SIMBA81
190 ໂພສ
SIMBA81
ລາຍງານ
ບລັອກຜູ້ໃຊ້
ເປີດການຊື້ຂາຍ
ຜູ້ຊື້ຂາຍປະຈໍາ
5.9 ປີ
40 ກໍາລັງຕິດຕາມ
35 ຜູ້ຕິດຕາມ
281 Liked
ໂພສ
Portfolio
ທັງໝົດ
ວົງຢືມ
ວີດີໂອ
ຖ່າຍທອດສົດ
·
--
Bitcoin quantum threat: Which wallets face the most risk?Fireblocks’ research chief has identified exposed public keys as the main factor in Bitcoin’s future quantum risk, citing public estimates that roughly 6.7 million to 7 million BTC sit behind keys already visible onchain.
Summary
Older Bitcoin outputs and reused addresses can leave funds behind public keys that are already exposed.Fireblocks recommends fresh deposit and change addresses, with continuous tracking of exposed balances.Bitcoin’s BIP 360 proposal reduces long-term key exposure but does not provide complete quantum protection.Fireblocks has cut Ethereum post-quantum signature verification from 8.09 million to 1.23 million gas.
Fireblocks Vice President of Research Michael Gutkin told crypto.news that a holder’s exposure depends on the blockchain, address type, and transaction history, rather than whether the owner is an exchange, institution, or individual.
“Exposure ultimately comes down to whether the public key is already visible onchain.”
In Gutkin’s assessment, frequent transactions can create exposure through address reuse and the handling of unspent Bitcoin. A treasury that rarely moves its holdings may keep public keys hidden for longer, he said, but only if the address format and previous activity have not already revealed them.
Bitcoin’s older outputs and reused addresses expose keys
For early Bitcoin outputs known as pay-to-public-key, or P2PK, Gutkin explained that the public key is visible from the start. Many outputs dating to the Satoshi era use that format, leaving their keys exposed even when the coins have never moved, he said.
By comparison, Gutkin said pay-to-public-key-hash and native SegWit addresses, known as P2PKH and P2WPKH, hide the public key until the first spend. Once a holder spends from an address, however, the key becomes permanently visible, according to his explanation.
If the same address receives more Bitcoin afterward, Gutkin said those new funds sit behind a key that has already been revealed. For holders checking their exposure, he recommended examining whether addresses have spent before and whether they continue receiving funds.
Taproot introduces another distinction. The authors of BIP 360 identify Taproot outputs as exposed to long-duration quantum attacks because their output public keys are visible when created.
According to the proposal, a sufficiently capable quantum computer could derive a private key from an exposed public key. Its authors distinguish attacks against keys visible for long periods from faster attacks attempted after a transaction reveals a key but before it confirms.
The concern remains a future threat. In a Sep. 17 report on Bitcoin’s migration challenges, Ledger Chief Technology Officer Charles Guillemet said no cryptographically relevant quantum computer capable of breaking Bitcoin’s current signatures was known to exist.
Guillemet nevertheless warned that research, software changes, hardware-wallet upgrades and user adoption could take years, making preparation a separate issue from the arrival of a working attacker.
Gradual wallet changes can reduce Bitcoin exposure
Responding to calls for “bunker mode” preparation, Gutkin argued that institutions should manage public-key exposure continuously rather than plan a single mass transfer.
“For an institution, I don’t think the goal should be a one-time mass migration,” he said.
Under his proposed approach, new Bitcoin deposits would go to fresh addresses, while change from transactions would also return to fresh addresses. Gutkin said institutions should track individual unspent transaction outputs, or UTXOs, to identify which funds already sit behind exposed keys.
Through normal spending, Gutkin explained, exposed addresses could gradually empty while new funds arrive at addresses whose public keys remain hidden. He said a live exposure dashboard should show both the remaining exposed balance and the transactions creating additional exposure.
Fireblocks already supports several components of that process, according to Gutkin, and is developing tools for selecting transaction inputs based on exposure and displaying affected balances.
Other custody providers have introduced related controls. In its July 22 announcement, BitGo detailed four Bitcoin wallet controls covering exposure scoring, address remediation, transaction-input selection, and updated address defaults.
BitGo said its input-selection method attempts to spend all unspent outputs associated with a selected address, reducing the chance of leaving funds behind after a transaction reveals the key. The company described the controls as operational preparation rather than a replacement for a future Bitcoin upgrade.
For a rushed migration, Gutkin warned that large holders competing for limited Bitcoin transaction capacity could drive fees higher and slow confirmations. Within institutions, he said, additional transactions and approvals could increase mistakes, including sending change back to an exposed address.
To limit phishing and handling errors, Gutkin recommended establishing destination addresses, approval policies and trusted communication channels in advance. He said an urgent transfer should not require customers or staff to follow unfamiliar instructions or bypass existing controls.
Bitcoin still needs a quantum-resistant spending method
Even with better address practices, Gutkin said Bitcoin would still need a quantum-resistant method for authorizing transactions.
In his explanation, BIP 360 addresses one part of the problem by proposing pay-to-Merkle-root outputs, which remove Taproot’s exposed key-spending path. Gutkin stressed that reducing long-term public-key exposure does not make the proposal a complete post-quantum solution.
The proposal’s authors likewise state that protection against attacks during the brief period before a transaction confirms may require post-quantum signatures. BIP 360 remains listed as a draft.
Unlike Ethereum, Gutkin said Bitcoin cannot simply accept a new signature-verification contract through a general-purpose application layer. Depending on the chosen design, he explained, protocol changes may be necessary to support the scheme and keep transaction fees manageable.
Gutkin also pointed to research into hash-based signatures, including designs that track signing state to reduce overhead. Such approaches involve trade-offs in signature size, wallet design and recordkeeping, he said.
For U.S. investors holding Bitcoin through funds, custody arrangements are also part of the preparation. A Sep. 23 report on Coinbase’s post-quantum custody plans noted that spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF investors do not control the private keys securing fund holdings; the issuers’ selected custodians manage them.
In that report, Coinbase Chief Cryptographer Yehuda Lindell described plans for custody infrastructure capable of supporting different post-quantum signature schemes. Lindell said Coinbase was exploring programmable hardware security modules as an alternative when a blockchain’s chosen scheme cannot work with its existing distributed-signing systems.
Ethereum’s cheaper verification still requires wallet changes
On Ethereum, Gutkin said standard accounts expose their public keys once they sign a transaction because the key can be recovered from the signature. Unlike Bitcoin address rotation, he explained, regularly replacing an Ethereum account is less practical because balances, token approvals and application activity are tied to it.
For Solana’s standard wallets, Gutkin noted that the address is the public key itself, so the key is exposed without any initial spending transaction.
Programmable Ethereum accounts offer a way to change transaction authorization while retaining the account, according to Gutkin. Fireblocks’ research has reduced verification of ML-DSA-44, a post-quantum signature scheme, from 8.09 million gas to 1.23 million gas.
In a Sep. 2 research post, Fireblocks reported that the verifier follows FIPS 204, the digital-signature standard published by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gutkin said the team improved the implementation rather than changing the standardized algorithm.
Among the changes, Gutkin identified more efficient hashing, mathematical operations, signature decoding, public-key handling, and memory use. Peak memory consumption fell from nearly a megabyte to about 41 kilobytes, he said.
The design still carries costs. Gutkin put the one-time deployment cost for the expanded public key at roughly 4.1 million gas, alongside the 1.23 million gas required for each verification.
For a treasury or cold wallet making relatively few transactions, Gutkin said those costs may be reasonable. He cautioned that a standard Ethereum account cannot simply switch to ML-DSA, while smart-account integration, custody support and compatibility with decentralized applications still require engineering work.
Gutkin also said the verifier does not make Ethereum’s entire system post-quantum secure, with separate research continuing at its consensus and data layers.
Despite extensive testing and formal verification, Gutkin said Fireblocks’ implementation remains research code requiring audits and hardening before production use. For institutional custody, he added, the company is separately researching production-grade post-quantum signing systems.
Bitcoin quantum threat: Which wallets face the most risk?
Fireblocks’ research chief has identified exposed public keys as the main factor in Bitcoin’s future quantum risk, citing public estimates that roughly 6.7 million to 7 million BTC sit behind keys already visible onchain.
Summary
Older Bitcoin outputs and reused addresses can leave funds behind public keys that are already exposed.Fireblocks recommends fresh deposit and change addresses, with continuous tracking of exposed balances.Bitcoin’s BIP 360 proposal reduces long-term key exposure but does not provide complete quantum protection.Fireblocks has cut Ethereum post-quantum signature verification from 8.09 million to 1.23 million gas.
Fireblocks Vice President of Research Michael Gutkin told crypto.news that a holder’s exposure depends on the blockchain, address type, and transaction history, rather than whether the owner is an exchange, institution, or individual.
“Exposure ultimately comes down to whether the public key is already visible onchain.”
In Gutkin’s assessment, frequent transactions can create exposure through address reuse and the handling of unspent Bitcoin. A treasury that rarely moves its holdings may keep public keys hidden for longer, he said, but only if the address format and previous activity have not already revealed them.
Bitcoin’s older outputs and reused addresses expose keys
For early Bitcoin outputs known as pay-to-public-key, or P2PK, Gutkin explained that the public key is visible from the start. Many outputs dating to the Satoshi era use that format, leaving their keys exposed even when the coins have never moved, he said.
By comparison, Gutkin said pay-to-public-key-hash and native SegWit addresses, known as P2PKH and P2WPKH, hide the public key until the first spend. Once a holder spends from an address, however, the key becomes permanently visible, according to his explanation.
If the same address receives more Bitcoin afterward, Gutkin said those new funds sit behind a key that has already been revealed. For holders checking their exposure, he recommended examining whether addresses have spent before and whether they continue receiving funds.
Taproot introduces another distinction. The authors of BIP 360 identify Taproot outputs as exposed to long-duration quantum attacks because their output public keys are visible when created.
According to the proposal, a sufficiently capable quantum computer could derive a private key from an exposed public key. Its authors distinguish attacks against keys visible for long periods from faster attacks attempted after a transaction reveals a key but before it confirms.
The concern remains a future threat. In a Sep. 17 report on Bitcoin’s migration challenges, Ledger Chief Technology Officer Charles Guillemet said no cryptographically relevant quantum computer capable of breaking Bitcoin’s current signatures was known to exist.
Guillemet nevertheless warned that research, software changes, hardware-wallet upgrades and user adoption could take years, making preparation a separate issue from the arrival of a working attacker.
Gradual wallet changes can reduce Bitcoin exposure
Responding to calls for “bunker mode” preparation, Gutkin argued that institutions should manage public-key exposure continuously rather than plan a single mass transfer.
“For an institution, I don’t think the goal should be a one-time mass migration,” he said.
Under his proposed approach, new Bitcoin deposits would go to fresh addresses, while change from transactions would also return to fresh addresses. Gutkin said institutions should track individual unspent transaction outputs, or UTXOs, to identify which funds already sit behind exposed keys.
Through normal spending, Gutkin explained, exposed addresses could gradually empty while new funds arrive at addresses whose public keys remain hidden. He said a live exposure dashboard should show both the remaining exposed balance and the transactions creating additional exposure.
Fireblocks already supports several components of that process, according to Gutkin, and is developing tools for selecting transaction inputs based on exposure and displaying affected balances.
Other custody providers have introduced related controls. In its July 22 announcement, BitGo detailed four Bitcoin wallet controls covering exposure scoring, address remediation, transaction-input selection, and updated address defaults.
BitGo said its input-selection method attempts to spend all unspent outputs associated with a selected address, reducing the chance of leaving funds behind after a transaction reveals the key. The company described the controls as operational preparation rather than a replacement for a future Bitcoin upgrade.
For a rushed migration, Gutkin warned that large holders competing for limited Bitcoin transaction capacity could drive fees higher and slow confirmations. Within institutions, he said, additional transactions and approvals could increase mistakes, including sending change back to an exposed address.
To limit phishing and handling errors, Gutkin recommended establishing destination addresses, approval policies and trusted communication channels in advance. He said an urgent transfer should not require customers or staff to follow unfamiliar instructions or bypass existing controls.
Bitcoin still needs a quantum-resistant spending method
Even with better address practices, Gutkin said Bitcoin would still need a quantum-resistant method for authorizing transactions.
In his explanation, BIP 360 addresses one part of the problem by proposing pay-to-Merkle-root outputs, which remove Taproot’s exposed key-spending path. Gutkin stressed that reducing long-term public-key exposure does not make the proposal a complete post-quantum solution.
The proposal’s authors likewise state that protection against attacks during the brief period before a transaction confirms may require post-quantum signatures. BIP 360 remains listed as a draft.
Unlike Ethereum, Gutkin said Bitcoin cannot simply accept a new signature-verification contract through a general-purpose application layer. Depending on the chosen design, he explained, protocol changes may be necessary to support the scheme and keep transaction fees manageable.
Gutkin also pointed to research into hash-based signatures, including designs that track signing state to reduce overhead. Such approaches involve trade-offs in signature size, wallet design and recordkeeping, he said.
For U.S. investors holding Bitcoin through funds, custody arrangements are also part of the preparation. A Sep. 23 report on Coinbase’s post-quantum custody plans noted that spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF investors do not control the private keys securing fund holdings; the issuers’ selected custodians manage them.
In that report, Coinbase Chief Cryptographer Yehuda Lindell described plans for custody infrastructure capable of supporting different post-quantum signature schemes. Lindell said Coinbase was exploring programmable hardware security modules as an alternative when a blockchain’s chosen scheme cannot work with its existing distributed-signing systems.
Ethereum’s cheaper verification still requires wallet changes
On Ethereum, Gutkin said standard accounts expose their public keys once they sign a transaction because the key can be recovered from the signature. Unlike Bitcoin address rotation, he explained, regularly replacing an Ethereum account is less practical because balances, token approvals and application activity are tied to it.
For Solana’s standard wallets, Gutkin noted that the address is the public key itself, so the key is exposed without any initial spending transaction.
Programmable Ethereum accounts offer a way to change transaction authorization while retaining the account, according to Gutkin. Fireblocks’ research has reduced verification of ML-DSA-44, a post-quantum signature scheme, from 8.09 million gas to 1.23 million gas.
In a Sep. 2 research post, Fireblocks reported that the verifier follows FIPS 204, the digital-signature standard published by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gutkin said the team improved the implementation rather than changing the standardized algorithm.
Among the changes, Gutkin identified more efficient hashing, mathematical operations, signature decoding, public-key handling, and memory use. Peak memory consumption fell from nearly a megabyte to about 41 kilobytes, he said.
The design still carries costs. Gutkin put the one-time deployment cost for the expanded public key at roughly 4.1 million gas, alongside the 1.23 million gas required for each verification.
For a treasury or cold wallet making relatively few transactions, Gutkin said those costs may be reasonable. He cautioned that a standard Ethereum account cannot simply switch to ML-DSA, while smart-account integration, custody support and compatibility with decentralized applications still require engineering work.
Gutkin also said the verifier does not make Ethereum’s entire system post-quantum secure, with separate research continuing at its consensus and data layers.
Despite extensive testing and formal verification, Gutkin said Fireblocks’ implementation remains research code requiring audits and hardening before production use. For institutional custody, he added, the company is separately researching production-grade post-quantum signing systems.
Summary
Older Bitcoin outputs and reused addresses can leave funds behind public keys that are already exposed.Fireblocks recommends fresh deposit and change addresses, with continuous tracking of exposed balances.Bitcoin’s BIP 360 proposal reduces long-term key exposure but does not provide complete quantum protection.Fireblocks has cut Ethereum post-quantum signature verification from 8.09 million to 1.23 million gas.
Fireblocks Vice President of Research Michael Gutkin told crypto.news that a holder’s exposure depends on the blockchain, address type, and transaction history, rather than whether the owner is an exchange, institution, or individual.
“Exposure ultimately comes down to whether the public key is already visible onchain.”
In Gutkin’s assessment, frequent transactions can create exposure through address reuse and the handling of unspent Bitcoin. A treasury that rarely moves its holdings may keep public keys hidden for longer, he said, but only if the address format and previous activity have not already revealed them.
Bitcoin’s older outputs and reused addresses expose keys
For early Bitcoin outputs known as pay-to-public-key, or P2PK, Gutkin explained that the public key is visible from the start. Many outputs dating to the Satoshi era use that format, leaving their keys exposed even when the coins have never moved, he said.
By comparison, Gutkin said pay-to-public-key-hash and native SegWit addresses, known as P2PKH and P2WPKH, hide the public key until the first spend. Once a holder spends from an address, however, the key becomes permanently visible, according to his explanation.
If the same address receives more Bitcoin afterward, Gutkin said those new funds sit behind a key that has already been revealed. For holders checking their exposure, he recommended examining whether addresses have spent before and whether they continue receiving funds.
Taproot introduces another distinction. The authors of BIP 360 identify Taproot outputs as exposed to long-duration quantum attacks because their output public keys are visible when created.
According to the proposal, a sufficiently capable quantum computer could derive a private key from an exposed public key. Its authors distinguish attacks against keys visible for long periods from faster attacks attempted after a transaction reveals a key but before it confirms.
The concern remains a future threat. In a Sep. 17 report on Bitcoin’s migration challenges, Ledger Chief Technology Officer Charles Guillemet said no cryptographically relevant quantum computer capable of breaking Bitcoin’s current signatures was known to exist.
Guillemet nevertheless warned that research, software changes, hardware-wallet upgrades and user adoption could take years, making preparation a separate issue from the arrival of a working attacker.
Gradual wallet changes can reduce Bitcoin exposure
Responding to calls for “bunker mode” preparation, Gutkin argued that institutions should manage public-key exposure continuously rather than plan a single mass transfer.
“For an institution, I don’t think the goal should be a one-time mass migration,” he said.
Under his proposed approach, new Bitcoin deposits would go to fresh addresses, while change from transactions would also return to fresh addresses. Gutkin said institutions should track individual unspent transaction outputs, or UTXOs, to identify which funds already sit behind exposed keys.
Through normal spending, Gutkin explained, exposed addresses could gradually empty while new funds arrive at addresses whose public keys remain hidden. He said a live exposure dashboard should show both the remaining exposed balance and the transactions creating additional exposure.
Fireblocks already supports several components of that process, according to Gutkin, and is developing tools for selecting transaction inputs based on exposure and displaying affected balances.
Other custody providers have introduced related controls. In its July 22 announcement, BitGo detailed four Bitcoin wallet controls covering exposure scoring, address remediation, transaction-input selection, and updated address defaults.
BitGo said its input-selection method attempts to spend all unspent outputs associated with a selected address, reducing the chance of leaving funds behind after a transaction reveals the key. The company described the controls as operational preparation rather than a replacement for a future Bitcoin upgrade.
For a rushed migration, Gutkin warned that large holders competing for limited Bitcoin transaction capacity could drive fees higher and slow confirmations. Within institutions, he said, additional transactions and approvals could increase mistakes, including sending change back to an exposed address.
To limit phishing and handling errors, Gutkin recommended establishing destination addresses, approval policies and trusted communication channels in advance. He said an urgent transfer should not require customers or staff to follow unfamiliar instructions or bypass existing controls.
Bitcoin still needs a quantum-resistant spending method
Even with better address practices, Gutkin said Bitcoin would still need a quantum-resistant method for authorizing transactions.
In his explanation, BIP 360 addresses one part of the problem by proposing pay-to-Merkle-root outputs, which remove Taproot’s exposed key-spending path. Gutkin stressed that reducing long-term public-key exposure does not make the proposal a complete post-quantum solution.
The proposal’s authors likewise state that protection against attacks during the brief period before a transaction confirms may require post-quantum signatures. BIP 360 remains listed as a draft.
Unlike Ethereum, Gutkin said Bitcoin cannot simply accept a new signature-verification contract through a general-purpose application layer. Depending on the chosen design, he explained, protocol changes may be necessary to support the scheme and keep transaction fees manageable.
Gutkin also pointed to research into hash-based signatures, including designs that track signing state to reduce overhead. Such approaches involve trade-offs in signature size, wallet design and recordkeeping, he said.
For U.S. investors holding Bitcoin through funds, custody arrangements are also part of the preparation. A Sep. 23 report on Coinbase’s post-quantum custody plans noted that spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF investors do not control the private keys securing fund holdings; the issuers’ selected custodians manage them.
In that report, Coinbase Chief Cryptographer Yehuda Lindell described plans for custody infrastructure capable of supporting different post-quantum signature schemes. Lindell said Coinbase was exploring programmable hardware security modules as an alternative when a blockchain’s chosen scheme cannot work with its existing distributed-signing systems.
Ethereum’s cheaper verification still requires wallet changes
On Ethereum, Gutkin said standard accounts expose their public keys once they sign a transaction because the key can be recovered from the signature. Unlike Bitcoin address rotation, he explained, regularly replacing an Ethereum account is less practical because balances, token approvals and application activity are tied to it.
For Solana’s standard wallets, Gutkin noted that the address is the public key itself, so the key is exposed without any initial spending transaction.
Programmable Ethereum accounts offer a way to change transaction authorization while retaining the account, according to Gutkin. Fireblocks’ research has reduced verification of ML-DSA-44, a post-quantum signature scheme, from 8.09 million gas to 1.23 million gas.
In a Sep. 2 research post, Fireblocks reported that the verifier follows FIPS 204, the digital-signature standard published by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gutkin said the team improved the implementation rather than changing the standardized algorithm.
Among the changes, Gutkin identified more efficient hashing, mathematical operations, signature decoding, public-key handling, and memory use. Peak memory consumption fell from nearly a megabyte to about 41 kilobytes, he said.
The design still carries costs. Gutkin put the one-time deployment cost for the expanded public key at roughly 4.1 million gas, alongside the 1.23 million gas required for each verification.
For a treasury or cold wallet making relatively few transactions, Gutkin said those costs may be reasonable. He cautioned that a standard Ethereum account cannot simply switch to ML-DSA, while smart-account integration, custody support and compatibility with decentralized applications still require engineering work.
