onboarding

Ja GameFi ir viena universāla patiesība, tad tā ir šī: hype ir neizbēgams, bet ilgtspējība ir nopelnīta. Ikviens, kurš ir pavadījis vairāk nekā dažus mēnešus šajā jomā, ir bijis liecinieks ciklam - pēkšņiem uzsākumiem, eksplozīviem tokenu pieaugumiem, radītāju viļņiem, kas runā par nākamo lielo lietu, gildēm #Onboarding hiperviļņos, un tad, tikpat ātri, atdzišanas fāze, kad realitāte ieiet. Orientēšanās šajos ciklos nav vienkārši jautājums par tirgus laika noteikšanu; tā ir par izpratni par pamatpsiholoģiju, ekonomiku un kopienas modeļiem, kas tos veido. Un dažas organizācijas to saprot labāk nekā @Yield Guild Games (YGG), kas ir izturējusi vairāk hype ciklu nekā lielākā daļa un katru reizi iznākusi ar asāku ieskatu.

The evolution of the scholar contract is one of the most defining chapters in the history of blockchain gaming a journey that mirrors the rise, correction, and maturation of the entire #GameFi ecosystem. What began as a simple handshake agreement between asset owners and players has now transformed into a sophisticated economic relationship built on sustainability, incentives, and long-term alignment.

In the earliest days of GameFi, scholar contracts were designed around speed. The goal was #Onboarding get players into the game quickly, distribute in-game assets just as fast, and grow guild participation at scale. @Yield Guild Games (YGG) became a pioneer of this model, connecting people who had never touched crypto to opportunities in virtual economies. At the time, the contract structure didn’t need complexity revenue sharing was enough because demand far exceeded supply. As token prices surged, efficiency and throughput mattered more than sustainability.

But every economic experiment hits its breaking point. As emissions increased and market dynamics shifted, token-based game economies faced pressure. The fixed-share model once celebrated began to show limitations. Scholars felt the squeeze as rewards thinned, and guilds realized that purely performance-based agreements weren’t adaptable to volatile market conditions. The industry needed a new framework.

This was the catalyst for the next phase of evolution. Instead of treating scholars as short-term yield generators, leading guilds like YGG began viewing them as long-term participants in an emerging digital workforce. The contract model shifted from extraction to empowerment. It no longer focused solely on how much a player could earn, but how much value they could create.

Today’s scholar contracts increasingly reward deeper engagement such as participating in tournaments, contributing to strategy, testing early game features, and supporting community-building initiatives. The modern scholar is not just a player but a collaborator. As a result, the reward structure has become more flexible, taking into account skill, consistency, loyalty, and game-specific contribution.

This evolution also reflects the rising sophistication of game economies themselves. Developers now understand that player incentives must be balanced with economic sinks, asset scarcity, and community health. Scholar contracts have adapted to align with these new design philosophies. Instead of encouraging players to extract tokens as quickly as possible, many agreements now promote reinvestment upgrading NFTs, supporting guild-owned assets, or participating in multi-stage gameplay loops.

YGG’s approach has been central in shaping this shift. By focusing on education, responsible onboarding, and player development, the guild helped redefine what a scholar contract represents in #Web3 . It’s no longer just a distribution mechanism it’s a framework for shared growth and long-term ecosystem resilience.

The result is a model that feels less like a financial contract and more like a partnership one where scholars, guilds, and game developers all share aligned incentives. The scholar contract has matured, and with it, the entire philosophy of Web3 gaming has evolved from rapid expansion to sustainable, meaningful participation.

@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG

Padodamies patiesībai: kriptovalūta joprojām ir biedējoša lielākajai daļai cilvēku. Terminoloģija, maciņi, degvielas maksas, pastāvīgā baža par kļūdas izdarīšanu — tas ir milzīgs ieejas barjera. Vairums projektu ir tik aizņemti ar jau pārliecinātajiem, ka tie ignorē lielo potenciālo lietotāju okeānu, kas vēl joprojām ir krastā. Tas ir milzīgs iespēju brīdis kopienas vadītam projektam kā @Walrus 🦭/acc

Kas notiek, ja daļa Walrus identitātes kļūst sinonīma pieejamai, augstas kvalitātes kriptovalūtas izglītībai? Tas nav par $WAL reklamēšanu. Tas ir par uzticamā resursa kļūšanu jaunpienācējiem. Uzglītodami, jūs piesaistāt lietotājus, kas ir pateicīgi, lojāli un ticami iesaistās jūsu ekosistēmā pirmkārt.

Whenever people step into the world of @Yield Guild Games for the first time, one of the things that tends to confuse them is the structure of YGG and its SubDAOs. And honestly, that confusion makes sense at first. You hear terms like main guild, SubDAO, regional DAO, and community-specific guild, and it's easy to think they are all the same thing wearing slightly different outfits. But the more time you spend in the YGG ecosystem, the clearer the differences become and those differences reveal why this structure is one of YGG’s greatest strengths.

YGG is the parent organization. It’s the global guild the original framework that brings together gamers from all over the world, coordinates large-scale partnerships, creates governance rules, manages the main treasury, and sets the long-term vision for the ecosystem. Think of YGG as the foundation, the central hub, the starting point from which everything else branches out. But what makes YGG truly unique is how it allows communities to take this foundation and build something localized, customized, and culturally tailored through SubDAOs.

SubDAOs are essentially specialized branches of the main guild. Some are region-based, like YGG SEA, which focuses specifically on the Southeast Asian gaming community. Others may be game-specific or theme-specific depending on what the ecosystem needs. The purpose of a SubDAO is to bring YGG’s global mission down to the local level, where players share similar languages, time zones, and gaming cultures. It’s like YGG gives you the blueprint, but the SubDAO brings it to life in a way that fits the people on the ground.

What’s fascinating is how the relationship between YGG and its SubDAOs creates a decentralized yet unified structure. The main guild supports big-picture strategy partnerships with major game studios, long-term investments, DAO governance frameworks, and ecosystem-wide initiatives. Meanwhile, SubDAOs are the ones focused on hands-on community building. They host local events, train players, manage #Onboarding pipelines, translate materials, create region-specific programs, and ensure that every player feels represented. They are not just smaller versions of YGG they are localized engines of growth.

YGG is the tree, and SubDAOs are its branches. The tree provides nutrients and structure, while the branches reach out in different directions to grow leaves, fruit, and new life. And the beautiful part is that each branch grows differently depending on its environment cultural differences, game preferences, community needs, and regional opportunities all shape how a SubDAO evolves.

This structure makes the guild scalable in a way that many organizations struggle to achieve. If YGG tried to manage every region, every community event, and every local partnership from the central level, things would move slowly and feel disconnected. But by empowering SubDAOs, decisions happen faster. Communities take ownership of their journey. Leaders emerge naturally. And players feel a stronger bond because the guild they interact with speaks their language literally and culturally.

Another important difference lies in autonomy. SubDAOs are not just extensions that follow orders from the main guild. They have their own treasuries, leadership teams, governance processes, and strategic priorities. While they align with YGG’s overall mission, they adapt that mission to what works best in their region or game ecosystem. This autonomy is what makes SubDAOs resilient. If a particular region faces challenges or a game ecosystem shifts, the SubDAO can pivot without waiting for top-level approval. They are agile, fast, and deeply connected to their communities.

It’s also worth noting that SubDAOs serve as talent incubators. Many of the strongest community leaders, tournament organizers, creators, and analysts emerge from SubDAOs because they get hands-on experience in shaping their communities. They learn governance, community management, strategy, and project execution. Over time, SubDAO leaders often influence the direction of the broader YGG ecosystem, creating a feedback loop where local perspectives drive global innovation.

And this brings us to one of the most powerful differences the flow of value. YGG provides support, partnerships, assets, and strategic connections, while SubDAOs generate grassroots activity events, onboarding, competitions, mentorship programs, and creator networks. The success of one benefits the other. When SubDAOs thrive, they increase the overall strength of YGG. When YGG lands new partnerships, SubDAOs get access to better resources. It’s a symbiotic relationship built on shared interests.

From a community standpoint this structure also makes YGG feel more human. Joining a massive global guild can feel overwhelming, but joining a SubDAO feels like joining a neighborhood within a city. You instantly have people who understand your region’s culture, speak your language, play during your time zone, and connect with your local gaming traditions. This sense of belonging is one of the biggest reasons YGG has become a global phenomenon it never sacrificed community intimacy for scale.

Another way to think about it is this YGG brings the vision, while SubDAOs bring the heartbeat. YGG sets the trajectory, but SubDAOs power the movement. The main guild plants the seeds, but SubDAOs nurture the garden. It is a structure that balances decentralization with cohesion, creativity with strategy, and global influence with local authenticity.

When people ask about the difference between YGG and SubDAOs, the answer is simple but meaningful. YGG is the global foundation the parent ecosystem focused on governance, partnerships, and strategic direction. SubDAOs are localized hubs communities that take the global vision and shape it into real experiences, real opportunities, and real community growth on the ground.

Without YGG SubDAOs wouldn’t have the structure, network, or shared identity they rely on. Without SubDAOs, YGG wouldn’t have the reach, cultural richness, or community-driven strength that defines it today. Together, they create an ecosystem where gamers from around the world can contribute, grow, and become part of something bigger something built from the ground up, one community at a time.

@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG

Kad jūs šodien skatāties uz Linea, tās aktīvo ekosistēmu, tās pieaugošo ikdienas darījumu skaitu un spēcīgo kopienu, ir viegli pieņemt, ka lietotāju pieņemšana notika dabiski, jo tā ir zkEVM, ko atbalsta spēcīga tehnoloģija. Taču Lineas pieaugums nebija nejaušs. Tīkls ieguldīja ievērojamu daudzumu domāšanas un stratēģijas, lai uzņemtu lietotājus, kā to izglītotu un kā samazinātu barjeras, kas parasti attur cilvēkus no jaunu ķēžu izpētes. Godīgi sakot, tas ir viens no lielākajiem iemesliem, kāpēc @Linea.eth ir kļuvis par tik pieejamu un strauji augošu #Layer2 Ethereum ekosistēmā.

If you had asked me two or three years ago what a scholar was in Web3, I probably would have given you a simple answer someone who borrows #NFTs plays a game, earns tokens, and splits rewards with a guild. That definition wasn’t wrong it was just incomplete.

Watching @Yield Guild Games evolve from the inside, I have learned that the scholar role was never meant to stay static. It was always a starting point. In the early days of YGG, scholars were #Onboarding into something entirely new. Most had never used a crypto wallet before. Many didn’t even think of gaming as something that could generate value beyond entertainment. Yet on-chain, you could already see patterns forming wallets tied to scholarship programs showing consistent activity, regular payouts, and behavior closer to labor participation than speculation.

What changed everything was expectation. As games became more complex and margins tighter, being a scholar stopped being about just logging hours. Performance mattered. Strategy mattered. Understanding in-game economies mattered. Scholars who treated it like free money faded out. Those who treated it like a role grew.

Inside YGG, top scholars began doing things that don’t fit the casual gamer stereotype. They tracked earnings, optimized routes, managed multiple accounts responsibly, and helped onboard new players. Some even contributed feedback to game developers, acting as real-time QA from emerging markets something Web2 studios usually pay heavily for.

From a DAO perspective, this evolution was visible. Reward distributions increasingly favored consistency over spikes. Wallets tied to experienced scholars showed longer retention, lower churn, and better asset utilization. That’s not luck that’s professionalization. The most interesting part, though, was upward mobility.

I have seen scholars become managers. Not because they were loud on social media, but because they understood the ground reality. They knew what burnout looked like. They knew which incentive tweaks worked and which ones broke morale. When YGG subDAOs started forming, many of the strongest contributors weren’t external hires they were former scholars who had earned trust over time.

This is something people outside the ecosystem often miss. YGG didn’t just distribute NFTs; it created career paths inside digital economies. Of course, it wasn’t perfect. Some scholarship models failed. Some games collapsed. Some token incentives didn’t survive market cycles. But even those failures taught scholars how fragile digital economies can be a lesson most retail participants only learn the hard way.

What matters is that the scholar identity matured. Today, being a YGG scholar isn’t about being passive. It’s about adaptability. Scholars now think in terms of risk, opportunity cost, and long-term participation. They ask smarter questions. They move between games. They understand when to scale back and when to double down. And here’s the part I think about most.

If Web3 truly wants to onboard the next billion users, it won’t happen through abstract narratives about decentralization. It’ll happen through roles people can grow into. Scholar was one of the first roles that made sense to everyday users. YGG refined it, stress-tested it, and let it evolve naturally.

That’s why I don’t see scholars as a temporary phase in Web3 gaming. I see them as early contributors in a system still figuring itself out. And if history has taught us anything, it’s this the people who grow with the system often end up shaping it.
@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG

Ātra nauda piesaista bari. Ilgtermiņa vērtība veido komunitātes. Un ceļš no baras uz komunitāti ir izglītība. Visizturīgākās kriptoprojektu nav tikai izstrādā produktus; tie aktīvi audzina zinātkāru lietotāju bāzi. Tas ir dziļš iespēju brīdis @Walrus 🦭/acc un $WAL pod.

Padomājiet. Komunitāte, kas saprot tikai „pirkt zemāk, pārdot augstāk“, ir nemierīga. Tā tūlīt aizbēgs, ja parādīsies pirmā problēma vai nākamais mirdzošais objekts. Taču komunitāte, kas saprot, kāpēc darbojas protokols, tā tokenomikas mehānismus un nākotnes plānus, kļūst neapturama spēka. Tā kļūst par evaņģēliem, aizstāvētājiem un kopizstrādātājiem.