๐Ÿ‘€๐ŸŽถ๐Ÿฅ๐ŸŽน๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐ŸŽค What's the Beat ๐Ÿช˜ of one hand clapping ?

๐Ÿซณ
๐ŸŽค

$BEAT
What I don't get about this one is :

The point of the whole project is that humans and AI agents can work together , they can create, cooperate as equals, own wallets , go into competitions even.

๐Ÿ™‹โ€โ™€๏ธ & ๐Ÿค– = ๐Ÿฆพ ๐ŸชŽ ๐Ÿฅ

So, humans & AI agents together creating music ๐ŸŽถ and let's not forget - ๐Ÿช™ coins too, cause Audiera is crypto project after all, right ?

We can even see the tokenimics ,how the tokens are decided about 40% goes to the community , only 8% goes to the team , 15 % goes to marketing ....
Sounds good so far , right ? Also , big part of it is still locked, with unlocks on every 1st in the month and lots of burning too.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Now, the part I honestly don't get. If humans and AI agents can own wallets - what is the difference ?

Because behind every AI agent there is ultimately - human.
I mean, how do I know that this agentic wallets are not owned by the team it self? The most famous ones ARE owned by the team and that is not secret, it is a fact.
So again - how much does the team own from this token ?

With the constant rumors surrounding $BEAT ,like the one about the team abandoning the project, and the crazy variations in the tokens price , I think it is only natural that we ask this questions .

So , if I have AI agent , the agent has his wallet , and "he" buys some BEAT - who actually owns the tokens ?

BTW, after the last dump to about $0.6 ,it's starting to go up again toward $1.3.
๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ Rumour has it some ๐Ÿณ are stuck under $1.6 , so if it brakes the $1.6 it will remain bullish, but if it gets rejected at $1.2 than we may be witnessing it's last kicks ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