Recently, I've been receiving push notifications, and when I open the BN Square, all I see is Liangxi earning big.
Earning 15 million at once is comparable to the near profit of a listed company in a year.
As a result, many people also want to learn how to earn big like Liangxi.
But no one considered that those who took the opposite position against Liangxi would suffer huge losses.
Those who lose big don't speak up, while those who earn big gain attention and become the focus of the market.
As a result, he became a role model in the market, allowing those who want to turn their fortunes through trading coins to find a benchmark. They admire him and envy him.
But today I want to share a truth.
This market is no longer the ineffective market of the past; it has become an effective market, with various robots and quantitative strategies participating in trading at all times.
Players in the cryptocurrency space, market makers, and arbitrageurs are all fully engaged, and trying to make money through market movements without information advantage has become very difficult.
You must remember one thing: without information advantage, it's impossible to make money.
At every stage of the market, there are thousands of strategies running, and Liangxi's strategy just happened to emerge.
Now the market conditions at this stage just happen to fit his strategy.
However, the market is not static.
The so-called source of gains and losses means that both your earnings and losses are caused by the same strategy; it's just that the strategy was aligned with the market at that time.
If one day the strategy no longer aligns with the market, then this strategy will lead to huge losses.
No one can ensure their strategy aligns perfectly with the market at every stage.
So the money Liangxi earned is not aligned with the other 1000 strategies, while his strategy just aligns with the market.
So everyone loses, while he earns big.
If you don't believe it,
I can share a methodology with everyone: based on the validity of probability statistical sample laws, the sample size must be greater than 30 to be considered a meaningful statistic.
You should follow those who are making money in real trading; having more than 16 profitable trades out of 30 is a meaningful strategy.
In other words, you can't just look at how someone is making money right now; you need to continuously track them for 30 times, and if more than 16 times are profitable, then that strategy is meaningful for the current market. However, after this phase, it may become ineffective immediately, as others in the market will certainly discover this profitable strategy, so as the number of people increases, this strategy will inevitably fail.
Those who have traded contracts and earned big cannot stop. They can only keep going down this path.
There are only two outcomes: if you can preserve your wealth in time and make good asset allocations, then you can ensure a worry-free life for the latter half of your life.
The second scenario is that when the strategy does not align with the market strategy at that time, it will lead to significant losses, ultimately giving everything back to the market.
And very few people can choose the first outcome.
Looking at various strategies in the market, compared to holding coins, it is worth less than a leg hair.
Perhaps now you think that if I tell another joke, I will be laughed at.
But if you look back at today in 10 years, you will understand that those strategies that once earned big will become history.
Only holding coins as a simple strategy of buying and not selling can lead you to the other side.