Everyone's flexing advanced proofs, but that's not the whole quantum story đ§”
You can have the cleanest proof system on the planet and still get cooked on the signature side. Transaction signatures are a totally separate attack surface.
Where $STRK stands:
âą Programmable (native account abstraction) accounts can support alternative signature verification
âą That means a path to swap in quantum-resistant schemes without breaking the chain
âą BUT existing accounts do NOT magically become quantum-safe
Possible â done. Users still have to migrate, wallets still have to ship support, and the old sig schemes don't just disappear.
So when someone says a chain is quantum-ready, ask which layer they mean: proofs or signatures. Most people mix them up.
Flexibility is a real edge for $STRK, but it's an upgrade path, not a shield. Don't confuse the two â ïž
You can have the cleanest proof system on the planet and still get cooked on the signature side. Transaction signatures are a totally separate attack surface.
Where $STRK stands:
âą Programmable (native account abstraction) accounts can support alternative signature verification
âą That means a path to swap in quantum-resistant schemes without breaking the chain
âą BUT existing accounts do NOT magically become quantum-safe
Possible â done. Users still have to migrate, wallets still have to ship support, and the old sig schemes don't just disappear.
So when someone says a chain is quantum-ready, ask which layer they mean: proofs or signatures. Most people mix them up.
Flexibility is a real edge for $STRK, but it's an upgrade path, not a shield. Don't confuse the two â ïž