#Kalshi just took another serious legal hit, and in my view this could become a much bigger problem for the prediction-market model.

The Sixth Circuit ruled that Ohio and Tennessee can enforce their own gambling laws against Kalshi’s sports contracts. The court also made it clear that state-by-state compliance is possible through geofencing, even if it becomes expensive or complicated.

What really catches my attention is the exposure here. Around 69% of Kalshi’s modeled retail sports demand reportedly comes from states without legal online sportsbooks. That means wider state restrictions could directly hit a huge part of the market that helped prediction platforms grow in the first place.

We now have different appeals courts reaching different conclusions, so this legal fight is far from finished.

From my point of view, the biggest question is no longer just whether prediction markets can grow — it is whether they can maintain one national market or eventually be forced into a state-by-state system.

This could reshape liquidity, access, and the whole US prediction-market business model. 👀

$AMP
$MUBARAK
$RARE