rameet_14

Blockchain ma być fundamentem zdecentralizowanego internetu.
Ale jest jedno główne ograniczenie, o którym prawie nikt nie mówi - przechowywanie danych.
Wszyscy mówią o tym, jak blockchain napędzi przyszłość AI, aktywów rzeczywistych (RWA) i w pełni aplikacji na łańcuchu. Ale zanim tam dotrzemy, musimy odpowiedzieć na jedno bardzo podstawowe pytanie.
Oddzielmy mit od rzeczywistości.
Powszechne nieporozumienie
To stwierdzenie często się powtarza - ale rzeczywistość jest bardziej złożona.
Technicznie, możesz przechowywać duże pliki. Ale prawdopodobnie nie powinieneś. Nie przy obecnym działaniu blockchainów.

For more than a decade, blockchains have treated payments as a feature—important, yes, but secondary. Ethereum built a world computer. Solana optimized for high-speed execution. Layer-2s asked how to scale transactions. Plasma asks a quieter, more radical question.
What if the blockchain itself is the payment rail?
This isn’t a tweak. It’s a philosophical reset.
From “Payments on Blockchain” to “Blockchain as Payments”
Most blockchains begin with a general-purpose design and then add payments on top. Tokens move because they must; stablecoins exist because users demand them. Fees fluctuate, congestion spikes, and users learn to tolerate friction as the cost of decentralization.
Plasma rejects that framing entirely.
Instead of building a chain and then asking how payments fit, Plasma starts with the assumption that payments are the chain’s reason for existence. The ledger is not a multipurpose playground—it is a dedicated settlement engine optimized for stablecoin flows.
In other words:
Ethereum hosts payments
Plasma is the payment system
That distinction changes everything.
Stablecoins as First-Class Citizens
On most networks, stablecoins are guests. They inherit the rules, costs, and inefficiencies of the host chain. Gas is paid in volatile assets. Fees spike during unrelated activity. Finality depends on conditions the user doesn’t care about.
Plasma inverts the hierarchy.
Stablecoins—especially dollar-denominated ones—are treated as native economic primitives, not contracts riding shotgun. The network’s throughput, fee logic, and execution model are tuned around the assumption that the primary thing moving across the wire is money meant to behave like money.
The result is a chain where:
Transfers are predictable
Fees are negligible or abstracted away
Finality feels closer to payments infrastructure than crypto experimentation
This is less “Web3 UX” and more financial plumbing.
Why This Is a Philosophical Shift, Not Just an Optimization
Calling Plasma “faster” or “cheaper” misses the point. Plenty of chains chase speed. Plasma is questioning what blockchains are for.
Traditional blockchains inherit their DNA from computers: computation first, money second. Plasma borrows its DNA from payment networks—Visa, ACH, SWIFT—but rebuilds them with cryptographic settlement instead of institutional trust.
The implication is subtle but profound:
Users shouldn’t think about gas
Developers shouldn’t design around congestion
Payments shouldn’t compete with NFTs, memecoins, or arbitrage bots
Money should move because the system exists to move money.
Execution Without Economic Noise
Because Plasma is payment-centric, it can make design choices that generalist chains cannot. Execution environments are simplified. Economic incentives are aligned around reliability, not speculative throughput. Validator behavior is optimized for consistency, not opportunistic extraction.
This reduces what might be called economic noise—the invisible friction caused by competing incentives inside a shared execution space. In practice, this means stablecoin transfers behave more like:
A network service
A utility
A background process
And less like:
A trade
A bet on gas prices
A race against mempool chaos
That psychological shift matters as much as the technical one.
The Invisible Infrastructure Thesis
Plasma’s long game isn’t to be admired—it’s to disappear.
The most successful payment rails in history are boring. Nobody marvels at TCP/IP when sending an email. Nobody thinks about card settlement layers when tapping a phone. Plasma is aiming for that same invisibility: a cryptographic settlement layer that fades into the background while apps, wallets, and businesses take center stage.
This is why Plasma feels less like a “crypto narrative” and more like infrastructure logic. It’s not chasing maximal composability or cultural gravity. It’s chasing reliability, predictability, and scale.
Why This Direction Matters
As stablecoins quietly become one of crypto’s most successful products, the question is no longer whether people want on-chain dollars—it’s whether the infrastructure moving those dollars is designed for the job.
Plasma’s answer is direct:
Stop treating payments as a feature.
Start treating them as the foundation.
