The recent $ADA exploit on Splash is another reminder of something I think gets overlooked in DeFi. The validator flaw was patched, but around 2.42M ADA is still missing. Fixing the code can stop the same attack path, but it doesn't bring the liquidity that was already drained back. That got me thinking about STON and @ston_fi When you’re dealing with DEXs and liquidity, it’s not just about how much liquidity a protocol has. You also have to look at the infrastructure behind it, how the contracts are secured, how swaps are handled, and what happens when something goes wrong. the Platform says its contracts are open-source and audited, and its v2 contracts have been reviewed by Trail of Bits. Omniston's escrow contracts have also gone through an audit with no critical issues reported. That obviously doesn't mean “no risk” DeFi never works like that. But as Stonfi keeps expanding from a TON DEX into cross-chain infrastructure, security becomes even more important. More chains means more liquidity. More liquidity means more users and more value moving through the system. And the bigger the system gets, the more important it becomes to get the infrastructure right. That's the part of Ston I'm paying attention to beyond the chart. $HBAR #Altcoin Season#