Binance Square
Yeakub Durjoy
286 Posts

Yeakub Durjoy

Community Moderator and Builder | Crypto Analyst | Web3 Enthusiasts
Occasional Trader
4.6 Years
23 Following
1.0K+ Followers
1.5K+ Liked
Posts
PINNED
·
--
Article
Bitcoin isn’t going to zero, it’s rocketing to $1 million and beyondWhen this bull run kicked off, I was convinced $BTC would top out around $200K. Then the market shifted, politics got messier, and I trimmed my target to $150K. Turns out I was dead wrong and yeah, you can blame the noise, the skeptics, and half the “crypto experts” online. Because like clockwork, every few months the same crowd shows up to announce Bitcoin is “dead” again. A dip happens, regulators start talking, some geopolitical headline hits, and suddenly it’s doomsday. They’ve been calling it for 16 years. And they’ve missed the point every single time. If you’ve been around long enough, you already know Bitcoin isn’t dying. It’s leveling up. It’s quietly turning into the base layer of a new financial system, with a clear path to $500K+ over the next decade. And honestly, the bigger picture is even more bullish than that. Bitcoin isn’t going to zero. It’s laying the groundwork to go way higher, with $1M per coin not just possible, but increasingly realistic. The Institutional Wall of Money The biggest difference between now and the 2017 “Wild West” isn’t the chart, it’s the buyer. This isn’t just retail traders tapping buy on their phones anymore. It’s the biggest financial institutions on the planet stepping in with size. BlackRock, Fidelity, and even legacy giants like JPMorgan aren’t simply observing from the sidelines now, they’re actively getting involved. Spot Bitcoin ETFs reportedly pulled in around $22B in net inflows in 2025 even with late year weakness, and BlackRock’s IBIT alone was said to be $25B+ and turning into one of their meaningful revenue engines. Institutions are estimated to hold roughly a quarter of Bitcoin ETPs, and surveys suggest about 85% of firms either already have exposure or plan to soon. On top of that, you’ve got U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve conversations floating around and pension funds like Wisconsin and Michigan expanding their positions. This is the key shift. Bitcoin isn’t being treated like a side bet anymore, it’s being wired into the plumbing of the global financial system. When the world’s largest asset managers start treating Bitcoin like a core portfolio pillar, the “it’s going to zero” argument basically stops being serious. Michael Saylor put it in his usual loud way: “My forecast is $13 million a coin by the year 2045, and what I tell everybody is every bitcoin you don’t buy today is going to cost you $13 million in the future.” The Skeptics Are Wrong Again While governments keep printing fiat at a pace that feels nonstop, Bitcoin stays locked to pure math, 21 million coins, no exceptions. It’s one of the few assets on earth where demand can surge but supply simply can’t respond. Cathie Wood at ARK has been hammering this scarcity point for years, even as the market structure evolves and stablecoins play a bigger role. Wood put it like this: “Our bull case for Bitcoin is $1.5 million by 2030… Bitcoin is still strengthening its role as a global store of value.” Prepare for the Noise Does that mean we go straight up from here? Not even close. The road to $1M is going to be messy, full of 20%, 30%, even 50% drops. And every single time it happens, headlines will scream “crash” like it’s the end of crypto. Critics will jump on every dip with the usual “told you so.” But volatility is the fee you pay for the upside. Institutions aren’t glued to the 24 hour chart. They’re thinking in 5 to 10 year cycles. So expect deep drawdowns that get sensationalized. That’s normal. What matters is the long game, adoption, liquidity, and the fundamentals improving in the background. Tune out the FUD, stay focused on the base case. Best time to accumulate was yesterday. Next best time is today. What’s your take on all these crypto price predictions?

