BlackRock’s latest move into DeFi is already making waves across the market.
UNI jumped more than 3% after the asset-management giant announced plans to bring its $2 billion tokenized U.S. Treasury fund to Uniswap and purchase the protocol’s governance token as part of the rollout. The decision signals a notable shift, with one of the world’s largest financial institutions leaning on public DeFi infrastructure rather than closed, proprietary systems.
The fund, known as BUIDL, has quickly grown into the largest tokenized money market product on the market, with over $2 billion in assets. It’s already been deployed across multiple blockchains, and the Uniswap integration marks another step toward making real-world assets tradable directly on decentralized platforms.
The broader trend is hard to ignore. Tokenized Treasuries and other real-world assets are increasingly being viewed as the next phase of institutional crypto adoption, especially as firms look for yield-bearing instruments that can function inside on-chain financial systems.
UNI’s price reaction may have been modest, but the signal from BlackRock is much bigger: institutions are starting to treat public DeFi protocols as legitimate financial rails.
#DeFi #cryptoNews #Tokenization $UNI
Plasma like a chain built for real money movement, not noise. It’s aiming straight at stablecoin settlement with sub-second finality, full EVM compatibility, and that “gasless USDT” style UX that makes payments feel effortless. If this catches in high-adoption markets and serious finance rails, the narrative shifts from “maybe” to “this is actually useful.”
Now the part that can punch price in the face: supply and unlocks. Genesis supply sits at 10,000,000,000 XPL, and circulating is still around ~1.8B, so there’s a lot sitting off-market that can become sell pressure when schedules hit. The next date I’m watching is Feb 25, 2026 (Ecosystem & Growth unlock), and the heavier calendar moments later are July 28, 2026 (~1B XPL event) and Sep 25, 2026 (~1.76B unlock) — those cliffs can flip sentiment in a single day if liquidity isn’t ready.
Dumps usually come when a big unlock lands into weak bids, early holders take profit, or the market’s already tired and thin. Absorption happens when volume is strong, demand is real, and people actually need the token because the chain is being used — plus any staking/validator dynamics that keep supply locked instead of leaking. It feels like the clean truth is: **unlocks create pressure automatically… and only real demand can turn that pressure into a non-event.
#plasma @Plasma $XPL
{spot}(XPLUSDT)
#Plasma
What advantages would Plasma have if stablecoins become the core infrastructure of crypto?
Imagine a future where most on-chain activity revolves around stablecoins. Not meme speculation. Not yield farming. Just capital moving in and out — payments, settlements, liquidity flows.
If stablecoins truly become the backbone of the ecosystem, the standards change. The foundation of a financial system cannot be “sometimes fast, sometimes slow” or “sometimes cheap, sometimes expensive.” It needs consistency. It needs predictability.
In that scenario, Plasma holds a structural advantage because it was built with stablecoins at its center from day one.
It doesn’t compete for block space with countless other narratives. Fewer conflicting use cases. Less reliance on speculative congestion. More focus on optimizing for one core function: stable value transfer.
Large general-purpose chains can support stablecoins, but they must constantly balance DeFi, NFTs, memecoins, gaming, and more. Plasma ($XPL) makes a trade-off — sacrificing breadth for specialization and operational stability.
So the real question becomes:
If stablecoins become crypto’s backbone, will the market value focused infrastructure built specifically for that purpose? Or will it continue to favor broad, multi-use ecosystems?
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
I noticed something on $XPL that looks bearish at first… but the deeper read is actually more interesting.
Active addresses are clearly down from that early-2025 surge. And yeah, that can look like “the chain is losing users.” But TVL didn’t fall off a cliff with it — capital stayed relatively sticky. To me, that usually means one thing: the tourists left, but the liquidity didn’t.
Early ecosystems almost always get inflated by airdrop hunters + incentive farms. It’s loud, it’s spiky, and it makes charts look healthier than reality. When those rewards cool down, the “free money” crowd rotates out and you finally see what the baseline demand looks like.
So this phase feels less like collapse… and more like normalization.
