๐—š๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ก๐—”๐—ก๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ ๐—•๐—˜๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ ๐—ช๐—›๐—˜๐—ก ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—œ๐—ฅ ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—˜๐—ช๐—˜๐——

A governance decision should not be judged solely by whether it receives approval. The intended change and the results that follow are also important.

Participants can ask whether implementation matched the proposal, whether the original objective was achieved, and whether unexpected effects require further attention.

JST governance and JustLend Improvement Proposals provide a context for studying this connection between community decisions and protocol outcomes.

Post-decision review helps transform governance from a sequence of isolated votes into a process of learning and accountability. It also creates a clearer basis for future proposals by identifying which approaches worked as intended and which assumptions need reconsideration.

@Justin Sunๅญ™ๅฎ‡ๆ™จ @DeFi_JUST #TRONEcoStar