stf

🚨 In the situation involving Banco Master, the Supreme Federal Court (STF) has already begun its typical approach when inquiries venture into perilous areas: dimming the spotlight.

The initial action: Dias Toffoli mandated complete confidentiality. This prohibition means that the public is unable to observe, monitor, or question the proceedings. When a Supreme Court investigation becomes classified, it is not merely precautionary — it serves as a barrier. The topic is taken out of the public eye so that the system can function quietly, away from any external influence.

Next came a second, more telling measure: the STF exerted tighter control over the Federal Police (PF). Toffoli instructed that the evidence collected be placed under the jurisdiction of the Court, diminishing the PF's usual capacity to manage the analysis and progression of the case. What should operate as a criminal investigation is gradually evolving into a process overseen by the court.

This is an effective method to suppress a case without overtly terminating it.

Then there’s the familiar conclusion: when the revelations become troubling, the emphasis shifts. Suddenly, the discussion is no longer centered on the findings but rather on “leaks,” “confidential status,” and “attacks on institutions. ” As is often the case, Alexandre de Moraes steps in with sweeping actions, initiating investigations against those who bring to light the behind-the-scenes activities, while framing the Court as the victim — not as a body that needs monitoring.

This is the manner in which the story is altered.

Lava Jato adhered to this precise pattern: it began with the terminology of “legality,” followed by procedural hurdles, annulments, and, ultimately, full discrediting. As the investigation climbed to the higher tiers of authority, the STF executed what it has consistently done best:

It transformed an active inquiry into a judicial graveyard.

Now, concerning Banco Master, Brazil is observing the same sequence unfold.

Complete confidentiality. Centralized evidence. The PF pushed out of the picture.
The discourse redirected.
And the case was gradually relegated to a drawer where nothing progresses without authorization.

In Brazil, corruption seldom concludes — because there is perpetually a court poised to “protect democracy” precisely when an investigation begins to gain traction.

#STF #BancoMaster #Corrupcao #CorrupcaoBrasileira

$BTC
$ETH
$XRP

画期的な決定として、ブラジルの連邦最高裁判所（STF）は、2022年の選挙に続くクーデター計画への関与に対して、前大統領ジャイル・ボルソナロと7人の同盟者を有罪とする投票を行いました。これはブラジルの民主主義にとって重要な瞬間です。🇧🇷⚖️
判決：
STFの最初のパネルは4対1の多数決に達し、アレクサンドル・デ・モラエス、フラビオ・ジーノ、カルメン・ルシア、クリスティアーノ・ザニンの判事が有罪判決に投票しました。クリスティアーノ・ザニンによる最終投票は圧倒的多数を確認しました。裁判所はボルソナロが犯罪組織のリーダーであり、権力を維持するための陰謀を画策したと認定しました。

ブラジルにおける法的安全性の欠如は繰り返し議論されているテーマであり、特にアレクサンドレ・デ・モラエス大臣の連邦最高裁判所（STF）における決定の後、論争を引き起こし、国のビジネス環境に影響を与えています。投資家を引き付け、経済を強化するために不可欠な資本の姿は圧力を受けています。
モラエスの決定の影響
モラエスの決定は過剰だと見なされており、いくつかのケースでは憲法が規定する範囲を超えています。彼の指導の下で始まった調査、例えばフェイクニュースに関する調査は、権力の均衡と一人の大臣に権力が集中することについて議論を引き起こしました。批評家は、これが憲法上の保証を侵害し、投資家にとって恣意的かつ予測不可能な決定を恐れる敵対的な環境を生み出すと主張しています。