Bit_Rase
Verificēts autors
Crypto Enthusiast | #BTC since 2017 | NFTs, Exchanges and Blockchain Analysis #Binance kol @Bit_Rise #CMC kol X. 👉@Meech_1000x kol @Bit_Rise #DM #TG @Bit_Risee
Atvērts tirdzniecības darījums
B2 turētājs
Tirgo bieži
4.3 gadi
84 Seko
39.6K+ Sekotāji
90.6K Patika
3.6K+ Kopīgots
Publikācijas
Portfelis
Visi
Cenu piedāvājumi
Tiešraides
PINNED
Brothers, let me start with something that won’t sound exciting: lately when I look at $XPL , I don’t open the chart first. I look at the people and the rules. In this kind of market, emotion won’t save you. Mechanisms might.
Two things caught my attention around @plasma recently — one is the data, the other is the event mechanics.
On the data side: XPL is trading around $0.083. Daily volume sits roughly between $48–50M. Circulating supply is about 1.8B, with market cap hovering near $150M. Sounds stable on the surface.
But here’s the uncomfortable part: Binance shows roughly a –74% drop over the last 90 days. That’s not noise — that’s structural damage. It tells you that what feels like a “bottom” to you might just be someone else’s mid-exit zone. No hero moves.
Now the activity side. The CreatorPad Plasma campaign runs from Jan 16 to Feb 12 (UTC), with a 3.5M XPL reward pool. Solid incentives. But the real drama hasn’t been about rewards — it’s been about the scoring system. Some posts were flagged “irrelevant” and received zero points. Binance Square acknowledged it as a system issue and said scores are being corrected.
Honestly? That’s peak crypto: even the rules can glitch.
So my approach is simple:
Stay within the theme.
Avoid unnecessary trading theatrics.
Keep records of submissions and interactions.
Experience has taught me that “rule risk” is real risk.
One more date on the radar: February 25 unlock, according to Tokenomist. Unlocks don’t automatically mean price drops — but they do shift expectations around supply and potential sell pressure.
Right now, this feels less like a “fundamental breakout” market and more like a “sentiment repair + rule adjustment” phase.
My position is straightforward: I’m not against a bullish case for @plasma. But keep rhythm. Participate in events if it makes sense. Don’t oversize positions. As the unlock approaches, risk control matters more than optimism.
In rough markets, survival beats prediction.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Two things caught my attention around @plasma recently — one is the data, the other is the event mechanics.
On the data side: XPL is trading around $0.083. Daily volume sits roughly between $48–50M. Circulating supply is about 1.8B, with market cap hovering near $150M. Sounds stable on the surface.
But here’s the uncomfortable part: Binance shows roughly a –74% drop over the last 90 days. That’s not noise — that’s structural damage. It tells you that what feels like a “bottom” to you might just be someone else’s mid-exit zone. No hero moves.
Now the activity side. The CreatorPad Plasma campaign runs from Jan 16 to Feb 12 (UTC), with a 3.5M XPL reward pool. Solid incentives. But the real drama hasn’t been about rewards — it’s been about the scoring system. Some posts were flagged “irrelevant” and received zero points. Binance Square acknowledged it as a system issue and said scores are being corrected.
Honestly? That’s peak crypto: even the rules can glitch.
So my approach is simple:
Stay within the theme.
Avoid unnecessary trading theatrics.
Keep records of submissions and interactions.
Experience has taught me that “rule risk” is real risk.
One more date on the radar: February 25 unlock, according to Tokenomist. Unlocks don’t automatically mean price drops — but they do shift expectations around supply and potential sell pressure.
Right now, this feels less like a “fundamental breakout” market and more like a “sentiment repair + rule adjustment” phase.
My position is straightforward: I’m not against a bullish case for @plasma. But keep rhythm. Participate in events if it makes sense. Don’t oversize positions. As the unlock approaches, risk control matters more than optimism.
In rough markets, survival beats prediction.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
PINNED
Why I’m Still Watching XPL: From an 80% Collapse to a Test of Real Stablecoin Demand
Let’s be rational for a moment. In this market, everyone shouts about “value,” yet most capital still chases memes and AI narratives. Meanwhile, infrastructure that actually moves money quietly gets ignored. XPL (Plasma) sits right in that uncomfortable zone—serious positioning, painful price action.
The uncomfortable truth? Since its September 2025 launch, XPL dropped more than 80%, with stretches of continuous decline. That sounds brutal—and it is. But it also tells us something important: this isn’t a token sustained by hype. It has to survive on usage.
I’m not watching it because “it fell so much it must bounce.” That logic is lazy. I’m watching it because I want to see whether stablecoin payments can become a real business in a weak market.
1) The data isn’t fantasy anymore
XPL trades around $0.08, with roughly $40–50M in 24h volume and a market cap near $150M. That’s not dream pricing. That’s a level where real transactions happen. It has liquidity and active participants.
