🧐 The Catizen project is raising concerns for all the wrong reasons. Imagine dedicating time and effort to a game, only to receive just 2 tokens from the airdrop! Meanwhile, those who spent big on in-game purchases are reaping significant rewards. So, is this about building a community, or is it just a money grab?

💾 The selective distribution of rewards raises questions: Does Catizen truly value its players, or only those who spend the most?

🔍 Other projects, like $NOT and $DOGS, generously rewarded their communities, creating loyalty and growth. Catizen, however, seems to have taken a different route.

💡 Could this be a deliberate strategy to stabilize prices? Some speculate that the Cati token might surge to $0.50 or even $2, making those 2 tokens worth a lot more. But if the project fails, it’s just another case of over-promising and under-delivering, leaving the community frustrated. 🎭

📈 Is this move genius or misguided? As the Cati token enters the market, all eyes are on Catizen. The stakes are high, and the community is watching closely.

What do you think—brilliant marketing or just a way to benefit big spenders? Share your thoughts! 💬

#WeAreAllSatoshi #Write2Earn! #U.S.UnemploymentNewLow #BinanceLaunchpoolHMSTR #BTCReboundsAfterFOMC $BTC

$ETH

$BNB