Gutkin also said the verifier does not make Ethereum’s entire system post-quantum secure, with separate research continuing at its consensus and data layers.
Despite extensive testing and formal verification, Gutkin said Fireblocks’ implementation remains research code requiring audits and hardening before production use. For institutional custody, he added, the company is separately researching production-grade post-quantum signing systems.
81
·
--
ບົດຄວາມ
US eyes $1 billion Iran-linked crypto seizure, Bessent saysU.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said authorities have located about $1 billion in Iran-linked cryptocurrency that they could seize this week as Washington presses ahead with financial restrictions against Tehran.
Summary
Bessent said U.S. authorities could seize $1 billion in Iran-linked cryptocurrency during the week.Treasury sanctioned 17 vessels on Oct. 8 over alleged shipments of Iranian petroleum products.Tether reported approximately $550 million in Iran-linked USDT freezes during 2026.Chainalysis estimated Iran’s cryptocurrency ecosystem handled more than $7.78 billion in activity during 2025.
Scott Bessent said at Newsmax’s NPolicy Summit in Washington on Oct. 8 that officials knew where the cryptocurrency was held and were working to isolate the assets.
“We’re probably gonna seize a billion dollars of crypto this week,” he said.
During the interview with Greta Van Susteren, the Treasury secretary described Washington’s approach as an “absolute isolation campaign,” encompassing financial restrictions, maritime controls and limits on international travel.
According to The Block’s report, Bessent did not establish whether the targeted $1 billion would be additional to amounts previously announced by U.S. authorities. His latest remarks described a possible seizure rather than a completed transfer of the assets into government custody.
Iran-linked crypto has faced earlier wallet freezes
As crypto.news reported on Sep. 28, Tether put its Iran-linked USDT freezes for 2026 at approximately $550 million, citing cooperation with the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and U.S. law enforcement.
In Tether’s account, more than $344 million was frozen across two addresses in April after U.S. authorities supplied information about the wallets. The company said OFAC added the addresses to the Central Bank of Iran’s sanctions entry the following day.
For July, the issuer reported more than $130 million frozen across four additional TRON wallets as Treasury added the addresses to the central bank’s designation.
Under the freezing policy described by Tether, blocked USDT cannot move from the affected addresses. September court filings described a separate U.S. effort to forfeit $61.2 million in USDT across ten TRON addresses that Tether had frozen in 2025.
According to those filings, a Sep. 14 warrant authorized the FBI to take custody of the tokens, while the civil forfeiture complaint sought government ownership. Prosecutors associated the funds with alleged Iranian oil proceeds.
Treasury sanctions have reached exchanges and foreign firms
In coverage published Sep. 3, Bessent identified digital assets as targets for possible further restrictions alongside airlines and maritime businesses, according to Reuters’ account of his remarks.
Treasury launched Operation Economic Outcast on Aug. 24, extending sanctions authority over Iran’s digital asset sector and other parts of its economy. The department said the measures could reach foreign people and companies operating in or supporting the covered sectors.
US eyes $1 billion Iran-linked crypto seizure, Bessent says
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said authorities have located about $1 billion in Iran-linked cryptocurrency that they could seize this week as Washington presses ahead with financial restrictions against Tehran.
Summary
Bessent said U.S. authorities could seize $1 billion in Iran-linked cryptocurrency during the week.Treasury sanctioned 17 vessels on Oct. 8 over alleged shipments of Iranian petroleum products.Tether reported approximately $550 million in Iran-linked USDT freezes during 2026.Chainalysis estimated Iran’s cryptocurrency ecosystem handled more than $7.78 billion in activity during 2025.
Scott Bessent said at Newsmax’s NPolicy Summit in Washington on Oct. 8 that officials knew where the cryptocurrency was held and were working to isolate the assets.
“We’re probably gonna seize a billion dollars of crypto this week,” he said.
During the interview with Greta Van Susteren, the Treasury secretary described Washington’s approach as an “absolute isolation campaign,” encompassing financial restrictions, maritime controls and limits on international travel.
According to The Block’s report, Bessent did not establish whether the targeted $1 billion would be additional to amounts previously announced by U.S. authorities. His latest remarks described a possible seizure rather than a completed transfer of the assets into government custody.
Iran-linked crypto has faced earlier wallet freezes
As crypto.news reported on Sep. 28, Tether put its Iran-linked USDT freezes for 2026 at approximately $550 million, citing cooperation with the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and U.S. law enforcement.
In Tether’s account, more than $344 million was frozen across two addresses in April after U.S. authorities supplied information about the wallets. The company said OFAC added the addresses to the Central Bank of Iran’s sanctions entry the following day.
For July, the issuer reported more than $130 million frozen across four additional TRON wallets as Treasury added the addresses to the central bank’s designation.
Under the freezing policy described by Tether, blocked USDT cannot move from the affected addresses. September court filings described a separate U.S. effort to forfeit $61.2 million in USDT across ten TRON addresses that Tether had frozen in 2025.
According to those filings, a Sep. 14 warrant authorized the FBI to take custody of the tokens, while the civil forfeiture complaint sought government ownership. Prosecutors associated the funds with alleged Iranian oil proceeds.
Treasury sanctions have reached exchanges and foreign firms
In coverage published Sep. 3, Bessent identified digital assets as targets for possible further restrictions alongside airlines and maritime businesses, according to Reuters’ account of his remarks.
Treasury launched Operation Economic Outcast on Aug. 24, extending sanctions authority over Iran’s digital asset sector and other parts of its economy. The department said the measures could reach foreign people and companies operating in or supporting the covered sectors.
Summary
Bessent said U.S. authorities could seize $1 billion in Iran-linked cryptocurrency during the week.Treasury sanctioned 17 vessels on Oct. 8 over alleged shipments of Iranian petroleum products.Tether reported approximately $550 million in Iran-linked USDT freezes during 2026.Chainalysis estimated Iran’s cryptocurrency ecosystem handled more than $7.78 billion in activity during 2025.
Scott Bessent said at Newsmax’s NPolicy Summit in Washington on Oct. 8 that officials knew where the cryptocurrency was held and were working to isolate the assets.
“We’re probably gonna seize a billion dollars of crypto this week,” he said.
During the interview with Greta Van Susteren, the Treasury secretary described Washington’s approach as an “absolute isolation campaign,” encompassing financial restrictions, maritime controls and limits on international travel.
According to The Block’s report, Bessent did not establish whether the targeted $1 billion would be additional to amounts previously announced by U.S. authorities. His latest remarks described a possible seizure rather than a completed transfer of the assets into government custody.
Iran-linked crypto has faced earlier wallet freezes
As crypto.news reported on Sep. 28, Tether put its Iran-linked USDT freezes for 2026 at approximately $550 million, citing cooperation with the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and U.S. law enforcement.
In Tether’s account, more than $344 million was frozen across two addresses in April after U.S. authorities supplied information about the wallets. The company said OFAC added the addresses to the Central Bank of Iran’s sanctions entry the following day.
For July, the issuer reported more than $130 million frozen across four additional TRON wallets as Treasury added the addresses to the central bank’s designation.
Under the freezing policy described by Tether, blocked USDT cannot move from the affected addresses. September court filings described a separate U.S. effort to forfeit $61.2 million in USDT across ten TRON addresses that Tether had frozen in 2025.
According to those filings, a Sep. 14 warrant authorized the FBI to take custody of the tokens, while the civil forfeiture complaint sought government ownership. Prosecutors associated the funds with alleged Iranian oil proceeds.
Treasury sanctions have reached exchanges and foreign firms
In coverage published Sep. 3, Bessent identified digital assets as targets for possible further restrictions alongside airlines and maritime businesses, according to Reuters’ account of his remarks.
Treasury launched Operation Economic Outcast on Aug. 24, extending sanctions authority over Iran’s digital asset sector and other parts of its economy. The department said the measures could reach foreign people and companies operating in or supporting the covered sectors.
88
·
--
Where is BTC headed this October?Bitcoin price has recovered toward $83,000 after testing $80,400, but weakening daily momentum and a still-positive weekly breakout leave its October outlook dependent on holding the $79,600–$80,400 support zone.
Summary
$79,663 marks daily Supertrend support beneath Bitcoin’s rebound toward $83,000.Daily MACD remains bearish, with its histogram falling to approximately negative 537.Bitcoin’s weekly chart remains above the upper boundary of a falling wedge.The liquidation heatmap shows a large concentration of leveraged positions near $87,000.
TradingView’s Binance BTC/USDT daily chart placed Bitcoin at $83,012 on Oct. 9, while the weekly chart showed $82,928. The weekly price was down 4.16%, following a high of $86,999 and a low of $80,394.
Bitcoin’s recovery has therefore reduced the distance from its recent highs without reversing the weekly decline. The charts present competing signals for the rest of October: short-term momentum has deteriorated, while the broader recovery from the summer lows remains intact.
Bitcoin’s $80,000 support faces its next test
On the daily TradingView chart, Bitcoin remained above its green Supertrend line at $79,663.52. The indicator still supports a bullish trend reading, although the recent decline has brought price closer to that threshold.
Together, the Supertrend reading and the weekly low identify approximately $79,600–$80,400 as the nearest major support area. A sustained move below that range would weaken the daily recovery structure and expose the earlier trading region around $75,000–$76,000.
The daily MACD offers a more cautious signal. Its blue line stood at 1,172, below the orange signal line at 1,709.23, while the histogram registered negative 537.22.
You might also like:Bitcoin could benefit from rising U.S. debt fears: CoinShares
The bearish crossover indicates that upward momentum has slowed despite Bitcoin’s rebound. Both MACD lines remained above zero, however, distinguishing the current loss of momentum from a fully negative reading across the indicator.
Based on those chart signals, another support test remains possible unless Bitcoin rebuilds momentum above the nearby resistance area. A recovery through $84,000–$85,000 would be an initial improvement, while the recent highs around $86,500–$87,000 represent the more important barrier.
The weekly breakout keeps a recovery scenario alive
Bitcoin’s weekly TradingView chart shows price above the upper boundary of a falling wedge drawn across the decline from its 2025 highs. The breakout occurred before the latest pullback, and the recent candles remain above that descending boundary.
The weekly structure therefore still supports a conditional recovery scenario. The pullback has not yet returned Bitcoin inside the marked wedge, although remaining above the pattern alone does not establish a new upward move.
The weekly Awesome Oscillator stood at positive 10,355.38, with green bars above zero. Its reading contrasts with the bearish daily MACD and suggests that momentum remains stronger on the longer timeframe.
Weekly ADX registered 27.40. The reading indicates an established trend, but ADX measures strength rather than direction and cannot independently confirm that Bitcoin will rise.
Taken together, the weekly breakout and positive oscillator leave room for another attempt at $87,000 if nearby support holds. A sustained break above that recent high would strengthen the chart-based case for a move toward $90,000.
Repeated rejection below $87,000 would leave Bitcoin trading beneath the same ceiling that stopped its early-October advance. Under that scenario, the weekly recovery would need further consolidation before a clearer direction emerges.
Liquidation levels point to $85,000 and $87,000
CoinGlass’s one-week liquidation heatmap shows Bitcoin rebounding after a steep decline toward $80,400. At the right edge of the chart, leveraged positions remain concentrated above the price, including bands around $85,000 and $87,000.