Less noise. Fewer empty transactions. More signal around who’s actually here to build, provide liquidity, or use the rails. If Plasma keeps the infrastructure tight while organic usage ramps, this is the exact kind of quiet period that tends to surprise people later.
Watching it like a payments engine, not a hype chart.
#Plasma @Plasma
📊 Solana Distribution Pattern Keeps $190 in Focus for Bulls
Solana extended its decline this week as selling pressure pushed the token toward a critical technical zone. The asset trades near $80 after losing over 12% in seven days. Daily volume exceeds $4.3 billion, showing active positioning from both bulls and bears.
With a market cap above $45 billion, Solana remains a major large-cap asset. However, analysts now debate whether this level marks a short-term floor or signals further downside.
🔸 Support at $72 and $64 Faces Early Pressure
Morecryptoonl notes that market structure still looks weak on higher timeframes. The analyst explains that buyers must defend price before a break below $72.
Otherwise, the probability of another leg lower increases. Moreover, the chart lacks a clear five-wave impulsive move upward. Hence, conviction around a confirmed bottom remains limited.
If buyers step in quickly, last week’s low could hold as a base. However, that scenario requires a decisive break above $90. Without that breakout, risk stays tilted toward another sweep of liquidity. Morecryptoonl identifies $62 as the next key support if weakness continues.
Additionally, ErickCrypto21M tracks similar levels but places stronger emphasis on $64. According to that analysis, $64 acts as major structural support. The analyst sees resistance around $95 before any sustained upside.
Consequently, price may retest $64 before attempting a broader recovery. A move above $95 would improve medium-term sentiment significantly.
🔸 Distribution Pattern Keeps $190 in Focus
Beyond short-term levels, Solana still trades inside a broad distribution range. The token rejected the prior 2021 all-time high zone near $260. Since then, price carved a visible head-and-shoulders structure. Breakdown pressure accelerated toward the $80–$81 area. This zone now serves as critical short-term support.
ReetikaTrades references Capo’s broader outlook on Solana. That view anticipates a sharp rebound toward $190 before deeper downside.
#SOL | #Solana | $SOL
{spot}(SOLUSDT)
I’m looking at Plasma (XPL) and honestly… it feels different.
It’s a Layer 1 blockchain built mainly for one thing: stablecoin settlement. Not hype. Not endless experiments. Just moving digital dollars — especially USDT — fast and smoothly.
Plasma is fully EVM compatible (Reth), so developers can build easily. It runs on PlasmaBFT, designed for fast, near-instant finality — meaning when you send money, it feels final, not uncertain.
The big idea?
“Gasless USDT transfers” and “stablecoin-first gas.”
No more stress about holding another token just to pay fees. If you’re sending stablecoins, that’s what the network is optimized for. If this works at scale, It becomes one of the simplest payment rails in crypto.
Security also matters. Plasma is designed with Bitcoin-anchored security to increase neutrality and censorship resistance. That’s important when you’re talking about real payments, real businesses, real people.
XPL is the network’s native token that supports incentives and validation behind the scenes. Users may move stablecoins daily, but the chain still needs strong infrastructure to stay secure.
They’re targeting two main groups:
• Retail users in high stablecoin adoption markets
• Institutions in payments and finance
And here’s the real question:
Why should sending digital dollars feel complicated?
Plasma must prove sustainability, especially around gasless transfers at high volume. But We’re seeing a serious attempt to build infrastructure that feels invisible — where money just moves.
I believe when technology disappears into simplicity, that’s when it truly matters.
