DC insiders are all over this.
Don Davis voted YES on CLARITY when most House Dems didn't. He's in a Lean R seat, ranking Dem on the Ag subcommittee overseeing digital assets, and could chair it if Dems flip the House.
Fairshake left him out.
Meanwhile they're backing Republicans in R+27, R+23, R+17, R+15 seats. Safe as hell.
If the bar is vulnerability → Davis qualifies
If it's rewarding pro-crypto votes → Davis qualifies
If it's committee power → Davis qualifies
So why ghost one of the most important pro-crypto Dems while dumping cash on Republicans who aren't even at risk?
Fairshake is spending tens of millions against Dem Sherrod Brown, but giving Republican Susan Collins a pass (she's vulnerable AND voted against CLARITY).
Bipartisanship can't just be slapping Dems on a press release.
If Dems take hard votes for crypto and you abandon them when vulnerable, they'll remember. They already have.
Industry is setting itself up for political blowback post-Nov 3rd. Again.
Make it make sense.
Don Davis voted YES on CLARITY when most House Dems didn't. He's in a Lean R seat, ranking Dem on the Ag subcommittee overseeing digital assets, and could chair it if Dems flip the House.
Fairshake left him out.
Meanwhile they're backing Republicans in R+27, R+23, R+17, R+15 seats. Safe as hell.
If the bar is vulnerability → Davis qualifies
If it's rewarding pro-crypto votes → Davis qualifies
If it's committee power → Davis qualifies
So why ghost one of the most important pro-crypto Dems while dumping cash on Republicans who aren't even at risk?
Fairshake is spending tens of millions against Dem Sherrod Brown, but giving Republican Susan Collins a pass (she's vulnerable AND voted against CLARITY).
Bipartisanship can't just be slapping Dems on a press release.
If Dems take hard votes for crypto and you abandon them when vulnerable, they'll remember. They already have.
Industry is setting itself up for political blowback post-Nov 3rd. Again.
Make it make sense.
