Is the Binance Wallet taking up 75% of DEX volume? 👀
A pretty notable figure is being shared: the Binance Wallet is said to be processing around 75% of the total DEX trading volume via Web3 wallets, equivalent to over $13B in volume per day.
The noteworthy part isn’t just the number.
It shows a major shift in how users approach DeFi.
Instead of having to connect a wallet themselves, find a DEX, switch chains, and then handle each step one by one, the experience is increasingly being packaged right inside the wallet.
🔑 And this is a huge advantage for Binance.
Binance isn’t just a CEX exchange. They own an ecosystem of exchange → Web3 Wallet → BNB Chain → on-chain liquidity.
If users can move from assets on Binance to on-chain trading almost seamlessly, the line between CEX and DeFi will keep getting blurrier.
That’s the part I find truly interesting.
It’s not just that Binance added another wallet.
It’s that millions of users from a major exchange are being brought closer to the on-chain economy.
And if this trend continues, BNB Chain won’t only benefit from user volume.
It could become a gateway to bring money flowing from Binance into DeFi.
The remaining question:
Is 75% today only a temporary peak, or is it just the beginning?
@Dusk HAS BUILT THE ROAD. BUT WHERE IS THE TRAFFIC?
#Dusk currently presents €300M+ confirmed institutional issuance, 50K+ investor reach, 210M+ $DUSK staked and ~10s deterministic finality. Those are meaningful numbers. But another set of numbers is worth watching: current explorer data shows a much smaller level of direct network activity, with roughly 921 addresses, 68 active addresses over 24h, 41,938 total transactions and 8 contract calls over 24h at the time of the snapshot.
That creates an interesting gap.
There is a difference between assets being issued and assets being actively used.
Dusk itself makes this distinction clear in its latest research: tokenization can coordinate ownership, transfers and settlement, but it cannot create buyers, sellers or fair prices. A functioning market still needs demand, liquidity, pricing, payment infrastructure and an authorized venue.
NPEX makes the question even more interesting. The regulated venue has facilitated €200M+ in financing for 100+ SMEs and connects 17,500+ active investors. Dusk and NPEX are working toward bringing issuance, trading, disclosure and settlement into an onchain workflow.
So the ingredients are clearly there.
But how much of that activity will actually become recurring onchain activity on Dusk?
Not partnerships. Not announcements. Not potential market size.
I mean transactions, trading, settlement, returning investors, returning issuers and real liquidity.
That is where I think the next chapter gets interesting.
Dusk has shown that it can build the infrastructure. The harder question is whether that infrastructure can generate sustained financial activity.
Maybe the current numbers are simply the early stage of a much larger pipeline.
Maybe institutional adoption takes time to translate into onchain activity.
Or maybe the hardest part isn't building the road.
Maybe it's getting the financial world to drive on it.
The noteworthy point is not that the VN-Index has not yet broken above 1,800, but that the market breadth is too weak: HoSE has 225 declining stocks versus 93 advancing ones, while VIC contributes much of the pull to the index.
The VN-Index has broken above 1,800, only to fall back to 1,791.
What’s frightening is not the 1,800 figure.
It’s that even though the index is green, most stocks are still red.
VIC is carrying the score, while selling pressure is spreading.
In my view, this is not yet a convincing breakout.
1,800 will be a gateway — but who is truly pushing that door open?
Do you think the next session will break above 1,800, or will it be sold down again? 👀 $VIC $C98 $TOMO
BTC $80K — is this the final bull trap before the cycle bottom? 👀
BTC is pressing against $80K after a strong rebound from the bottom zone.
But I’m not ready to call this a breakout yet.
Bitfinex previously warned that the market is in a late-stage bear market state: volatility, volume, and liquidity are all contracting.
What’s more notable: the $80K zone used to be a key market-structure level. If BTC can break above it and hold, the story would be completely different.
But what if it gets strongly rejected?
This could be the last relief rally — pulling FOMO back in before the market truly finds a bottom.
I’m watching three levels:
$80K → breakout or bull trap? $84K → the next resistance zone. $63K → an important demand zone.
If BTC gets rejected at $80K, where do you think the cycle bottom will be? 👇
ETH is maturing into a productive digital asset: Ethereum is the settlement layer for stablecoins, DeFi, and RWA; ETFs are also bringing traditional capital flows into ETH.
But when markets go risk-off, ETH is still often sold like a risky asset.
That’s the big difference.
Gold = preserve capital. BTC = digital monetary asset. ETH = infrastructure + yield + growth.
If you want to call ETH a safe haven, it has to prove its ability to hold value when liquidity runs for the exits—not just rally strongly during bullish markets.
I’ll look at 3 things: ETF flows → network usage → ETH performance during the next major risk-off.
If ETH passes that test, the thesis will change completely.
Is ETH becoming a safe haven, or is it just becoming a higher-quality asset?
👀 BNB Chain now has 1.09M+ RWA holders, $5.83B in distributed RWA value and $27.76B in 30-day transfer volume. That tells me RWA is moving beyond institutional experiments and into real onchain activity. And when an ecosystem connected to Binance starts pushing tokenized assets toward a much broader user base, it explains why RWA suddenly seems to be everywhere across Binance Square, X and other crypto platforms.
But adoption creates a new question.
A tokenized security can still be constrained by KYC/AML, investor eligibility, transfer restrictions, custody, disclosure, jurisdiction and settlement. The token may be digital, but the rules around it still create friction.
The rules aren't the enemy. They're the price of trust. Regulation, eligibility and disclosure exist for a reason: they make financial markets transparent and accountable. The problem begins when those rules are fragmented across different systems, turning necessary safeguards into unnecessary friction. The asset isn't the prisoner. The fragmented system around it is.
⚙️ This is where Dusk becomes interesting to me. Binance provides distribution and liquidity, BNB Chain is creating a large environment for RWA activity, while Dusk is approaching another layer of the problem: connecting issuance → eligibility → custody → trading → transfer → payment → settlement into a coherent regulated onchain lifecycle. Its ecosystem includes NPEX, Cordial Systems, Quantoz, Chainlink and 21X, each addressing different pieces of that financial stack.
And that's why I'm starting to look at Dusk differently.
The token is the asset. The lifecycle is the infrastructure.
Dusk — Infrastructure for regulated onchain finance.
The most controversial point is whether the ETF is truly the catalyst—but the current pump is coming with extremely high leverage. The latest data shows ZEC perp has about $1.8B in open interest and $5.29B volume/24h.
🔥 IS ZEC RIDING THE WAVE OR SETTING A TRAP?
ZEC just broke above $800, at one point reaching ~ $855 — the highest price level since 2018.
The catalyst is very clear:
🏦 Grayscale is nearing the process of listing the Zcash ETF on NYSE Arca, ticker ZCSH. 🐋 DCG is still discussing the possibility of contributing around 200,000 ZEC to the fund—but this is not yet a guaranteed purchase commitment.
But there’s one thing that makes me cautious:
⚠️ $1.8B open interest in the perpetual market.
Meaning, this rally isn’t just spot-driven. Leverage is playing a very strong role.
So I split everyone into two camps:
🟢 BULL CAMP: ETF opens → new capital flows in → ZEC breaks $855 → price discovery.
🔴 BEAR CAMP: ETF news has already been priced in → leverage is too high → just a little BTC shake → longs get liquidated → ZEC turns around extremely fast.
I want to see which side is right. 👇
Comment 🚀 if ZEC breaks above $1,000 Comment 💀 if ZEC crashes before the ETF creates inflows