Spam isn’t only a moderation problem. It’s an incentive problem. On most platforms, sending another person a message has almost no economic friction. That makes it cheap to send the same message to thousands of people. Liberdus experiments with a different mechanism: message tolls. If someone isn’t your Friend or Connection, a toll can be required before they message you. The amount is set by the recipient and can also be disabled entirely. The interesting part isn't the fee itself. It’s the change in incentives: Before: Send → reach → repeat. With a toll: Send → pay → recipient decides whether to engage. And the system can return the unused toll if the recipient never interacts. So maybe the bigger question for Web3 messaging isn't how do we filter more spam? But, how do we make spam less economically attractive in the first place? That’s a very different way of thinking about digital communication. Would you rather have better spam filters or stronger economic disincentives for spammers? @Liberdus #liberdus #SOL $SOL