I’ve been thinking about DuskEVM a little differently lately.
A new chain doesn’t become useful just because the technology is there.
Someone has to build on it.
Then people have to actually use those applications.
And that’s where the interesting part starts.
More builders can bring more applications.
More applications can bring more activity.
More activity can create more reasons to use $DUSK
Then that utility can attract more builders again.
It’s a simple loop, but getting that loop moving is the hard part.
That’s what I see in this DuskEVM picture.
Not just another EVM environment sitting there waiting for attention.
The real question is whether builders, applications and users can create enough activity to make the ecosystem feed itself.
Because at the end of the day, I’d rather see a token become useful because people actually need it than because everyone is simply talking about it.
That’s the kind of growth I’m watching for with Dusk.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
A new chain doesn’t become useful just because the technology is there.
Someone has to build on it.
Then people have to actually use those applications.
And that’s where the interesting part starts.
More builders can bring more applications.
More applications can bring more activity.
More activity can create more reasons to use $DUSK
Then that utility can attract more builders again.
It’s a simple loop, but getting that loop moving is the hard part.
That’s what I see in this DuskEVM picture.
Not just another EVM environment sitting there waiting for attention.
The real question is whether builders, applications and users can create enough activity to make the ecosystem feed itself.
Because at the end of the day, I’d rather see a token become useful because people actually need it than because everyone is simply talking about it.
That’s the kind of growth I’m watching for with Dusk.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