Am I shouting “buy”? Absolutely not. But it’s clearly worth serious research.
2) Plasma isn’t “just another chain”
Plasma positions itself as a high-performance Layer 1 focused on stablecoin payments—low fees, fast settlement, EVM compatibility.
It’s not trying to be everything at once. The pitch is simple: make stablecoin transfers fast, cheap, and reliable. Stablecoins are on-chain cash flow. If cash flow struggles, everything else is just storytelling.
3) Why it’s gaining attention again
Two recent developments matter:
CreatorPad campaign (Jan 16 – Feb 12, 2026) with 3.5M XPL in rewards. Yes, campaigns bring noise—but they also bring visibility and community expansion.
NEAR Intents integration (Jan 23, 2026). The real value isn’t the partnership headline; it’s smoother cross-chain execution. Stablecoins don’t live on one chain. Settlement must move seamlessly.
If Plasma simplifies cross-chain stablecoin flows, it’s not just saving fees—it’s competing for settlement-layer relevance.
4) USDT0 improvements
USDT0 highlighted that settlement speed between Plasma and Ethereum improved 2x. That matters more than people think. Faster settlement means lower friction, lower slippage, and fewer operational risks.
For stablecoin infrastructure, user demands are simple: don’t break, don’t lag, don’t overcharge.
5) Why the market punished it anyway
Markets don’t reward correctness. They reward certainty.
Stablecoin payments are a long-term business. Token prices are short-term votes. If usage growth isn’t obvious and continuous, price will struggle—no matter how rational the thesis.
The real questions aren’t about vision. They’re about execution:
Is there sustained growth in real payment activity?
Is stablecoin settlement volume trending upward?
Can Plasma capture value beyond being a “free USDT highway”?
It must become the default settlement layer—not just a cheap transfer route.
6) My observation framework
I track it in survival mode:
Is cross-chain UX genuinely improving?
Are stablecoin settlement speeds and stability consistently upgraded?
Do campaigns convert into real on-chain activity?
Is trading volume sustained beyond price spikes?
Volume without price growth can still signal active competition—not stagnation.
7) The unglamorous truth
If Plasma succeeds, it probably won’t deliver meme-level explosions. It’s infrastructure. It builds slowly—then earns trust.
But risk is real: if by 2026 stablecoin usage doesn’t show measurable traction, it risks becoming another “correct idea, wrong timing” case.
My stance is simple: no blind faith, no blind hate. Watch the data.
In this market, survival matters more than excitement. Stablecoin settlement is real demand. I’d rather track something tied to money flow than chase the next short-term spike.
First survive. Then win.
@Plasma #plasma $XPL
The uncomfortable truth? Since its September 2025 launch, XPL dropped more than 80%, with stretches of continuous decline. That sounds brutal—and it is. But it also tells us something important: this isn’t a token sustained by hype. It has to survive on usage.
I’m not watching it because “it fell so much it must bounce.” That logic is lazy. I’m watching it because I want to see whether stablecoin payments can become a real business in a weak market.
1) The data isn’t fantasy anymore
XPL trades around $0.08, with roughly $40–50M in 24h volume and a market cap near $150M. That’s not dream pricing. That’s a level where real transactions happen. It has liquidity and active participants.
Am I shouting “buy”? Absolutely not. But it’s clearly worth serious research.
2) Plasma isn’t “just another chain”
Plasma positions itself as a high-performance Layer 1 focused on stablecoin payments—low fees, fast settlement, EVM compatibility.
It’s not trying to be everything at once. The pitch is simple: make stablecoin transfers fast, cheap, and reliable. Stablecoins are on-chain cash flow. If cash flow struggles, everything else is just storytelling.
3) Why it’s gaining attention again
Two recent developments matter:
CreatorPad campaign (Jan 16 – Feb 12, 2026) with 3.5M XPL in rewards. Yes, campaigns bring noise—but they also bring visibility and community expansion.
NEAR Intents integration (Jan 23, 2026). The real value isn’t the partnership headline; it’s smoother cross-chain execution. Stablecoins don’t live on one chain. Settlement must move seamlessly.
If Plasma simplifies cross-chain stablecoin flows, it’s not just saving fees—it’s competing for settlement-layer relevance.
4) USDT0 improvements
USDT0 highlighted that settlement speed between Plasma and Ethereum improved 2x. That matters more than people think. Faster settlement means lower friction, lower slippage, and fewer operational risks.
For stablecoin infrastructure, user demands are simple: don’t break, don’t lag, don’t overcharge.
5) Why the market punished it anyway
Markets don’t reward correctness. They reward certainty.
Stablecoin payments are a long-term business. Token prices are short-term votes. If usage growth isn’t obvious and continuous, price will struggle—no matter how rational the thesis.
The real questions aren’t about vision. They’re about execution:
Is there sustained growth in real payment activity?
Is stablecoin settlement volume trending upward?
Can Plasma capture value beyond being a “free USDT highway”?
