biticoin

The first full week of February delivered one of the most jarring reality checks the crypto market has experienced since the post-pandemic unwind, compressing months of fragile optimism into a few violent trading sessions. What began as a tentative attempt by Bitcoin to reclaim higher ground quickly morphed into a broad, confidence-shaking liquidation event that exposed how thin conviction had become beneath the surface. Prices moved fast, sentiment moved faster, and by the time the dust settled, the market was left staring at a familiar question that has defined every major downturn of the past decade: is this the kind of fear that precedes capitulation and renewal, or the opening act of something deeper and more structural?
Bitcoin entered the week hovering between roughly $76,900 and $78,700, buoyed briefly by short covering and opportunistic buying after a period of consolidation. The push toward the $79,000 area looked, at first glance, like the start of a stabilisation phase that could reset momentum. Instead, it proved to be a bull trap. As broader equity markets tilted risk-off and macro caution reasserted itself, crypto followed suit with unsettling speed. Selling pressure intensified through the middle of the week, and by February 5 and 6, Bitcoin was cascading toward intraday lows near $60,000 to $62,000. The pace of the move was what rattled investors most. Liquidations fed on themselves, negative flows accelerated, and roughly $350 billion was wiped from the total crypto market capitalisation in what felt like the blink of an eye.
This was not a slow grind lower that allows narratives to adjust and positioning to rebalance. It was a forced reset. Leveraged players were flushed out, stop losses were triggered en masse, and even long-term holders were confronted with the uncomfortable sensation of watching paper gains evaporate in days. The sell-off echoed earlier episodes in crypto history, but it arrived in a market that many had assumed was structurally stronger due to institutional participation, regulated products, and a more mature infrastructure. That assumption is now being re-examined.
A partial rebound late on February 6 offered some relief. Bitcoin clawed its way back into the $68,000 to $71,500 range as dip buyers stepped in near levels perceived as oversold. There was evidence of stabilisation in flows and a temporary pause in forced selling, but the recovery lacked conviction. Volume thinned on the upside, rallies stalled quickly, and anxiety remained palpable. By the weekend, price action had shifted into consolidation, with Bitcoin oscillating in a narrow band and set to close around $68,000 to $71,000. The market was no longer in free fall, but it was far from comfortable.
Sentiment data told a story even starker than price. The Crypto Fear and Greed Index plunged into “Extreme Fear” territory, briefly touching levels as low as five, a reading not seen since the chaos surrounding the 2022 collapse of major industry players. Even by February 8, with prices somewhat steadier, the index hovered around eight, signalling a market dominated by defensive positioning and emotional exhaustion. Extreme fear has historically been a double-edged signal. On one hand, it reflects genuine stress, forced selling, and the potential for further downside if macro conditions deteriorate. On the other, it has often coincided with medium-term bottoms, when the last marginal sellers capitulate and risk-reward begins to skew in favour of patient capital.
The broader crypto market mirrored Bitcoin’s turmoil. Total market capitalisation shrank toward approximately $2.05 trillion, marking the lowest point of the week. Altcoins bore the brunt of the damage, as capital rotated defensively into Bitcoin, pushing BTC dominance above 58 percent. This pattern reinforced Bitcoin’s role as the perceived safe harbour within crypto itself, even as it remained volatile in absolute terms. For many investors, the message was clear: when stress hits, liquidity and perceived quality matter more than speculative upside.
Against this turbulent backdrop, several headlines captured the deeper forces shaping the market’s trajectory. One of the most psychologically significant was the plunge in the Fear and Greed Index to levels associated with the FTX-era collapse. Such readings underscore the extent to which confidence has been shaken, but they also invite a contrarian interpretation. Markets rarely bottom when fear is merely elevated; they bottom when fear feels intolerable. Whether this episode qualifies will depend on how price behaves around key support zones and whether macro headwinds ease or intensify in the weeks ahead.
Another notable development came from the stablecoin sector, where Tether announced a $100 million investment in Anchorage Digital, a US federally chartered crypto bank valued at $4.2 billion. The move signalled a deepening commitment to regulated infrastructure and compliant institutional adoption, particularly around the issuance of USA₮ in the United States. At a time when speculative excess is being purged from the market, this kind of strategic investment highlights a parallel trend: while prices fluctuate wildly, the underlying plumbing of the crypto ecosystem continues to mature. For long-term observers, this divergence between short-term volatility and long-term infrastructure build-out is one of the most important themes to watch.
#Biticoin

金融資産の進化する風景の中で、ビットコイン、金、銀はそれぞれ異なる位置を占めています。金と銀は長い間、信頼できる価値の保存手段と見なされてきましたが、ビットコインはデジタルファーストの世界に合わせた新しい形のお金を表しています。この比較は、ビットコインファーストの視点から始まります。金や銀が価値を持たないからではなく、伝統の視点から見られることが多いため、現代の制約の文脈でその有用性を十分に検討されることがないからです。この分析の目的は、金と銀の核心的な機能を特定し、継承された信念と実際の有用性を分離し、現在の世界的な圧力の下でそれぞれの資産がどこで崩壊するかを探り、ビットコインを対比として位置づけることです。