Tokenization gets attention because the asset becomes visible on-chain. The harder part is everything that happens after: ownership changes, corporate actions, compliance and settlement.
Publicar
--
AlphaLQ
·
--
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk What if a blockchain could prove a transaction was valid without revealing which note was actually spent?
That’s what caught my attention in @Dusk ’s Phoenix model.
Phoenix uses notes, nullifiers and ZK proofs so the network can verify that a transaction follows the rules and prevent double-spending, without identifying the specific note that was spent.
That made me look at privacy differently.
For Dusk, this becomes especially interesting in regulated financial markets, where transaction confidentiality still needs to work alongside compliance and verification.
Now I’m curious: can this balance between private transaction details and verifiable rules hold when real financial activity scales?
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk
That’s what caught my attention in @Dusk ’s Phoenix model.
Phoenix uses notes, nullifiers and ZK proofs so the network can verify that a transaction follows the rules and prevent double-spending, without identifying the specific note that was spent.
That made me look at privacy differently.
For Dusk, this becomes especially interesting in regulated financial markets, where transaction confidentiality still needs to work alongside compliance and verification.
Now I’m curious: can this balance between private transaction details and verifiable rules hold when real financial activity scales?
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk
Aviso legal: inclui opiniões de terceiros. Não constitui aconselhamento. A Binance AI pode ser utilizada sem garantia. Consulta os Termos e Condições.