Dusk⊠maybe the interesting product isn't privacy at all. đ
I used to think privacy was simple:
Public đ
Private đ
Then I started looking closer.
In financial markets, not everyone needs to see the same thing.
An investor may need to prove eligibility.
An auditor may need evidence.
A regulator may need access to specific information.
An institution may need to protect its position from competitors.
So why should everyone see everything?
That question changed how I started looking at Dusk.
Because hiding information isn't enough.
And making everything transparent isn't the answer either.
The interesting part is the space in between:
Who gets to see what?
Why?
And when?
Maybe that's where Dusk's privacy model becomes more interesting than simply calling it a âprivate blockchain.â
But then I found myself asking something even harder:
If the rules decide who gets to see whatâŠ
who gets to write the rules?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
I used to think privacy was simple:
Public đ
Private đ
Then I started looking closer.
In financial markets, not everyone needs to see the same thing.
An investor may need to prove eligibility.
An auditor may need evidence.
A regulator may need access to specific information.
An institution may need to protect its position from competitors.
So why should everyone see everything?
That question changed how I started looking at Dusk.
Because hiding information isn't enough.
And making everything transparent isn't the answer either.
The interesting part is the space in between:
Who gets to see what?
Why?
And when?
Maybe that's where Dusk's privacy model becomes more interesting than simply calling it a âprivate blockchain.â
But then I found myself asking something even harder:
If the rules decide who gets to see whatâŠ
who gets to write the rules?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk