Bitcoin isn’t going to zero, it’s rocketing to $1 million and beyond
When this bull run kicked off, I was convinced $BTC would top out around $200K. Then the market shifted, politics got messier, and I trimmed my target to $150K. Turns out I was dead wrong and yeah, you can blame the noise, the skeptics, and half the “crypto experts” online. Because like clockwork, every few months the same crowd shows up to announce Bitcoin is “dead” again. A dip happens, regulators start talking, some geopolitical headline hits, and suddenly it’s doomsday. They’ve been calling it for 16 years. And they’ve missed the point every single time. If you’ve been around long enough, you already know Bitcoin isn’t dying. It’s leveling up. It’s quietly turning into the base layer of a new financial system, with a clear path to $500K+ over the next decade. And honestly, the bigger picture is even more bullish than that. Bitcoin isn’t going to zero. It’s laying the groundwork to go way higher, with $1M per coin not just possible, but increasingly realistic. The Institutional Wall of Money The biggest difference between now and the 2017 “Wild West” isn’t the chart, it’s the buyer. This isn’t just retail traders tapping buy on their phones anymore. It’s the biggest financial institutions on the planet stepping in with size. BlackRock, Fidelity, and even legacy giants like JPMorgan aren’t simply observing from the sidelines now, they’re actively getting involved. Spot Bitcoin ETFs reportedly pulled in around $22B in net inflows in 2025 even with late year weakness, and BlackRock’s IBIT alone was said to be $25B+ and turning into one of their meaningful revenue engines. Institutions are estimated to hold roughly a quarter of Bitcoin ETPs, and surveys suggest about 85% of firms either already have exposure or plan to soon. On top of that, you’ve got U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve conversations floating around and pension funds like Wisconsin and Michigan expanding their positions. This is the key shift. Bitcoin isn’t being treated like a side bet anymore, it’s being wired into the plumbing of the global financial system. When the world’s largest asset managers start treating Bitcoin like a core portfolio pillar, the “it’s going to zero” argument basically stops being serious. Michael Saylor put it in his usual loud way: “My forecast is $13 million a coin by the year 2045, and what I tell everybody is every bitcoin you don’t buy today is going to cost you $13 million in the future.” The Skeptics Are Wrong Again While governments keep printing fiat at a pace that feels nonstop, Bitcoin stays locked to pure math, 21 million coins, no exceptions. It’s one of the few assets on earth where demand can surge but supply simply can’t respond. Cathie Wood at ARK has been hammering this scarcity point for years, even as the market structure evolves and stablecoins play a bigger role. Wood put it like this: “Our bull case for Bitcoin is $1.5 million by 2030… Bitcoin is still strengthening its role as a global store of value.” Prepare for the Noise Does that mean we go straight up from here? Not even close. The road to $1M is going to be messy, full of 20%, 30%, even 50% drops. And every single time it happens, headlines will scream “crash” like it’s the end of crypto. Critics will jump on every dip with the usual “told you so.” But volatility is the fee you pay for the upside. Institutions aren’t glued to the 24 hour chart. They’re thinking in 5 to 10 year cycles. So expect deep drawdowns that get sensationalized. That’s normal. What matters is the long game, adoption, liquidity, and the fundamentals improving in the background. Tune out the FUD, stay focused on the base case. Best time to accumulate was yesterday. Next best time is today. What’s your take on all these crypto price predictions?