The brightest overhead band sits near $87,000. If Bitcoin advances into that region, closures of vulnerable short positions could amplify the move, although the heatmap cannot establish whether buyers will first drive price there.
Below the market, visible bands remain around $82,000 and $80,400. The positioning leaves room for volatility in either direction, particularly if Bitcoin loses the levels recovered during its latest bounce.
An Oct. 9 commentary post accompanying a CryptoQuant chart reported approximately 55,600 BTC moving to exchanges at a loss over 24 hours. The post interpreted the transfers as pressure on newer holders while acknowledging that exchange deposits do not necessarily represent completed sales.
The same commentary cited $1.09 billion in crypto liquidations, including approximately $1.05 billion in long positions. Those figures describe the reported market-wide event, rather than Bitcoin liquidations alone.
The exchange-transfer data adds a potential supply concern to the technical picture. It does not establish how much Bitcoin was sold or whether the holders behind those deposits will continue selling.
US policy remains an October catalyst
Government-linked wallet movements have added another supply concern. crypto.news reported approximately 833.6 BTC worth $71.56 million moving toward Coinbase Prime, with around 264.9 BTC tied to the Bitfinex case and 568.7 BTC linked to the Potapenko and Turogin forfeiture. The transfer raised sale questions rather than confirming a completed disposal.
The Federal Reserve’s September meeting minutes recorded a quarter-point increase to a 3.75%–4% policy range and scheduled the next meeting for Oct. 27–28. The minutes also described higher Treasury yields and oil-driven inflation pressures.
Reuters reported that most officials considered another increase appropriate by year-end, while investors expected an October pause and a December hike. An October increase therefore remains a risk rather than an established outcome.
For the remaining weeks of October, the chart-based outlook hinges on two zones: support around $79,600–$80,400 and resistance around $86,500–$87,000. Holding support and clearing resistance would strengthen the recovery case toward $90,000; losing support would shift attention toward $75,000–$76,000.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Read more:Cardano price looks fragile below $0.24: Can it hold $0.21?
Read more about
BitcoinPrice Analysis
Cardano price looks fragile below $0.24: Can it hold $0.21?
By Lawrence Mondal
Oct 9, 2026 at 08:44 PM GMT+5
Edited by Lawrence Mondal
Markets
Share
Cardano price has fallen below $0.24 after reversing its early October rally, with weakening daily momentum and an analyst’s ascending-channel warning putting $0.21 back in focus.
Summary
Cardano price traded near $0.236, down about 9.2% from its weekly opening price.Daily RSI fell to 48.06, while price slipped below the $0.2483 Bollinger midpoint.Ali Martinez identified $0.21 as a possible downside level following an ascending-channel rejection.Weekly Supertrend resistance stood at $0.2762, above ADA’s attempted recovery.
TradingView’s Binance ADA/USDT data showed Cardano trading at $0.2359 on Oct. 9, recovering modestly after a sharp sell-off. The daily session ranged between $0.2313 and $0.2415, with ADA up 1.59% from its opening price.
The rebound followed a much larger retreat from the weekly high. TradingView’s weekly chart recorded a high of $0.2824 and a low of $0.2238, leaving ADA near $0.2358 and down 9.2% against its weekly opening price.
Measured from the weekly high, Cardano had lost approximately 16.5%. Its bounce from the weekly low amounted to about 5.4%, leaving the recovery well short of the preceding decline.
You might also like:Cardano’s Hoskinson challenges Vitalik over AI threats to crypto
Cardano’s channel rejection puts $0.21 in focus
Analyst Ali Martinez identified a rejection at the upper boundary of an ascending channel on Cardano’s daily chart in an Oct. 8 post. His analysis placed the channel’s lower boundary near $0.21 and made a move toward that level conditional on the rejection holding.
The channel illustration marked intermediate levels near $0.23 and $0.256, with the upper region around $0.29. ADA’s subsequent move below $0.24 left it closer to the lower marked levels than to the area where the analyst identified the rejection.
A decline from $0.2359 to $0.21 would amount to roughly 11%. Before reaching that level, ADA would encounter the recent weekly low at $0.2238, an observable reference from the latest sell-off.
Jesse Olson also pointed to weakening daily momentum in an Oct. 9 post. He said Cardano had shown bearish divergence several days earlier and that a sell signal, together with a candle close below his trend dots, had preceded two targets being reached.
Olson identified a lower yellow zone as a possible retest area. His warning and Martinez’s channel analysis both described downside setups, although they used different chart tools and conditions.
A recovery above $0.24 would reverse the immediate loss of that price level. TradingView’s daily readings place another reference higher, near $0.2483, before ADA reaches the $0.256 region marked in Martinez’s chart.
Daily RSI slips below 50 as ADA loses its midpoint
TradingView’s daily chart showed Cardano’s relative strength index at 48.06, below the neutral 50 level. The RSI also sat beneath its displayed moving average of 59.88 after falling sharply from its early October readings.
The daily Bollinger Bands placed the 20-day simple moving average at $0.2483, the upper band at $0.2700 and the lower band at $0.2276. ADA traded below the midpoint and approximately 3.6% above the lower band.
The midpoint stood around 5.3% above the latest price. A move back to that average would recover part of the recent decline, while the upper band remained approximately 14.5% higher.
On the downside, the lower Bollinger Band and the weekly low formed two nearby references at $0.2276 and $0.2238. Martinez’s $0.21 scenario lies below both.
The daily chart also showed that the latest retreat followed a recovery from the June lows, when ADA traded around $0.14–$0.15. Despite the October reversal, the price remained above that earlier trough.
Weekly resistance remains near $0.276
TradingView’s weekly Supertrend remained red at $0.2762, above Cardano’s latest price. The weekly high of $0.2824 briefly exceeded that level before ADA retreated beneath it.
At $0.2358, Cardano would need to rise roughly 17% to reach the Supertrend line. The daily upper Bollinger Band at $0.2700 sits slightly below that weekly reference.
The weekly Awesome Oscillator showed a positive reading of 0.0120, giving a different momentum reading from the daily RSI below 50. The positive oscillator coincided with price remaining beneath the weekly Supertrend.
The longer-term chart showed ADA’s recovery from its midyear low, but the latest weekly decline interrupted that advance. The $0.2700–$0.2824 area now contains the daily upper band, weekly Supertrend and recent weekly high.
Liquidation bands sit above and below ADA’s rebound
CoinGlass’s one-month liquidation heatmap showed visible concentrations around $0.23–$0.24, with further bands below near $0.215–$0.22. Above the latest price, brighter concentrations appeared around $0.257–$0.26 and $0.28.
The heatmap traced ADA’s early October rise toward $0.28, followed by its sharp fall toward $0.224 and a partial recovery near $0.24. Its lower concentrations overlap the price region between the recent weekly low and Martinez’s $0.21 channel target.
For US investors using exchange-traded exposure, Volatility Shares’ Cardano ETF provides ADA-linked exposure through instruments rather than directly holding ADA, according to the issuer. Its product disclosures identify price volatility and rebalancing among the fund’s risks.
Cardano’s immediate recovery references remain $0.24 and the $0.2483 daily midpoint. Below the market, $0.2276 and $0.2238 precede the conditional $0.21 downside level identified by Martinez.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Read more:Ethereum price at $2,500 crossroads as Supertrend turns bearish
Read more about
CardanoPrice Analysis
Follow us on social media
Ethereum price at $2,500 crossroads as Supertrend turns bearish
By Lawrence Mondal
Oct 9, 2026 at 08:14 PM GMT+5
Edited by Lawrence Mondal
Markets
Share
Ethereum price has recovered to around $2,493 after a sharp fall toward $2,400, but its daily Supertrend has turned bearish, and the 4-hour chart still shows negative money flow.
Summary
Ethereum price trades near $2,493 after recovering from its sharp decline toward $2,400.Daily Supertrend resistance stands at $2,764, above Ethereum’s current price.The 4-hour Bollinger midpoint at $2,569 marks the next recovery hurdle.U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $486.1 million in outflows across four trading sessions.
Ethereum price struggles to recover $2,500
TradingView’s Binance ETH/USDT daily chart showed Ethereum at $2,492.98 on Oct. 9, up 0.73% for the session. The day’s price range extended from $2,471.05 to $2,520.54, leaving ETH below $2,500 despite an earlier move above that level.
The daily chart shows a sharp reversal from the trading range established near $2,650–$2,750 in late September and early October. Ethereum’s latest bounce has recovered only part of that decline, with the price still below the area where it traded before selling accelerated.
On the 4-hour TradingView chart, ETH stood at $2,493.31 after falling 0.53% during the displayed period. Its recovery from the recent low had stalled near $2,500, while the latest candles remained below the chart’s falling moving average.
You might also like:Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade could ease DeFi congestion, Curve says
Analyst Ella identified $2,500 as the first level buyers need to reclaim in an Oct. 9 post. She described Ethereum’s move from approximately $2,700 to a wick near $2,400 as a decline of close to 11%, with selling accelerating toward the end.
Ella said a recovery above $2,500 could ease some of the panic, while failure to regain that level would leave the bounce vulnerable. Her assessment places the immediate focus on whether Ethereum can hold above the round-number threshold after briefly trading through it.
Daily Supertrend turns bearish above ETH
The daily TradingView chart displayed a red Supertrend reading at $2,764.28 following Ethereum’s latest sell-off. The indicator had previously tracked below the price during the advance from August into September.
Its shift above ETH places the daily trend signal on the bearish side. At approximately $2,493, Ethereum traded nearly 10% below the Supertrend level, leaving a substantial gap between the rebound and a potential reversal of that signal.
The earlier green Supertrend line ended around $2,477.52, close to the current price. Ethereum’s sharp downward wick passed below that area before the rebound, while the newly displayed red line established a higher resistance threshold.
TradingView’s daily Average Directional Index stood at 35.48. The reading remained above 25, a commonly used threshold for an established trend, although the line had declined from its September highs.
ADX measures trend strength rather than direction. In Ethereum’s current setup, the bearish direction comes from the Supertrend change and the price breakdown, while the falling ADX shows that measured trend strength has eased from earlier readings.
The daily chart also places the former $2,650–$2,750 trading range above the market. A recovery into that area would retrace more of the recent fall, but ETH would still need to clear the Supertrend resistance near $2,764 to reverse the indicator’s bearish setting.
The 4-hour chart puts $2,569 ahead of a stronger recovery
Ethereum’s 4-hour Bollinger Bands showed a midpoint of $2,568.56, an upper band of $2,731.37 and a lower band of $2,405.75. ETH traded in the lower half of that range after bouncing from near the lower boundary.
The midpoint stood roughly 3% above the displayed price. A move above $2,500 would therefore clear the nearest round-number hurdle while leaving the 20-period moving average around $2,569 as the next technical test.
The bands had widened during the sell-off, with the upper boundary rising and the lower boundary falling. On the chart, that expansion accompanied the break from Ethereum’s earlier consolidation around $2,700.
The 4-hour Chaikin Money Flow reading was negative at -0.10. The indicator’s position below zero points to selling pressure across its measurement period, even after Ethereum recovered from the low.