@Plasma $XPL #Plasma #plasma
🎁抽1个Hungry Degens 盲盒和 5个Degen Lite NFT
关注官推 @HungryDegens 并点赞评论
最近我花了点时间研究了 @HungryDegens,越看越觉得这个项目的设计思路值得聊聊。它从 Abstract 起步,迁移至 Base,获得 Base 官方支持,在abstract上交易量大约是109ETH。转战到base属于在风口上,因为base的AI加上支持很容易出金。通过体验我感觉这可能是我见过的第一个让 NFT 真正变成生产工具的项目。
它的官网:https://t.co/ZdzGXvzmOv。可以使用这个邀请码:0J3MQI
接下来说说它的机制和吸引我的点:
Hungry Degens 总供应量 8,888 枚,目前已售出 6,000 枚。5 个角色,每个角色对应一个专属 AI Agent:
Trenches Ghost(2,800 枚)→ 链上侦探,追踪内幕钱包、识别 Dev 资金关联的狙击手群组、区分真实交易和刷量
Scammed Steve(2,024 枚)→ 安全卫士,扫描蜜罐合约、隐藏增发、高税陷阱,拦截危险授权
Leverage Larry(2,024 枚)→ 合约交易员,提供入场点位、止盈止损、鲸鱼持仓异动、清算价格模拟
Dustbag Danny(1,020 枚)→ 持仓管家,监控价格波动±20%、发现叙事轮动机会
Airdrop Andy(1,020 枚)→ 空投猎手,分三级扫描:��流生态空投 / 社交任务奖励 / 白名单微机会
关键点:持有哪个角色的 NFT,才能解锁哪个 AI。不是买一个全解锁,是一对一绑定。这意味着每个角色都有独立的需求支撑。供应量越少的角色(Danny、Andy 各仅 1,020 枚),稀缺性越强。
另外它的访问权限分层也增加了需求,我认为这个设计很聪明:
• 免费层:Discord 公开频道看 AI 信号(只读)
• 试用层:钱包签名后每个 Agent 可私聊 5 次(无需持有 NFT)
• 持有者层:按稀有度分配每日额度
• C 级 15 次/天 | R 级 20 次 | RR 级 25 次 | SR/SSR 无限制
试用 → 体验价值 → 转化购买。这个漏斗设计比大多数 NFT 项目高明得多。
具体的游戏玩法:
每个 Degen 出生时是裸体的,只有稀有度、肤色、发色三个基础属性。
玩家需要质押 NFT → 喂食物获得 EXP → 升级提高 $DUST 产出 → 开盲盒获得衣服装备 → 装备提供挖矿倍率加成 → 集齐套装触发超级倍率,这一套逻辑下来,就容易形成正循环。
它的所有装备都是链上资产,可以在 OpenSea 交易。食物包是消耗品,不可转让,只能卖回平台。
装备既是游戏道具,又是链上可交易资产,还是挖矿效率的倍增器。三重价值锚定。
另外还有 Degen Lite —— 灵魂绑定版本,不可交易但可以参与游戏和质押,降低新用户入门门槛。
$DUST 代币经济
总量 1000 亿,分配:社区 65%(无锁仓)— 通过质押挖矿产出;流动性 15% ,营销 15%, 团队仅 5%(6 个月锁仓 + 24 个月线性释放)
核心通缩机制:游戏内消费 $DUST 的分配 →70% 销毁,5% 推荐奖励,5% LP ,10% 国库,10% 营销。其中这里面的70% 销毁率非常激进。只要游戏有活跃度,$DUST 的流通量会持续收缩。
项目采用动态奖励池机制,早期质押者 + 高等级 + 高装备 = 更大份额。先发优势明显。
为什么我觉得这个项目值得关注
大多数 AI x NFT 项目的问题是:AI 是噱头,NFT 是载体,两者没有真正的绑定关系。
Hungry Degens 做对了一件事 —— 把 AI 的使用权和 NFT 的持有权硬绑定。你不是在买一张图片,你是在买一个 24/7 运行的链上分析工具的访问权。
而且每个角色功能不同、供应量不同,这意味着市场会自然形成差异化定价。如果 Leverage Larry 的信号真的好用,它的地板价就会和其他角色拉开差距,这才是 NFT 应该有的价值逻辑。
另外现在官网上也有社媒任务,每完成3个可以领取1袋food,建议都去做做。
白皮书:
– BUILT FOR STABLECOIN SETTLEMENT
Plasma is a dedicated Layer 1 engineered specifically for stablecoins — focused purely on speed, low cost, and dependable transfers.