It must become the default settlement layer—not just a cheap transfer route.
6) My observation framework
I track it in survival mode:
Is cross-chain UX genuinely improving?
Are stablecoin settlement speeds and stability consistently upgraded?
Do campaigns convert into real on-chain activity?
Is trading volume sustained beyond price spikes?
Volume without price growth can still signal active competition—not stagnation.
7) The unglamorous truth
If Plasma succeeds, it probably won’t deliver meme-level explosions. It’s infrastructure. It builds slowly—then earns trust.
But risk is real: if by 2026 stablecoin usage doesn’t show measurable traction, it risks becoming another “correct idea, wrong timing” case.
My stance is simple: no blind faith, no blind hate. Watch the data.
In this market, survival matters more than excitement. Stablecoin settlement is real demand. I’d rather track something tied to money flow than chase the next short-term spike.
First survive. Then win.
@Plasma #plasma $XPL
The Real AI Chain Revolution: How Vanar Redefines “Native Intelligence”
AI has become the hottest buzzword in crypto. Almost every project now claims to be “AI-powered,” afraid of being left behind. But if you strip away the marketing, most so-called AI + blockchain platforms are simply plugging an AI interface or API into an existing chain and calling it innovation. That’s like installing a touchscreen in an old vehicle — it may look modern, but the engine underneath hasn’t changed.
True AI integration requires more than surface-level additions. It demands infrastructure built specifically for intelligence from the ground up. And this is where Vanar stands apart.
Rather than treating AI as a feature layered onto a traditional chain, Vanar designed its architecture to be AI-native from day one. The blockchain isn’t just hosting AI — it is structured to support and empower it at its core.
Traditional public chains like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain were engineered around transactions, DeFi, and financial settlement. Their memory structures, execution environments, and scheduling systems are optimized for transfers — not for intelligent agents. When you attempt to run advanced AI agents on these networks, limitations quickly appear: memory bottlenecks, reasoning delays, unstable execution, fragmented data flow, and inconsistent on-chain settlement. These environments were never built for sustained, autonomous AI activity.
Vanar approaches this challenge differently. AI is not an add-on — it is the foundation. From resource allocation and memory architecture to on-chain reasoning and automated workflows, every component is engineered for continuous AI operation. AI agents on Vanar can receive tasks, process them autonomously, and provide results without human intervention. Automated billing and value settlement mechanisms ensure seamless monetization of AI services, lowering barriers for both developers and enterprises.
What makes Vanar even more compelling is that its AI-native framework is not theoretical. It’s not just a vision outlined in white papers. It is deployable, verifiable infrastructure. Developers can launch AI agents directly on-chain, enabling automated reasoning and real-time settlement. Businesses can integrate AI modules to build intelligent, revenue-generating services — forming a genuine on-chain commercial loop.
Many still judge blockchains by TPS, fees, or ecosystem size. But the AI era demands more: stability, continuity, automation, transparency, and explainability. The design logic of older chains simply does not align with the needs of intelligent agents. Vanar avoids chasing superficial metrics and instead focuses on enabling AI to function on-chain as smoothly as it does locally — without interruptions or structural constraints.
Beyond present capabilities, Vanar is laying groundwork for a broader AI-agent economy. As intelligent agents expand across industries, they will require secure, stable, and scalable on-chain environments. Vanar is positioning itself as that foundational layer.
In a market obsessed with short-term hype, Vanar takes a long-term approach. It doesn’t rely on flashy marketing or speculative narratives. Instead, it builds infrastructure designed for lasting utility. It is more than a public chain — it is an operating system for the convergence of AI and blockchain.
The competition among AI chains isn’t about who markets the loudest. It’s about who truly prepares the environment AI needs. Through its AI-native philosophy, Vanar redefines what a blockchain can be in the intelligence era.
The future will not belong to projects that simply attach AI labels. It will belong to those built for AI from inception. And Vanar is positioning itself at the forefront of that shift.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
True AI integration requires more than surface-level additions. It demands infrastructure built specifically for intelligence from the ground up. And this is where Vanar stands apart.
Rather than treating AI as a feature layered onto a traditional chain, Vanar designed its architecture to be AI-native from day one. The blockchain isn’t just hosting AI — it is structured to support and empower it at its core.
Traditional public chains like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain were engineered around transactions, DeFi, and financial settlement. Their memory structures, execution environments, and scheduling systems are optimized for transfers — not for intelligent agents. When you attempt to run advanced AI agents on these networks, limitations quickly appear: memory bottlenecks, reasoning delays, unstable execution, fragmented data flow, and inconsistent on-chain settlement. These environments were never built for sustained, autonomous AI activity.
Vanar approaches this challenge differently. AI is not an add-on — it is the foundation. From resource allocation and memory architecture to on-chain reasoning and automated workflows, every component is engineered for continuous AI operation. AI agents on Vanar can receive tasks, process them autonomously, and provide results without human intervention. Automated billing and value settlement mechanisms ensure seamless monetization of AI services, lowering barriers for both developers and enterprises.
