đ The wallet was inactive â but its private key still worked
On October 26, 48 wallets linked to Bloom Trading lost 9,408 SOL in just 94 seconds, according to Bitquery's on-chain investigation
Five hadn't traded on Bloom since early 2025
Here's the part that matters đ
$SOL
Every drain was signed with the affected wallet's own key â no malicious token approval or smart contract exploit required
â ïž The source of the key exposure is still unconfirmed
But the security lesson is clear
Stopping a bot doesn't make a previously shared private key safe again
đ If a trading bot has ever held your wallet's private key, moving remaining funds to a fresh wallet with a new key is safer than simply disconnecting the bot
An inactive wallet isn't necessarily a secure wallet
#solana #CryptoSecurity
On October 26, 48 wallets linked to Bloom Trading lost 9,408 SOL in just 94 seconds, according to Bitquery's on-chain investigation
Five hadn't traded on Bloom since early 2025
Here's the part that matters đ
$SOL
Every drain was signed with the affected wallet's own key â no malicious token approval or smart contract exploit required
â ïž The source of the key exposure is still unconfirmed
But the security lesson is clear
Stopping a bot doesn't make a previously shared private key safe again
đ If a trading bot has ever held your wallet's private key, moving remaining funds to a fresh wallet with a new key is safer than simply disconnecting the bot
An inactive wallet isn't necessarily a secure wallet
#solana #CryptoSecurity
