💰 How does the Upscale referral program work?
Today we want to break down a mechanism that many traders unfairly overlook.
They open the “Referrals” tab, see 10%, and assume it’s not much.
But what most people don’t realize is that 10% in Upscale can be more rewarding than 50% on CEX exchanges. Here’s why 👇
Centralized exchanges, or CEXs (such as Bybit, Binance, OKX), typically pay you a percentage of the trading fees generated by the trader you referred.
Some platforms offer up to 50–70% commission sharing. It sounds impressive.
🍆 But here’s the catch…
Let’s look at a simple example.
Exchange fee: 0.1%
You receive 50% of that.
Your friend trades $250 in volume.
Calculation:
$250 × 0.1% × 50% = $0.125
That’s 12 cents.
Even with $10,000 in trading volume, you’d only receive $5 in cashback.
Because the reward is calculated from trading fees, the actual payout depends entirely on how much and how long your friend trades.
💸 Upscale takes a different approach
Our trading fees are among the lowest on the market, starting from 0.0035%. We intentionally keep them low without compromising referral conditions.
Instead of sharing trading fees, we share a portion of the challenge fee.
If your friend purchases a $250 account, you receive $25 immediately at the moment of purchase.
If they purchase a $1,300 account, you receive $130.
This model keeps trading costs low for traders while making referrals meaningfully rewarding.
🔗 If you’re already recommending Upscale, make sure you’re getting paid for it in our app!
One evening, while exploring emerging blockchain ecosystems and analyzing how infrastructure is evolving beyond speculation into practical utility, I came across #vanar . At first glance, it appeared to be another Layer-1 network, but a closer look revealed a design philosophy focused on real-world adoption rather than isolated technical experimentation.
@Vanar is built as a foundational Layer-1 blockchain, structured to support scalable applications across gaming, metaverse environments, AI integrations, and brand-driven digital experiences. Its ecosystem, including products like Virtua Metaverse and the VGN games network, reflects an infrastructure designed to handle high-engagement consumer platforms. Powered by the $VANRY token, Vanar enables efficient network operations while aligning incentives across users, developers, and platforms.
What makes #vanar significant is its clear focus on bridging blockchain infrastructure with mainstream digital ecosystems — positioning itself as a practical gateway for the next generation of Web3 users.
Mise à jour $BTC
Merci à tous ceux qui ont rejoint mon live d’aujourd’hui, vous êtes les meilleurs. Voici le récapitulatif des points abordés :
Le bitcoin est déjà dans un bear market confirmé et actuellement il souffle un peu dans la zone des 70 000 $ à la suite de sa baisse récente.
Son comportement dans cette zone, laisse envisager une cassure vers la zone des 50 000 $ et il se peut que le creux autour de cette dernière soit le creux du bear market, à cause d’un rapprochement avec les creux des bear markets précédents.
Dans un contexte macro, c’est vrai que les sorties des ETFs contribuent theoriquement à la baisse mais je ne pense pas qu’elles soient les facteurs clés derrières les baisses violentes sur le bitcoin, car les sorties restent minimes comparativement aux fonds totaux engagés dans les ETFs. L’environnement Risk-off explique une reduction de l’exposition des investisseurs sur le bitcoin/ les cryptos considéré comme « risque élevé ».
Il est important de ne pas :
> Réagir de manière excessive aux reculs mineurs ( hausses mineures dans un marché baissier )
> Confondre la volatilité avec un vrai changement de tendance;
> Trader les gros titres émotionnellement
J’espère du prix qu’il atteigne au moins le creux du bear market cette année.
Bitcoin n'est pas une question de prédiction. Il s'agit de probabilités. La structure nous indique où nous en sommes. Macro nous explique pourquoi.
Pensez-vous que nous aurons un nouvel ATH du bitcoin cette année ?
🚨 BREAKING
Here’s what’s reportedly driving Bitcoin’s sharp drop right now:
Binance offloaded 38,482 BTC
Wintermute sold 30,501 BTC
Coinbase moved 20,730 BTC
Fidelity sold 20,671 BTC
BlackRock sold 12,440 BTC
More than $40 billion in market value disappeared within 15 minutes.
Many are calling this a coordinated move by major players rather than organic selling pressure.
#Binance #squarecreator
🚨 $274,000,000,000 IN BITCOIN SELL PRESSURE COULD HIT THE MARKET THIS DECADE.
And this conversation isn’t coming from retail traders.
It’s coming from early Bitcoin analysts and longtime market participants who’ve been in the space since the beginning.
The concern here is not short-term price moves; it’s about QUANTUM COMPUTING.
A growing group of OG holders believes quantum tech is no longer a distant risk.
They think that within the next 5-10 years, quantum systems could become strong enough to challenge current cryptographic security, the same security Bitcoin depends on.
And if that happens, Bitcoin becomes one of the most obvious targets.
Not because the network is weak, but because it’s transparent, holds massive value, and runs on public-key cryptography.
Now here’s where the real overhang comes in.
There are roughly 4 million BTC from early eras (pre-2011) that are inactive or assumed lost.
Markets currently treat those coins as permanently out of circulation.
But if quantum computing ever makes it possible to access those wallets, even partially, that supply could come back into the market.
And markets won't wait for those coins to move; they'll price the possibility early.
To understand the scale of dead coins moving:
Since 2020, institutions and corporations together have accumulated roughly 3 million BTC.
That demand helped drive Bitcoin from around $10K to above $120K at peak levels.
So the idea of 4 million BTC potentially re-entering supply creates a long-term supply risk overhang on price.
And yes, quantum-resistant upgrades are already being researched.
But Bitcoin upgrades require global consensus, which is slow and difficult by design.
So until quantum protection is fully implemented, this remains a background risk narrative.
Obviously this quantum computing is not an immediate threat. But it is significant enough to stop big players from going all-in on Bitcoin.