@BabylonLabs_io Per Babylon's own wallet integration documentation if a BABY holder takes no action on a proposal your voting power will automatically be delegated to your validator.
Decisions made here ripple into Trustless Bitcoin Vaults (TBV)'s environment too. So what "not voting" means isn't a side detail.
Not voting doesn't mean staying neutral. Someone else casts a vote on your behalf. Based on their judgment. Not yours.
A holder who disagrees with their validator but never gets around to voting doesn't protect their position by staying silent. Silence hands the decision to someone else's discretion.
This is the standard liquid democracy pattern across Cosmos chains designed to keep quorum reachable.
Here's the part that sharpens it further. A holder can override their validator's default vote but only by voting before the period closes. On an urgent proposal with just a one day window that override chance could close before someone checking in occasionally even notices.
Does a shrinking override window change how seriously you'd check in?
#baby $BABY
Decisions made here ripple into Trustless Bitcoin Vaults (TBV)'s environment too. So what "not voting" means isn't a side detail.
Not voting doesn't mean staying neutral. Someone else casts a vote on your behalf. Based on their judgment. Not yours.
A holder who disagrees with their validator but never gets around to voting doesn't protect their position by staying silent. Silence hands the decision to someone else's discretion.
This is the standard liquid democracy pattern across Cosmos chains designed to keep quorum reachable.
Here's the part that sharpens it further. A holder can override their validator's default vote but only by voting before the period closes. On an urgent proposal with just a one day window that override chance could close before someone checking in occasionally even notices.
Does a shrinking override window change how seriously you'd check in?
#baby $BABY