What makes Vanar even more compelling is that its AI-native framework is not theoretical. It’s not just a vision outlined in white papers. It is deployable, verifiable infrastructure. Developers can launch AI agents directly on-chain, enabling automated reasoning and real-time settlement. Businesses can integrate AI modules to build intelligent, revenue-generating services — forming a genuine on-chain commercial loop.
Many still judge blockchains by TPS, fees, or ecosystem size. But the AI era demands more: stability, continuity, automation, transparency, and explainability. The design logic of older chains simply does not align with the needs of intelligent agents. Vanar avoids chasing superficial metrics and instead focuses on enabling AI to function on-chain as smoothly as it does locally — without interruptions or structural constraints.
Beyond present capabilities, Vanar is laying groundwork for a broader AI-agent economy. As intelligent agents expand across industries, they will require secure, stable, and scalable on-chain environments. Vanar is positioning itself as that foundational layer.
In a market obsessed with short-term hype, Vanar takes a long-term approach. It doesn’t rely on flashy marketing or speculative narratives. Instead, it builds infrastructure designed for lasting utility. It is more than a public chain — it is an operating system for the convergence of AI and blockchain.
The competition among AI chains isn’t about who markets the loudest. It’s about who truly prepares the environment AI needs. Through its AI-native philosophy, Vanar redefines what a blockchain can be in the intelligence era.
The future will not belong to projects that simply attach AI labels. It will belong to those built for AI from inception. And Vanar is positioning itself at the forefront of that shift.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
Most people say AI agents “can’t move” on-chain because they’re not smart enough. After testing multiple tools, I’ve realized that’s not the real issue. The real bottleneck is the blockchain infrastructure itself.
Today’s public chains were built for transfers, speculation, and DeFi. Their logic is rigid, data is fragmented, and settlement flows are complex. Expecting AI agents to autonomously execute tasks, continuously reason, and collaborate across different scenarios in such an environment is unrealistic. Many projects market themselves as “AI-powered,” but they’re simply layering AI on top of outdated architectures—fine for demos, unstable in real-world use.
Vanar takes a fundamentally different route. Instead of attaching AI to an existing chain, it designs the core architecture around intelligent agents from the start. Resource allocation, reasoning execution, interaction workflows, and value settlement are structured to support seamless AI operations. No superficial integrations. No forced compatibility. No artificial constraints. Agents can operate autonomously and complete full on-chain cycles with stability.
It’s time to stop focusing only on TPS or raw throughput. In the AI era, the real question is whether a chain can enable agents to function continuously and without friction. Vanar isn’t chasing hype—it’s targeting the structural barriers that prevent AI from scaling on-chain. That’s where genuine innovation lies, and that’s the direction the AI–blockchain convergence is heading.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
Today’s public chains were built for transfers, speculation, and DeFi. Their logic is rigid, data is fragmented, and settlement flows are complex. Expecting AI agents to autonomously execute tasks, continuously reason, and collaborate across different scenarios in such an environment is unrealistic. Many projects market themselves as “AI-powered,” but they’re simply layering AI on top of outdated architectures—fine for demos, unstable in real-world use.
Vanar takes a fundamentally different route. Instead of attaching AI to an existing chain, it designs the core architecture around intelligent agents from the start. Resource allocation, reasoning execution, interaction workflows, and value settlement are structured to support seamless AI operations. No superficial integrations. No forced compatibility. No artificial constraints. Agents can operate autonomously and complete full on-chain cycles with stability.
It’s time to stop focusing only on TPS or raw throughput. In the AI era, the real question is whether a chain can enable agents to function continuously and without friction. Vanar isn’t chasing hype—it’s targeting the structural barriers that prevent AI from scaling on-chain. That’s where genuine innovation lies, and that’s the direction the AI–blockchain convergence is heading.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
$RIVER has been riding that volatility wave hard
Wild swings, big sentiment shifts
When the price moves this fast, it’s belief + liquidity signals playing out in real time
Volatility it’s part of the game
Wild swings, big sentiment shifts
When the price moves this fast, it’s belief + liquidity signals playing out in real time
Volatility it’s part of the game
Mēs esam 150K+ spēcīgi. Tagad mēs vēlamies dzirdēt no jums.
Pastāstiet mums, kādu gudrību jūs nodosiet jauniem tirgotājiem? 💛 un laimējiet savu daļu no $500 USDC.
🔸 Sekojiet @BinanceAngel kvadrātveida kontam
🔸 Patīk šis ieraksts un pārsūtiet to
🔸 Komentējiet, kādu gudrību jūs nodosiet jauniem tirgotājiem? 💛
🔸 Aizpildiet aptauju: Aizpildiet aptauju
Top 50 atbildes uzvar. Radošums ir svarīgs. Ļaujiet savai balsij vadīt svinības. 😇 #Binance
$BNB
Pastāstiet mums, kādu gudrību jūs nodosiet jauniem tirgotājiem? 💛 un laimējiet savu daļu no $500 USDC.
