Everyone talks about AI agents getting smarter. Fewer people ask what happens when one of them has a wallet.
That's the part Kite seems to be built around. Its design splits identity into three layers: the user, the agent acting for them, and short-lived sessions for individual tasks. So the agent holds only a slice of your authority, and a session key can expire without touching the rest.
Then come the spending rules. Limits can be set in code, like a cap per transaction or per day, and the network enforces them instead of trusting the agent to behave. Payments are meant to be stablecoin based, which makes sense for machines that need predictable prices.
Does this solve it? I'm not sure. Rules are only as good as the person writing them, and a badly set limit is still a bad limit. Real adoption by agents and services is also unproven. Still, giving autonomy a boundary feels like the right question to start with. I'm curious how it holds up outside demos.
#KiteBBW $KITE
@KITE AI 中文
That's the part Kite seems to be built around. Its design splits identity into three layers: the user, the agent acting for them, and short-lived sessions for individual tasks. So the agent holds only a slice of your authority, and a session key can expire without touching the rest.
Then come the spending rules. Limits can be set in code, like a cap per transaction or per day, and the network enforces them instead of trusting the agent to behave. Payments are meant to be stablecoin based, which makes sense for machines that need predictable prices.
Does this solve it? I'm not sure. Rules are only as good as the person writing them, and a badly set limit is still a bad limit. Real adoption by agents and services is also unproven. Still, giving autonomy a boundary feels like the right question to start with. I'm curious how it holds up outside demos.
#KiteBBW $KITE
@KITE AI 中文
