For your goal, I'd prioritize coins that can realistically trade at 1$ per token, rather than coins that need an astronomical market cap to get there.

Current market snapshots from CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap show an important distinction: MemeCore is already near $1, Official Trump is above $1, and SPX6900 has a plausible but speculative route to $1. PEPE, BONK and FLOKI are much harder 1$ candidates because of their enormous circulating supplies.

### 1\. Compare the strongest candidates

Prices and market caps are recent retrieved snapshots, not guaranteed executable quotes. Entry zones below are provisional trade-planning levels, not confirmed support.

| Coin | Price snapshot | Market cap | 24h volume | Rise needed to $1 |

| --------------- | -------------- | ---------- | ---------- | ----------------- |

| MemeCore (M) | $0.80 | $1.83B | $3.31M | +25% |

| SPX6900 (SPX) | $0.377 | $351M | $7.19M | +165% |

| dogwifhat (WIF) | $0.182 | $182M | $45.73M | +449% |

Sources: CoinGecko's [MemeCore data](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/memecore?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [SPX6900 data](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/spx6900?utm_source=chatgpt.com) and [dogwifhat data](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/dogwifhat?utm_source=chatgpt.com).

How I rank them for your specific goal:

* Closest to $1: M. The price target is nearest, but the token has substantial future supply exposure: about 2.3 billion circulating against a maximum of 10 billion. That is a major risk.

* Balanced speculative candidate: SPX. Its lower circulating supply means 1$ would imply a market cap around $931 million, roughly 2.7 times its current level.

* Higher-risk momentum candidate: WIF. Its roughly 999 million circulating tokens mean 1$ implies about a $999 million market cap, around 5.5 times current capitalization. Its reported volume is the strongest of these three.

M — MemeCore

Current reference: ~$0.80

Entry zone: $0.72–$0.78, if price stabilizes after the pullback.

Targets: $0.90 / $1.00 / $1.15

Invalidation: below $0.65; reassess rather than automatically hold.

Risk: medium-high to high. The 1$ target is close, but token unlocks and relatively modest spot liquidity matter.

$SPX — SPX6900

Current reference: ~$0.377

Entry zone: $0.35–$0.37, preferably after support holds.

Targets: $0.45 / $0.60 / $1.00

Invalidation: below $0.32.

Risk: high. A 1$ move would require a substantial rally; do not assume it will happen quickly.

$WIF — dogwifhat

Current reference: ~$0.182

Entry zone: $0.176–$0.185, only if the price holds its recent range.

Targets: $0.25 / $0.35 / $1.00

Invalidation: below $0.165.

Risk: high. Better trading volume, but 1$ remains a much larger upside requirement.

These invalidation levels are proposed risk-management thresholds, not proven technical support or guarantees. Check the live chart before placing an order.

### 3\. How I'd allocate your $100

SPX6900

Primary speculative position

### $40

40%

MemeCore

Near-1$ candidate; supply risk

### $25

25%

WIF

Higher-upside, higher-risk position

### $15

15%

Keep in USDT

Reserve for a better setup

### $20

20%

I would buy in stages rather than put the full amount in immediately. Keep the reserve unless a good setup appears, and avoid leverage.

### 4\. Where to trade

* Centralized exchanges: Check the exact trading pair, fees and order-book depth on your exchange before buying.

* DEX: For SPX and WIF, verify the official token contract and pool liquidity before swapping. For M, check the specific BNB Chain pool; the available pool may be much thinner than centralized exchange markets.

My final take: SPX is my preferred speculative candidate from this shortlist, while M is the closest to 1$ by price. Neither is guaranteed to hit its target, and a $100 portfolio could lose a substantial portion of its value.