🔸 Sekojiet @BinanceAngel kvadrātveida kontam
🔸 Patīk šis ieraksts un pārsūtiet to
🔸 Komentējiet, kādu gudrību jūs nodosiet jauniem tirgotājiem? 💛
🔸 Aizpildiet aptauju: Aizpildiet aptauju
Top 50 atbildes uzvar. Radošums ir svarīgs. Ļaujiet savai balsij vadīt svinības. 😇 #Binance
$BNB
Binance Angels
·
--
Mēs esam 150K+ spēcīgi. Tagad mēs vēlamies dzirdēt no jums.
Pastāstiet mums, kādu gudrību jūs nodotu jauniem tirgotājiem? 💛 un laimējiet savu daļu no $500 USDC.
🔸 Sekojiet @BinanceAngel kvadrātkontam
🔸 Patīk šis ieraksts un pārsūtīt
🔸 Komentējiet, kādu gudrību jūs nodotu jauniem tirgotājiem? 💛
🔸 Aizpildiet aptauju: Fill in survey
Top 50 atbilžu laimē. Radošums ir svarīgs. Ļaujiet savai balsij vadīt svinības. 😇 #Binance
$BNB
{spot}(BNBUSDT)
Pastāstiet mums, kādu gudrību jūs nodotu jauniem tirgotājiem? 💛 un laimējiet savu daļu no $500 USDC.
🔸 Sekojiet @BinanceAngel kvadrātkontam
🔸 Patīk šis ieraksts un pārsūtīt
🔸 Komentējiet, kādu gudrību jūs nodotu jauniem tirgotājiem? 💛
🔸 Aizpildiet aptauju: Fill in survey
Top 50 atbilžu laimē. Radošums ir svarīgs. Ļaujiet savai balsij vadīt svinības. 😇 #Binance
$BNB
{spot}(BNBUSDT)
Sveiki visiem — sāksim īsu $BERA
Īsa iestatīšana: $BERAUSDT
Iegādes zona: 0.4900 – 0.5050
TP1: 0.4700
TP2: 0.4450
Stop Loss: 0.5300
Sviras efekts: 10x – 20x
Margin: 1% – 3%
Riska padoms: Ja TP1 sasniedz, nodrošiniet daļējus ienākumus un pārvietojiet stop uz breakeven, lai aizsargātu kapitālu.
$BERA ir iekļuvis spēcīgā pretestības / piegādes zonā pēc strauja impulsa. Momentums palēninās, un cena rāda izsīkuma pazīmes tuvu augstumiem. Šis iestatījums atbalsta pullback vai korektīvu kustību, kamēr pretestība notur.
Tirdzniecība gudri, nepārslogojiet un vienmēr ievērojiet savu stop. 💯
Noklikšķiniet zemāk, lai veiktu tirdzniecību
Īsa iestatīšana: $BERAUSDT
Iegādes zona: 0.4900 – 0.5050
TP1: 0.4700
TP2: 0.4450
Stop Loss: 0.5300
Sviras efekts: 10x – 20x
Margin: 1% – 3%
Riska padoms: Ja TP1 sasniedz, nodrošiniet daļējus ienākumus un pārvietojiet stop uz breakeven, lai aizsargātu kapitālu.
$BERA ir iekļuvis spēcīgā pretestības / piegādes zonā pēc strauja impulsa. Momentums palēninās, un cena rāda izsīkuma pazīmes tuvu augstumiem. Šis iestatījums atbalsta pullback vai korektīvu kustību, kamēr pretestība notur.
Tirdzniecība gudri, nepārslogojiet un vienmēr ievērojiet savu stop. 💯
Noklikšķiniet zemāk, lai veiktu tirdzniecību
$STX
STX USDT - ĪSS
Ieeja: 0.2639
Mērķis 1: 0.2598
Mērķis 2: 0.2575
Mērķis 3: 0.2507
Mērķis 4: 0.2380
Mērķis 5: 0.2246
Stop Loss: 0.277
Neizmantojiet vairāk par 5X sviru 💸💸
STX USDT - ĪSS
Ieeja: 0.2639
Mērķis 1: 0.2598
Mērķis 2: 0.2575
Mērķis 3: 0.2507
Mērķis 4: 0.2380
Mērķis 5: 0.2246
Stop Loss: 0.277
Neizmantojiet vairāk par 5X sviru 💸💸
$HYPE - Augšupejošā tendence turpinās, pārdošanas spiediens paliek spēcīgs.
Garš HYPE
Ieeja: 32.9 - 33.3
SL: 30.9
TP: 35 - 37 - 40
HYPE turpina vadīt #perpdex tendenci, spēcīga augšupejoša tendence ar signāliem, ka tiek atrasta jauna virsotne.
