#bitgetbreachforgedrequestsnotstolenkeys
The Bitget breach has a much more interesting lesson than “$350M was hacked.”

Bitget says attackers didn't steal its private keys.
Instead, they compromised a critical backend system inside its wallet infrastructure, spoofed transaction data and triggered the exchange's own authorization process to move funds.

Around $351.6M was affected across parts of Bitget's hot and warm wallets, while the exchange says its cold wallets remained secure.
That's the part I think deserves attention.

A crypto exchange can protect its private keys and still have a serious security problem if the systems feeding transactions into the signing process can be compromised.

So this isn't simply a story about “keys being stolen.”
It's a reminder that exchange security has multiple layers: key protection, transaction validation, backend integrity and authorization controls.

Bitget says the attack has been contained and a full technical report is expected.

The big question now is: how did the attacker get control of the transaction-generation layer in the first place?

#Bitget #CryptoSecurity #CyberSecurity