pinetwork

Pi tīkls ir viens no visvairāk apspriestajiem digitālās naudas projektiem, galvenokārt tāpēc, ka tā ir milzīga starptautiska kopiena un mobilās iegūšanas sistēma.
Tomēr viens jautājums vienmēr izraisa diskusijas:
👉 Kāda varētu būt Pi iespējamā cenas diapazons?
Šis raksts izpēta kopienas gaidas, parasti apspriežamos cenu diapazonus un faktorus, kas var ietekmēt Pi vērtību nākotnē.
🔘 Parasti apspriežamie Pi cenas diapazoni
Balstoties uz kopienas diskusijām un viedokļu aptaujām, Pi atbalstītāji parasti iekļaujas četrās plašās gaidīšanas grupās:

#PiNetwork Pi Network keeps publishing long blogs about “Open Network, AI, Ventures, Nodes, KYC, Ecosystem growth” — but let’s talk about the only thing that actually proves success in crypto: price and demand.
In 2025 they claim:
Open Network launched
17.5+ million users passed KYC
15.8 million migrated to Mainnet
$100M Pi Ventures announced
AI tools, App Studio, hackathons, nodes, protocol upgrades
DEX, AMM, domains, staking, games, partnerships
Sounds impressive on paper.
So here’s the simple question:
👉 If all of this really mattered, why did the price NEVER go up?
Not once. No sustained pump. No real demand. Only continuous decline.
In crypto, real progress shows up on-chain and on price charts.
Bitcoin builds → institutions buy → price reacts.
Ethereum upgrades → usage grows → price responds.
With Pi? No verifiable institutional buying
No on-chain proof of serious capital inflow
No real market demand
Just constant unlocking, selling pressure, and excuses
And yet Pi hype accounts keep spreading claims that have no basis in reality, pushing narratives and lies that lack any on-chain evidence or verifiable sources.
That’s not optimism — that’s misinformation.
On-chain data would expose such buys in minutes. None exist.
After 6+ years of development and an entire year of “big achievements” in 2025, the market’s verdict is clear: 📉 Price kept going down.
At some point, you stop blaming exchanges, manipulators, or “early phase” narratives and accept reality: The market does not believe in this project.
Utility without demand is meaningless.
Blogs without buyers are irrelevant.
Ecosystems without capital are just apps.
If a project does everything right but the price only falls, the conclusion is uncomfortable but obvious:
Either the model is broken — or the project has failed.
Harsh? Yes.
But this is crypto — not a motivation seminar.
I believed in Pi Network, but now I doubt it.