Binance Square
#worldsecurity

worldsecurity

226 skatījumi
5 piedalās diskusijā
BDV7071
·
--
Tramps aicina veidot globālu jūras koalīciju, lai nodrošinātu Hormuza šaurumu Bijušais prezidents Donalds Tramps ir aicinājis uz starptautisku jūras aliansi, lai nodrošinātu, ka Hormuza šaurums paliek atvērts un drošs. Agrīnas atbildes no galvenajām valstīm norāda uz ierobežotu atbalstu: Itālija: Noraidīts Spānija: Noraidīts Japāna: Noraidīts Francija: Nedroša Kanāda: Noraidīts Austrālija: Noraidīts Ķīna: Nav oficiālas atbildes Ziemeļkoreja: [Papildu detaļas gaida] $BTC #GlobalPolitics #GeopoliticsNews #InternationalAffairs #WorldSecurity Lūdzu, sekojiet BDV7071 {future}(BTCUSDT)
Tramps aicina veidot globālu jūras koalīciju, lai nodrošinātu Hormuza šaurumu
Bijušais prezidents Donalds Tramps ir aicinājis uz starptautisku jūras aliansi, lai nodrošinātu, ka Hormuza šaurums paliek atvērts un drošs. Agrīnas atbildes no galvenajām valstīm norāda uz ierobežotu atbalstu:
Itālija: Noraidīts
Spānija: Noraidīts
Japāna: Noraidīts
Francija: Nedroša
Kanāda: Noraidīts
Austrālija: Noraidīts
Ķīna: Nav oficiālas atbildes
Ziemeļkoreja: [Papildu detaļas gaida]
$BTC #GlobalPolitics #GeopoliticsNews #InternationalAffairs #WorldSecurity Lūdzu, sekojiet BDV7071
Skatīt tulkojumu
🌐 Who Really Defines “Peace”? Missiles. Bases. Sanctions. Wars. Some countries build defensive systems → called a threat. One superpower projects global force → called security. Ask yourself: If defense is punished and offense is praised, can there ever be real peace? Or is it just a game of who gets to decide the rules? Russia, China, Pakistan 🇵🇰, North Korea, Iran — all exploring ways to defend themselves. The U.S. — warning the world while keeping the largest military network ever. Global safety or global dominance? 🤔 #PeaceOrPower #GlobalDoubleStandards #WhoDecides #MissileRace #WorldSecurity $USDC {future}(USDCUSDT)
🌐 Who Really Defines “Peace”?

Missiles. Bases. Sanctions. Wars.

Some countries build defensive systems → called a threat.
One superpower projects global force → called security.

Ask yourself:
If defense is punished and offense is praised, can there ever be real peace?
Or is it just a game of who gets to decide the rules?

Russia, China, Pakistan 🇵🇰, North Korea, Iran — all exploring ways to defend themselves.
The U.S. — warning the world while keeping the largest military network ever.

Global safety or global dominance? 🤔

#PeaceOrPower #GlobalDoubleStandards #WhoDecides #MissileRace #WorldSecurity

$USDC
Skatīt tulkojumu
America’s Allies, the Real Showmen — Answer This, and Then Demand the Nobel Peace Prize The U.S. Director of National Intelligence, head of 18 intelligence agencies and advisor to Donald Trump, Tulsi Gabbard, has stated that Russia, China, Pakistan 🇵🇰, North Korea, and Iran are actively researching and developing advanced conventional and nuclear-capable missile systems—systems that can potentially reach the United States. According to her, this is a serious concern for Washington. But here’s the real question: If these countries are defending themselves and developing deterrence, why is it framed as a threat— while America’s own global missile networks, military bases, and wars are called “security” and “peacekeeping”? Who truly endangers global stability? And if the U.S. claims to seek peace, why does every path seem to lead to fear, sanctions, and war? Is this about global safety… or about maintaining dominance? Can peace really exist when one power decides who is allowed to defend itself and who is not? #GlobalPolitics #MissileRace #WorldSecurity #DoubleStandards #PeaceOrPower $USDC {spot}(USDCUSDT) $XRP {spot}(XRPUSDT) $XLM {spot}(XLMUSDT)
America’s Allies, the Real Showmen — Answer This, and Then Demand the Nobel Peace Prize
The U.S. Director of National Intelligence, head of 18 intelligence agencies and advisor to Donald Trump, Tulsi Gabbard, has stated that Russia, China, Pakistan 🇵🇰, North Korea, and Iran are actively researching and developing advanced conventional and nuclear-capable missile systems—systems that can potentially reach the United States.
According to her, this is a serious concern for Washington.
But here’s the real question:
If these countries are defending themselves and developing deterrence, why is it framed as a threat—
while America’s own global missile networks, military bases, and wars are called “security” and “peacekeeping”?
Who truly endangers global stability?
And if the U.S. claims to seek peace, why does every path seem to lead to fear, sanctions, and war?
Is this about global safety… or about maintaining dominance?

Can peace really exist when one power decides who is allowed to defend itself and who is not?

#GlobalPolitics #MissileRace #WorldSecurity #DoubleStandards #PeaceOrPower
$USDC
$XRP
$XLM
Pieraksties, lai skatītu citu saturu
Pievienojies kriptovalūtu entuziastiem no visas pasaules platformā Binance Square
⚡️ Lasi jaunāko un noderīgāko informāciju par kriptovalūtām.
💬 Uzticas pasaulē lielākā kriptovalūtu birža.
👍 Atklāj vērtīgas atziņas no pārbaudītiem satura veidotājiem.
E-pasta adrese / tālruņa numurs