Bitcoin isn’t going to zero, it’s rocketing to $1 million and beyond

When this bull run kicked off, I was convinced $BTC would top out around $200K. Then the market shifted, politics got messier, and I trimmed my target to $150K.
Turns out I was dead wrong and yeah, you can blame the noise, the skeptics, and half the “crypto experts” online.
Because like clockwork, every few months the same crowd shows up to announce Bitcoin is “dead” again. A dip happens, regulators start talking, some geopolitical headline hits, and suddenly it’s doomsday.
They’ve been calling it for 16 years. And they’ve missed the point every single time.
If you’ve been around long enough, you already know Bitcoin isn’t dying. It’s leveling up. It’s quietly turning into the base layer of a new financial system, with a clear path to $500K+ over the next decade.
And honestly, the bigger picture is even more bullish than that.
Bitcoin isn’t going to zero. It’s laying the groundwork to go way higher, with $1M per coin not just possible, but increasingly realistic.
The Institutional Wall of Money
The biggest difference between now and the 2017 “Wild West” isn’t the chart, it’s the buyer.
This isn’t just retail traders tapping buy on their phones anymore. It’s the biggest financial institutions on the planet stepping in with size.
BlackRock, Fidelity, and even legacy giants like JPMorgan aren’t simply observing from the sidelines now, they’re actively getting involved.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs reportedly pulled in around $22B in net inflows in 2025 even with late year weakness, and BlackRock’s IBIT alone was said to be $25B+ and turning into one of their meaningful revenue engines.
Institutions are estimated to hold roughly a quarter of Bitcoin ETPs, and surveys suggest about 85% of firms either already have exposure or plan to soon. On top of that, you’ve got U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve conversations floating around and pension funds like Wisconsin and Michigan expanding their positions.
This is the key shift. Bitcoin isn’t being treated like a side bet anymore, it’s being wired into the plumbing of the global financial system. When the world’s largest asset managers start treating Bitcoin like a core portfolio pillar, the “it’s going to zero” argument basically stops being serious.
Michael Saylor put it in his usual loud way:
“My forecast is $13 million a coin by the year 2045, and what I tell everybody is every bitcoin you don’t buy today is going to cost you $13 million in the future.”
The Skeptics Are Wrong Again
While governments keep printing fiat at a pace that feels nonstop, Bitcoin stays locked to pure math, 21 million coins, no exceptions. It’s one of the few assets on earth where demand can surge but supply simply can’t respond.
Cathie Wood at ARK has been hammering this scarcity point for years, even as the market structure evolves and stablecoins play a bigger role.
Wood put it like this:
“Our bull case for Bitcoin is $1.5 million by 2030… Bitcoin is still strengthening its role as a global store of value.”
Prepare for the Noise
Does that mean we go straight up from here?
Not even close.
The road to $1M is going to be messy, full of 20%, 30%, even 50% drops. And every single time it happens, headlines will scream “crash” like it’s the end of crypto.
Critics will jump on every dip with the usual “told you so.”
But volatility is the fee you pay for the upside. Institutions aren’t glued to the 24 hour chart. They’re thinking in 5 to 10 year cycles.
So expect deep drawdowns that get sensationalized. That’s normal. What matters is the long game, adoption, liquidity, and the fundamentals improving in the background.
Tune out the FUD, stay focused on the base case.
Best time to accumulate was yesterday. Next best time is today.
What’s your take on all these crypto price predictions?
PINNED
Article
Understanding the Memecoin Economy: How I See ItIn crypto, it’s normal to see “useless” things reach insane valuations. Dogecoin in the tens of billions. Monkey NFTs selling for millions. On the surface, no clear utility. So what are we really valuing? A memecoins like $DOGE , $PEPE , $pippin are just a token on a blockchain. Self custody, transparency, censorship resistance. Technically, it shares the same base properties as Bitcoin. Early on, even Bitcoin had “better” versions like Litecoin claiming to be faster and cheaper. History decided otherwise. So why are memecoins called useless? Because most crypto tokens promise utility inside a protocol. Memecoins usually do not. They lack the extra layer of functional purpose. But utility is only one way value forms. Value is simply what people are willing to pay. Businesses are valued on future cash flow. Art is valued on emotion, culture, and status. A sports jersey has little practical use, yet fans gladly pay to signal belonging. The purchase itself becomes a statement. Memecoins work in a similar way. They materialize shared culture. A meme that captures a global mood holds attention. Buying the token becomes a way to participate, to belong, even to sacrifice for the tribe. At the same time, memecoins are pure speculation. They function like a global casino. You bet on attention and momentum. You win or lose. Exchanges benefit from volume, and memecoins generate endless volume because they are not anchored to earnings or fundamentals. That is why they will not disappear Some explode because they are profitable for insiders. Others because the meme genuinely resonates. Most die. My takeaway is simple. A strong meme lowers the barrier to community growth. It does not guarantee success, but it makes coordination easier. If you play this game, look for tight communities around powerful cultural symbols. In smaller ecosystems, moves are clearer and risks are easier to read. Memecoins are psychology, culture, and gambling wrapped into one token. Understand that, and you understand the game.

