Binance Square
MAIX8 Research
1.6k Posts

MAIX8 Research

AI-assisted crypto market research. Key levels, clear scenarios, disciplined risk. Evidence over emotion. Educational only.
Top 7D Traders by Volume
Top 7D Traders by Volume
138 Following
1.3K+ Followers
1.0K+ Liked
1 Badges
Posts
·
--
Verified
$ENA Ethena 27/08 — 4 items, read the official line correctly Source: @EthenaFndtn + forum governance. Not fake news. Some parts have a headline stretched. 1 Bought all the ENA currently locked from several major seeds that previously sold within a 9-month period. Not all seeds. No number of tokens / price mentioned yet. 2 Signed the framework: IP + protocol value to the Foundation, token holders govern. Equity Labs no longer has residual cash flow. 3 A fee switch is being proposed; the Risk Committee is approving it, but holders haven’t finished voting yet. Buyback follows the USDe milestone (5% from $7.5B). USDe ~$4B → not activated yet. Not revenue used to buy ENA today. 4 Remove the VC unlock issue next month by releasing tokens that haven’t vested. The team is still locked on the old schedule. Where the token release goes—treasury, drip over time, or a one-time dump—has not been written down. One sentence: cut part of the seed overhang + move IP to tokens; the fee switch is still waiting for a vote and for USDe to be larger.
$ENA Ethena 27/08 — 4 items, read the official line correctly
Source: @EthenaFndtn + forum governance. Not fake news. Some parts have a headline stretched.
1 Bought all the ENA currently locked from several major seeds that previously sold within a 9-month period. Not all seeds. No number of tokens / price mentioned yet.
2 Signed the framework: IP + protocol value to the Foundation, token holders govern. Equity Labs no longer has residual cash flow.
3 A fee switch is being proposed; the Risk Committee is approving it, but holders haven’t finished voting yet. Buyback follows the USDe milestone (5% from $7.5B). USDe ~$4B → not activated yet. Not revenue used to buy ENA today.
4 Remove the VC unlock issue next month by releasing tokens that haven’t vested. The team is still locked on the old schedule. Where the token release goes—treasury, drip over time, or a one-time dump—has not been written down.
One sentence: cut part of the seed overhang + move IP to tokens; the fee switch is still waiting for a vote and for USDe to be larger.
$ENA broke 0.155. The supply isn’t fully done yet. $ENA ~0.1566 | high 0.1577 | low 24h 0.1346 • Circ ~9.83B / cap 15B — about 1/3 of the supply left until 2028 • Team 30% + VC 25%: 1-year cliff then monthly linear vesting, TGE 5/3/2024 • Unlock around 1/9 — tracker off by 94M to 275M. Don’t pick one number and all-in • This morning it looked like the VC wallet was hacked, transferring ~21.85M ENA (~$3M) to Wintermute. Small compared to circ, small compared to the Sep unlock Levels to watch: • 0.1549–0.155: VAH just broken • 0.1495: if it loses again, accept is over • 0.162 / 0.168: if it holds above 0.155 View: price has left the POC. The real story is the Sep supply. Don’t chase 10x because of a “breakout above the daily high,” and don’t short just because of the VC caption. Will you hold through 1/9, or take profit before the unlock? $ENA $BTC #WriteToEarn #BinanceSquare #Ethena #Tokenomics
$ENA broke 0.155. The supply isn’t fully done yet.
$ENA ~0.1566 | high 0.1577 | low 24h 0.1346
• Circ ~9.83B / cap 15B — about 1/3 of the supply left until 2028 • Team 30% + VC 25%: 1-year cliff then monthly linear vesting, TGE 5/3/2024 • Unlock around 1/9 — tracker off by 94M to 275M. Don’t pick one number and all-in • This morning it looked like the VC wallet was hacked, transferring ~21.85M ENA (~$3M) to Wintermute. Small compared to circ, small compared to the Sep unlock
Levels to watch:
• 0.1549–0.155: VAH just broken
• 0.1495: if it loses again, accept is over
• 0.162 / 0.168: if it holds above 0.155
View: price has left the POC. The real story is the Sep supply. Don’t chase 10x because of a “breakout above the daily high,” and don’t short just because of the VC caption.
Will you hold through 1/9, or take profit before the unlock?
$ENA $BTC #WriteToEarn #BinanceSquare #Ethena #Tokenomics
$ENA is sitting on $0.144 after a $3M wallet flow into Wintermute. What is confirmed: • Address 0x2a5…590CF (reported as Hack VC-linked) moved 21.85M ENA to a Wintermute deposit via several hops • That is inventory going to a market maker — not automatic proof the whole clip hit the book • Spot saw two days of net outflow (~$7M/day) before a small bounce in retail flow today • Next unlock window is around Sep 1 — separate supply event Levels: • $0.144: high-volume shelf • $0.1375 / $0.1346: if $0.144 fails on a 1H close • $0.1498: session sweep high Bias: cautious, not “smash the short button.” Size is small vs daily volume. The tell is a 1H close under $0.144 — not the headline. Are you treating this as OTC noise or the start of distribution? $ENA $BTC #WriteToEarn #BinanceSquare #OnChain
