Most blockchains treat execution and settlement as one problem.
Dusk takes a different approach.
DuskVM handles Rust/WASM execution.
DuskEVM brings Ethereum-compatible execution.
But both settle through DuskDS.
That separation is interesting.
Execution can evolve for different applications, while settlement remains the common foundation for finality and data availability.
For regulated markets, that could matter more than simply having another EVM chain.
Different execution environments.
One settlement layer.
That’s the architecture I’m watching.
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk
Do you think separating execution from settlement makes a blockchain more adaptable for financial markets?