#bStocksCIS @BinanceCIS

"About 50% of FY2027 bits are covered by new agreements" sounds like 50% of revenue is guaranteed. It is not.

At its August 13 Investor Day, Sandisk said it had signed New Business Model agreements with eight customers covering approximately 50% of FY2027 bits and about two-thirds of FY2028 bits. The contracts use committed volumes, minimum financial guarantees and structured pricing mechanisms.

Here is the practical distinction I use for $SNDKB .

What becomes more visible:
- demand volume
- capacity planning
- minimum customer commitment
- future cash-flow visibility

What is not automatically fixed:
- final selling price
- product mix
- shipment timing
- gross margin
- customer credit and execution risk

A "bit" is physical volume, not a dollar of revenue.

The same caution applies to Sandisk's FY2028 to FY2030 targets: mid-to-high teens revenue growth, about 80% non-GAAP gross margin, about 75% non-GAAP operating margin and about 50% adjusted free-cash-flow margin. These are management targets based on assumptions, not achieved results.

Sandisk also expects to return 100% of excess cash after investing in the business. The important word is "excess": it is the residual after operating and investment needs, not a fixed payout promise.

My four-question check is simple: Is volume committed? Is price fixed or formula-based? Is there a minimum cash guarantee? What can delay recognition?

Would you prefer more predictable contracted volume, even if it may reduce some upside from a sudden spot-price spike?