Understanding the Memecoin Economy: How I See It

In crypto, it’s normal to see “useless” things reach insane valuations. Dogecoin in the tens of billions. Monkey NFTs selling for millions. On the surface, no clear utility. So what are we really valuing?
A memecoins like $DOGE , $PEPE , $pippin are just a token on a blockchain. Self custody, transparency, censorship resistance. Technically, it shares the same base properties as Bitcoin. Early on, even Bitcoin had “better” versions like Litecoin claiming to be faster and cheaper. History decided otherwise.
So why are memecoins called useless?
Because most crypto tokens promise utility inside a protocol. Memecoins usually do not. They lack the extra layer of functional purpose. But utility is only one way value forms.
Value is simply what people are willing to pay. Businesses are valued on future cash flow. Art is valued on emotion, culture, and status. A sports jersey has little practical use, yet fans gladly pay to signal belonging. The purchase itself becomes a statement.
Memecoins work in a similar way. They materialize shared culture. A meme that captures a global mood holds attention. Buying the token becomes a way to participate, to belong, even to sacrifice for the tribe.
At the same time, memecoins are pure speculation. They function like a global casino. You bet on attention and momentum. You win or lose. Exchanges benefit from volume, and memecoins generate endless volume because they are not anchored to earnings or fundamentals.
That is why they will not disappear
Some explode because they are profitable for insiders. Others because the meme genuinely resonates. Most die.
My takeaway is simple. A strong meme lowers the barrier to community growth. It does not guarantee success, but it makes coordination easier. If you play this game, look for tight communities around powerful cultural symbols. In smaller ecosystems, moves are clearer and risks are easier to read.
Memecoins are psychology, culture, and gambling wrapped into one token. Understand that, and you understand the game.
The pullback on $US is what makes this setup interesting for me. Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 0.05240 to 0.05430 Stop: below 0.05150 TP1: 0.05750 TP2: 0.06000 TP3: 0.06230 to 0.06500 if momentum comes back The key area for me is 0.05240 to 0.05150. If $US holds above that zone and starts reclaiming 0.05550 to 0.05750, buyers can push it back toward the recent high. If it loses 0.05150 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long setup because that would show the pullback is turning weaker instead of forming continuation. {future}(USUSDT)
The pullback on $US is what makes this setup interesting for me.

Bias: Long on support hold
Entry zone: 0.05240 to 0.05430
Stop: below 0.05150
TP1: 0.05750
TP2: 0.06000
TP3: 0.06230 to 0.06500 if momentum comes back

The key area for me is 0.05240 to 0.05150. If $US holds above that zone and starts reclaiming 0.05550 to 0.05750, buyers can push it back toward the recent high. If it loses 0.05150 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long setup because that would show the pullback is turning weaker instead of forming continuation.
$LAB is finally showing a cleaner recovery attempt after spending weeks flat near the bottom. Bias: Long on pullback Entry zone: 0.1480 to 0.1520 Stop: below 0.1430 TP1: 0.1537 to 0.1550 TP2: 0.1650 TP3: 0.1760 to 0.1850 if volume keeps building The main area for me is 0.1439 to 0.1460. If LAB pulls back and holds above that zone, the long setup stays valid because buyers are defending the breakout from the base. A clean break above 0.1550 would make the move stronger. If it loses 0.1430, I’d cancel the long idea because that would put price back under the short-term support. {future}(LABUSDT)
$LAB is finally showing a cleaner recovery attempt after spending weeks flat near the bottom.

Bias: Long on pullback
Entry zone: 0.1480 to 0.1520
Stop: below 0.1430
TP1: 0.1537 to 0.1550
TP2: 0.1650
TP3: 0.1760 to 0.1850 if volume keeps building

The main area for me is 0.1439 to 0.1460. If LAB pulls back and holds above that zone, the long setup stays valid because buyers are defending the breakout from the base. A clean break above 0.1550 would make the move stronger. If it loses 0.1430, I’d cancel the long idea because that would put price back under the short-term support.
$SKHYNIX is giving an early recovery setup after bouncing from the 884 low, but I’d keep the risk tight because price is still sitting below the MA25 area near 1,195. Bias: Long on pullback Entry zone: 1,145 to 1,165 Stop: below 1,124 TP1: 1,195 to 1,197 TP2: 1,240 to 1,270 TP3: 1,330 to 1,360 if buyers reclaim momentum The main area for me is 1,126 to 1,145. If SKHYNIX holds above that zone and breaks back over 1,197 with volume, the recovery can extend higher. If it loses 1,124, I’d cancel the long setup quickly because that would show the bounce is failing and risk is no longer worth holding. {future}(SKHYNIXUSDT)
$SKHYNIX is giving an early recovery setup after bouncing from the 884 low, but I’d keep the risk tight because price is still sitting below the MA25 area near 1,195.

