i keep thinking if the DUSK is mine and i'm the one putting it into Hyperstaking, then my wallet should be the thing Dusk sees as staking.
like what else would ownership mean here.
my DUSK leaves through the Transfer Contract, enters a Stake Abstraction pool, and now somehow the Stake Contract position can sit under that Hyperstaking pool instead of under my wallet like a direct provisioner stake.
that part feels wrong.
because i'm still the one who supplied that DUSK into the pool. whatever share of the provisioner rewards comes back to me still starts from that contribution.
but the Hyperstaking pool can sit on DuskVM managing the Stake Contract position, while the provisioner is still the thing participating through Succinct Attestation with pooled DUSK behind it.
so wait. my DUSK can be helping that provisioner matter to Dusk consensus without my wallet being the provisioner at all?
“my DUSK is in the stake. my wallet isn't the stake.”
and i think that's the bit i kept collapsing.
the Hyperstaking pool can manage the Stake Contract position while the provisioner is the thing Succinct Attestation actually needs, and my wallet is still sitting outside that provisioner position even though the DUSK started with me.
which is weird because from my side i staked.
but when Succinct Attestation needs a provisioner, Dusk isn't looking through the Hyperstaking pool trying to find my wallet.
so what exactly did my wallet become in that staking relationship?
@Dusk #dusk #Dusk $DUSK
like what else would ownership mean here.
my DUSK leaves through the Transfer Contract, enters a Stake Abstraction pool, and now somehow the Stake Contract position can sit under that Hyperstaking pool instead of under my wallet like a direct provisioner stake.
that part feels wrong.
because i'm still the one who supplied that DUSK into the pool. whatever share of the provisioner rewards comes back to me still starts from that contribution.
but the Hyperstaking pool can sit on DuskVM managing the Stake Contract position, while the provisioner is still the thing participating through Succinct Attestation with pooled DUSK behind it.
so wait. my DUSK can be helping that provisioner matter to Dusk consensus without my wallet being the provisioner at all?
“my DUSK is in the stake. my wallet isn't the stake.”
and i think that's the bit i kept collapsing.
the Hyperstaking pool can manage the Stake Contract position while the provisioner is the thing Succinct Attestation actually needs, and my wallet is still sitting outside that provisioner position even though the DUSK started with me.
which is weird because from my side i staked.
but when Succinct Attestation needs a provisioner, Dusk isn't looking through the Hyperstaking pool trying to find my wallet.
so what exactly did my wallet become in that staking relationship?
@Dusk #dusk #Dusk $DUSK