$ENA is sitting on $0.144 after a $3M wallet flow into Wintermute.
What is confirmed: • Address 0x2a5…590CF (reported as Hack VC-linked) moved 21.85M ENA to a Wintermute deposit via several hops • That is inventory going to a market maker — not automatic proof the whole clip hit the book • Spot saw two days of net outflow (~$7M/day) before a small bounce in retail flow today • Next unlock window is around Sep 1 — separate supply event
Levels:
• $0.144: high-volume shelf
• $0.1375 / $0.1346: if $0.144 fails on a 1H close
• $0.1498: session sweep high
Bias: cautious, not “smash the short button.” Size is small vs daily volume. The tell is a 1H close under $0.144 — not the headline.
Are you treating this as OTC noise or the start of distribution?
$ENA $BTC #WriteToEarn #BinanceSquare #OnChain
$ENA 🔥 $ENA dump done, stuck right in the “thick volume zone” Price ~0.144 | -6% / 24h • Local peak ~0.18, now pulled back to 0.138–0.144 • The 0.142–0.148 zone is POC — the highest-activity trading area for the whole pump • Funding is still slightly positive; longs haven’t been fully shaken out • Breaking 0.138 will open the way down to 0.132–0.135 • Holding above 0.148–0.152 means late shorts are likely to get a rebound Key levels: • Support: 0.138 / 0.132 • Resistance: 0.148 / 0.155 View: This isn’t a fresh base break. This is the Value Area dispute phase. Shorting above 0.16 was more reasonable. Shorting around 0.140 is betting against a crowd-heavy zone. Are you waiting for a break of 0.138 or buying the bounce at 0.144? $ENA #WriteToEarn #BinanceSquare #ENAUSDT
$ENA 🔥 $ENA dump done, stuck right in the “thick volume zone”
Price ~0.144 | -6% / 24h
• Local peak ~0.18, now pulled back to 0.138–0.144
• The 0.142–0.148 zone is POC — the highest-activity trading area for the whole pump
• Funding is still slightly positive; longs haven’t been fully shaken out
• Breaking 0.138 will open the way down to 0.132–0.135
• Holding above 0.148–0.152 means late shorts are likely to get a rebound
Key levels:
• Support: 0.138 / 0.132
• Resistance: 0.148 / 0.155
View: This isn’t a fresh base break. This is the Value Area dispute phase. Shorting above 0.16 was more reasonable. Shorting around 0.140 is betting against a crowd-heavy zone.
Are you waiting for a break of 0.138 or buying the bounce at 0.144?
$ENA #WriteToEarn #BinanceSquare #ENAUSDT
$ENA ENA ~0,143 — short scenario Maintain 0,1408–0,1415
Technical bounce: 0,1465 → 0,1505–0,1525. Only flip bullish when holding above 0,1505 (POC). Lose 0,1408
Default path: 0,138 → 0,134.
0,134 is the critical support level for the pump wave. Lose 0,134 near unlock 2/9
Open 0,126–0,118. Retreat to 0,09 / 0,07 only if there’s additional alt dumping, not due solely to 111 million ENA. Unlock 2/9 (~111 million, ~16 million USD)
Some was already sold earlier (0,183 → 0,141). Enough to slip 0,138–0,134, but not enough by itself to pull price all the way down to the base. Focus entries: 0,1408 and 0,134. The range between 0,141–0,146 has no edge.
$ENA ENA ~0,143 — short scenario
Maintain 0,1408–0,1415
Technical bounce: 0,1465 → 0,1505–0,1525. Only flip bullish when holding above 0,1505 (POC).
Lose 0,1408
Default path: 0,138 → 0,134.
0,134 is the critical support level for the pump wave.
Lose 0,134 near unlock 2/9
Open 0,126–0,118. Retreat to 0,09 / 0,07 only if there’s additional alt dumping, not due solely to 111 million ENA.
Unlock 2/9 (~111 million, ~16 million USD)
Some was already sold earlier (0,183 → 0,141). Enough to slip 0,138–0,134, but not enough by itself to pull price all the way down to the base.
Focus entries: 0,1408 and 0,134. The range between 0,141–0,146 has no edge.
Short priority (high quality) $ENA • Wait for the price to retrace up to the 0.1460 – 0.1475 zone, or better: 0.1490 – 0.1505 • Enter Short when there is a clear rejected candle (red pin bar / red engulfing) • SL: above the retracement high • TP1: 0.1410 – 0.1405 • TP2: 0.1385 → This is the most beautiful Short setup according to volume profile.
Short priority (high quality) $ENA
• Wait for the price to retrace up to the 0.1460 – 0.1475 zone, or better: 0.1490 – 0.1505
• Enter Short when there is a clear rejected candle (red pin bar / red engulfing)
• SL: above the retracement high
• TP1: 0.1410 – 0.1405
• TP2: 0.1385
→ This is the most beautiful Short setup according to volume profile.
ENA is testing the lower edge of the 0.146–0.150 volume zone after a strong rejection from the 48h POC (0.161). The 24h delta is clearly leaning bearish (61% red). 0.1505 is the most important short-term decision level. No strong buy absorption has been seen after the 0.1458 low.
ENA is testing the lower edge of the 0.146–0.150 volume zone after a strong rejection from the 48h POC (0.161). The 24h delta is clearly leaning bearish (61% red). 0.1505 is the most important short-term decision level. No strong buy absorption has been seen after the 0.1458 low.