Bias: Long on pullback
Entry zone: 1,145 to 1,165
Stop: below 1,124
TP1: 1,195 to 1,197
TP2: 1,240 to 1,270
TP3: 1,330 to 1,360 if buyers reclaim momentum

The main area for me is 1,126 to 1,145. If SKHYNIX holds above that zone and breaks back over 1,197 with volume, the recovery can extend higher. If it loses 1,124, I’d cancel the long setup quickly because that would show the bounce is failing and risk is no longer worth holding.
$TLM is still sitting in that quiet compression zone after the big July spike cooled off, and this is where I’d only look for a long if support keeps holding. Price is around 0.001601, up about 2.89%, with the 24h range between 0.001548 and 0.001654. It is holding close to the MA99 near 0.001584, but still below MA7 0.001620 and MA25 0.001692, so this is an early bounce setup, not a confirmed breakout yet. Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 0.001580 to 0.001605 Stop: below 0.001540 TP1: 0.001650 to 0.001654 TP2: 0.001690 to 0.001720 TP3: 0.001850 to 0.001950 if volume returns The main area I’d watch is 0.001584 to 0.001548. If TLM keeps defending that zone and reclaims 0.001620, buyers can try to push it back toward the 24h high first. A stronger confirmation comes above 0.001692, because that would put price back over the MA25 resistance. If it loses 0.001540, I’d cancel the long idea because the support hold would no longer look clean. {future}(TLMUSDT)
$TLM is still sitting in that quiet compression zone after the big July spike cooled off, and this is where I’d only look for a long if support keeps holding. Price is around 0.001601, up about 2.89%, with the 24h range between 0.001548 and 0.001654. It is holding close to the MA99 near 0.001584, but still below MA7 0.001620 and MA25 0.001692, so this is an early bounce setup, not a confirmed breakout yet.

Bias: Long on support hold
Entry zone: 0.001580 to 0.001605
Stop: below 0.001540
TP1: 0.001650 to 0.001654
TP2: 0.001690 to 0.001720
TP3: 0.001850 to 0.001950 if volume returns

The main area I’d watch is 0.001584 to 0.001548. If TLM keeps defending that zone and reclaims 0.001620, buyers can try to push it back toward the 24h high first. A stronger confirmation comes above 0.001692, because that would put price back over the MA25 resistance. If it loses 0.001540, I’d cancel the long idea because the support hold would no longer look clean.
$MU is showing a cleaner long structure now after reclaiming the MA25 near 891 and MA99 near 901. Price is around 921.84, up about 5.05%, and it already pushed close to the 24h high at 926.41, so I would not chase the top of the move. Bias: Long on pullback Entry zone: 902 to 916 Stop: below 884 TP1: 926 to 930 TP2: 960 to 980 TP3: 1,020 to 1,050 if volume keeps supporting the move The main area I’d watch is 901 to 891. If MU pulls back and holds above that zone, buyers still look in control and the breakout structure stays valid. If it loses 884 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would put price back under the key moving average area. A clean break above 926.41 can confirm continuation toward the next upside levels. {future}(MUUSDT)
$MU is showing a cleaner long structure now after reclaiming the MA25 near 891 and MA99 near 901. Price is around 921.84, up about 5.05%, and it already pushed close to the 24h high at 926.41, so I would not chase the top of the move.

Bias: Long on pullback
Entry zone: 902 to 916
Stop: below 884
TP1: 926 to 930
TP2: 960 to 980
TP3: 1,020 to 1,050 if volume keeps supporting the move

The main area I’d watch is 901 to 891. If MU pulls back and holds above that zone, buyers still look in control and the breakout structure stays valid. If it loses 884 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would put price back under the key moving average area. A clean break above 926.41 can confirm continuation toward the next upside levels.
$SKHY is trying to turn the 147 to 150 area into a base after that sharp drop, and the current price near 154.43 is sitting right under the MA25 around 155.31. That makes the long setup interesting, but I would not chase aggressively until buyers either defend support or reclaim the 156.70 high area with volume. Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 151.50 to 154.30 Stop: below 147.00 TP1: 156.70 TP2: 160.00 to 163.00 TP3: 168.00 to 172.00 if momentum keeps building The main zone for me is 149.80 to 147.00. If SKHY pulls back and holds above that area, the long setup stays valid because buyers are still defending the short-term trend. A clean break above 156.70 would make the setup stronger and could open the way toward 160+. If it loses 147.00 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would mean the recovery is failing. {future}(SKHYUSDT)
$SKHY is trying to turn the 147 to 150 area into a base after that sharp drop, and the current price near 154.43 is sitting right under the MA25 around 155.31. That makes the long setup interesting, but I would not chase aggressively until buyers either defend support or reclaim the 156.70 high area with volume.

