I used to think tokenization was mainly about putting an asset on a blockchain.
The more I looked into @Dusk the more I realized the bigger change is coordination.
A token can represent ownership and simplify transfers. Dusk connects eligibility rules controlled transfers and settlement around the same workflow.
But a blockchain does not replace securities law or the people responsible for custody administration venues and legal processes.
That tradeoff makes this more interesting to me. The goal is not to pretend traditional infrastructure disappears. It is to reduce fragmented handoffs where possible.
So the better question is not “can tokenization replace finance?”
It is “which parts of financial infrastructure become easier to coordinate when ownership and settlement share the same system?”
What matters most for real-world tokenization?
#dusk $DUSK
@Dusk $ONG
$PROM
The more I looked into @Dusk the more I realized the bigger change is coordination.
A token can represent ownership and simplify transfers. Dusk connects eligibility rules controlled transfers and settlement around the same workflow.
But a blockchain does not replace securities law or the people responsible for custody administration venues and legal processes.
That tradeoff makes this more interesting to me. The goal is not to pretend traditional infrastructure disappears. It is to reduce fragmented handoffs where possible.
So the better question is not “can tokenization replace finance?”
It is “which parts of financial infrastructure become easier to coordinate when ownership and settlement share the same system?”
What matters most for real-world tokenization?
#dusk $DUSK
@Dusk $ONG
$PROM
Compliance
0%
Faster settlement
0%
Easier ownership
33%
All of these
67%
3 Votes • Vote fermé