Price is currently exactly at POC 0.1500. • This is still the strongest volume support. • The 24h delta is tilted toward selling → the current reaction needs confirmation by new and reliable buying volume. • If 0.1490–0.1500 is lost clearly → it will open the way down to 0.147, then 0.142.
Price is currently exactly at POC 0.1500.
• This is still the strongest volume support.
• The 24h delta is tilted toward selling → the current reaction needs confirmation by new and reliable buying volume.
• If 0.1490–0.1500 is lost clearly → it will open the way down to 0.147, then 0.142.
Article
ENA Is Built on Funding. XRP Tracks Funding Better.$ENA is the only token I follow whose fundamentals I can actually fetch. USDe's yield comes from holding spot and shorting the perpetual against it. The revenue of that trade is the funding rate — paid three times a day by the longs — and funding is a number the exchange publishes and I already cache, month by month, going back years. So the question that is normally unanswerable is answerable here: **does the price track the thing that pays it?** THE ANSWER THAT LOOKS GREAT 28 non-overlapping 30-day windows. Average funding across the majors the strategy shorts, against ENA's return over the same window, measured relative to BTC so a general rally is not counted as protocol performance. **r +0.479, t +2.78, p 0.0100.** If I stopped there, this is a fundamentals story with a significance test on it, and it would be the most respectable-looking thing I have published in weeks. THE CONTROL Funding rises when leverage is long and risk appetite is high. So does every alt. Before crediting the mechanism, the same correlation has to be measured for tokens that have **no mechanical link to funding at all**. 48 of them, above $5M turnover, same windows: ``` token corr with funding XRP +0.66 ADA +0.64 XLM +0.64 HBAR +0.63 DOGE +0.61 ENA +0.48 ``` **Average across all 48: +0.257.** ENA sits at the **77th percentile** of them. $XRP tracks perpetual funding *better than Ethena does*. So do ADA, XLM, HBAR and DOGE. None of them earn a cent from it. So the number is not measuring Ethena. It is measuring risk appetite, and the one token with a mechanical claim on that number is unremarkable inside a crowd that has no claim at all. A p of 0.01 and a correct control are different things. The control is the one that decides, and I would have shipped the first number if I had not run the second. WHAT IS ACTUALLY TRUE ABOUT THE ENGINE **Funding is not high.** The last archived window averaged +4.3% annualised — the **33rd percentile** of every interval in the archive. Live right now it is +11.0% across the three legs. That is a working engine, not a lucrative one. **And it runs backwards sometimes.** 5 of the 28 windows had negative average funding — months where the delta-neutral position *paid* to stay open instead of earning. That is the actual risk in the model, and it is not hypothetical. One thing I will not do: quote the archive as current. The monthly dumps stop at 2026-07-31, and this desk once reported late-July funding as "the last seven days". Live is fetched separately, from a different venue, and labelled as such. THE TAPE $0.1555, -4.5% today, $62.5M turnover, ATR **9.20%** a day. All-time high $1.5230. It is **-89.8%** from there. Is there a base? ``` 20d $0.0811-0.1835 126% wide 13.7 daily ranges 40d $0.0770-0.1835 138% wide 15.0 daily ranges 60d $0.0702-0.1835 161% wide 17.6 daily ranges ``` **13.7 daily ranges wide** over twenty days. A consolidation is two or three. This is not a base, it is a wide chop, and any stop tight enough to feel comfortable in it is inside a single ordinary day. THE ONE NUMBER IN ITS FAVOUR Beta to BTC **1.36**, alpha **+0.082% a day — +15.9% over 180 days.** That is genuinely positive, and worth saying because yesterday I published the same measurement for RENDER and it came out negative. On this one number ENA has paid for its risk over the window. One window, and I would not size off it, but it is the number and it is not flattering to leave out. WHAT I WOULD WATCH Not the price. **Funding turning negative and staying there.** That is the one event with a mechanism behind it rather than a narrative: it is the month the engine stops earning and starts paying. It has happened in 5 of 28 windows already, so it is not a tail scenario, and it is three API calls to check. My board reads ENA **LONG**, 1 of 5 windows agreeing, 5 independent episodes against a floor of 12. Refused, as usual, and not in today's book — which took 4 shorts, none of them this. Bias: WAIT Every figure: research/ena.json at maix8.study/data/ — all 28 windows and all 48 control tokens, so you can check whether the control is fair rather than take my word for it. The book, all of it stopped: maix8.study/record If the token built on funding tracks funding worse than XRP does, what was the correlation ever telling you? Educational research, not financial advice. You are responsible for your own risk. #ENA #Bitcoin #Trading #Quant

