𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗥𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪𝗦 𝗡𝗘𝗘𝗗 𝗧𝗢 𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗖𝗛 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗞
A minor interface change and a modification to asset-handling logic do not necessarily require the same level of scrutiny.
Security review should reflect the potential impact of the change, the privileges involved, and the consequences if something behaves unexpectedly.
For applications built on TRON, teams can define review requirements for different categories of updates instead of relying on a single informal approval process.
Changes affecting permissions, financial calculations, contract interactions, or critical dependencies may justify additional testing and independent review.
The purpose is to direct attention where mistakes could have the greatest consequences.
A consistent risk-based process helps teams move efficiently without treating every change as equally safe or equally dangerous.
@trondao
@justinsuntron
#TRONEcoStar
A minor interface change and a modification to asset-handling logic do not necessarily require the same level of scrutiny.
Security review should reflect the potential impact of the change, the privileges involved, and the consequences if something behaves unexpectedly.
For applications built on TRON, teams can define review requirements for different categories of updates instead of relying on a single informal approval process.
Changes affecting permissions, financial calculations, contract interactions, or critical dependencies may justify additional testing and independent review.
The purpose is to direct attention where mistakes could have the greatest consequences.
A consistent risk-based process helps teams move efficiently without treating every change as equally safe or equally dangerous.
@trondao
@justinsuntron
#TRONEcoStar