marketcycles

Kas ir "Lāču tirgus"?

Lielākā daļa cilvēku redz krītošās kriptovalūtu cenas un uzreiz domā par katastrofu, bet "lāču tirgus" nav tikai par lietu krišanu; tas ir specifisks tirgus cikls, kas satur slēptas patiesības gudriem investoriem. Zinot to, var mainīt, kā tu jūties par sarkanajām diagrammām!

Vai tu zini to sajūtu, kad tavs mīļākais veikals paziņo par milzīgu izpārdošanu, bet tu šaubies, jo domā, ka cenas varētu samazināties vēl vairāk?

Tas ir kaut kas līdzīgs lāču tirgum kriptovalūtās.

Tas ir brīdis, kad tirgus, ieskaitot lielos spēlētājus kā Bitcoin (BTC), piedzīvo ilgtspējīgu cenu kritumu, parasti samazinoties par 20% vai vairāk no nesenajiem maksimumiem.

un kāpēc tas nenozīmē to, ko jūs domājat)
Visi mīl teikt: «Bitcoin — tā ir matemātika».
Lieliski. Tad runāsim matemātikas valodā.
Bez memēm. Bez «to the moon». Bez reliģiskā ekstāze.
⸻
1️⃣ Eksponenciālais pieaugums nevar ilgt mūžīgi
Bitcoin vēsturiski auga eksponenciāli.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading near $68,166, positioned at a technically and psychologically decisive range. The market is not trending — it is compressing. And compression precedes expansion.
The question is not whether volatility is coming.
The question is direction.
After studying multi-cycle structure, liquidity positioning, macro correlations, and sentiment data, two dominant scenarios emerge.
📉 The Bear Thesis: The $50K Liquidity Sweep

1. Structural Resistance at $72K
Bitcoin continues to stall below the $72,000–$73,000 supply zone — a region that previously acted as distribution during the prior all-time high formation.
Repeated rejections at this level suggest:
Aggressive overhead supply
Unwilling breakout buyers
Large players distributing into strength
Until this level is reclaimed on high volume, the market remains technically vulnerable.
2. The Psychological $60K Pivot
The $60K level is not just horizontal support — it is a liquidity magnet.
If price decisively loses $60K:
Stop losses cascade
Late longs unwind
Perpetual funding flips negative
Below that, the $50K–$53K zone becomes the next high-probability liquidity pool.
Why that region?
0.618 Fibonacci retracement of the current cycle
Previous consolidation base
Significant on-chain accumulation cluster
CME gap confluence (historical behavior)
Markets often engineer one final flush before structural reversals. A sweep into $50K would reset funding, sentiment, and leverage — preparing the ground for sustainable upside.
3. Momentum Divergence
On the higher timeframes:
Price made higher highs
RSI failed to confirm
This bearish divergence historically precedes:
Distribution phases
Final shakeouts
Deep corrective pullbacks
Momentum exhaustion at resistance is not random — it reflects declining marginal demand.
4. Macro Headwinds
Bitcoin does not trade in isolation.
Current macro backdrop:
Elevated bond yields
Tight global liquidity
Strong dollar conditions
Risk asset hesitation
Until liquidity conditions improve, explosive upside may remain capped.
📈 The Bull Thesis: Post-Halving Expansion Cycle

While short-term structure looks fragile, longer-term context tells a different story.
1. Multi-Cycle Ascending Structure (2018–Present)
Since the 2018 bear market low, Bitcoin has maintained a higher-timeframe ascending trajectory.
Each cycle includes:
Blow-off top
70–80% correction
Base formation
Mid-cycle retracement
Expansion phase
If this is a mid-cycle retracement rather than a macro top, current price action resembles prior accumulation phases.
2. Sentiment Reset
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index is hovering near extreme fear.
Historically:
Retail sells fear
Long-term capital accumulates fear
Markets bottom when participants feel maximum discomfort — not maximum optimism.
3. Post-Halving Supply Dynamics
Following each halving event:
Supply issuance drops
Miner sell pressure reduces
Scarcity narrative strengthens
Previous cycles show delayed expansion — not immediate rallies. Price often consolidates for months before accelerating.
4. Institutional Structural Demand
Unlike 2018:
Spot ETFs now exist
Institutional capital participates
Dips attract structured inflows
This creates demand layers beneath price — particularly during volatility spikes.
🔑 The Decisive Levels
Bearish Continuation Trigger:
Loss of $60K on strong volume → opens path to $50K liquidity sweep.
Bullish Confirmation Trigger:

Daily close above $72K–$73K → invalidates short-term bearish structure.
If reclaimed with conviction, next expansion targets align toward:
→ $80K
→ $100K+ continuation
📊 Probability Framework
Markets rarely move in straight lines.
Short term:
Expect volatility compression between $60K–$70K.
Medium term:
A liquidity event (either flush or breakout) is increasingly likely.
Long term:
Structural trend remains intact unless $50K fails decisively on weekly timeframe.
💡 Strategic Perspective
Prediction is ego. Positioning is edge.
I’m monitoring:
• $60K for structural failure
• $72K for breakout confirmation
• Funding + open interest for leverage imbalance
• Liquidity shifts in global markets
Sentiment is washed out. Structure is compressing. Liquidity is coiling.
When Bitcoin resolves from this range, it won’t move quietly.
It will expand.
The only question is from which level.
#bitcoin
#CryptoAnalysis
#TechnicalStructure
#MarketCycles
$BTC

Krypto 2026. gadā vairs nav tikai hype virzīts.
Spot ETFs, institucionālā glabāšana, OTC likviditāte un dziļi atvasinājumu tirgi ir pārveidojuši tirgus struktūru.
Bet viena pamata dinamika paliek nemainīga:
Atšķirība starp to, kā domā valis — un kā reaģē lielākā daļa mazumtirdzniecības dalībnieku.
Izpratne par šo atstarpi ir vieta, kur ir priekšrocības.
1️⃣ Institucionālais Valis > Klasiskais Valis
Iepriekšējās ciklos mēs izsekojām lielām uz ķēdes makiem.
2026. gadā īstā uzkrāšana bieži notiek caur:
ETF ieplūdes / izplūdes
Valsts uzņēmumi

Kriptovalūtu tirgus piedzīvo svārstību un nenoteiktības fāzi.
Cenas mainās ātri. Noskaņojums ir sajaukts. Daudzi investori ir apjukuši.
Bet tas nav nekas jauns.
Katrs nozīmīgs izaugsmes cikls kriptovalūtu vēsturē sākās ar šaubām, bailēm un konsolidāciju.
Šī fāze atdala divu veidu cilvēkus:
• Tie, kuri reaģē emocionāli
• Tie, kuri novēro, mācas un pozicionē sevi
Gudri investori nejautā: “Kāpēc tirgus ir krities?”
Viņi jautā: “Kādas iespējas tas rada?”