People were told the Clarity Act failed over definitions and jurisdiction. That’s not why it collapsed.
The bill died because it exposed a $6.6 trillion problem that threatens the banking business model.
Not regulation. Not consumer protection - Survival.
Banks weren’t trying to save the economy. They were trying to save themselves.
Here’s the math they don’t say on TV. The average savings account pays under 0.5%. Checking accounts pay almost nothing.
Banks take your money and invest it in short-term Treasuries, earning over 3.5%. They keep the spread. That gap is their lifeline.
Stablecoins were about to break it.
If the reserves earn yield, users would earn yield.
Same dollar. Same Treasuries. No middleman.
Suddenly, people could earn hundreds instead of pennies. Banks ran the numbers and panicked.
Their own estimates showed that if stablecoins were allowed to pay yield, up to 30% of deposits could leave the system. Trillions walking out the door. Lending would shrink. The business model would crack.
So they lobbied Washington.
The solution wasn’t to ban stablecoins outright. That would be obvious. Instead, they inserted a clause banning yield just for holding them. No yield, no competition.
Coinbase called it what it was. A kill switch. Without support, the bill collapsed.
While this was happening, something else went unnoticed. China moved its digital currency to an interest-bearing model.
Follow for more Tips✅