If Ethereum taught the world that code could be law, Plasma is exploring a different lesson—that money, when designed properly, should feel effortless.
Not louder. Not flashier. Just fundamentally right.
@Plasma $XPL #Plasma

Wyobraź sobie świat, w którym blockchain nie jest tylko rejestrem transakcji, ale myślącą maszyną — taką, która nie tylko przechowuje dane, ale także je rozumie, uczy się na ich podstawie i działa na ich podstawie z celem. To odważne twierdzenie Vanar Chain, blockchaina opartego na AI, który przekształca nasze myślenie o inteligentnych kontraktach, zdecentralizowanych aplikacjach i logice on-chain.
W swojej istocie, Vanar nie jest tylko kolejną siecią Layer-1 w zatłoczonym wszechświecie blockchaina. Został stworzony z AI zintegrowanym jako obywatel pierwszej klasy — co oznacza, że AI nie jest czymś, co dodajesz później za pomocą oracle'ów lub połączeń API, jest wbudowane bezpośrednio w sam protokół.

Kiedy esports i zdecentralizowane przechowywanie się krzyżują, to sygnał, że cyfrowa gospodarka w końcu przechodzi w erę, w której trwałość danych, kreatywna własność i zminimalizowana infrastruktura zaufania naprawdę mają znaczenie poza Twitterem kryptowalutowym. Team Liquid, jedna z najbardziej znanych i odnoszących sukcesy organizacji esportsowych na świecie, niedawno ogłosiła strategiczne partnerstwo z Walrus Protocol w celu zabezpieczenia 250 terabajtów materiałów z meczów, treści graczy i mediów z marką. To, co może wyglądać jak decyzja o zakupie technologii korporacyjnej na zewnątrz, w rzeczywistości odzwierciedla głębszą zmianę w tym, jak cyfrowi twórcy myślą o przechowywaniu, integralności archiwalnej i przyszłościowej dystrybucji treści.

The launch of Walrus Protocol Mainnet marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of decentralized storage, and the announcement of Claynosaurz as a Mainnet launch partner signals exactly the kind of real-world, high-fidelity application Walrus was built to support. Rather than positioning itself as just another decentralized file system, Walrus introduces a fundamentally new storage paradigm—programmable, economically scalable, and application-aware data infrastructure. The Claynosaurz partnership brings this vision to life.
Understanding Walrus: Storage Designed for Scale and Utility
Walrus is a decentralized object storage network designed to support large, mutable, and application-critical data directly at the protocol layer. Built with modern Web3 applications in mind, Walrus departs from earlier storage systems by focusing on three core innovations: 2D erasure coding (RedStuff), programmable storage logic, and sustainable network economics.
Traditional decentralized storage often forces trade-offs—either data is cheap but unreliable, or resilient but prohibitively expensive at scale. Walrus addresses this through RedStuff, a two-dimensional erasure coding scheme that significantly improves durability while reducing replication overhead. This allows Walrus to store large media files—images, animations, videos, AI datasets—efficiently without sacrificing availability.
More importantly, Walrus introduces programmability at the storage layer. Data stored on Walrus is not inert; it can be accessed, validated, and transformed based on on-chain logic. This capability is essential for modern applications that require dynamic content updates, conditional access, and composability across ecosystems like NFTs, gaming, and digital identity.
Why Claynosaurz Is a Perfect Mainnet Launch Partner
Claynosaurz is far more than an NFT collection. It is a Web3 entertainment brand built around high-quality 3D characters, storytelling, and community-driven experiences. From the beginning, Claynosaurz has focused on pushing the boundaries of what digital collectibles can represent—blending animation, interactivity, and real-world engagement.
This ambition creates unique technical requirements. Claynosaurz assets are media-heavy, frequently evolving, and deeply integrated with user identity and utility. Static storage solutions struggle to support this level of complexity. Walrus, by contrast, is purpose-built for it.
By leveraging Walrus, Claynosaurz can store and manage rich media assets while attaching logic that governs how and when content changes. This opens the door to customizable NFTs, evolving characters, gated experiences, and dynamic lore, all backed by decentralized infrastructure rather than centralized servers.
Programmable Storage Unlocks Dynamic Experiences
One of the most significant aspects of this partnership is how programmable storage transforms NFTs from static objects into living digital entities. With Walrus, Claynosaurz can update asset metadata, visual states, or experience access based on on-chain events—such as user actions, time-based milestones, or community achievements—without breaking decentralization guarantees.
