๐๐ผ๐ ๐ง๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฝ๐๐ผ ๐ฃ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ณ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ผ ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐น๐๐ถ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐
A multi-chain portfolio can drift away from its target allocation as prices move.
For example, you might start with:
30% ETH
30% stablecoins
20% TON assets
20% other assets
After market movements, those percentages can look very different.
That is where rebalancing comes in.
๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐-๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐๐ปโ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฝ.
Your assets are sitting on separate blockchains, so you first need to decide:
โข Which allocation is overweight? โข Which chain should receive capital? โข What asset should arrive there? โข What will the complete route cost? โข Does the expected benefit justify moving the funds?
The last question is important.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐๐ปโ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ต ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ผ ๐บ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ณ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐.
Once the decision is made, you need an execution mechanism.
One approach is a bridge: lock an asset on one chain and receive a representation on another.
Another approach is a cross-chain swap.
With Omniston, STON.fi uses an RFQ + resolver model. Resolvers compete to provide a quote, while paired HTLCs coordinate settlement across the two chains.
Conceptually:
๐ฆ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐
โ
๐ค๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐๐
โ
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐น๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ค๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ
โ
๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ง๐๐๐
โ
๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐
The goal is an all-or-nothing settlement: the quoted swap completes, or the relevant timelock/refund mechanism allows funds to return.
A multi-chain portfolio can drift away from its target allocation as prices move.
For example, you might start with:
30% ETH
30% stablecoins
20% TON assets
20% other assets
After market movements, those percentages can look very different.
That is where rebalancing comes in.
๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐-๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐๐ปโ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฝ.
Your assets are sitting on separate blockchains, so you first need to decide:
โข Which allocation is overweight? โข Which chain should receive capital? โข What asset should arrive there? โข What will the complete route cost? โข Does the expected benefit justify moving the funds?
The last question is important.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐๐ปโ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ต ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ผ ๐บ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ณ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐.
Once the decision is made, you need an execution mechanism.
One approach is a bridge: lock an asset on one chain and receive a representation on another.
Another approach is a cross-chain swap.
With Omniston, STON.fi uses an RFQ + resolver model. Resolvers compete to provide a quote, while paired HTLCs coordinate settlement across the two chains.
Conceptually:
๐ฆ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐
โ
๐ค๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐๐
โ
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐น๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ค๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ
โ
๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ง๐๐๐
โ
๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐
The goal is an all-or-nothing settlement: the quoted swap completes, or the relevant timelock/refund mechanism allows funds to return.