It offers full EVM compatibility through Reth, so Ethereum developers can deploy without changing their workflow. With PlasmaBFT enabling sub-second finality, transactions settle almost instantly. Added security comes from Bitcoin anchoring.
Gasless stablecoin transfers eliminate extra friction — users don’t need to worry about holding a separate gas token. The architecture is straightforward: stablecoins come first.
If stablecoins are driving real-world crypto usage, Plasma positions itself as the infrastructure built to support that scale.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
{spot}(XPLUSDT)
Prediction markets have a fatal flaw: They leak alpha.
Traditional markets → Truth machines → But transparency = competitors win free intelligence
Imagine this:
→ Good PMs trader bets on sport rising star
→ Everyone sees it
→ Competitive edge = lost
The Solution → Encrypted Opportunity Markets and @benchdotgames, powered by @arcium is changing the game
━━━━
► The Paradox
Hide Price → Preserve Value, because information value diminished as it spreads
— Old Way (Prediction Markets)
▸ Public prices = instant "truth"
▸ Freeloaders benefit without paying
— New Way (Bench Encrypted Markets)
▸ Encrypted prices = data property rights
▸ Creators keep competitive advantage
➠ Result: Crowdsource intelligence without exposing strategy
━━━━
► The Mechanism: Locking vs. Betting
Bench fundamentally changes the risk profile of participating in a market to solve the "trust gap via Opportunity Cost Model.
➠ Bench Opportunity Cost model
▸ No capital loss (funds locked, not bet)
▸ Skin in game (yield/liquidity cost)
▸ Lower barrier + aligned incentives
━━━━
► Real Use Cases: Proprietary Discovery
→ Talent Scouting: Market signals hidden from rivals
→ R&D Decisions: Crowdsource tech strategy privately
━━━━
► From Prediction to Opportunity
The launch of the Arcium mainnet has laid the technical foundation for this privacy-first layer. Bench is moving beyond the binary "True/False" nature of prediction markets into a nuanced, utility-driven model.
By replacing public gambling with private signaling, Bench isn't just building a market; they are building a corporate intelligence engine. In a world where data is abundant, the only data that matters is the data nobody else has.
Current Price: 1,966
Ethereum is not going up or down much it is staying below the 2,000 dollar mark. This is after it went up to 2,015 dollars. Then came back down. The price of Ethereum went down to 1,901 dollars recently. Buyers are making sure it does not go down any further. They are defending the area where Ethereum usually does not go below.
The funding rate for Ethereum is a bit negative it is at -0.0021 percent. This means that people are not buying much of Ethereum things are pretty balanced. The open interest for Ethereum is still very strong it is around 3.5 billion USDT. This shows that a lot of people are still interested, in Ethereum and are participating in the market.
Trade Plan – Swing Long
Entry Zone: 1,920 – 1,960
Stop Loss: 1,820
Targets:
• 2,100
• 2,250
• 2,420
• Extended: 2,650
Leverage: 2x–4x conservative
Risk–Reward: Approximately 1:3+ toward TP2–TP3
Setup Logic
The Ethereum price is doing well when it is between 1,900 and 1,920. This area is very important for people who want to buy Ethereum. Long as the Ethereum price stays above 1,820 at the end of each day things are looking good for Ethereum. If Ethereum can get back above 2,020 in a way it will probably keep going up, to 2,100 and even higher.
When the number goes below 1,820 the structure becomes weak. This means that the bias of the market will turn bearish in a short time. This is because the market structure is not strong when it is, below 1,820. The bearish bias is what we can expect to see in the term.
This is a structured swing setup. Controlled leverage and disciplined risk management remain essential.
$ETH
{future}(ETHUSDT)
🚨US JOB DATA JUST SHOCKED EVERYONE
$TAKE $PIPPIN $BERA
Everyone was waiting for a weak job print after Kevin Hassett's comment yesterday.
But the exact opposite happened.
The unemployment rate came in at 4.3% vs. 4.4% expected.
The US economy added 130,000 jobs in January, the highest since April 2025.
The US private sector added 172,000 jobs in January, the highest level in a year.
This was a strong job report, which means March rate cuts are probably off the table now.