Bias: Long on support hold
Entry zone: 151.50 to 154.30
Stop: below 147.00
TP1: 156.70
TP2: 160.00 to 163.00
TP3: 168.00 to 172.00 if momentum keeps building

The main zone for me is 149.80 to 147.00. If SKHY pulls back and holds above that area, the long setup stays valid because buyers are still defending the short-term trend. A clean break above 156.70 would make the setup stronger and could open the way toward 160+. If it loses 147.00 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would mean the recovery is failing.
$RAVE is still trading under pressure, and the short idea looks cleaner only if price fails around the moving average zone. Current price is near 0.2824, with 24h high at 0.2903 and low at 0.2784. Since it is already close to the lower side, I would not short the bottom. I’d wait for a bounce first. Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 0.2835 to 0.2860 Stop: above 0.2910 TP1: 0.2785 TP2: 0.2740 TP3: 0.2650 to 0.2600 if sellers keep control The rejection area for me is 0.2855 to 0.2910. If RAVE bounces into that zone and fails, the short setup looks better because MA7 and MA25 are still acting as resistance. If it breaks above 0.2910 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that would show buyers are trying to reclaim momentum. {future}(RAVEUSDT)
$RAVE is still trading under pressure, and the short idea looks cleaner only if price fails around the moving average zone. Current price is near 0.2824, with 24h high at 0.2903 and low at 0.2784. Since it is already close to the lower side, I would not short the bottom. I’d wait for a bounce first.

Bias: Short on bounce
Entry zone: 0.2835 to 0.2860
Stop: above 0.2910
TP1: 0.2785
TP2: 0.2740
TP3: 0.2650 to 0.2600 if sellers keep control

The rejection area for me is 0.2855 to 0.2910. If RAVE bounces into that zone and fails, the short setup looks better because MA7 and MA25 are still acting as resistance. If it breaks above 0.2910 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that would show buyers are trying to reclaim momentum.
WTI is not fully bullish yet, but the bounce from 74.32 is worth watching. $CL is around 76.45 after a sharp drop from the 81.90 area, so for me this is more of a recovery long setup, not a trend reversal yet. Price is still below MA7 81.57, MA25 82.71, and MA99 85.63, which means the bigger structure is still heavy. Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 75.20 to 76.40 Stop: below 74.20 TP1: 76.80 to 77.50 TP2: 79.50 to 81.50 TP3: 82.70 to 85.00 if buyers reclaim the MA zone The main area for me is 74.30 to 75.20. If CL keeps holding above that zone and breaks back over 76.80, buyers can attempt a stronger relief move toward 79.50+. If it loses 74.20 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the bounce is failing. Would you take the early bounce here, or wait for a clean reclaim above 76.80 first? {future}(CLUSDT)
WTI is not fully bullish yet, but the bounce from 74.32 is worth watching. $CL is around 76.45 after a sharp drop from the 81.90 area, so for me this is more of a recovery long setup, not a trend reversal yet. Price is still below MA7 81.57, MA25 82.71, and MA99 85.63, which means the bigger structure is still heavy.

Bias: Long on support hold
Entry zone: 75.20 to 76.40
Stop: below 74.20
TP1: 76.80 to 77.50
TP2: 79.50 to 81.50
TP3: 82.70 to 85.00 if buyers reclaim the MA zone

The main area for me is 74.30 to 75.20. If CL keeps holding above that zone and breaks back over 76.80, buyers can attempt a stronger relief move toward 79.50+. If it loses 74.20 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the bounce is failing.
Would you take the early bounce here, or wait for a clean reclaim above 76.80 first?
$ZEC is starting to look interesting again because buyers have reclaimed the key moving average cluster instead of just giving a random green candle. Price is around 518.69, up about 6.73% in 24h, and it is now trading above MA7 483.99, MA25 508.77, and MA99 496.32. That gives the long setup a cleaner structure, but since it is already close to the 24h high at 521.25, I’d rather wait for a pullback than chase. Bias: Long on pullback Entry zone: 508 to 516 Stop: below 496 TP1: 521 to 525 TP2: 545 to 555 TP3: 575 to 600 if volume expands The main support area for me is 503 to 508. If ZEC pulls back and holds above that zone, buyers still look in control and the long setup stays valid. A break above 521.25 with strong volume would confirm momentum continuation. If it loses 496, I’d cancel the long idea because that would put price back below the MA99 and weaken the breakout structure. {future}(ZECUSDT)
$ZEC is starting to look interesting again because buyers have reclaimed the key moving average cluster instead of just giving a random green candle. Price is around 518.69, up about 6.73% in 24h, and it is now trading above MA7 483.99, MA25 508.77, and MA99 496.32.
That gives the long setup a cleaner structure, but since it is already close to the 24h high at 521.25, I’d rather wait for a pullback than chase.