This means a Claynosaurz character can evolve visually over time, unlock new animations, or grant access to physical or digital events, all while remaining verifiably stored on Walrus. The storage layer becomes an active participant in the application logic, not just a passive repository.
This approach aligns with a broader shift in Web3: moving away from “mint and forget” NFTs toward persistent digital identities and experiences. Walrus provides the infrastructure needed to make that shift scalable and secure.
Mainnet Readiness and Economic Sustainability
The Claynosaurz partnership also validates Walrus’s Mainnet readiness. Entertainment brands cannot afford downtime, broken assets, or unpredictable costs. Walrus’s economic model—where storage prices decrease as the network scales while operator margins remain stable—ensures long-term reliability for high-traffic applications.
As more data is stored on Walrus, the network becomes cheaper for users while continuing to reward storage operators and stakers. This creates a positive feedback loop where adoption strengthens the network rather than stressing it. For Claynosaurz, this means confidence that their content infrastructure will remain performant and cost-effective as their audience grows.
A Signal to the Broader Web3 Ecosystem
Walrus welcoming Claynosaurz as a Mainnet launch partner is more than a single collaboration—it is a signal to the broader Web3 ecosystem. It demonstrates that decentralized storage is ready to support mainstream-quality media, entertainment, and consumer applications, not just archival use cases.
For developers, this partnership shows what becomes possible when storage is programmable, economically aligned, and deeply integrated with application logic. For creators and brands, it highlights a path toward building rich, interactive digital worlds without relying on centralized infrastructure.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus $WAL

The modern digital economy is rapidly shifting toward subscription and pay-per-content models, especially for media such as video, audio, and interactive content. Creators face persistent challenges: centralized platforms often control access, take significant revenue cuts, and expose content to piracy. Walrus Protocol provides a decentralized solution, empowering creators to retain control, enforce monetization, and secure their content while still reaching their audience.
How Walrus Supports Subscription Models
Walrus Protocol combines off-system storage with end-to-end encryption to create a secure, decentralized content delivery ecosystem. Creators can store encrypted media directly on Walrus, while access is controlled through cryptographic decryption keys. Only subscribers or paying users receive the keys necessary to unlock the content, enabling fine-grained access control without relying on centralized platforms.
Key elements of this model include.
Encrypted Storage: Media is encrypted before leaving the creator’s system, ensuring that even storage nodes cannot access the content.
Controlled Decryption: Access is granted exclusively to users who meet predefined conditions, such as subscription payments or one-time content purchases.
Off-System Storage: By separating content storage from the payment or platform system, Walrus ensures resilience, censorship resistance, and lower operational costs.
Auditable Access: The system allows creators to verify that only paying users can decrypt and consume the content, providing trust and accountability.
Benefits for Creators
Walrus Protocol’s subscription model unlocks significant advantages for creators.
Revenue Retention: No reliance on centralized platforms that take high fees; creators monetize directly.
Content Security: Encrypted storage reduces piracy and unauthorized sharing.
Flexible Monetization: Supports recurring subscriptions, pay-per-view, or tiered access levels.
Scalable Infrastructure: Off-system storage and decentralized nodes reduce costs while supporting high-traffic content delivery.
For independent artists, educators, and niche media publishers, this represents a paradigm shift in how digital content can be monetized and protected.
Benefits for Users
Subscribers benefit from.
Secure Access: Their content consumption is private and protected.
Fair Access Models: Transparent, direct payment ensures value for both creators and users.
Decentralized Assurance: Users rely on cryptographic guarantees rather than platform trust, reducing risk of censorship or arbitrary content removal.
Why Walrus Stands Out
Traditional subscription platforms often struggle with balancing security, accessibility, and decentralization. Walrus solves these challenges by combining decentralized storage, cryptography, and access control. Unlike centralized content servers:
Storage is distributed, reducing single points of failure.
Encryption guarantees that only authorized users can access content.
Subscription enforcement occurs at the protocol level, not via platform rules, reducing reliance on intermediaries.
This positions Walrus as a foundational protocol for a creator-first, subscription-driven digital economy.