In crypto, it’s normal to see “useless” things reach insane valuations. Dogecoin in the tens of billions. Monkey NFTs selling for millions. On the surface, no clear utility. So what are we really valuing? A memecoins like $DOGE , $PEPE , $pippin are just a token on a blockchain. Self custody, transparency, censorship resistance. Technically, it shares the same base properties as Bitcoin. Early on, even Bitcoin had “better” versions like Litecoin claiming to be faster and cheaper. History decided otherwise. So why are memecoins called useless? Because most crypto tokens promise utility inside a protocol. Memecoins usually do not. They lack the extra layer of functional purpose. But utility is only one way value forms. Value is simply what people are willing to pay. Businesses are valued on future cash flow. Art is valued on emotion, culture, and status. A sports jersey has little practical use, yet fans gladly pay to signal belonging. The purchase itself becomes a statement. Memecoins work in a similar way. They materialize shared culture. A meme that captures a global mood holds attention. Buying the token becomes a way to participate, to belong, even to sacrifice for the tribe. At the same time, memecoins are pure speculation. They function like a global casino. You bet on attention and momentum. You win or lose. Exchanges benefit from volume, and memecoins generate endless volume because they are not anchored to earnings or fundamentals. That is why they will not disappear Some explode because they are profitable for insiders. Others because the meme genuinely resonates. Most die. My takeaway is simple. A strong meme lowers the barrier to community growth. It does not guarantee success, but it makes coordination easier. If you play this game, look for tight communities around powerful cultural symbols. In smaller ecosystems, moves are clearer and risks are easier to read. Memecoins are psychology, culture, and gambling wrapped into one token. Understand that, and you understand the game.
$SNDKUSDT is still trading under pressure after losing the short-term MA area. Price is around 1,178.61, down about 4.63%, with the daily range between 1,150.79 and 1,266.99.
Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 1,190 to 1,245 Stop: above 1,275 TP1: 1,150 TP2: 1,100 TP3: 1,030 to 980 if selling pressure continues
The key rejection area for me is 1,245 to 1,275. If SNDK bounces there and fails, sellers still look in control. If it reclaims 1,275 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a stronger relief bounce.
$1000RATS is the type of chart where I’d be very careful chasing either side. Price is around 0.06157, up more than 25% in 24h, but it already wicked hard from the 0.07760 high.
Bias: Short on rejection Entry zone: 0.06650 to 0.07200 Stop: above 0.07850 TP1: 0.05650 TP2: 0.05000 TP3: 0.04450 to 0.04000 if the pump starts unwinding
The key area for me is 0.07200 to 0.07850. If 1000RATS pushes back into that zone and fails, the short setup looks cleaner because late buyers may start taking profit. If it breaks and holds above 0.07850 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into another squeeze.
This is the kind of chart where the short idea is less about guessing the top and more about waiting for the pump to cool off. $BLESS is around 0.01970, up more than 70% in 24h, but it already rejected from the 0.02250 high and is now showing profit-taking near the upper range.
Bias: Short on rejection Entry zone: 0.02050 to 0.02230 Stop: above 0.02350 TP1: 0.01830 TP2: 0.01650 TP3: 0.01400 to 0.01200 if the pump starts unwinding
The key area for me is 0.02230 to 0.02350. If BLESS bounces back into that zone and fails, the short setup looks cleaner because late buyers may start taking profit. If it breaks and holds above 0.02350 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into another squeeze.
$FOGO is sitting at 0.00828, down about 2.70%, and price is already right near the 24h low. The bigger trend still looks weak because it is trading far below MA25 around 0.00889 and MA99 around 0.01304, but I would not short directly at the bottom.
Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 0.00845 to 0.00885 Stop: above 0.00920 TP1: 0.00810 TP2: 0.00785 TP3: 0.00750 to 0.00720 if selling pressure continues
The key rejection area for me is 0.00885 to 0.00920. If FOGO bounces into that zone and fails, sellers still look in control. If it reclaims 0.00920 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a relief bounce instead of another leg down.
$RAVE is pushing near the top of its 24h range around 0.2934, with the daily high sitting at 0.2956. The bounce has strength in the short term, but the bigger chart still looks capped because price is far below the MA99 near 0.4162.
Bias: Short on rejection Entry zone: 0.2940 to 0.3000 Stop: above 0.3060 TP1: 0.2860 TP2: 0.2780 TP3: 0.2650 to 0.2550 if selling pressure returns
The key area for me is 0.3000 to 0.3060. If RAVE pushes into that zone and rejects, the short setup looks cleaner. If it breaks and holds above 0.3060 with volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a stronger relief move.
