@Vanarchain "Is VANAR optimizing for developers or investors?"
VANAR talks like a developer chain, but moves like an investor-optimized network.
Look at the architecture. VANAR positions itself around gaming and entertainment, yet core infra decisions—permissioned validators, curated partners, and ecosystem grants—reduce friction for studios only after capital alignment. That’s not dev-first; that’s capital-first with dev onboarding layered on top. Real dev-first chains remove coordination cost first. VANAR manages it.
Token utility exposes the bias. VANAR’s token is more visible in staking narratives, ecosystem funds, and long-term lockups than in unavoidable, daily developer pain points like gas abstraction or composable tooling incentives. Developers can build around VANAR, but they’re not forced to depend on the token deeply.
A comparison table using VANAR docs + public SDKs:
Columns: VANAR vs Immutable vs Polygon
Rows: Validator openness, SDK maturity, mandatory token usage, time-to-deploy.
It clearly shows VANAR lowers risk for capital partners faster than for indie devs.
That’s not evil. But call it what it is.......
#VANAR #GameFi #Web3Infra #Layer1 #vanar $VANRY