Strategic Implications
As media continues to move toward creator-owned and subscription-based models, protocols like Walrus provide the infrastructure needed for scalable, secure, and monetizable content distribution. Investors and creators alike should note that decentralized content access is not just a technical innovation—it represents a fundamental shift in digital monetization and trust, potentially displacing legacy platforms in music, video, education, and other media sectors.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus $WAL

The global financial system has been on a turbulent path, driven by rising interest rates, liquidity pressures, and unprecedented market stress. The recent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) sent shockwaves across traditional finance, exposing vulnerabilities in risk management, capital adequacy, and regulatory oversight. While these events unfolded in traditional markets, blockchain technology—and platforms like Dusk Network—offer insights and potential solutions for increasing resilience, transparency, and trust in financial ecosystems.
Interest Rates, Liquidity, and Institutional Risk
Interest rate hikes across major economies have strained banks and lending institutions. Institutions with long-dated assets faced mark-to-market losses as rates increased, creating liquidity mismatches. SVB’s collapse highlighted how concentrated risk and lack of transparency in balance sheets can amplify systemic shocks.
In contrast, blockchain networks like Dusk provide real-time, auditable ledgers for asset holdings and settlements. With privacy-preserving transparency, institutions can maintain confidentiality while ensuring regulators or counterparties can verify liquidity and solvency, reducing the likelihood of hidden exposure.
The SVB Collapse: Lessons for Transparency and Compliance
SVB’s sudden downfall was a reminder that information asymmetry and slow reporting mechanisms can destabilize financial institutions. In a traditional system, regulators and investors only see snapshots of risk positions, often too late to prevent contagion.
Dusk Network’s architecture, featuring Confidential Security Contracts (XSCs) and zero-knowledge proofs, allows for selective disclosure. This ensures compliance and auditability without exposing sensitive information to the public. For banks, investment firms, and financial platforms, this means regulated on-chain assets can be monitored in real time for liquidity and risk without compromising client privacy.
Blockchain as a Hedge Against Systemic Fragility
While blockchain cannot prevent macroeconomic shocks or monetary policy impacts, networks like Dusk introduce structural resilience in several ways:
Deterministic Settlement: Dusk’s Succinct Attestation consensus ensures transactions are final and verifiable, minimizing counterparty risk in payments and settlements.
Programmable Compliance: Regulatory rules can be embedded directly in assets, reducing operational errors that contribute to systemic risk.
Confidential Transparency: Institutions can prove solvency, collateral adequacy, and asset-backed positions to auditors or regulators without revealing proprietary data.
Decentralized Participation: Active provisioners and stakers create distributed trust, preventing single points of failure that exacerbate crises.
This combination reduces systemic exposure while increasing confidence in financial operations—even in volatile environments.
Dusk Network’s Relevance in the Post-SVB Era
Events like SVB’s demise highlight why blockchain adoption is not just a novelty but a necessity for modern financial systems. Dusk Network provides tools that:
Enable regulated, on-chain banking and asset issuance
Offer confidential settlements and tokenized securities
Ensure provable compliance with evolving regulatory frameworks
Improve risk monitoring and auditability for both institutions and regulators
By bridging regulatory compliance with cryptographic trust, Dusk presents a framework where institutional finance can operate more safely, reducing vulnerabilities exposed by traditional banking crises.
Investor Perspective: Why This Matters
For investors, the strange turn of events in the financial sector underscores the fragility of traditional institutions and the opportunity for compliance-first blockchain infrastructure:
Networks like Dusk are positioned to capture institutional adoption as banks and asset managers seek resilient platforms.
Tokenized securities, digital bonds, and RWAs become safer and more auditable when issued on a network with deterministic finality and built-in compliance.
Adoption is not hype-driven but problem-driven, solving concrete issues revealed by recent market shocks.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

We all know that breaking the rules is expensive, but the cost of not breaking the rules - that is of staying compliant - is expensive too, and makes the cost of doing business very high. There are a lot of inefficiencies in our current systems, from the long wait times to settle transactions in traditional finance to the inability of users to custody their own assets, there’s a lot of room for improvement and innovation that will benefit both businesses and users.
Today, we will look at the cost of staying compliant with three general principles - Know-Your-Customer (KYC), Anti-Money Laundering (AML), and Counter Terrorism Funding (CTF). We will dive into the effect these costs have on businesses, users, and innovation, and finally how Dusk Network and our bespoke KYC/AML tool Citadel can offer an easier and cheaper solution.
KYC and AML are both important requirements to prevent financial crime, including everything from identity theft and using someone else’s credentials to access services to large-scale money laundering or funding terrorism. While they are necessary requirements, the system for managing these processes are inefficient, expensive, and cumbersome.