Together, the price below the Bollinger midpoint and negative CMF leave the short-term recovery without a clear bullish confirmation. A sustained move above $2,569 alongside CMF returning above zero would strengthen the recovery case on that timeframe.
On the downside, the lower Bollinger Band near $2,406 overlaps with the recent price trough around $2,400. A break below that zone would take Ethereum beneath both the latest low area and the displayed band boundary.
ETF withdrawals continue as liquidation clusters sit overhead
Farside Investors recorded $201.9 million in U.S. spot Ethereum ETF outflows on Oct. 6 and another $160.9 million on Oct. 7. Combined withdrawals reached $362.8 million across those two sessions.
The same dataset showed $72.5 million in further outflows on Oct. 8. Including the $50.8 million withdrawn on Oct. 5, net redemptions totaled $486.1 million across four trading sessions, extending the funds’ outflow streak to eight sessions.
CoinGlass’s one-week Ethereum liquidation heatmap showed its brightest remaining overhead concentration around $2,635–$2,640. Additional bands appeared near $2,610 and across approximately $2,740–$2,760, above the current market price.
Below ETH, the heatmap displayed smaller concentrations around $2,450–$2,460 and $2,400, with further bands near $2,380. Those levels sit beneath the rebound and around the area reached during the sharpest part of the decline.
A separate weekly assessment from the analyst publishing as Wealthmanager offered a longer-term bullish scenario. The analyst described an inverse head-and-shoulders setup, a reclaimed neckline and improving RSI, with a successful retest potentially opening a move toward $3,200–$4,000.
That forecast remains conditional on the weekly retest holding. On the shorter TradingView timeframes, Ethereum still faces $2,500 and $2,569 before the former trading range and daily Supertrend resistance near $2,764.
#BTC走势分析 #ETHETFsApproved #Cardano
Where is BTC headed this October?
Bitcoin price has recovered toward $83,000 after testing $80,400, but weakening daily momentum and a still-positive weekly breakout leave its October outlook dependent on holding the $79,600–$80,400 support zone.
Summary
$79,663 marks daily Supertrend support beneath Bitcoin’s rebound toward $83,000.Daily MACD remains bearish, with its histogram falling to approximately negative 537.Bitcoin’s weekly chart remains above the upper boundary of a falling wedge.The liquidation heatmap shows a large concentration of leveraged positions near $87,000.
TradingView’s Binance BTC/USDT daily chart placed Bitcoin at $83,012 on Oct. 9, while the weekly chart showed $82,928. The weekly price was down 4.16%, following a high of $86,999 and a low of $80,394.
Bitcoin’s recovery has therefore reduced the distance from its recent highs without reversing the weekly decline. The charts present competing signals for the rest of October: short-term momentum has deteriorated, while the broader recovery from the summer lows remains intact.
Bitcoin’s $80,000 support faces its next test
On the daily TradingView chart, Bitcoin remained above its green Supertrend line at $79,663.52. The indicator still supports a bullish trend reading, although the recent decline has brought price closer to that threshold.
Together, the Supertrend reading and the weekly low identify approximately $79,600–$80,400 as the nearest major support area. A sustained move below that range would weaken the daily recovery structure and expose the earlier trading region around $75,000–$76,000.
The daily MACD offers a more cautious signal. Its blue line stood at 1,172, below the orange signal line at 1,709.23, while the histogram registered negative 537.22.
You might also like:Bitcoin could benefit from rising U.S. debt fears: CoinShares
The bearish crossover indicates that upward momentum has slowed despite Bitcoin’s rebound. Both MACD lines remained above zero, however, distinguishing the current loss of momentum from a fully negative reading across the indicator.
Based on those chart signals, another support test remains possible unless Bitcoin rebuilds momentum above the nearby resistance area. A recovery through $84,000–$85,000 would be an initial improvement, while the recent highs around $86,500–$87,000 represent the more important barrier.
The weekly breakout keeps a recovery scenario alive
Bitcoin’s weekly TradingView chart shows price above the upper boundary of a falling wedge drawn across the decline from its 2025 highs. The breakout occurred before the latest pullback, and the recent candles remain above that descending boundary.
The weekly structure therefore still supports a conditional recovery scenario. The pullback has not yet returned Bitcoin inside the marked wedge, although remaining above the pattern alone does not establish a new upward move.
The weekly Awesome Oscillator stood at positive 10,355.38, with green bars above zero. Its reading contrasts with the bearish daily MACD and suggests that momentum remains stronger on the longer timeframe.
Weekly ADX registered 27.40. The reading indicates an established trend, but ADX measures strength rather than direction and cannot independently confirm that Bitcoin will rise.
Taken together, the weekly breakout and positive oscillator leave room for another attempt at $87,000 if nearby support holds. A sustained break above that recent high would strengthen the chart-based case for a move toward $90,000.
Repeated rejection below $87,000 would leave Bitcoin trading beneath the same ceiling that stopped its early-October advance. Under that scenario, the weekly recovery would need further consolidation before a clearer direction emerges.
Liquidation levels point to $85,000 and $87,000
CoinGlass’s one-week liquidation heatmap shows Bitcoin rebounding after a steep decline toward $80,400. At the right edge of the chart, leveraged positions remain concentrated above the price, including bands around $85,000 and $87,000.
The brightest overhead band sits near $87,000. If Bitcoin advances into that region, closures of vulnerable short positions could amplify the move, although the heatmap cannot establish whether buyers will first drive price there.
Below the market, visible bands remain around $82,000 and $80,400. The positioning leaves room for volatility in either direction, particularly if Bitcoin loses the levels recovered during its latest bounce.
An Oct. 9 commentary post accompanying a CryptoQuant chart reported approximately 55,600 BTC moving to exchanges at a loss over 24 hours. The post interpreted the transfers as pressure on newer holders while acknowledging that exchange deposits do not necessarily represent completed sales.
The same commentary cited $1.09 billion in crypto liquidations, including approximately $1.05 billion in long positions. Those figures describe the reported market-wide event, rather than Bitcoin liquidations alone.
The exchange-transfer data adds a potential supply concern to the technical picture. It does not establish how much Bitcoin was sold or whether the holders behind those deposits will continue selling.
US policy remains an October catalyst
Government-linked wallet movements have added another supply concern. crypto.news reported approximately 833.6 BTC worth $71.56 million moving toward Coinbase Prime, with around 264.9 BTC tied to the Bitfinex case and 568.7 BTC linked to the Potapenko and Turogin forfeiture. The transfer raised sale questions rather than confirming a completed disposal.
The Federal Reserve’s September meeting minutes recorded a quarter-point increase to a 3.75%–4% policy range and scheduled the next meeting for Oct. 27–28. The minutes also described higher Treasury yields and oil-driven inflation pressures.
Reuters reported that most officials considered another increase appropriate by year-end, while investors expected an October pause and a December hike. An October increase therefore remains a risk rather than an established outcome.
For the remaining weeks of October, the chart-based outlook hinges on two zones: support around $79,600–$80,400 and resistance around $86,500–$87,000. Holding support and clearing resistance would strengthen the recovery case toward $90,000; losing support would shift attention toward $75,000–$76,000.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Read more:Cardano price looks fragile below $0.24: Can it hold $0.21?
Read more about
BitcoinPrice Analysis
Cardano price looks fragile below $0.24: Can it hold $0.21?
By Lawrence Mondal
Oct 9, 2026 at 08:44 PM GMT+5
Edited by Lawrence Mondal
Markets
Share
Cardano price has fallen below $0.24 after reversing its early October rally, with weakening daily momentum and an analyst’s ascending-channel warning putting $0.21 back in focus.
Summary
Cardano price traded near $0.236, down about 9.2% from its weekly opening price.Daily RSI fell to 48.06, while price slipped below the $0.2483 Bollinger midpoint.Ali Martinez identified $0.21 as a possible downside level following an ascending-channel rejection.Weekly Supertrend resistance stood at $0.2762, above ADA’s attempted recovery.
TradingView’s Binance ADA/USDT data showed Cardano trading at $0.2359 on Oct. 9, recovering modestly after a sharp sell-off. The daily session ranged between $0.2313 and $0.2415, with ADA up 1.59% from its opening price.
The rebound followed a much larger retreat from the weekly high. TradingView’s weekly chart recorded a high of $0.2824 and a low of $0.2238, leaving ADA near $0.2358 and down 9.2% against its weekly opening price.
Measured from the weekly high, Cardano had lost approximately 16.5%. Its bounce from the weekly low amounted to about 5.4%, leaving the recovery well short of the preceding decline.
You might also like:Cardano’s Hoskinson challenges Vitalik over AI threats to crypto
Cardano’s channel rejection puts $0.21 in focus
Analyst Ali Martinez identified a rejection at the upper boundary of an ascending channel on Cardano’s daily chart in an Oct. 8 post. His analysis placed the channel’s lower boundary near $0.21 and made a move toward that level conditional on the rejection holding.
The channel illustration marked intermediate levels near $0.23 and $0.256, with the upper region around $0.29. ADA’s subsequent move below $0.24 left it closer to the lower marked levels than to the area where the analyst identified the rejection.
A decline from $0.2359 to $0.21 would amount to roughly 11%. Before reaching that level, ADA would encounter the recent weekly low at $0.2238, an observable reference from the latest sell-off.
Jesse Olson also pointed to weakening daily momentum in an Oct. 9 post. He said Cardano had shown bearish divergence several days earlier and that a sell signal, together with a candle close below his trend dots, had preceded two targets being reached.
Olson identified a lower yellow zone as a possible retest area. His warning and Martinez’s channel analysis both described downside setups, although they used different chart tools and conditions.
A recovery above $0.24 would reverse the immediate loss of that price level. TradingView’s daily readings place another reference higher, near $0.2483, before ADA reaches the $0.256 region marked in Martinez’s chart.
Daily RSI slips below 50 as ADA loses its midpoint
TradingView’s daily chart showed Cardano’s relative strength index at 48.06, below the neutral 50 level. The RSI also sat beneath its displayed moving average of 59.88 after falling sharply from its early October readings.
The daily Bollinger Bands placed the 20-day simple moving average at $0.2483, the upper band at $0.2700 and the lower band at $0.2276. ADA traded below the midpoint and approximately 3.6% above the lower band.
The midpoint stood around 5.3% above the latest price. A move back to that average would recover part of the recent decline, while the upper band remained approximately 14.5% higher.
On the downside, the lower Bollinger Band and the weekly low formed two nearby references at $0.2276 and $0.2238. Martinez’s $0.21 scenario lies below both.
The daily chart also showed that the latest retreat followed a recovery from the June lows, when ADA traded around $0.14–$0.15. Despite the October reversal, the price remained above that earlier trough.
Weekly resistance remains near $0.276
TradingView’s weekly Supertrend remained red at $0.2762, above Cardano’s latest price. The weekly high of $0.2824 briefly exceeded that level before ADA retreated beneath it.
At $0.2358, Cardano would need to rise roughly 17% to reach the Supertrend line. The daily upper Bollinger Band at $0.2700 sits slightly below that weekly reference.
