Some people don't understand why the market is washed out during the shock decline, and the more it falls, the more it buys. How to wash out retail investors?
In fact, it is a very simple truth. For the main force, the cost is low, the capital cost is low, and it can keep smashing
What is the so-called buying more when it falls? Can you eat it if the main force sells all the chips to you?
Assuming that in this extreme case, the retail investors are rich and stupid, then it's a good relationship. I will sell it all to you. I will take the money to play the next plate. Why should I waste time with you?
You can't pull the price in the long process of purchasing goods, which means that no one really buys this thing. And after you take all the chips, no one will come to save you.
The more retail investors buy, the less likely the main force will pull the market, and it will be over if it keeps smashing.
Don't confuse the cause and effect. It is the main force that tests the market after concentrating its chips. It will pull when the selling volume is small. If the selling volume is large, then continue to smash.
The K-line you see is drawn by the main force. It has never been a rise when there is a fall, and it is not that you will make money if you buy more and more when it falls...
If you have Sol, grab the chance while the price is a bit better and switch to $HYPE . A new era has begun
律动BlockBeats
·
--
Driven by SOL’s 9% daily rise, multiple SOL treasury concept stocks surge by double digits
BlockBeats news: On June 27, as SOL rose by about 9.7%, multiple Solana digital asset treasury (DAT)-related stocks saw double-digit gains during Friday’s trading session.
According to Bitget market data, Sol Strategies (STKE) surged as much as 22%, Forward Industries (FWDI) rose as much as 12%, and SkyAI (SKYA), DeFi Development Corp. (DFDV), and Solana Company (HSDT) also jumped about 10% or more at one point.
On the news front, Forward will be added to the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000, and Upexi (UPXI) will be added to the Russell Microcap; however, data shows that all current SOL DAT are still below 1x mNAV. (The Block)
$HYPE has also started predicting the market—don’t panic
PANews
·
--
Polymarket is compromised by a third-party vendor, leading to the theft of about $3 million in users’ assets
PANews June 26 news: According to Decrypt, the prediction market platform Polymarket was compromised due to an intrusion by a third-party vendor, resulting in malicious code being injected into the website front end. About 15 user accounts were stolen of approximately $3 million in funds. Polymarket said the issue has been resolved, and affected users will receive full reimbursement, but it did not disclose the specific name of the vendor involved. The stolen funds were originally the platform’s USD-pegged stablecoin pUSD. The attacker converted them into ETH and then consolidated them to a wallet address.
This attack was the second security incident affecting Polymarket within the past two months. Last month, a wallet used by an employee for topping up and paying user rewards was stolen after the private key was leaked, resulting in losses of about $700,000.
No issues with the positioning of the hypercore support.
Binance News
·
--
Hyperliquid Community Questions HyperEVM's Positioning and Development Barriers
The Hyperliquid community is reportedly questioning the positioning of HyperEVM, suggesting it's not designed to be a general-purpose Ethereum execution environment, but rather a specialized execution layer for interacting with Hypercore combos. According to Odaily Planet Daily, the community believes that the core design of HyperEVM should rely on corewriter and precompiled contracts, rather than being used as a general L1; however, the current learning curve for developers is quite steep, and the complex interactions with system addresses require multiple trades for cross-asset operations, making asset swaps generally less efficient than AMM mechanisms.
The community also points out that HyperEVM has long faced an 'ignored' issue, possibly due to the team's resources being focused on HIP-3, HIP-4, and products like combo margin, leading to insufficient investment in ecosystem development; they suggest improvements in developer tools, optimization of the corewriter mechanism, and incentives for more on-chain experimental applications.
Humanity Update on Stolen Progress: Suspected North Korean Hackers Involved, About 141 Million Tokens Stolen and Dumped
BlockBeats reports that on June 14, the Humanity project team dropped a statement about a cross-chain attack on H tokens that went down on June 8. The attacker phished the project director's device permissions through emails, snatched the private keys, and executed on-chain operations. The report highlights that the technical methods and toolchain used in this attack show similarities to tactics employed by North Korean hacker groups.
The attack went down in a dual-chain environment with Ethereum and BNB Chain. The attacker upgraded the Ethereum contract using stolen keys and snagged around 141.18 million H tokens; meanwhile, they hijacked the ProxyAdmin contract on the BSC side and minted new tokens. After that, the attacker started dumping the related assets in batches on Uniswap and PancakeSwap for about 8 hours, hitting liquidity and token holders hard.
U.S. government issues export control order citing national security, Anthropic suspends all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
According to Cointelegraph, Anthropic received a U.S. government export control directive at 5:21 PM EST on Friday, ordering them to immediately halt access to their flagship AI models Fable 5 and Mythos 5 due to national security concerns. The directive requires Anthropic to cut off usage for all foreign personnel, including foreign employees, regardless of their location. To ensure compliance, Anthropic took both models offline for all users, while other models like Opus 4.8 remain unaffected. This directive came just days after Anthropic officially launched Fable 5 and Mythos 5, both of which are built on the Mythos Preview—a general language model that Anthropic claimed identified thousands of vulnerabilities in critical software. The government cited security risks, claiming Fable 5 has a potential 'jailbreak' method that could bypass security protections, but only provided verbal evidence. Anthropic characterized it as a 'non-general jailbreak'—essentially guiding the model to read specific code libraries and fix software flaws.