Garš HYPE
Ieeja: 32.9 - 33.3
SL: 30.9
TP: 35 - 37 - 40
HYPE turpina vadīt #perpdex tendenci, spēcīga augšupejoša tendence ar signāliem, ka tiek atrasta jauna virsotne.
Lai būtu godīgi, es pēdējā laikā esmu pārdomājis $XPL — un tas nav saistīts ar cenu svārstībām.
Es turpinu skatīties diagrammā, nevis lai noķertu apakšu vai sekotu momentumam, bet lai uzdotu praktiskāku jautājumu: ja es pārtrauktu skatīties cenu, vai šai ķēdei joprojām būtu iemesls pastāvēt? Vai tā kļūtu par kaut ko, ko cilvēki ir spiesti izmantot, nevis tikai interesētos par to?
Plasma uzmanība uz stabilu monētu maksājumiem nav nepareiza. Tas patiesībā ir viens no nedaudzajiem stāstiem, kas nav balstīts uz troksni. Bet 2026. gadā būt lētam, ātram un EVM-saderīgam nav aizsardzība — tas ir tikai pamats. Daudzas ķēdes jau tagad efektīvi spēj apstrādāt stabilu monētu pārvedumus.
Kas lika man šaubīties, ir lietotāju motivācija. Daudzas ekosistēmas veicina aktivitāti, izmantojot DeFi stimulus un gaisa pilienus. Plasma mērķē uz maksājumu infrastruktūru — lēnāku, grūtāku ceļu. Tas nav par to, lai lietotāji šodien būtu satraukti; tas ir par to, lai laika gaitā kļūtu neaizstājams. Problēma ir tā, ka tirgi reti gaida šo pāreju.
Tad ir pats tokens. Likviditāte izskatās labi, bet kādu patiesu lomu spēlē $XPL ? Ja stabilās monētas pārvietojas mērogā, kamēr tokens paliek ierobežots uz maksām vai pārvaldību, ilgtermiņa pieprasījums kļūst apšaubāms. Bez skaidras vērtības iegūšanas cena balstās uz cerībām.
Es neesmu ne optimistisks, ne pesimistisks. Mana nostāja ir vienkārša: nekādi smagi darījumi, nekādas emocionālas kustības. Pusstundā es vērtēšu pēc reālas lietošanas — nevis troksņa.
@Plasma #Plasma
Es turpinu skatīties diagrammā, nevis lai noķertu apakšu vai sekotu momentumam, bet lai uzdotu praktiskāku jautājumu: ja es pārtrauktu skatīties cenu, vai šai ķēdei joprojām būtu iemesls pastāvēt? Vai tā kļūtu par kaut ko, ko cilvēki ir spiesti izmantot, nevis tikai interesētos par to?
Plasma uzmanība uz stabilu monētu maksājumiem nav nepareiza. Tas patiesībā ir viens no nedaudzajiem stāstiem, kas nav balstīts uz troksni. Bet 2026. gadā būt lētam, ātram un EVM-saderīgam nav aizsardzība — tas ir tikai pamats. Daudzas ķēdes jau tagad efektīvi spēj apstrādāt stabilu monētu pārvedumus.
Kas lika man šaubīties, ir lietotāju motivācija. Daudzas ekosistēmas veicina aktivitāti, izmantojot DeFi stimulus un gaisa pilienus. Plasma mērķē uz maksājumu infrastruktūru — lēnāku, grūtāku ceļu. Tas nav par to, lai lietotāji šodien būtu satraukti; tas ir par to, lai laika gaitā kļūtu neaizstājams. Problēma ir tā, ka tirgi reti gaida šo pāreju.
Tad ir pats tokens. Likviditāte izskatās labi, bet kādu patiesu lomu spēlē $XPL ? Ja stabilās monētas pārvietojas mērogā, kamēr tokens paliek ierobežots uz maksām vai pārvaldību, ilgtermiņa pieprasījums kļūst apšaubāms. Bez skaidras vērtības iegūšanas cena balstās uz cerībām.
Es neesmu ne optimistisks, ne pesimistisks. Mana nostāja ir vienkārša: nekādi smagi darījumi, nekādas emocionālas kustības. Pusstundā es vērtēšu pēc reālas lietošanas — nevis troksņa.
@Plasma #Plasma
TVL, stabilo monētu mērogs, zemas maksas — vai Plasma (XPL) tiešām var uzturēt šo modeli?
Ļaujiet man būt tiešam.
Nesenā satura pieaugums ap @undefined sākotnēji neizskatījās organiski — tas šķita kā koordinēta pastiprināšana. Bet pēc tam, kad dziļāk iedziļinājos blokķēdes datos un aktivitāšu mehānikā, ir skaidrs, ka šī momentum nav pilnībā ražota. Divas spēka to virza:
CreatorPad stimuli
2026. gada stabilo monētu maksājumu naratīva atjaunošana
Tas nav hype ieraksts. Tas ir mēģinājums saprast, uz kā patiesībā balstās XPL — un kur tas varētu sabrukt.