The weekly Awesome Oscillator showed a positive reading of 0.0120, giving a different momentum reading from the daily RSI below 50. The positive oscillator coincided with price remaining beneath the weekly Supertrend.
The longer-term chart showed ADA’s recovery from its midyear low, but the latest weekly decline interrupted that advance. The $0.2700–$0.2824 area now contains the daily upper band, weekly Supertrend and recent weekly high.
Liquidation bands sit above and below ADA’s rebound
CoinGlass’s one-month liquidation heatmap showed visible concentrations around $0.23–$0.24, with further bands below near $0.215–$0.22. Above the latest price, brighter concentrations appeared around $0.257–$0.26 and $0.28.
The heatmap traced ADA’s early October rise toward $0.28, followed by its sharp fall toward $0.224 and a partial recovery near $0.24. Its lower concentrations overlap the price region between the recent weekly low and Martinez’s $0.21 channel target.
For US investors using exchange-traded exposure, Volatility Shares’ Cardano ETF provides ADA-linked exposure through instruments rather than directly holding ADA, according to the issuer. Its product disclosures identify price volatility and rebalancing among the fund’s risks.
Cardano’s immediate recovery references remain $0.24 and the $0.2483 daily midpoint. Below the market, $0.2276 and $0.2238 precede the conditional $0.21 downside level identified by Martinez.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Read more:Ethereum price at $2,500 crossroads as Supertrend turns bearish
Read more about
CardanoPrice Analysis
Follow us on social media
Ethereum price at $2,500 crossroads as Supertrend turns bearish
By Lawrence Mondal
Oct 9, 2026 at 08:14 PM GMT+5
Edited by Lawrence Mondal
Markets
Share
Ethereum price has recovered to around $2,493 after a sharp fall toward $2,400, but its daily Supertrend has turned bearish, and the 4-hour chart still shows negative money flow.
Summary
Ethereum price trades near $2,493 after recovering from its sharp decline toward $2,400.Daily Supertrend resistance stands at $2,764, above Ethereum’s current price.The 4-hour Bollinger midpoint at $2,569 marks the next recovery hurdle.U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $486.1 million in outflows across four trading sessions.
Ethereum price struggles to recover $2,500
TradingView’s Binance ETH/USDT daily chart showed Ethereum at $2,492.98 on Oct. 9, up 0.73% for the session. The day’s price range extended from $2,471.05 to $2,520.54, leaving ETH below $2,500 despite an earlier move above that level.
The daily chart shows a sharp reversal from the trading range established near $2,650–$2,750 in late September and early October. Ethereum’s latest bounce has recovered only part of that decline, with the price still below the area where it traded before selling accelerated.
On the 4-hour TradingView chart, ETH stood at $2,493.31 after falling 0.53% during the displayed period. Its recovery from the recent low had stalled near $2,500, while the latest candles remained below the chart’s falling moving average.
You might also like:Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade could ease DeFi congestion, Curve says
Analyst Ella identified $2,500 as the first level buyers need to reclaim in an Oct. 9 post. She described Ethereum’s move from approximately $2,700 to a wick near $2,400 as a decline of close to 11%, with selling accelerating toward the end.
Ella said a recovery above $2,500 could ease some of the panic, while failure to regain that level would leave the bounce vulnerable. Her assessment places the immediate focus on whether Ethereum can hold above the round-number threshold after briefly trading through it.
Daily Supertrend turns bearish above ETH
The daily TradingView chart displayed a red Supertrend reading at $2,764.28 following Ethereum’s latest sell-off. The indicator had previously tracked below the price during the advance from August into September.
Its shift above ETH places the daily trend signal on the bearish side. At approximately $2,493, Ethereum traded nearly 10% below the Supertrend level, leaving a substantial gap between the rebound and a potential reversal of that signal.
The earlier green Supertrend line ended around $2,477.52, close to the current price. Ethereum’s sharp downward wick passed below that area before the rebound, while the newly displayed red line established a higher resistance threshold.
TradingView’s daily Average Directional Index stood at 35.48. The reading remained above 25, a commonly used threshold for an established trend, although the line had declined from its September highs.
ADX measures trend strength rather than direction. In Ethereum’s current setup, the bearish direction comes from the Supertrend change and the price breakdown, while the falling ADX shows that measured trend strength has eased from earlier readings.
The daily chart also places the former $2,650–$2,750 trading range above the market. A recovery into that area would retrace more of the recent fall, but ETH would still need to clear the Supertrend resistance near $2,764 to reverse the indicator’s bearish setting.
The 4-hour chart puts $2,569 ahead of a stronger recovery
Ethereum’s 4-hour Bollinger Bands showed a midpoint of $2,568.56, an upper band of $2,731.37 and a lower band of $2,405.75. ETH traded in the lower half of that range after bouncing from near the lower boundary.
The midpoint stood roughly 3% above the displayed price. A move above $2,500 would therefore clear the nearest round-number hurdle while leaving the 20-period moving average around $2,569 as the next technical test.
The bands had widened during the sell-off, with the upper boundary rising and the lower boundary falling. On the chart, that expansion accompanied the break from Ethereum’s earlier consolidation around $2,700.
The 4-hour Chaikin Money Flow reading was negative at -0.10. The indicator’s position below zero points to selling pressure across its measurement period, even after Ethereum recovered from the low.
Together, the price below the Bollinger midpoint and negative CMF leave the short-term recovery without a clear bullish confirmation. A sustained move above $2,569 alongside CMF returning above zero would strengthen the recovery case on that timeframe.
On the downside, the lower Bollinger Band near $2,406 overlaps with the recent price trough around $2,400. A break below that zone would take Ethereum beneath both the latest low area and the displayed band boundary.
ETF withdrawals continue as liquidation clusters sit overhead
Farside Investors recorded $201.9 million in U.S. spot Ethereum ETF outflows on Oct. 6 and another $160.9 million on Oct. 7. Combined withdrawals reached $362.8 million across those two sessions.
The same dataset showed $72.5 million in further outflows on Oct. 8. Including the $50.8 million withdrawn on Oct. 5, net redemptions totaled $486.1 million across four trading sessions, extending the funds’ outflow streak to eight sessions.
CoinGlass’s one-week Ethereum liquidation heatmap showed its brightest remaining overhead concentration around $2,635–$2,640. Additional bands appeared near $2,610 and across approximately $2,740–$2,760, above the current market price.
Below ETH, the heatmap displayed smaller concentrations around $2,450–$2,460 and $2,400, with further bands near $2,380. Those levels sit beneath the rebound and around the area reached during the sharpest part of the decline.
A separate weekly assessment from the analyst publishing as Wealthmanager offered a longer-term bullish scenario. The analyst described an inverse head-and-shoulders setup, a reclaimed neckline and improving RSI, with a successful retest potentially opening a move toward $3,200–$4,000.
That forecast remains conditional on the weekly retest holding. On the shorter TradingView timeframes, Ethereum still faces $2,500 and $2,569 before the former trading range and daily Supertrend resistance near $2,764.
#BTC走势分析 #ETHETFsApproved #Cardano
Summary
$79,663 marks daily Supertrend support beneath Bitcoin’s rebound toward $83,000.Daily MACD remains bearish, with its histogram falling to approximately negative 537.Bitcoin’s weekly chart remains above the upper boundary of a falling wedge.The liquidation heatmap shows a large concentration of leveraged positions near $87,000.
TradingView’s Binance BTC/USDT daily chart placed Bitcoin at $83,012 on Oct. 9, while the weekly chart showed $82,928. The weekly price was down 4.16%, following a high of $86,999 and a low of $80,394.
Bitcoin’s recovery has therefore reduced the distance from its recent highs without reversing the weekly decline. The charts present competing signals for the rest of October: short-term momentum has deteriorated, while the broader recovery from the summer lows remains intact.
Bitcoin’s $80,000 support faces its next test
On the daily TradingView chart, Bitcoin remained above its green Supertrend line at $79,663.52. The indicator still supports a bullish trend reading, although the recent decline has brought price closer to that threshold.
Together, the Supertrend reading and the weekly low identify approximately $79,600–$80,400 as the nearest major support area. A sustained move below that range would weaken the daily recovery structure and expose the earlier trading region around $75,000–$76,000.
The daily MACD offers a more cautious signal. Its blue line stood at 1,172, below the orange signal line at 1,709.23, while the histogram registered negative 537.22.
You might also like:Bitcoin could benefit from rising U.S. debt fears: CoinShares
The bearish crossover indicates that upward momentum has slowed despite Bitcoin’s rebound. Both MACD lines remained above zero, however, distinguishing the current loss of momentum from a fully negative reading across the indicator.
Based on those chart signals, another support test remains possible unless Bitcoin rebuilds momentum above the nearby resistance area. A recovery through $84,000–$85,000 would be an initial improvement, while the recent highs around $86,500–$87,000 represent the more important barrier.
The weekly breakout keeps a recovery scenario alive
Bitcoin’s weekly TradingView chart shows price above the upper boundary of a falling wedge drawn across the decline from its 2025 highs. The breakout occurred before the latest pullback, and the recent candles remain above that descending boundary.
The weekly structure therefore still supports a conditional recovery scenario. The pullback has not yet returned Bitcoin inside the marked wedge, although remaining above the pattern alone does not establish a new upward move.
The weekly Awesome Oscillator stood at positive 10,355.38, with green bars above zero. Its reading contrasts with the bearish daily MACD and suggests that momentum remains stronger on the longer timeframe.
Weekly ADX registered 27.40. The reading indicates an established trend, but ADX measures strength rather than direction and cannot independently confirm that Bitcoin will rise.
Taken together, the weekly breakout and positive oscillator leave room for another attempt at $87,000 if nearby support holds. A sustained break above that recent high would strengthen the chart-based case for a move toward $90,000.
Repeated rejection below $87,000 would leave Bitcoin trading beneath the same ceiling that stopped its early-October advance. Under that scenario, the weekly recovery would need further consolidation before a clearer direction emerges.
Liquidation levels point to $85,000 and $87,000
CoinGlass’s one-week liquidation heatmap shows Bitcoin rebounding after a steep decline toward $80,400. At the right edge of the chart, leveraged positions remain concentrated above the price, including bands around $85,000 and $87,000.
The brightest overhead band sits near $87,000. If Bitcoin advances into that region, closures of vulnerable short positions could amplify the move, although the heatmap cannot establish whether buyers will first drive price there.
Below the market, visible bands remain around $82,000 and $80,400. The positioning leaves room for volatility in either direction, particularly if Bitcoin loses the levels recovered during its latest bounce.
An Oct. 9 commentary post accompanying a CryptoQuant chart reported approximately 55,600 BTC moving to exchanges at a loss over 24 hours. The post interpreted the transfers as pressure on newer holders while acknowledging that exchange deposits do not necessarily represent completed sales.
The same commentary cited $1.09 billion in crypto liquidations, including approximately $1.05 billion in long positions. Those figures describe the reported market-wide event, rather than Bitcoin liquidations alone.
The exchange-transfer data adds a potential supply concern to the technical picture. It does not establish how much Bitcoin was sold or whether the holders behind those deposits will continue selling.
