If you're still ignoring tokens that actually share trading fees with holders, stop now.
This mistake has cost traders millions as they FOMO into chains where all the activity just enriches validators while their bags sit idle. You watch volume explode and wonder why your portfolio isn't moving.
NEAR flips the usual L1 script. More trading activity generates more fees that get distributed directly to $NEAR holders. Most people missed this while they were busy comparing TPS numbers on $SOL or waiting for the next $ETH upgrade.
We've seen this play out before with projects that actually shared the upside. Holders who understood the model got rewarded as activity grew, while everyone else bought the top later.
Where do you think this fee distribution model takes $NEAR compared to the rest of the pack?
#NEAR #L1s #Crypto
This mistake has cost traders millions as they FOMO into chains where all the activity just enriches validators while their bags sit idle. You watch volume explode and wonder why your portfolio isn't moving.
NEAR flips the usual L1 script. More trading activity generates more fees that get distributed directly to $NEAR holders. Most people missed this while they were busy comparing TPS numbers on $SOL or waiting for the next $ETH upgrade.
We've seen this play out before with projects that actually shared the upside. Holders who understood the model got rewarded as activity grew, while everyone else bought the top later.
Where do you think this fee distribution model takes $NEAR compared to the rest of the pack?
#NEAR #L1s #Crypto