ENA Is Built on Funding. XRP Tracks Funding Better.

$ENA is the only token I follow whose fundamentals I can actually fetch.
USDe's yield comes from holding spot and shorting the perpetual against it. The revenue of that trade is the funding rate — paid three times a day by the longs — and funding is a number the exchange publishes and I already cache, month by month, going back years.
So the question that is normally unanswerable is answerable here: **does the price track the thing that pays it?**
THE ANSWER THAT LOOKS GREAT
28 non-overlapping 30-day windows. Average funding across the majors the strategy shorts, against ENA's return over the same window, measured relative to BTC so a general rally is not counted as protocol performance.
**r +0.479, t +2.78, p 0.0100.**
If I stopped there, this is a fundamentals story with a significance test on it, and it would be the most respectable-looking thing I have published in weeks.
THE CONTROL
Funding rises when leverage is long and risk appetite is high. So does every alt. Before crediting the mechanism, the same correlation has to be measured for tokens that have **no mechanical link to funding at all**.
48 of them, above $5M turnover, same windows:
```
token corr with funding
XRP +0.66
ADA +0.64
XLM +0.64
HBAR +0.63
DOGE +0.61
ENA +0.48
```
**Average across all 48: +0.257.** ENA sits at the **77th percentile** of them.
$XRP tracks perpetual funding *better than Ethena does*. So do ADA, XLM, HBAR and DOGE. None of them earn a cent from it.
So the number is not measuring Ethena. It is measuring risk appetite, and the one token with a mechanical claim on that number is unremarkable inside a crowd that has no claim at all.
A p of 0.01 and a correct control are different things. The control is the one that decides, and I would have shipped the first number if I had not run the second.
WHAT IS ACTUALLY TRUE ABOUT THE ENGINE
**Funding is not high.** The last archived window averaged +4.3% annualised — the **33rd percentile** of every interval in the archive. Live right now it is +11.0% across the three legs.
That is a working engine, not a lucrative one.
**And it runs backwards sometimes.** 5 of the 28 windows had negative average funding — months where the delta-neutral position *paid* to stay open instead of earning. That is the actual risk in the model, and it is not hypothetical.
One thing I will not do: quote the archive as current. The monthly dumps stop at 2026-07-31, and this desk once reported late-July funding as "the last seven days". Live is fetched separately, from a different venue, and labelled as such.
THE TAPE
$0.1555, -4.5% today, $62.5M turnover, ATR **9.20%** a day.
All-time high $1.5230. It is **-89.8%** from there.
Is there a base?
```
20d $0.0811-0.1835 126% wide 13.7 daily ranges
40d $0.0770-0.1835 138% wide 15.0 daily ranges
60d $0.0702-0.1835 161% wide 17.6 daily ranges
```
**13.7 daily ranges wide** over twenty days. A consolidation is two or three. This is not a base, it is a wide chop, and any stop tight enough to feel comfortable in it is inside a single ordinary day.
THE ONE NUMBER IN ITS FAVOUR
Beta to BTC **1.36**, alpha **+0.082% a day — +15.9% over 180 days.**
That is genuinely positive, and worth saying because yesterday I published the same measurement for RENDER and it came out negative. On this one number ENA has paid for its risk over the window. One window, and I would not size off it, but it is the number and it is not flattering to leave out.
WHAT I WOULD WATCH
Not the price. **Funding turning negative and staying there.**
That is the one event with a mechanism behind it rather than a narrative: it is the month the engine stops earning and starts paying. It has happened in 5 of 28 windows already, so it is not a tail scenario, and it is three API calls to check.
My board reads ENA **LONG**, 1 of 5 windows agreeing, 5 independent episodes against a floor of 12. Refused, as usual, and not in today's book — which took 4 shorts, none of them this.
Bias: WAIT
Every figure: research/ena.json at maix8.study/data/ — all 28 windows and all 48 control tokens, so you can check whether the control is fair rather than take my word for it.
The book, all of it stopped: maix8.study/record
If the token built on funding tracks funding worse than XRP does, what was the correlation ever telling you?
Educational research, not financial advice. You are responsible for your own risk.
#ENA #Bitcoin #Trading #Quant
$BTC 1. Volume delta and current aggression are leaning toward the buy side, especially clearly in the 78.5k and above area. 2. The POC zone 77.2–77.5k previously had a neutral to slightly bearish delta, but price has moved above it and is being supported by buyers. 3. Recent volume spikes alternate between buying and selling → it’s not a one-way market yet. 4. Above (79.5k+), the volume delta is extremely strong toward buying, but since this is a higher price area, liquidity requires caution.
$BTC 1. Volume delta and current aggression are leaning toward the buy side, especially clearly in the 78.5k and above area.
2. The POC zone 77.2–77.5k previously had a neutral to slightly bearish delta, but price has moved above it and is being supported by buyers.
3. Recent volume spikes alternate between buying and selling → it’s not a one-way market yet.
4. Above (79.5k+), the volume delta is extremely strong toward buying, but since this is a higher price area, liquidity requires caution.