US policy remains an October catalyst
Government-linked wallet movements have added another supply concern. crypto.news reported approximately 833.6 BTC worth $71.56 million moving toward Coinbase Prime, with around 264.9 BTC tied to the Bitfinex case and 568.7 BTC linked to the Potapenko and Turogin forfeiture. The transfer raised sale questions rather than confirming a completed disposal.
The Federal Reserve’s September meeting minutes recorded a quarter-point increase to a 3.75%–4% policy range and scheduled the next meeting for Oct. 27–28. The minutes also described higher Treasury yields and oil-driven inflation pressures.
Reuters reported that most officials considered another increase appropriate by year-end, while investors expected an October pause and a December hike. An October increase therefore remains a risk rather than an established outcome.
For the remaining weeks of October, the chart-based outlook hinges on two zones: support around $79,600–$80,400 and resistance around $86,500–$87,000. Holding support and clearing resistance would strengthen the recovery case toward $90,000; losing support would shift attention toward $75,000–$76,000.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Read more:Cardano price looks fragile below $0.24: Can it hold $0.21?
Read more about
BitcoinPrice Analysis
Cardano price looks fragile below $0.24: Can it hold $0.21?
By Lawrence Mondal
Oct 9, 2026 at 08:44 PM GMT+5
Edited by Lawrence Mondal
Markets
Share
Cardano price has fallen below $0.24 after reversing its early October rally, with weakening daily momentum and an analyst’s ascending-channel warning putting $0.21 back in focus.
Summary
Cardano price traded near $0.236, down about 9.2% from its weekly opening price.Daily RSI fell to 48.06, while price slipped below the $0.2483 Bollinger midpoint.Ali Martinez identified $0.21 as a possible downside level following an ascending-channel rejection.Weekly Supertrend resistance stood at $0.2762, above ADA’s attempted recovery.
TradingView’s Binance ADA/USDT data showed Cardano trading at $0.2359 on Oct. 9, recovering modestly after a sharp sell-off. The daily session ranged between $0.2313 and $0.2415, with ADA up 1.59% from its opening price.
The rebound followed a much larger retreat from the weekly high. TradingView’s weekly chart recorded a high of $0.2824 and a low of $0.2238, leaving ADA near $0.2358 and down 9.2% against its weekly opening price.
Measured from the weekly high, Cardano had lost approximately 16.5%. Its bounce from the weekly low amounted to about 5.4%, leaving the recovery well short of the preceding decline.
You might also like:Cardano’s Hoskinson challenges Vitalik over AI threats to crypto
Cardano’s channel rejection puts $0.21 in focus
Analyst Ali Martinez identified a rejection at the upper boundary of an ascending channel on Cardano’s daily chart in an Oct. 8 post. His analysis placed the channel’s lower boundary near $0.21 and made a move toward that level conditional on the rejection holding.
The channel illustration marked intermediate levels near $0.23 and $0.256, with the upper region around $0.29. ADA’s subsequent move below $0.24 left it closer to the lower marked levels than to the area where the analyst identified the rejection.
A decline from $0.2359 to $0.21 would amount to roughly 11%. Before reaching that level, ADA would encounter the recent weekly low at $0.2238, an observable reference from the latest sell-off.
Jesse Olson also pointed to weakening daily momentum in an Oct. 9 post. He said Cardano had shown bearish divergence several days earlier and that a sell signal, together with a candle close below his trend dots, had preceded two targets being reached.
Olson identified a lower yellow zone as a possible retest area. His warning and Martinez’s channel analysis both described downside setups, although they used different chart tools and conditions.
A recovery above $0.24 would reverse the immediate loss of that price level. TradingView’s daily readings place another reference higher, near $0.2483, before ADA reaches the $0.256 region marked in Martinez’s chart.
Daily RSI slips below 50 as ADA loses its midpoint
TradingView’s daily chart showed Cardano’s relative strength index at 48.06, below the neutral 50 level. The RSI also sat beneath its displayed moving average of 59.88 after falling sharply from its early October readings.
The daily Bollinger Bands placed the 20-day simple moving average at $0.2483, the upper band at $0.2700 and the lower band at $0.2276. ADA traded below the midpoint and approximately 3.6% above the lower band.
The midpoint stood around 5.3% above the latest price. A move back to that average would recover part of the recent decline, while the upper band remained approximately 14.5% higher.
On the downside, the lower Bollinger Band and the weekly low formed two nearby references at $0.2276 and $0.2238. Martinez’s $0.21 scenario lies below both.
The daily chart also showed that the latest retreat followed a recovery from the June lows, when ADA traded around $0.14–$0.15. Despite the October reversal, the price remained above that earlier trough.
Weekly resistance remains near $0.276
TradingView’s weekly Supertrend remained red at $0.2762, above Cardano’s latest price. The weekly high of $0.2824 briefly exceeded that level before ADA retreated beneath it.
At $0.2358, Cardano would need to rise roughly 17% to reach the Supertrend line. The daily upper Bollinger Band at $0.2700 sits slightly below that weekly reference.
The weekly Awesome Oscillator showed a positive reading of 0.0120, giving a different momentum reading from the daily RSI below 50. The positive oscillator coincided with price remaining beneath the weekly Supertrend.
The longer-term chart showed ADA’s recovery from its midyear low, but the latest weekly decline interrupted that advance. The $0.2700–$0.2824 area now contains the daily upper band, weekly Supertrend and recent weekly high.
Liquidation bands sit above and below ADA’s rebound
CoinGlass’s one-month liquidation heatmap showed visible concentrations around $0.23–$0.24, with further bands below near $0.215–$0.22. Above the latest price, brighter concentrations appeared around $0.257–$0.26 and $0.28.
The heatmap traced ADA’s early October rise toward $0.28, followed by its sharp fall toward $0.224 and a partial recovery near $0.24. Its lower concentrations overlap the price region between the recent weekly low and Martinez’s $0.21 channel target.
For US investors using exchange-traded exposure, Volatility Shares’ Cardano ETF provides ADA-linked exposure through instruments rather than directly holding ADA, according to the issuer. Its product disclosures identify price volatility and rebalancing among the fund’s risks.
Cardano’s immediate recovery references remain $0.24 and the $0.2483 daily midpoint. Below the market, $0.2276 and $0.2238 precede the conditional $0.21 downside level identified by Martinez.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Read more:Ethereum price at $2,500 crossroads as Supertrend turns bearish
Read more about
CardanoPrice Analysis
Follow us on social media
Ethereum price at $2,500 crossroads as Supertrend turns bearish
By Lawrence Mondal
Oct 9, 2026 at 08:14 PM GMT+5
Edited by Lawrence Mondal
Markets
Share
Ethereum price has recovered to around $2,493 after a sharp fall toward $2,400, but its daily Supertrend has turned bearish, and the 4-hour chart still shows negative money flow.
Summary
Ethereum price trades near $2,493 after recovering from its sharp decline toward $2,400.Daily Supertrend resistance stands at $2,764, above Ethereum’s current price.The 4-hour Bollinger midpoint at $2,569 marks the next recovery hurdle.U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $486.1 million in outflows across four trading sessions.
Ethereum price struggles to recover $2,500
TradingView’s Binance ETH/USDT daily chart showed Ethereum at $2,492.98 on Oct. 9, up 0.73% for the session. The day’s price range extended from $2,471.05 to $2,520.54, leaving ETH below $2,500 despite an earlier move above that level.
The daily chart shows a sharp reversal from the trading range established near $2,650–$2,750 in late September and early October. Ethereum’s latest bounce has recovered only part of that decline, with the price still below the area where it traded before selling accelerated.
On the 4-hour TradingView chart, ETH stood at $2,493.31 after falling 0.53% during the displayed period. Its recovery from the recent low had stalled near $2,500, while the latest candles remained below the chart’s falling moving average.
You might also like:Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade could ease DeFi congestion, Curve says
Analyst Ella identified $2,500 as the first level buyers need to reclaim in an Oct. 9 post. She described Ethereum’s move from approximately $2,700 to a wick near $2,400 as a decline of close to 11%, with selling accelerating toward the end.
Ella said a recovery above $2,500 could ease some of the panic, while failure to regain that level would leave the bounce vulnerable. Her assessment places the immediate focus on whether Ethereum can hold above the round-number threshold after briefly trading through it.
Daily Supertrend turns bearish above ETH
The daily TradingView chart displayed a red Supertrend reading at $2,764.28 following Ethereum’s latest sell-off. The indicator had previously tracked below the price during the advance from August into September.
Its shift above ETH places the daily trend signal on the bearish side. At approximately $2,493, Ethereum traded nearly 10% below the Supertrend level, leaving a substantial gap between the rebound and a potential reversal of that signal.
The earlier green Supertrend line ended around $2,477.52, close to the current price. Ethereum’s sharp downward wick passed below that area before the rebound, while the newly displayed red line established a higher resistance threshold.
TradingView’s daily Average Directional Index stood at 35.48. The reading remained above 25, a commonly used threshold for an established trend, although the line had declined from its September highs.
ADX measures trend strength rather than direction. In Ethereum’s current setup, the bearish direction comes from the Supertrend change and the price breakdown, while the falling ADX shows that measured trend strength has eased from earlier readings.
The daily chart also places the former $2,650–$2,750 trading range above the market. A recovery into that area would retrace more of the recent fall, but ETH would still need to clear the Supertrend resistance near $2,764 to reverse the indicator’s bearish setting.
The 4-hour chart puts $2,569 ahead of a stronger recovery
Ethereum’s 4-hour Bollinger Bands showed a midpoint of $2,568.56, an upper band of $2,731.37 and a lower band of $2,405.75. ETH traded in the lower half of that range after bouncing from near the lower boundary.
The midpoint stood roughly 3% above the displayed price. A move above $2,500 would therefore clear the nearest round-number hurdle while leaving the 20-period moving average around $2,569 as the next technical test.
The bands had widened during the sell-off, with the upper boundary rising and the lower boundary falling. On the chart, that expansion accompanied the break from Ethereum’s earlier consolidation around $2,700.
The 4-hour Chaikin Money Flow reading was negative at -0.10. The indicator’s position below zero points to selling pressure across its measurement period, even after Ethereum recovered from the low.
Together, the price below the Bollinger midpoint and negative CMF leave the short-term recovery without a clear bullish confirmation. A sustained move above $2,569 alongside CMF returning above zero would strengthen the recovery case on that timeframe.
On the downside, the lower Bollinger Band near $2,406 overlaps with the recent price trough around $2,400. A break below that zone would take Ethereum beneath both the latest low area and the displayed band boundary.
ETF withdrawals continue as liquidation clusters sit overhead
Farside Investors recorded $201.9 million in U.S. spot Ethereum ETF outflows on Oct. 6 and another $160.9 million on Oct. 7. Combined withdrawals reached $362.8 million across those two sessions.
The same dataset showed $72.5 million in further outflows on Oct. 8. Including the $50.8 million withdrawn on Oct. 5, net redemptions totaled $486.1 million across four trading sessions, extending the funds’ outflow streak to eight sessions.
CoinGlass’s one-week Ethereum liquidation heatmap showed its brightest remaining overhead concentration around $2,635–$2,640. Additional bands appeared near $2,610 and across approximately $2,740–$2,760, above the current market price.
Below ETH, the heatmap displayed smaller concentrations around $2,450–$2,460 and $2,400, with further bands near $2,380. Those levels sit beneath the rebound and around the area reached during the sharpest part of the decline.
A separate weekly assessment from the analyst publishing as Wealthmanager offered a longer-term bullish scenario. The analyst described an inverse head-and-shoulders setup, a reclaimed neckline and improving RSI, with a successful retest potentially opening a move toward $3,200–$4,000.
That forecast remains conditional on the weekly retest holding. On the shorter TradingView timeframes, Ethereum still faces $2,500 and $2,569 before the former trading range and daily Supertrend resistance near $2,764.
#BTC走势分析 #ETHETFsApproved #Cardano
126
·
--
ສັນຍານໝີ
💭 My Take on Bitcoin
I think $BTC might go down soon. 📉
The price is struggling around $65K, and if that support breaks, we could see it drop toward $60K–$55K.
I’m watching carefully and planning my next move. Patience is key—buying the dip could be smart if it goes lower.
#BTC #Crypto #MyView #CryptoThoughts p$BTC
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
💭 My Take on Bitcoin
I think $BTC might go down soon. 📉
The price is struggling around $65K, and if that support breaks, we could see it drop toward $60K–$55K.
I’m watching carefully and planning my next move. Patience is key—buying the dip could be smart if it goes lower.
#BTC #Crypto #MyView #CryptoThoughts p$BTC
I think $BTC might go down soon. 📉
The price is struggling around $65K, and if that support breaks, we could see it drop toward $60K–$55K.
I’m watching carefully and planning my next move. Patience is key—buying the dip could be smart if it goes lower.
#BTC #Crypto #MyView #CryptoThoughts p$BTC
45
·
--
Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) said Monday it bought 65,341 ether (ETH)What to know:
Bitmine (BMNR) bought 65,341 ETH last week worth about $138 million at current prices as the firm doubled down on its crypto purchase strategy.
The firm now holds more than 4.66 million tokens, while it also increased its cash reserves to $1.1 billion.
Chairman Thomas Lee said ETH is in the final stages of a "mini-crypto winter" and that the broader crypto slump is nearing an end.
$ETH
{spot}(ETHUSDT)
Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) said Monday it bought 65,341 ether (ETH)
What to know:
Bitmine (BMNR) bought 65,341 ETH last week worth about $138 million at current prices as the firm doubled down on its crypto purchase strategy.
The firm now holds more than 4.66 million tokens, while it also increased its cash reserves to $1.1 billion.
Chairman Thomas Lee said ETH is in the final stages of a "mini-crypto winter" and that the broader crypto slump is nearing an end.
$ETH
Bitmine (BMNR) bought 65,341 ETH last week worth about $138 million at current prices as the firm doubled down on its crypto purchase strategy.
The firm now holds more than 4.66 million tokens, while it also increased its cash reserves to $1.1 billion.
Chairman Thomas Lee said ETH is in the final stages of a "mini-crypto winter" and that the broader crypto slump is nearing an end.
$ETH
72
·
--
#signdigitalsovereigninfra $SIGN
Hello Everyone
I like what @SignOfficial is building. It’s all about making trust simple online. With $SIGN, you can prove who you are or sign things without relying on big companies. It feels more direct and secure. This kind of system could make everyday digital actions e
#signdigitalsovereigninfra $SIGN
Hello Everyone
I like what @SignOfficial is building. It’s all about making trust simple online. With $SIGN , you can prove who you are or sign things without relying on big companies. It feels more direct and secure. This kind of system could make everyday digital actions e
Hello Everyone
I like what @SignOfficial is building. It’s all about making trust simple online. With $SIGN , you can prove who you are or sign things without relying on big companies. It feels more direct and secure. This kind of system could make everyday digital actions e
8
·
--
Simple Trust, Real Ownership: Why @SignOfficial and $SIGN Matter #SignDigitalSovereignInfraHello Everyone 🙂
I’ve been checking out what @SignOfficial is doing, and honestly it feels simple but powerful. The idea is clear — people should own their identity and data, not big platforms. That’s where $SIGN comes in.
@SignOfficial is building tools that help verify things online in a trusted way, without needing middlemen. This could make things like signing documents, proving credentials, or confirming identity much easier and safer.
What I like most is that it’s not complicated to understand. It’s about trust, ownership, and making digital life more secure for everyone. If this grows, it could become something we use every day without even thinking about it.
Keeping an eye on $S
#SignDigitalSovereignInfra
Simple Trust, Real Ownership: Why @SignOfficial and $SIGN Matter #SignDigitalSovereignInfra
Hello Everyone 🙂
I’ve been checking out what @SignOfficial is doing, and honestly it feels simple but powerful. The idea is clear — people should own their identity and data, not big platforms. That’s where $SIGN comes in.
@SignOfficial is building tools that help verify things online in a trusted way, without needing middlemen. This could make things like signing documents, proving credentials, or confirming identity much easier and safer.
What I like most is that it’s not complicated to understand. It’s about trust, ownership, and making digital life more secure for everyone. If this grows, it could become something we use every day without even thinking about it.
Keeping an eye on $S
#SignDigitalSovereignInfra
I’ve been checking out what @SignOfficial is doing, and honestly it feels simple but powerful. The idea is clear — people should own their identity and data, not big platforms. That’s where $SIGN comes in.
@SignOfficial is building tools that help verify things online in a trusted way, without needing middlemen. This could make things like signing documents, proving credentials, or confirming identity much easier and safer.
What I like most is that it’s not complicated to understand. It’s about trust, ownership, and making digital life more secure for everyone. If this grows, it could become something we use every day without even thinking about it.
Keeping an eye on $S
#SignDigitalSovereignInfra
18
·
--
Digital Sovereignty Redefined: @SignOfficial and the Rise of $SIGNThe concept of digital sovereignty is becoming increasingly important, especially for rapidly growing regions like the Middle East. Governments and businesses are looking for secure, scalable, and independent infrastructure to manage identity, data, and digital interactions without relying heavily on external systems. This is where @SignOfficial stands out as a powerful solution.
@SignOfficial is building a foundation that enables verifiable credentials, secure identity systems, and transparent digital processes. With the integration of $SIGN, the ecosystem supports trustless verification and efficient coordination between institutions, enterprises, and users. This can play a crucial role in sectors like finance, government services, and cross-border trade.
For the Middle East, where digital transformation is accelerating, having a robust infrastructure like this can unlock new economic opportunities. It can enhance trust, reduce fraud, and streamline operations at scale. The ability to verify data securely while maintaining user control aligns perfectly with the region’s push toward innovation and independence.
As adoption grows, $SIGN could become a key component in enabling digital economies that are both resilient and future-ready. The vision behind @SignOfficial reflects a shift toward decentralized yet compliant systems that empower nations and individuals alike.
#SignDig
Digital Sovereignty Redefined: @SignOfficial and the Rise of $SIGN
The concept of digital sovereignty is becoming increasingly important, especially for rapidly growing regions like the Middle East. Governments and businesses are looking for secure, scalable, and independent infrastructure to manage identity, data, and digital interactions without relying heavily on external systems. This is where @SignOfficial stands out as a powerful solution.
@SignOfficial is building a foundation that enables verifiable credentials, secure identity systems, and transparent digital processes. With the integration of $SIGN, the ecosystem supports trustless verification and efficient coordination between institutions, enterprises, and users. This can play a crucial role in sectors like finance, government services, and cross-border trade.
For the Middle East, where digital transformation is accelerating, having a robust infrastructure like this can unlock new economic opportunities. It can enhance trust, reduce fraud, and streamline operations at scale. The ability to verify data securely while maintaining user control aligns perfectly with the region’s push toward innovation and independence.
As adoption grows, $SIGN could become a key component in enabling digital economies that are both resilient and future-ready. The vision behind @SignOfficial reflects a shift toward decentralized yet compliant systems that empower nations and individuals alike.
#SignDig
@SignOfficial is building a foundation that enables verifiable credentials, secure identity systems, and transparent digital processes. With the integration of $SIGN, the ecosystem supports trustless verification and efficient coordination between institutions, enterprises, and users. This can play a crucial role in sectors like finance, government services, and cross-border trade.
For the Middle East, where digital transformation is accelerating, having a robust infrastructure like this can unlock new economic opportunities. It can enhance trust, reduce fraud, and streamline operations at scale. The ability to verify data securely while maintaining user control aligns perfectly with the region’s push toward innovation and independence.
As adoption grows, $SIGN could become a key component in enabling digital economies that are both resilient and future-ready. The vision behind @SignOfficial reflects a shift toward decentralized yet compliant systems that empower nations and individuals alike.
#SignDig
17
·
--
#signdigitalsovereigninfra $SIGN
Exploring how @SignOfficial is shaping the future of digital sovereignty in the Middle East 🌍. With $SIGN, we’re seeing infrastructure that empowers secure identity, trust, and scalable economic growth across the region. #SignDigitalSovereignInfra
#signdigitalsovereigninfra $SIGN
Exploring how @SignOfficial is shaping the future of digital sovereignty in the Middle East 🌍. With $SIGN , we’re seeing infrastructure that empowers secure identity, trust, and scalable economic growth across the region. #SignDigitalSovereignInfra
Exploring how @SignOfficial is shaping the future of digital sovereignty in the Middle East 🌍. With $SIGN , we’re seeing infrastructure that empowers secure identity, trust, and scalable economic growth across the region. #SignDigitalSovereignInfra
15
ເຂົ້າສູ່ລະບົບເພື່ອສຳຫຼວດເນື້ອຫາເພີ່ມເຕີມ
ເຂົ້າຮ່ວມກຸ່ມຜູ້ໃຊ້ຄຣິບໂຕທົ່ວໂລກໃນ Binance Square.
⚡️ ໄດ້ຮັບຂໍ້ມູນຫຼ້າສຸດ ແລະ ທີ່ມີປະໂຫຍດກ່ຽວກັບຄຣິບໂຕ.
💬 ໄດ້ຮັບຄວາມໄວ້ວາງໃຈຈາກຕະຫຼາດແລກປ່ຽນຄຣິບໂຕທີ່ໃຫຍ່ທີ່ສຸດໃນໂລກ.
👍 ຄົ້ນຫາຂໍ້ມູນເຊີງເລິກທີ່ແທ້ຈາກນັກສ້າງທີ່ໄດ້ຮັບການຢືນຢັນ.
ອີເມວ / ເບີໂທລະສັບ
ຫົວຂໍ້ທີ່ກໍາລັງນິຍົມ
EarningsSeason
2.1M ຄັ້ງທີ່ເບິ່ງ
10,213 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
Earnings Season Session 2: Tesla & Meta Earnings — All Eyes on Magnificent 7
Binance Square Official
·712 ຖືກໃຈ
·1.3M ຄັ້ງທີ່ເບິ່ງ
ZcashDevelopersConfirmNovemberDateForNU7Upgrade
45,378 ຄັ້ງທີ່ເບິ່ງ
738 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ
OCCIssuesFirstFinalRuleUnderGENIUSAct
35,705 ຄັ້ງທີ່ເບິ່ງ
638 ກຳລັງສົນທະນາ