The cost of compliance
Being compliant isn’t cheap. More and more requirements are being placed on both businesses and users to verify identities and sources of income. While for users there are concerns when it comes to uploading so much personal data - having to verify, manage, secure, and protect this data is difficult for businesses too.
This doesn’t even begin to take into account the fines, reputational hit, and potential legal action for failing to satisfy the requirements.
It is estimated that the cost for verifying a single KYC profile ranges from $13 to $130, with the cost of AML expected to rise to £30 billion ($37 billion) in the UK alone across financial institutions in 2023.
It’s not only just gathering and checking the data - organizations then spend a fortune managing and protecting that data once they’ve verified it - which is estimated to be around $88 million dollars a year just for large banks, not to mention smaller banks, streaming services, e-commerce, etc.
Another downside to this, as PwC points out in this article and Dusk Network founder Emanuele Francioni spoke about here while sharing his vision for the future of finance, is that organizations are duplicating this work. If you KYC with Bank A and Bank B, both of those banks are running exactly the same checks, verifications, man-hours, etc on you resulting in the work essentially being done twice.
This is costly and inefficient, costing big institutions a lot of money and making it near impossible for smaller ones to compete. This results in an expensive and clunky system where only the big boys with deep pockets can play, and smaller, potentially more innovative companies can’t compete.
The cost of non-compliance
While institutions are spending billions to stay on the right side of the law, fines for non-compliance also amount to billions of dollars, totaling around $5 billion dollars in 2022. While for some institutions this may be written off as “the cost of doing business”, smaller institutions are again less likely to be able to pay these fines should they end up breaking the law, causing providers of everything from banking to streaming services to become very centralized. Not to mention the reputational hit that institutions suffer and the impact this has on their bottom line.
In addition, this causes smaller organizations to become hyper-risk-averse, refusing to take on anything other than pure ‘white bread’ customers. While no one is denying that avoiding risks is a good thing, these institutions are turning away perfectly good customers whom they simply foresee having minor difficulties, or who have red flags which can include having multiple bank accounts in different countries (some of us like to travel and/or have international backgrounds!). When it comes to KYC/AML institutions understandably err on the side of caution, but this can mean rejecting perfectly good applications.
We can see how expensive it is to stay compliant with these laws and regulations, and that not staying compliant is hardly cheap either.
The cost of opportunity
There are several costs that are hard to quantify, but definitely significant. Firstly, is the lost opportunities encountered by organizations if a potential customer or client decides they don’t want to spend their time doing the KYC/AML process. Secondly, is the cost of the lost resources that could be spent on other things if they were not being spent on requesting, verifying, and storing this data. Thirdly, the cost to the economy of all those companies and financial opportunities that never even got off the ground because they looked at the compliance costs and decided not to bother.
We are all losing out here. Users run the risk of getting their data stolen and have to go through lengthy procedures to be granted access to services. Institutions could spend their resources on more interesting things, and small, innovative companies can’t even get a look in.
All in all, the current system is clunky, expensive, and inefficient, and leads to hacks, exploits, a high barrier of entry, and constricts innovation.
What if we could do better..?
The Citadel solution
Citadel is Dusk Network’s one-and-done KYC/AML solution that relieves companies of the burden of having to verify, protect, and manage so much data, and reduces the risks of hacks and data leaks by using zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to radically rethink the way we store and verify data and identity.
Zero-knowledge proofs prove that a statement is true without revealing the content of the statement. For example, in this context, say you’re applying for a bank account and have over $10,000 in savings to qualify.
Using traditional methods you would need to provide statements showing you have over $10,000, and the bank would know that you have, for example, $12,500 in savings. Using ZKPs, rather than having to share all your data and give away potentially personal details, a cryptographic proof is generated to confirm that you meet the requirements. That’s all they know - that you satisfy the requirement of having a minimum of $10,000 in savings. They don’t know what you have, just that you qualify.
The solution of proving that instead of what totally changes the way we approach data and do business.
Dusk Network is developing Citadel to essentially be an identity layer that companies can tap into. Users just KYC once, and institutions are able to access this layer to verify if someone meets their criteria but never have to actually manage that data themselves.
Casting your mind back to the big, hefty numbers we were looking at earlier, imagine how different it would be if Citadel was widely adopted. All those billions of dollars going to research and development, to improving employees’ conditions, or lowering costs for customers, not to mention how many more companies could have a seat at the table.
There is practically nothing to hack as the data is encrypted with ZKPs, there’s no need to replicate the work that’s going on, and users are able to practice selective disclosure as to what information they share.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK