@Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK
I’ve been watching @Dusk_Foundation a bit more closely lately, and honestly, I think I was judging the progress too much from the outside.

The interesting part isn’t another feature being announced. It’s that Dusk is gradually making the network easier to actually build on.

DuskEVM gives developers a more familiar route into the ecosystem, while the wallet and connection tooling makes the user side less awkward. Those sound like small improvements, but they’re the kind of things that matter once real applications have to work end to end.

The security side also caught my attention. The AEGIS review resulted in 39 fixes, including 7 critical findings. The bridge issues were another reminder that the hardest risks aren’t always inside the core chain itself.

So I’m less interested in asking whether Dusk has good technology. I’m watching whether all these pieces can survive real usage.

My view has improved, but I’m not calling it proven yet.

What I want to see next is simple: real applications, real users, reliable infrastructure, and actual financial workflows running without the system becoming too complicated.

That’s the point where I’d seriously change my conviction on Dusk. $LAB
$BOME