we’re not just holding coins — we’re holding faith, fun, and friendship! 💛
$ETH $BTC $SOL
#puppies #WEFDavos2026 #TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat #TrumpTariffsOnEurope #MarketRebound
wait...Guys Leave everything and Focus here....I want your full attention.... because Em gonna share something important with you'll ...
This is the weekly chart of $BTC
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
and here’s my personal view on the next move backed by logic, not noise.....
Everyone is screaming “long” or “short,” but very few are actually reading the chart. So here’s the breakdown based purely on market structure, levels, and momentum.
Look closely at the chart:
BTC has created multiple rejections from the supply zone around 90,500–91,000.
Each time price tapped this zone, sellers stepped in decisively.
This confirms one thing:
The market is still respecting the downtrend.
Right now, BTC is hovering near the mid-level around 90,000, but the real decision point remains the same 88,000–87,500 demand block.
This level has held multiple times, but the pressure toward it is increasing.
If BTC breaks below 87,500 with strong weekly confirmation, the next liquidity pocket opens directly toward 85,500–85,000.
There is no strong support in between.
On the other hand, the trend only shifts bullish if $BTC reclaims 91,500–92,000 with strong volume.
At this moment, there is no signal of strength, no momentum shift, and no bullish confirmation.
So what’s the plan?
After reviewing the structure again, the message is clear:
BTC is still forming lower highs → trend remains bearish.
The rejection from 90,700 confirms that sellers are still in control.
Until BTC reclaims that level, upside remains weak and unstable.
People asking for entries right now are ignoring the reality:
We are stuck between strong resistance and strong demand—the worst place to take a position.
This is not a clean long setup.
This is not a safe short setup.
The risk-to-reward is simply not worth it.
Bottom Line:
– Structure = bearish
– This zone = no clean entries
– The smartest move = WAIT
Either BTC reclaims 92,000+ for a valid long…
Or breaks 87,500 for a clean downside continuation.
Until one of those happens, this is a no-trade zone.
The first time I seriously looked into regulated crypto infrastructure, I remember thinking, this stuff either ignores regulators completely or bends so far it loses the point of crypto. There never seemed to be a middle ground. @Dusk_Foundation Network caught my attention because it wasn’t trying to run from regulation—or worship it either.
From what I’ve seen, $DUSK matters because it acknowledges an uncomfortable truth most crypto people don’t like to admit: institutions aren’t going away. Banks, funds, and governments will keep playing a role. The question isn’t if they enter crypto, but how. Dusk seems built for that reality.
What I like is how it treats privacy. Not the “hide everything and hope nobody asks” kind, but selective privacy. Transactions can stay confidential while still being auditable when needed. That sounds boring until you imagine real-world assets, securities, or funds actually using blockchain without legal nightmares.
I won’t pretend it’s perfect. Regulated systems move slow, and that can clash with crypto’s speed and experimentation. There’s also the risk that being regulation-friendly makes it less attractive to hardcore decentralization purists.
Still, I think #Dusk sits in an honest place. It doesn’t sell fantasies. It builds tools for a future where crypto has to coexist with laws, not pretend they don’t exist. That alone makes it worth paying attention to.