Bias: Long on pullback
Entry zone: 508 to 516
Stop: below 496
TP1: 521 to 525
TP2: 545 to 555
TP3: 575 to 600 if volume expands

The main support area for me is 503 to 508. If ZEC pulls back and holds above that zone, buyers still look in control and the long setup stays valid. A break above 521.25 with strong volume would confirm momentum continuation. If it loses 496, I’d cancel the long idea because that would put price back below the MA99 and weaken the breakout structure.
$SUI is not giving a full breakout yet, but the long idea gets interesting because price is trying to hold the short-term MA7 area near 0.6878. Current price is around 0.6906, with the 24h range between 0.6869 and 0.7003. Since SUI is still below MA25 near 0.7205 and MA99 near 0.8329, I’d treat this as a support bounce setup, not a confirmed trend reversal. Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 0.6870 to 0.6910 Stop: below 0.6810 TP1: 0.7000 TP2: 0.7200 to 0.7250 TP3: 0.7600 to 0.7800 if volume comes back The main area for me is 0.6869 to 0.6878. If SUI keeps holding above that zone and breaks 0.7003 with stronger volume, buyers can try to push it toward the MA25 resistance near 0.7205. If it loses 0.6810, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the support bounce is failing. Would you take the early bounce here, or wait for a clean break above 0.7003 first? {future}(SUIUSDT)
$SUI is not giving a full breakout yet, but the long idea gets interesting because price is trying to hold the short-term MA7 area near 0.6878. Current price is around 0.6906, with the 24h range between 0.6869 and 0.7003. Since SUI is still below MA25 near 0.7205 and MA99 near 0.8329, I’d treat this as a support bounce setup, not a confirmed trend reversal.

Bias: Long on support hold
Entry zone: 0.6870 to 0.6910
Stop: below 0.6810
TP1: 0.7000
TP2: 0.7200 to 0.7250
TP3: 0.7600 to 0.7800 if volume comes back

The main area for me is 0.6869 to 0.6878. If SUI keeps holding above that zone and breaks 0.7003 with stronger volume, buyers can try to push it toward the MA25 resistance near 0.7205. If it loses 0.6810, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the support bounce is failing.
Would you take the early bounce here, or wait for a clean break above 0.7003 first?
After a run like this, $AKE is not a short I’d force at the bottom. Price is around 0.004440, down about 6.92%, after rejecting from the upper zone near 0.0060. The trend had a strong pump, but now the chart is cooling off, so the cleaner short setup is waiting for a weak bounce into resistance. Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 0.00455 to 0.00483 Stop: above 0.00515 TP1: 0.00420 TP2: 0.00403 TP3: 0.00365 to 0.00330 if selling pressure continues The key rejection area for me is 0.00483 to 0.00515. If AKE bounces there and fails, sellers can keep control and push it back toward the 24h low. If it reclaims 0.00515 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into another squeeze. {future}(AKEUSDT)
After a run like this, $AKE is not a short I’d force at the bottom. Price is around 0.004440, down about 6.92%, after rejecting from the upper zone near 0.0060. The trend had a strong pump, but now the chart is cooling off, so the cleaner short setup is waiting for a weak bounce into resistance.

Bias: Short on bounce
Entry zone: 0.00455 to 0.00483
Stop: above 0.00515
TP1: 0.00420
TP2: 0.00403
TP3: 0.00365 to 0.00330 if selling pressure continues

The key rejection area for me is 0.00483 to 0.00515. If AKE bounces there and fails, sellers can keep control and push it back toward the 24h low. If it reclaims 0.00515 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into another squeeze.
$ESPORTS is trying to wake up from the lower base, but I’d be careful chasing it right near the 24h high. Price is around 0.01847, up about 7.13%, with the daily range between 0.01694 and 0.01871. The bounce looks active, but funding is also high, so the cleaner long setup is waiting for a pullback instead of entering straight into resistance. Bias: Long on pullback Entry zone: 0.01780 to 0.01830 Stop: below 0.01680 TP1: 0.01870 TP2: 0.02000 to 0.02150 TP3: 0.02400 to 0.02600 if volume keeps building The key area for me is 0.01690 to 0.01780. If ESPORTS holds above that zone and breaks 0.01870 with stronger volume, buyers can try to build a bigger recovery move. If it loses 0.01680, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the bounce is failing. {future}(ESPORTSUSDT)
$ESPORTS is trying to wake up from the lower base, but I’d be careful chasing it right near the 24h high. Price is around 0.01847, up about 7.13%, with the daily range between 0.01694 and 0.01871. The bounce looks active, but funding is also high, so the cleaner long setup is waiting for a pullback instead of entering straight into resistance.

