etfs

JĀBŪT SLAPSKA
$XRP
Ir daudz runāts par #xrp un ar visu #ETFs viņa vārds ir ieguvis vērtību, un nav brīnums, jo šāda ETF esamība šim kripto aktīvam piešķir lielāku uzticību un prestižu pret citiem projektiem. Tomēr, neskatoties uz to, ka to sūta uz debesīm, cena ir samazinājusies daudz, nerunājot par procentiem, tas ir acīmredzami pēc vispārējā tirgus krituma.
Ir svarīgi aplūkot dažus aspektus, viens no tiem ir tā popularitāte un nemitīga bezmaksas reklāma, ko veic turētāji par savu tuvāko nākotni un no otras puses, ko rāda daži indikatori.

Bitcoin just went through one of its sharpest selloffs in years.
Over the last 24 hours, $BTC plunged toward the $60,000 level amid an accelerated wave of selling that closely mirrors the mechanics of the 2022 FTX collapse. While Bitcoin later rebounded to around $69,800, the damage under the surface tells a much deeper story.
This was not a single headline-driven crash. It was a mechanical unwind — driven by ETF outflows, forced liquidations, and whales moving supply onto exchanges.
On-Chain Price Models Show How Deep the Damage Ran
Glassnode data highlights how far price deviated from key on-chain reference levels during the drop:
STH Cost Basis: ~$94,000Active Investor Mean: ~$86,800True Market Mean: ~$80,100Realized Price: ~$55,600
With spot price collapsing well below these widely watched benchmarks, it’s clear that a large portion of the market was pushed into unrealized and realized losses simultaneously.
This kind of dislocation doesn’t happen quietly — it creates stress across leverage, spot holders, and institutional flows.
X Filled the Narrative Vacuum — But Evidence Was Elsewhere
As price fell, social media exploded with theories:
A hidden Hong Kong hedge fund blowupYen-funded carry trade stressEven quantum security panic
Not every rumor is false, but this pattern is familiar. Fast liquidations create a narrative vacuum, and speculation rushes in before hard data can catch up.
The more durable explanation lies in observable market plumbing:
Persistent ETF outflowsForced leveraged liquidationsWhales depositing $BTC onto exchanges
It’s not cinematic — but it’s how crypto selloffs usually propagate.
ETF Outflows Removed the “Automatic Dip Buyer”
One of the most important structural shifts has been sustained selling through US spot Bitcoin ETFs.
Over the past four months:
Net ETF outflows exceed $6 billion (SoSo Value data)
When ETF inflows are strong, the market benefits from a steady, price-insensitive buyer. When outflows persist, that support fades — and downside moves become sharper.
Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart noted:
ETF holders are sitting on their largest losses since launchThe current drawdown represents the worst percentage pullback (~42%) since ETFs launched in January 2024
This doesn’t cause a crash on its own — but it weakens rebounds and thins liquidity, setting the stage for violent downside once key levels break.
Liquidations Turn Selling Into a Cascade
Once BTC lost critical support, the market flipped from discretionary selling to forced selling.
According to CoinGlass:
Over $1.2 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated
This is classic crypto behavior:
Risk reduction beginsKey levels failExchanges forcibly close positionsSelling feeds on itself
When liquidity is thin, forced flow dominates price discovery, making moves feel sudden and information-driven — even when they’re purely mechanical.
On-Chain Data Confirms Capitulation and Whale Activity
Blockchain data adds another layer of confirmation.
On Feb. 4, Bitcoin’s Entity-Adjusted Realized Loss (7D-SMA) hit $889 million per dayThis marked the largest daily realized loss since November 2022
These readings usually appear during capitulation phases, when holders are locking in losses at scale after long-held support levels break.
At the same time, CryptoQuant data showed whales depositing large amounts of $BTC onto Binance, signaling potential selling or hedging behavior during the drawdown.
Final Take
This move wasn’t driven by a single “smoking gun.”
It was the result of:
Persistent ETF outflowsLeverage being forcefully unwoundWhales moving supply to exchangesThin liquidity amplifying every downside break
The result looked chaotic — but the mechanics were clear.
When leverage, structure, and psychology all crack at once, price moves faster than narratives can keep up.
#Bitcoin #BTC #crypto #Onchain #ETFs

#ETH NEW YORK — February 8, 2026 — Nasdaq has confirmed that position limits for options on BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) remain unchanged, addressing recent market rumors suggesting a removal of these constraints.
Despite reports of a push to eliminate caps, Bitwise advisor Jeff Park clarified that the current limit of 250,000 contracts stays in effect. While Nasdaq recently filed a proposal with the SEC to increase this limit to one million contracts to meet rising institutional demand, the request has not yet received regulatory approval.
The exchange’s stance emphasizes market stability, as position limits are designed to prevent manipulative schemes and ensure that no single entity exerts excessive influence over the underlying asset. For now, IBIT—which ranks among the top U.S. assets by options open interest—will continue to operate under the same standard limits as other major commodity-based ETFs, pending further SEC review later this month.
#ETFs $ETH