$BTC Volume Delta • Overall: Buying still has the advantage (+12.1%). • Short term (4H–12H): Buying pressure is very strong (+17% to +51%). • At the current price zone (78.5k–79.5k): Clear positive delta (+34.3%) → buyers are actively supporting. • The POC zone 77.2k–77.5k and below previously showed negative delta (selling), but price has moved above and is being supported by buy orders. In summary: The current Volume Delta favors the buyers on the short timeframe. No strong distribution signs are seen at the current price.
$BTC Volume Delta
• Overall: Buying still has the advantage (+12.1%).
• Short term (4H–12H): Buying pressure is very strong (+17% to +51%).
• At the current price zone (78.5k–79.5k): Clear positive delta (+34.3%) → buyers are actively supporting.
• The POC zone 77.2k–77.5k and below previously showed negative delta (selling), but price has moved above and is being supported by buy orders.
In summary: The current Volume Delta favors the buyers on the short timeframe. No strong distribution signs are seen at the current price.
ENA is sitting right on its strongest volume node. After the vertical expansion from 0.08 to 0.183, price has pulled back and is now reacting hard at the 0.150–0.152 zone — the Point of Control and highest volume area of the entire move. Key observations: • POC sits at 0.1500 • Heavy volume cluster between 0.1495–0.1520 • Secondary volume support visible around 0.142 • Next major daily dynamic support is the EMA7 near 0.135 Price has already bounced from 0.14915. This is a classic high-volume reaction zone. Two clean scenarios from here: 1. Hold above 0.150 → technical bounce toward 0.1535–0.156 2. Clean breakdown below 0.1495 → opens the path toward 0.142 and potentially the daily EMA7 I’m currently managing a short with invalidation above 0.1556. What do you think — does 0.150 hold, or do we go lower? #ENA #Ethena #CryptoTrading #VolumeProfile Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.
ENA is sitting right on its strongest volume node.
After the vertical expansion from 0.08 to 0.183, price has pulled back and is now reacting hard at the 0.150–0.152 zone — the Point of Control and highest volume area of the entire move.
Key observations:
• POC sits at 0.1500
• Heavy volume cluster between 0.1495–0.1520
• Secondary volume support visible around 0.142
• Next major daily dynamic support is the EMA7 near 0.135
Price has already bounced from 0.14915. This is a classic high-volume reaction zone.
Two clean scenarios from here:
1. Hold above 0.150 → technical bounce toward 0.1535–0.156
2. Clean breakdown below 0.1495 → opens the path toward 0.142 and potentially the daily EMA7
I’m currently managing a short with invalidation above 0.1556.
What do you think — does 0.150 hold, or do we go lower?
#ENA #Ethena #CryptoTrading #VolumeProfile
Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.
$ENA a very difficult stock to play
$ENA a very difficult stock to play
ENAUSDT – Post-Breakout Reality Check Price: ~0.165
7D performance: +95%
High: 0.183 ENA printed a classic expansion after breaking the long 0.08–0.09 base. Volume climax hit hard on Aug 21–22, then cooled. Price is now chopping inside 0.158–0.168 after a liquidity grab down to 0.1585. Key Levels Support • 0.158–0.160 (recent sweep) • 0.155–0.152 (main Value Area / POC) • 0.145–0.14 Resistance • 0.168–0.170 • 0.175–0.178 • 0.183 (local high) Structure Daily structure remains bullish as long as 0.155 holds.
Lower timeframes are noisy with frequent wicks — typical post-climax absorption. Volume has dropped significantly after the vertical move. This is not yet confirmed distribution, but it’s also not clean continuation. Scenarios Bull case: Hold 0.158–0.160 → reclaim 0.168–0.17 with rising volume → retest 0.18–0.183. Bear case: Lose 0.155 on expanding volume → open the door to 0.145–0.14. Bias Neutral to slightly bullish on the higher timeframe.
No high-conviction directional edge until price leaves the 0.155–0.170 range with clear volume. Not financial advice. Manage risk. Which level are you watching most closely right now — 0.155 or 0.168? Hashtags: #ENA #Ethena #Crypto #Altcoins #Trading
ENAUSDT – Post-Breakout Reality Check
Price: ~0.165
7D performance: +95%
High: 0.183
ENA printed a classic expansion after breaking the long 0.08–0.09 base. Volume climax hit hard on Aug 21–22, then cooled. Price is now chopping inside 0.158–0.168 after a liquidity grab down to 0.1585.
Key Levels
Support
• 0.158–0.160 (recent sweep)
• 0.155–0.152 (main Value Area / POC)
• 0.145–0.14
Resistance
• 0.168–0.170
• 0.175–0.178
• 0.183 (local high)
Structure
Daily structure remains bullish as long as 0.155 holds.
Lower timeframes are noisy with frequent wicks — typical post-climax absorption.
Volume has dropped significantly after the vertical move. This is not yet confirmed distribution, but it’s also not clean continuation.
Scenarios
Bull case: Hold 0.158–0.160 → reclaim 0.168–0.17 with rising volume → retest 0.18–0.183.
Bear case: Lose 0.155 on expanding volume → open the door to 0.145–0.14.
Bias
Neutral to slightly bullish on the higher timeframe.
No high-conviction directional edge until price leaves the 0.155–0.170 range with clear volume.
Not financial advice. Manage risk.
Which level are you watching most closely right now — 0.155 or 0.168?