Bias: Long on pullback
Entry zone: 0.01780 to 0.01830
Stop: below 0.01680
TP1: 0.01870
TP2: 0.02000 to 0.02150
TP3: 0.02400 to 0.02600 if volume keeps building

The key area for me is 0.01690 to 0.01780. If ESPORTS holds above that zone and breaks 0.01870 with stronger volume, buyers can try to build a bigger recovery move. If it loses 0.01680, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the bounce is failing.
$DEXE still looks like a weak bounce after that massive breakdown, not a real recovery yet. Price is around 2.243, sitting below MA7 near 2.403, while the bigger MA zones are far above. That keeps the short-term structure heavy, but I would not short directly near the lower range. The cleaner plan is waiting for a bounce into resistance first. Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 2.30 to 2.40 Stop: above 2.52 TP1: 2.12 TP2: 2.00 TP3: 1.75 to 1.56 if selling pressure returns The key rejection area for me is 2.40 to 2.52. If DEXE bounces there and fails, sellers still look in control. If it reclaims 2.52 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a stronger relief bounce. {future}(DEXEUSDT)
$DEXE still looks like a weak bounce after that massive breakdown, not a real recovery yet. Price is around 2.243, sitting below MA7 near 2.403, while the bigger MA zones are far above. That keeps the short-term structure heavy, but I would not short directly near the lower range. The cleaner plan is waiting for a bounce into resistance first.

Bias: Short on bounce
Entry zone: 2.30 to 2.40
Stop: above 2.52
TP1: 2.12
TP2: 2.00
TP3: 1.75 to 1.56 if selling pressure returns

The key rejection area for me is 2.40 to 2.52. If DEXE bounces there and fails, sellers still look in control. If it reclaims 2.52 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a stronger relief bounce.
$BANK is still bleeding after the spike completely cooled off. Price is around 0.0396, down about 5.49% in 24h, and the chart is trading under MA7 near 0.0677, which keeps the structure weak. Since it is already close to the daily low at 0.0380, I would not short the bottom. I’d wait for a bounce into resistance first. Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 0.0405 to 0.0430 Stop: above 0.0465 TP1: 0.0380 TP2: 0.0355 TP3: 0.0320 to 0.0300 if selling pressure continues The key rejection area for me is 0.0430 to 0.0465. If BANK bounces there and fails, sellers still look in control. If it reclaims 0.0465 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a relief bounce instead. {future}(BANKUSDT)
$BANK is still bleeding after the spike completely cooled off. Price is around 0.0396, down about 5.49% in 24h, and the chart is trading under MA7 near 0.0677, which keeps the structure weak. Since it is already close to the daily low at 0.0380, I would not short the bottom. I’d wait for a bounce into resistance first.

Bias: Short on bounce
Entry zone: 0.0405 to 0.0430
Stop: above 0.0465
TP1: 0.0380
TP2: 0.0355
TP3: 0.0320 to 0.0300 if selling pressure continues

The key rejection area for me is 0.0430 to 0.0465. If BANK bounces there and fails, sellers still look in control. If it reclaims 0.0465 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a relief bounce instead.
$US is still holding a strong uptrend, but after rejecting from the 0.06230 spike area, I’d be more selective with the long. Price is around 0.05224, still up about 2.33% in 24h, and it is sitting near the short-term support zone after cooling down from the recent high. Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 0.05080 to 0.05230 Stop: below 0.04780 TP1: 0.05500 TP2: 0.05730 TP3: 0.06000 to 0.06230 if momentum returns The key area for me is 0.04810 to 0.05080. If US holds above that zone and starts reclaiming 0.05500, buyers can try to push it back toward the 24h high. If it loses 0.04780 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the pullback is turning weaker instead of forming continuation. {future}(USUSDT)
$US is still holding a strong uptrend, but after rejecting from the 0.06230 spike area, I’d be more selective with the long. Price is around 0.05224, still up about 2.33% in 24h, and it is sitting near the short-term support zone after cooling down from the recent high.