1️⃣ CreatorPad: Satiksme tagad ir novērtēts produkts
Nesenā satura pieaugums ap @undefined sākotnēji neizskatījās organiski — tas šķita kā koordinēta pastiprināšana. Bet pēc tam, kad dziļāk iedziļinājos blokķēdes datos un aktivitāšu mehānikā, ir skaidrs, ka šī momentum nav pilnībā ražota. Divas spēka to virza:
CreatorPad stimuli
2026. gada stabilo monētu maksājumu naratīva atjaunošana
Tas nav hype ieraksts. Tas ir mēģinājums saprast, uz kā patiesībā balstās XPL — un kur tas varētu sabrukt.
1️⃣ CreatorPad: Satiksme tagad ir novērtēts produkts
$LTC USDT Liela lejupvērsta tendence — skatāmies stabilizācijas zonu
Litecoin sasniedza maksimumu ap 84.89 un kopš tā laika ir bijusi skaidri negatīva struktūra, veidojot zemākus maksimumus un zemākus minimumus ikdienas grafikā. Cena nesen izsita likviditāti ap 45.00 zonu un atlec, parādot īstermiņa pirkšanas spiedienu. Tomēr tendence joprojām ir vāja, un šis solis izskatās vairāk kā atvieglojuma lecienu, nevis pilnīga apgriešanās pagaidām. Ir nepieciešama spēks virs galvenā pretestības, lai apstiprinātu tendences maiņu.
Tirdzniecības iestatījums
Ieeja: 52.5 – 55.0
Mērķis 1: 60.0
Mērķis 2: 66.5
Mērķis 3: 72.0
Stop Loss: 45.0
Paziņojiet man, ja vēlaties to Binance Square stilā vai ar stiprāku āķi.
Litecoin sasniedza maksimumu ap 84.89 un kopš tā laika ir bijusi skaidri negatīva struktūra, veidojot zemākus maksimumus un zemākus minimumus ikdienas grafikā. Cena nesen izsita likviditāti ap 45.00 zonu un atlec, parādot īstermiņa pirkšanas spiedienu. Tomēr tendence joprojām ir vāja, un šis solis izskatās vairāk kā atvieglojuma lecienu, nevis pilnīga apgriešanās pagaidām. Ir nepieciešama spēks virs galvenā pretestības, lai apstiprinātu tendences maiņu.
Tirdzniecības iestatījums
Ieeja: 52.5 – 55.0
Mērķis 1: 60.0
Mērķis 2: 66.5
Mērķis 3: 72.0
Stop Loss: 45.0
Paziņojiet man, ja vēlaties to Binance Square stilā vai ar stiprāku āķi.
$ASTER pamodās, izstiepās un atcerējās, ka iepriekš tas tika tirgots daudz augstāk... 0.6s atkal, un cilvēki jau čukst "viens dolārs" it kā tas nesadzird 💸
$SUI bouncs zaudē spēku, pārdevēji atgriežas.
Augšupejošie mēģinājumi ir vāji un piedāvājums sāk dominēt.
Īsā pozīcija $SUI
Ieeja: 0.987 – 0.991
SL: 1.005
TP1: 0.975
TP2: 0.965
TP3: 0.955
Pircēji neiztur augstākas līmeņus labi, un lejupvērstā momentums sāk paātrināties.
Tirdzniecība $SUI šeit💸💸
Augšupejošie mēģinājumi ir vāji un piedāvājums sāk dominēt.
Īsā pozīcija $SUI
Ieeja: 0.987 – 0.991
SL: 1.005
TP1: 0.975
TP2: 0.965
TP3: 0.955
Pircēji neiztur augstākas līmeņus labi, un lejupvērstā momentums sāk paātrināties.
Tirdzniecība $SUI šeit💸💸
$PYR parāda spēcīgu atveseļošanos, pircēji agresīvi iejaucas.
Momentum pieaug, jo atsitieni paliek sekli un tiek absorbēti.
Long $PYR
Ieeja: 0.399 – 0.405
SL: 0.380
TP1: 0.440
TP2: 0.460
TP3: 0.480
Pārdošanas spiediens ātri izzūd, un piedāvājumi labi aizsargā, saglabājot augšupejošo turpinājumu neskartu.
Tirdzniecība $PYR šeit 💸💸
Momentum pieaug, jo atsitieni paliek sekli un tiek absorbēti.
Long $PYR
Ieeja: 0.399 – 0.405
SL: 0.380
TP1: 0.440
TP2: 0.460
TP3: 0.480
Pārdošanas spiediens ātri izzūd, un piedāvājumi labi aizsargā, saglabājot augšupejošo turpinājumu neskartu.
Tirdzniecība $PYR šeit 💸💸
SAFU fonda atjauninājums – kā Binance aizsargā lietotāju aktīvus
Kas ir SAFU?