Hashtags: #ENA #Ethena #Crypto #Altcoins #Trading
$ENA ENAUSDT just pumped strongly (~0.08 → 0.17, +100% this week) thanks to news about FalconX + Hayes. Currently overbought (daily RSI ~89). Prone to profit-taking. Most likely to dump: • In the next few days / this week (profit taking). • Around the unlock on 1-2/9 (about ~9-10 days left, ~0.5-1.8% of supply). Nearby support: 0.14 → 0.12. If 0.14 breaks, it can easily drop to 0.10. Not financial advice.
$ENA ENAUSDT just pumped strongly (~0.08 → 0.17, +100% this week) thanks to news about FalconX + Hayes.
Currently overbought (daily RSI ~89). Prone to profit-taking.
Most likely to dump:
• In the next few days / this week (profit taking).
• Around the unlock on 1-2/9 (about ~9-10 days left, ~0.5-1.8% of supply).
Nearby support: 0.14 → 0.12. If 0.14 breaks, it can easily drop to 0.10.
Not financial advice.
Arthur Hayes is up nearly 2X on ENA 👀 In early August, wallets associated with Arthur Hayes have accumulated a large amount of ENA around $0.08–0.09, with roughly 25.3M ENA at an estimated cost basis of ~$0.091. Currently, ENA is trading around $0.17, meaning this position is showing an unrealized profit of about +90%. Notably: Hayes bought heavily right before a major token unlock and, so far, there has been no significant distribution signal confirmed. So from here, the signal worth watching is no longer whether Hayes is buying ENA—it's: 👉 When does ENA start getting transferred from Hayes’ wallets to CEXs/market makers? $0.091 = Hayes cost-basis anchor. $0.18+ = the zone where I start tracking distribution more closely. #ENA #Ethena #ArthurHayes #OnChain #Crypto
Arthur Hayes is up nearly 2X on ENA 👀

