đšđȘđș ONE EU LICENSE. CUSTOMERS ACROSS 27 COUNTRIES. WHO WATCHES THE BIGGEST CRYPTO FIRMS?
Europe wants a new answer: ESMA.
According to the reported Council agreement, the EUâs largest crypto service providers could move from national supervision to direct oversight by the European Securities and Markets Authority.
Hereâs what matters đ
đŠ Only the biggest players
Around 10â15 of roughly 360 providers could qualify. Most would remain under national regulators.
đ Size determines scrutiny
The proposed framework includes a threshold of 15 million active EU users, or meeting three of five significance criteria involving customers, custody assets, transaction volumes and financial connections.
đ Stronger enforcement
ESMA could inspect firms, investigate breaches, impose fines and potentially restrict services or withdraw authorization.
đ Why change MiCA supervision?
One national license lets a provider operate across the EU. But its customers and risks can extend far beyond the country supervising it.
âł Not law yet
This is the Councilâs negotiating position. Talks with the European Parliament still lie ahead, with a proposed two-year transition.
đĄ Potential crypto impact
More consistent oversight could strengthen confidence in major platformsâbut also increase compliance costs. This is a structural development, not an automatic price catalyst.
đ„ Would one central watchdog make EU crypto saferâor add more bureaucracy?
#CryptoRegulation
$SUI
$XRP
$SEI
Europe wants a new answer: ESMA.
According to the reported Council agreement, the EUâs largest crypto service providers could move from national supervision to direct oversight by the European Securities and Markets Authority.
Hereâs what matters đ
đŠ Only the biggest players
Around 10â15 of roughly 360 providers could qualify. Most would remain under national regulators.
đ Size determines scrutiny
The proposed framework includes a threshold of 15 million active EU users, or meeting three of five significance criteria involving customers, custody assets, transaction volumes and financial connections.
đ Stronger enforcement
ESMA could inspect firms, investigate breaches, impose fines and potentially restrict services or withdraw authorization.
đ Why change MiCA supervision?
One national license lets a provider operate across the EU. But its customers and risks can extend far beyond the country supervising it.
âł Not law yet
This is the Councilâs negotiating position. Talks with the European Parliament still lie ahead, with a proposed two-year transition.
đĄ Potential crypto impact
More consistent oversight could strengthen confidence in major platformsâbut also increase compliance costs. This is a structural development, not an automatic price catalyst.
đ„ Would one central watchdog make EU crypto saferâor add more bureaucracy?
#CryptoRegulation
$SUI
$XRP
$SEI