derivative

Bitcoin’s -53% drop in just 120 days feels abnormal — because it is.
No exchange collapse.
No outright bans.
No single black-swan headline.
Yet price kept bleeding.
So what actually changed?

🔄 Bitcoin No Longer Trades Like Old Cycles

In early cycles, BTC price was driven by:

Spot buyers & sellers

On-chain coin movement

Fixed supply meeting real demand

That model is no longer dominant.
Today, Bitcoin trades as a synthetic, leveraged asset.
A huge share of price discovery now happens via:

Futures & perpetuals

Options

ETFs

Prime broker lending

Wrapped BTC & structured products

👉 Exposure without touching real BTC.

⚙️ How Derivatives Pushed BTC Lower — Non-Stop

Institutions can short Bitcoin at scale through derivatives:

No need for spot selling

No coins leaving wallets

Once price slips:

Longs get liquidated

Forced selling kicks in

Liquidations trigger more liquidations

That’s why this drop looked mechanical, not emotional:

Funding flips negative

Open interest collapses

Bounce attempts get sold instantly

This wasn’t retail panic.
This was positioning being unwound.

❌ The “21M Supply” Narrative Isn’t Enough Anymore

Bitcoin’s hard cap didn’t change — but effective supply did.
Paper BTC now trades at scale.
Price reacts to:

Hedging flows

Leverage resets

Risk-off macro behavior

Not just spot demand.
Crypto is now treated like a leveraged macro asset.
When stocks wobble → crypto gets sold first.

🌍 Macro = Background Pressure, Not the Trigger

Yes, macro matters:

Equity weakness

Volatile gold & silver

Fed liquidity expectations

Geopolitical tension

But macro amplified the move — it didn’t start it.
This sell-off looks controlled, not capitulatory:

Red candles stacking

Shallow relief rallies

Large players quietly reducing exposure

🔮 What Happens Next?

⚠️ Relief bounces are possible — liquidation events usually get them.
But:

Sustained upside is harder

Derivatives still control price

Global risk remains fragile

📌 The key takeaway:
Bitcoin didn’t dump because fundamentals broke.
It dumped because BTC now trades through leverage, not just supply.
And leverage cuts both ways.
$BTC
#Bitcoin #BTC #CryptoMarkets #Derivative #MarketStructure #Macro #RiskOff

Īsa atbilde:
Tieši – nē.
Netieši – jā, dažreiz diezgan spēcīgi.
Ko mūžīgie nākotnes līgumi nedara
Mūžīgie līgumi:
nenotiek faktiskās aktīvu tirdzniecības (nav nopirkti vai pārdoti reāli monētas),
nenoraksta automātiski vietējo cenu,
ir atvasinājumi → to cena ir piesaistīta vietējā tirgū, nevis otrādi.
Citiem vārdiem sakot, nav tieša mehānisma, kur “nākotnes nosaka vietējo cenu”.
Ko patiesībā notiek (svarīgā daļa)
1️⃣ Finansēšanas likme – saikne starp nākotnes un vietējo tirgu