$LAB still looks more like a weak retest than a real recovery. Price is around 0.1374, sitting below MA7 near 0.1430, while MA25 is much higher around 0.2224. That tells me the bigger structure is still heavy, so the cleaner idea is waiting for a bounce into resistance instead of shorting the lower area directly.
Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 0.1400 to 0.1430 Stop: above 0.1480 TP1: 0.1345 TP2: 0.1280 TP3: 0.1200 to 0.1125 if selling pressure returns
The key area for me is 0.1430 to 0.1480. If LAB bounces there and rejects, sellers still have control. If it reclaims 0.1480 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a stronger relief move.
$US is still in a strong trend, but the short setup gets interesting after the rejection from the 0.0623 spike area. Price is around 0.05619, down about 3.16%, and now trading below the 24h high near 0.05905.
Bias: Short on rejection Entry zone: 0.05750 to 0.05900 Stop: above 0.06250 TP1: 0.05400 TP2: 0.05050 TP3: 0.04580 to 0.04300 if selling pressure increases
The key area for me is 0.05900 to 0.06250. If US bounces into that zone and fails again, the short setup looks cleaner because buyers may start taking profit after the big move. If it breaks and holds above 0.06250 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into another squeeze.
$BANK is still trading heavy after that sharp post-spike selloff. Price is around 0.0438, down about 11.69% in 24h, and sitting very close to the daily low near 0.0434. Since it is already at the lower side, I would not short directly here.
Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 0.0455 to 0.0485 Stop: above 0.0510 TP1: 0.0434 TP2: 0.0410 TP3: 0.0380 to 0.0350 if selling pressure continues
The key area for me is 0.0485 to 0.0510. If BANK bounces there and rejects, sellers still look in control. If it reclaims 0.0510 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a relief bounce.
$TLM is trying to hold around 0.001648, but the short setup only gets interesting if it fails near the resistance zone. Price is still below the MA25 around 0.001715, and the 24h high sits near 0.001747, so I would not short the low directly. I’d wait for a bounce and rejection first.
Bias: Short on rejection Entry zone: 0.001665 to 0.001715 Stop: above 0.001755 TP1: 0.001600 TP2: 0.001574 TP3: 0.001500 to 0.001450 if sellers take control
The key area for me is 0.001715 to 0.001755. If TLM pushes into that zone and rejects, the short setup looks cleaner. If it reclaims 0.001755 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into another squeeze toward the upper range.
$VANRY is sitting near the lower side of its 24h range, around 0.003713, after dropping almost 4%. This is not a strong trend reversal yet because price is still below MA7 near 0.004013, but the long setup can work if buyers defend the 0.00368 to 0.00370 support zone.
Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 0.00368 to 0.00373 Stop: below 0.00358 TP1: 0.00389 TP2: 0.00401 to 0.00405 TP3: 0.00425 to 0.00440 if volume returns
The key area for me is 0.00368. If VANRY holds above that level and starts reclaiming 0.00389, buyers can attempt a recovery toward the MA7 zone. If it breaks below 0.00358 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the downtrend is still in control.
$SOL is trying to defend the lower side of its 24h range, with price around 72.97 after bouncing from 72.58. The chart is not fully bullish yet because SOL is still below MA7 at 73.34, MA25 at 75.47, and MA99 at 78.21, so I’d treat this as a support bounce long, not a strong breakout trade.
Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 72.60 to 73.10 Stop: below 72.20 TP1: 74.30 TP2: 75.40 to 75.50 TP3: 78.00 to 78.20 if buyers reclaim the bigger MA zone
The key area for me is 72.50 to 72.60. If SOL keeps holding above that zone and breaks back over 73.34, buyers can push for the 24h high near 74.33 first. If it loses 72.20 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the support bounce is failing.
$DEXE is still trading like a weak retest setup, not a clean breakdown chase. Price is around 2.292, down 1.67% in 24h, and sitting close to the daily low near 2.273, so I would not short directly at this level.
Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 2.36 to 2.50 Stop: above 2.56 TP1: 2.27 TP2: 2.15 TP3: 2.00 to 1.90 if selling pressure continues
The key rejection zone for me is 2.50 to 2.56. If DEXE bounces there and fails, sellers still have control. If it reclaims 2.56 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a relief bounce.
$RE is still looking heavy after losing momentum from the spike zone. Price is around 0.4099, down 7.30% in 24h, and sitting very close to the daily low near 0.4077.
Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 0.4250 to 0.4480 Stop: above 0.4620 TP1: 0.4077 TP2: 0.3900 TP3: 0.3650 to 0.3500 if selling pressure continues
The key area for me is 0.4480 to 0.4620. If RE bounces into that zone and fails, sellers still have control. If it reclaims 0.4620 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a relief bounce toward the MA25 area near 0.4847.
$TAIKO looks weak after that big spike failed and price is now back near 0.07091, down about 3.36% in 24h. Since it is already close to the daily low at 0.07039.
Bias: Short on rejection Entry zone: 0.07200 to 0.07340 Stop: above 0.07550 TP1: 0.07040 TP2: 0.06850 TP3: 0.06600 to 0.06400 if selling pressure continues
The key area for me is 0.07340 to 0.07550. If TAIKO bounces there and rejects, sellers still have control. If it reclaims 0.07550 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a relief bounce toward the MA25 area near 0.07720.
BNB finally has a cleaner long setup after reclaiming the short-term MA zone. Price is near 587.75, up about 2.19%, with today’s range between 574.03 and 588.79. The move is strong, but since it is already close to the daily high, I’d rather wait for a pullback than chase the candle.
Bias: Long on pullback Entry zone: 579 to 585 Stop: below 572 TP1: 589 to 590 TP2: 600 TP3: 606 to 615 if momentum continues
The main support area for me is 574 to 579. If BNB pulls back and holds above that zone, buyers still look in control and the long setup stays valid. The bigger confirmation comes if price breaks above 590 and starts moving toward the MA99 area near 606.74. If it loses 572 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the breakout attempt is failing.
Would you enter on the pullback, or wait for a clean break above 590 first?
$COLLECT is around 0.05593, up about 4.23% and pushing into a higher resistance area after a strong recovery from the lower range. The chart still has momentum, but price is getting close to the previous rejection zone, so I would not chase long here.
Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 0.05650 to 0.05880 Stop: above 0.06150 TP1: 0.05250 TP2: 0.04900 TP3: 0.04500 if selling pressure returns
The key area for me is 0.05880 to 0.06150. If COLLECT pushes into that zone and rejects, the short setup can work because late buyers may start taking profit. If it breaks and holds above 0.06150 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into another upside squeeze.
$BANK is around 0.0486, down about 10.66% in 24h, with the daily range between 0.0456 and 0.0552. The chart is still weak after that sharp selloff, so I would not treat this as a strong trend reversal yet.
Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 0.0465 to 0.0486 Stop: below 0.0450 TP1: 0.0520 TP2: 0.0552 TP3: 0.0600 to 0.0648 if volume comes back
The key area for me is 0.0456 to 0.0465. If BANK holds above that zone and starts reclaiming 0.0505 with stronger volume, buyers can try to push it back toward the 24h high. If it loses 0.0450, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the bounce is failing.
$SOXL is around 124.16, up about 10% in 24h after bouncing hard from the 85.94 low area. The move looks strong because price has reclaimed the MA7 near 114.89, but it is still below the bigger MA25 resistance around 146.91, so I would not chase directly at the 24h high.
Bias: Long on pullback Entry zone: 116.50 to 121.50 Stop: below 111.00 TP1: 128.00 TP2: 138.00 TP3: 146.00 to 150.00 if momentum keeps building
The key area for me is 114.80 to 111.00. If SOXL pulls back and holds above that zone, buyers still have control and the long setup stays valid. If it loses 111.00 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the bounce is weakening. Since SOXL is already near the 24h high, the cleaner trade is waiting for a pullback instead of buying the top of the candle.