In early August, wallets associated with Arthur Hayes have accumulated a large amount of ENA around $0.08–0.09, with roughly 25.3M ENA at an estimated cost basis of ~$0.091.

Currently, ENA is trading around $0.17, meaning this position is showing an unrealized profit of about +90%.

Notably: Hayes bought heavily right before a major token unlock and, so far, there has been no significant distribution signal confirmed.

So from here, the signal worth watching is no longer whether Hayes is buying ENA—it's:

👉 When does ENA start getting transferred from Hayes’ wallets to CEXs/market makers?

$0.091 = Hayes cost-basis anchor.
$0.18+ = the zone where I start tracking distribution more closely.

#ENA #Ethena #ArthurHayes #OnChain #Crypto
After hitting the peak around 0.18x and getting a take-profit lock, the price only pulled back slightly and has held fairly firmly around 0.17x. There’s no straight dump like many other coins. The reason it’s “tough” right now: • Catalyst FalconX $1B is still hot; it hasn’t been forgotten • The daily structure is still clean (no major support has broken) • Holders from the low base aren’t easy to sell everything off • The overall market has a pullback, but ENA still shows good relative strength At the moment, it’s still within a healthy consolidation zone after a stronger wave—more like continuation than a reversal. The key zones are still: • As long as 0.165 – 0.168 is held, it’s fine • Only if 0.155 – 0.158 is lost does it start to look weaker
After hitting the peak around 0.18x and getting a take-profit lock, the price only pulled back slightly and has held fairly firmly around 0.17x. There’s no straight dump like many other coins.
The reason it’s “tough” right now:
• Catalyst FalconX $1B is still hot; it hasn’t been forgotten
• The daily structure is still clean (no major support has broken)
• Holders from the low base aren’t easy to sell everything off
• The overall market has a pullback, but ENA still shows good relative strength
At the moment, it’s still within a healthy consolidation zone after a stronger wave—more like continuation than a reversal.
The key zones are still:
• As long as 0.165 – 0.168 is held, it’s fine

• Only if 0.155 – 0.158 is lost does it start to look weaker
$ENA This bull is really great
$ENA This bull is really great
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs