google

Everyone keeps calling this an AI bubble... but the actual data shows we are NOT even close to the stage where bubbles burst.
History says bubbles collapse only when everyone believes they will never collapse. Right now, we are in the opposite phase.
Major Bubbles Follow the Same Pattern
If you study every major bubble: Dot-com (1995–2000), Housing (2005–2008), China (2013–2015) there is one common pattern:
Warnings come YEARS before the real top.Economists warned about tech stocks in 1997.The bubble burst in 2000.They warned about US housing in 2005.The crash came in late 2007–08.Early warnings NEVER kill the bubble.
They simply mark the beginning of its acceleration phase.
Why People Think AI Is a Bubble
People have been screaming market bubble:
OpenAI hype NVDA rally US government investments Massive speculation
But just like the dot-com era, this phase is where liquidity, capital, and optimism ramp up, not collapse. Bubbles end when confidence is absolute, not when fear is trending.
Google Trends Prove We Are Not at Peak
If you check Google Trends:
AI bubble searches are still high. That means people are expecting the crash. And when everyone expects a crash, bubbles usually don’t burst. The real danger zone is when search interest disappears when everyone believes the bubble is unbreakable.
We are not there yet.
Nasdaq Data Shows We Are Early, Not Late
While people call today’s market rally a bubble, the actual data says we’re nowhere close to a final peak. Nasdaq has gained only ~88% in the last 5 years. During the real dot-com mania, Nasdaq went 12× in five years (from ~400 to ~4800).
And the historical chart shows something important:
Economists turned bearish years before the real topWarnings came early, but the bubble kept expandingEven after crises, tech resumed its long-term pathTrue bubble peaks form only when public confidence is absolute
Right now, we’re still nowhere near that stage.
Valuations Are High, But Not Dot-Com Extreme

Valuations also show we are not at dot-com levels:
Dot-com Nasdaq P/E ≈ 60×
Today’s Nasdaq P/E ≈ 26×
S&P 500 P/E is high (~40), but still below historic extremes
These are elevated valuations, but not at the levels where bubbles usually burst.
Margin Debt Shows Bubble Still Building
Margin debt which shows how much leverage investors are using, is at a record $1.1 trillion.
This is the highest in history. But historically, bubbles burst only after leverage starts falling sharply. Right now, leverage is still rising, which means the speculation cycle is still ongoing.
Volatility Signals Fear, Not Euphoria

Trading volume and volatility also don’t match a final bubble phase.
Every time tech falls, VIX jumps sharply (20 → 28). Put option buying spikes heavily on every dip. A real bubble top usually shows the opposite:
low volatility, low put buying, and high confidence.
Right now, confidence is low and fear is high.
S&P 500 Equal-Weight Index Confirms This Isn’t a Full Bubble
A very important detail:
The S&P 500 equal-weighted index has been up only 10% the past year. That means the rally is coming mainly from a handful of mega-caps like:
NvidiaTeslaAppleGoogleAmazon
A true bubble peak needs full-market participation. That is not happening yet.
Macro Cycle Supports a Longer AI Runway
If we look at long-term macro conditions, they also support a longer bubble cycle:
The Fed has started to ease with T-bill purchases, which historically boosts valuations.Trump policies aim to bring global capital back to the U.S., which means more liquidity.US federal debt is projected to hit $50–$55 trillion by 2029, and this money ultimately flows into the economy.Global liquidity injections from Japan, China, and the U.S. will support risk assets.
These conditions historically extend bubbles, not end them.
Sentiment Is Nowhere Near Peak Optimism

Sentiment also shows we are not close to peak optimism.
Wall Street is divided. Retail investors fear every correction. Put open interest spikes every time equities fall. This is a classic early-to-mid bubble phase sentiment.
All Data Confirm We’re Not at the Late Stage Yet
All charts also support the idea that we haven’t hit the late-stage bubble dynamics:
Corporate earnings (especially Nvidia, Microsoft) still support valuationsNasdaq is rising but not at dot-com “parabolic” levelsEqual-weight S&P is flat, meaning the market is not overextendedMarket funding remains strong and still increasing
All these indicate that the stock market bubble is building, not peaking.
What the Full Dataset Actually Shows
✔ Nasdaq nowhere near dot-com valuation extremes
✔ Nasdaq return multiples far below past bubble peaks
✔ Margin debt rising, not collapsing
✔ Liquidity expansion ahead
✔ Equal-weight S&P flat
✔ Heavy concentration in a few names
✔ High fear, low complacency
✔ AI investment cycle only accelerating
✔ Google searches reflect fear, not mania
All of this shows: The bubble is real, but it is not close to bursting.
Historical Timing Suggests the Peak Is Years Away
If we follow the historical timeline:
Dot-com
Warnings: 1997–1999Burst: 2000–2001
Housing
Warnings: 2005–2007Burst: 2008
AI
Warnings: 2023–2025Likely peak: 2027–2028
This is the most realistic timeline based on valuations, liquidity, sentiment, and historical bubble cycles.
This is why we remain optimistic about the crypto market. We are definitely going through a correction, but the upcoming liquidity catalysts are too strong.
Conclusion
We will still see corrections, volatility, and pullbacks. But nothing in the data suggests an immediate collapse. Everything indicates that the cycle is still building strength. If this follows past patterns, the true mania phase, the stage where everything starts going vertical, is still ahead.
#Nvidia's #Apple #Google #Tesla #RiskAssetsMarketShock

#BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge
#Write2Earn #Write2Earn!
#Google @PATRICIA B-M
@Binance Square Official
@ABRA_PBMOfficialFans
@Aesthetic_Meow @HeadBanger
@表弟想自由_BNB @Madu_6 @Tapu13
Globālās meklēšanas par "Bitcoin" sasniedza maksimālo Google Trends punktu 100 laikā no 2026. gada 1. februāra. Tas ir augstākais līmenis pēdējo 12 mēnešu laikā (gadu augsts).
Iepriekšējais maksimums bija ap 95 2025. gada novembra vidū, kad Bitcoin nokritās zem $100,000.

Bitcoin februārī sākās ap $81,500.
Tas strauji kritās (apmēram 5 dienu laikā) līdz aptuveni $60,000 — zemākais līmenis kopš 2024. gada oktobra.

Ja Bitcoin kādreiz patiesi ieietu ilgstošā lāču tirgū, panika būtu visur.
Virsraksti kliegs, laika līnijas sabruks, un “kriptovalūta ir mirusi” mēnesiem ilgi būs Google trending. Tā izskatās īsta kapitullācija - skaļa, emocionāla un neizbēgama.
Bet tas nav tas, ko mēs redzam.
Meklēšanas interese paliek mērena. Publiskā apsēstība ir prombūtnē. Nav masu bailes, nav plaša izmisuma, nav kolektīvas vēlmes paziņot par beigu iestāšanos.
Iepriekšējos ciklos Google meklējumu uzplūdi iezīmēja emocionālās ekstrēmas: eiforija augšgalos, izmisums apakšgalos. Šodien mēs neesam ne vienā, ne otrā, kas tev pasaka kaut ko svarīgu.

Uz @Vanar ($VANRY ) šajā spēļu galda, tu neredzi nejaušo tirgus likumu, tu redzi tikai vienu raksturu uzliesmojošu mākslinieku — mēs viņu dēvējam par „dīleri”.
Šodien es nerunāšu ar tevi par pamatiem, šodien mēs runāsim par to, kāpēc tavs $VANRY vienmēr **„nopirkt un krīt, pārdot un pieaug”**.
📊 Fenomens 1: parasti ir „sirdsdarbības monitors”, kad ir ziņas, tad „atdzimst”
Atverot VANRY dienas grafiku, vai tu nepamanīji dīvainu skaistumu?
Bez ziņām tā K līnija izskatās kā slimnīcas instrumentā **„sirdsdarbības monitors (svītrkods)” — mirusi, līdzena līnija, kas pavada ļoti zemu tirdzniecības apjomu.

#Apple #Google #Paypal
Esiet gatavi ieguldīt monētās, kuras atbalsta un finansē slaveni miljardieri.
Laiks pirkt un turēt, jo tā sasniegs +$100 pēc tam, kad tā oficiāli tiks tirgota.
2026 - 2027 Digitālā ekonomikas sistēma visā pasaulē.

$BNB - $XRP - $BTC

S&P 500 indekss pieauga tūlīt pēc otrdienas tirdzniecības sākuma, balstoties uz spēcīgu lēcienu Palantir Technologies akcijās un ievērojamu atveseļošanos zelta un sudraba cenās, pēc tam, kad ASV akcijas uzsāka jaunu tirdzniecības mēnesi ar spēcīgu sākumu.
Un kopējais indekss pieauga par 0,1%, kamēr Nasdaq Composite indekss pieauga par 0,4%, savukārt Dow Jones Industrial indekss pārvietojās tuvu slēgšanas līmenim bez būtiskām izmaiņām.

Google sagrāva Meta finanšu tehnoloģiju jomā, kaut arī abas kompānijas sāka no aptuveni vienādām pozīcijām Web 2.0 gigantiem. Un šeit nemaz nav runa par veiksmi — atšķirība slēpjas principiāli atšķirīgajos pieejās, kā iegūt lietotāju un regulatoru uzticību.
Kāpēc Google Play uzvarēja Facebook Pay
Google Pay var lepoties ar 150 miljoniem lietotāju, kamēr Meta joprojām nevar pārliecināt ne patērētājus, ne uzņēmumus, ne regulatorus, ka spēj kļūt par uzticamu finanšu pakalpojumu sniedzēju. Paradokss ir tāds, ka Meta kontrolē digitālās ekosistēmas simtiem valstu ar miljardiem lietotāju, bet finanšu tehnoloģijas joprojām ir viņai terra incognita.

Tas ir VIENĪGAIS atlikušais optimistiskais scenārijs $BTC .
Finanšu tirgus diapazonā no 72-78 tūkstošiem dolāru jābūt atsitiena zonai.
Tālāk viss būs atkarīgs no tā, cik tālu tas ies.