Bias: Long on support hold
Entry zone: 0.05080 to 0.05230
Stop: below 0.04780
TP1: 0.05500
TP2: 0.05730
TP3: 0.06000 to 0.06230 if momentum returns

The key area for me is 0.04810 to 0.05080. If US holds above that zone and starts reclaiming 0.05500, buyers can try to push it back toward the 24h high. If it loses 0.04780 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the pullback is turning weaker instead of forming continuation.
$TAIKO still looks like a post-spike fade setup. Price is around 0.06936, sitting below MA7 near 0.07088, while MA25 is higher at 0.07593. Since price is already close to the lower side of the 24h range, I would not short at market. The cleaner trade is waiting for a bounce into resistance first. Bias: Short on bounce Entry zone: 0.07020 to 0.07150 Stop: above 0.07350 TP1: 0.06810 TP2: 0.06650 TP3: 0.06400 to 0.06000 if selling pressure continues The key rejection area for me is 0.07080 to 0.07350. If TAIKO bounces there and fails, sellers still look in control. If it reclaims 0.07350 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a stronger relief bounce toward the MA25 zone. {future}(TAIKOUSDT)
$TAIKO still looks like a post-spike fade setup. Price is around 0.06936, sitting below MA7 near 0.07088, while MA25 is higher at 0.07593. Since price is already close to the lower side of the 24h range, I would not short at market. The cleaner trade is waiting for a bounce into resistance first.

Bias: Short on bounce
Entry zone: 0.07020 to 0.07150
Stop: above 0.07350
TP1: 0.06810
TP2: 0.06650
TP3: 0.06400 to 0.06000 if selling pressure continues

The key rejection area for me is 0.07080 to 0.07350. If TAIKO bounces there and fails, sellers still look in control. If it reclaims 0.07350 with strong volume, I’d cancel the short idea because that could turn into a stronger relief bounce toward the MA25 zone.
$TAG is pulling back hard after rejecting near the 0.00140 area, but the chart is not broken yet as long as buyers defend the current support zone. Price is around 0.001174, down about 11% in 24h, so I would treat this as a risky bounce long, not a clean breakout chase. Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 0.001145 to 0.001175 Stop: below 0.001090 TP1: 0.001240 TP2: 0.001320 to 0.001360 TP3: 0.001400 to 0.001500 if momentum returns The key area for me is 0.001145 to 0.001090. If TAG holds above that zone and starts reclaiming 0.001240, buyers can try to push it back toward the recent rejection area. If it loses 0.001090 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the pullback is turning into a deeper breakdown. {future}(TAGUSDT)
$TAG is pulling back hard after rejecting near the 0.00140 area, but the chart is not broken yet as long as buyers defend the current support zone. Price is around 0.001174, down about 11% in 24h, so I would treat this as a risky bounce long, not a clean breakout chase.

Bias: Long on support hold
Entry zone: 0.001145 to 0.001175
Stop: below 0.001090
TP1: 0.001240
TP2: 0.001320 to 0.001360
TP3: 0.001400 to 0.001500 if momentum returns

The key area for me is 0.001145 to 0.001090. If TAG holds above that zone and starts reclaiming 0.001240, buyers can try to push it back toward the recent rejection area. If it loses 0.001090 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the pullback is turning into a deeper breakdown.
$VANRY is trying to build a recovery after holding the lower zone, but I’d still treat this as an early bounce setup, not a confirmed reversal yet. Price is around 0.003864, up about 3.54% in 24h, and it is sitting just under the MA7 near 0.003897. The cleaner long trigger comes if buyers hold support and start reclaiming that MA7 area. Bias: Long on support hold Entry zone: 0.00375 to 0.00386 Stop: below 0.00348 TP1: 0.00410 TP2: 0.00435 to 0.00457 TP3: 0.00470 to 0.00500 if volume keeps building The key area for me is 0.00348 to 0.00375. If VANRY holds above that zone and breaks back over 0.00390 to 0.00410, buyers can push for a stronger recovery move. If it loses 0.00348 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the bounce is failing. {future}(VANRYUSDT)
$VANRY is trying to build a recovery after holding the lower zone, but I’d still treat this as an early bounce setup, not a confirmed reversal yet. Price is around 0.003864, up about 3.54% in 24h, and it is sitting just under the MA7 near 0.003897. The cleaner long trigger comes if buyers hold support and start reclaiming that MA7 area.

Bias: Long on support hold
Entry zone: 0.00375 to 0.00386
Stop: below 0.00348
TP1: 0.00410
TP2: 0.00435 to 0.00457
TP3: 0.00470 to 0.00500 if volume keeps building

The key area for me is 0.00348 to 0.00375. If VANRY holds above that zone and breaks back over 0.00390 to 0.00410, buyers can push for a stronger recovery move. If it loses 0.00348 with strong selling, I’d cancel the long idea because that would show the bounce is failing.
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs