$BTC I see that the Asian shock has been absorbed, I will try to think in a logic of reform or pragmatism. I know that in some cases, or mostly, this market does not adhere to the logic of 1+1=2; here it could mean 0 or 9, but logic remains logic. Hence, some voices throughout the week have boasted that Bitcoin has equaled gold in stability and that it serves as a safe haven. So, will the Bitcoin market maker engage in bad publicity for himself? At that time, governments will not enter, and the markets rejecting this field will confirm the words of the rejecters that it is a volatile asset.
Rather, it is highly volatile, so there is no talk of a safe haven or reserves after that in Congress.