Lietotāju drošo aktīvu fonds (SAFU) tika izveidots ar Binance 2018. gada jūlijā kā aizsardzības rezerve lietotāju līdzekļiem. Tirdzniecības maksu daļa regulāri tiek piešķirta šim fondam, ļaujot tam augt laika gaitā un kalpot kā finansiāla drošības buferis negaidītu incidentu gadījumā.
2026. gada februārī SAFU maka vērtība ir aptuveni 1 miljards dolāru. Aktīvu sastāvs var mainīties periodiski atkarībā no Binance stratēģiskajiem lēmumiem.
Nesen Binance paziņoja par vairākiem nozīmīgiem atjauninājumiem SAFU — nozīmīgs solis, ņemot vērā pašreizējo tirgus svārstīgumu.
Lietotāju drošo aktīvu fonds (SAFU) tika izveidots ar Binance 2018. gada jūlijā kā aizsardzības rezerve lietotāju līdzekļiem. Tirdzniecības maksu daļa regulāri tiek piešķirta šim fondam, ļaujot tam augt laika gaitā un kalpot kā finansiāla drošības buferis negaidītu incidentu gadījumā.
2026. gada februārī SAFU maka vērtība ir aptuveni 1 miljards dolāru. Aktīvu sastāvs var mainīties periodiski atkarībā no Binance stratēģiskajiem lēmumiem.
Nesen Binance paziņoja par vairākiem nozīmīgiem atjauninājumiem SAFU — nozīmīgs solis, ņemot vērā pašreizējo tirgus svārstīgumu.
Šeit jūs atradīsiet labākās iespējas tirgos.
Viena no tām ir $ONDO
Masīva izaugsme TVL.
Cena sabruka.
Šis periods ir lielākais nepareizais novērtējums mūsu nozarē un pēdējā reize, kad jūs varat uzkrāt šīs pozīcijas.
Viena no tām ir $ONDO
Masīva izaugsme TVL.
Cena sabruka.
Šis periods ir lielākais nepareizais novērtējums mūsu nozarē un pēdējā reize, kad jūs varat uzkrāt šīs pozīcijas.
Šeit jūs atradīsiet labākās iespējas tirgos.
Viens no tiem ir $ONDO
Milzīgs pieaugums TVL.
Cena sabruka.
Šis periods ir lielākais nepareizs novērtējums mūsu nozarē un pēdējā reize, kad jūs varat uzkrāt šos amatus.
Viens no tiem ir $ONDO
Milzīgs pieaugums TVL.
Cena sabruka.
Šis periods ir lielākais nepareizs novērtējums mūsu nozarē un pēdējā reize, kad jūs varat uzkrāt šos amatus.
$PAXG Pircēji iekļūst pēc vieglas pauzes, momentum rāda atbalsta pazīmes
Augšupeja tiek aizsargāta un pieprasījums efektīvi absorbē nelielas kritumus.
Garais $PAXG
Ienākšana: 5,003 – 5,010
SL: 4,980
TP1: 5,030
TP2: 5,050
TP3: 5,070
Pārdošanas spiediens paliek vāji un piedāvājumi tur struktūru, saglabājot bullish turpinājumu neskartu.
Tirdzniecība $PAXG šeit 💸💸
Augšupeja tiek aizsargāta un pieprasījums efektīvi absorbē nelielas kritumus.
Garais $PAXG
Ienākšana: 5,003 – 5,010
SL: 4,980
TP1: 5,030
TP2: 5,050
TP3: 5,070
Pārdošanas spiediens paliek vāji un piedāvājumi tur struktūru, saglabājot bullish turpinājumu neskartu.
Tirdzniecība $PAXG šeit 💸💸
$ZEC rādīs spēcīgu bullish reakciju un momentum veidojas labi. Cena turas virs svarīgām atbalsta līmeniem un izskatās gatava vēl vienam uzlecošam solim. Tas dod labu iespēju ilgtermiņa tirgotājiem iekļūt agri un sekot tendencei.
Tirdzniecības iestatījums (ilgtermiņa):
Ieeja: 238 – 245
Mērķi: 255 — 270 — 290
Stop-Loss: 228
Momentum paliek spēcīgs un pircēji ir acīmredzami kontrolē. Atveriet ilgtermiņa pozīcijas ar pareizu riska pārvaldību un palieciet disciplinēti.
Noklikšķiniet zemāk, lai veiktu tirdzniecību 💸💸
Tirdzniecības iestatījums (ilgtermiņa):
Ieeja: 238 – 245
Mērķi: 255 — 270 — 290
Stop-Loss: 228
Momentum paliek spēcīgs un pircēji ir acīmredzami kontrolē. Atveriet ilgtermiņa pozīcijas ar pareizu riska pārvaldību un palieciet disciplinēti.
Noklikšķiniet zemāk, lai veiktu tirdzniecību 💸💸
Pieraksties, lai skatītu citu saturu